6eb82ff4c05ade042f469dfe345f18a2.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 55
Introduction to electron transport in molecular systems Reviews: Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 52, 681– 750 (2001) [http: //atto. tau. ac. il/~nitzan/nitzanabs. html/#213] Science, 300, 1384 -1389 (2003); MRS Bulletin, 29, 391 -395 (2004); Bulletin of the Israel Chemical Society, Issue 14, p. 3 -13 (Dec 2003) (Hebrew) Thanks I. Benjamin, A. Burin, B. Davis, S. Datta, D. Evans, M. Galperin, A. Ghosh, H. Grabert, P. Hänggi, G. Ingold, J. Jortner, S. Kohler, R. Kosloff, J. Lehmann, M. Majda, A. A. Mosyak, V. Mujica, R. Naaman, U. © Nitzan, TAU Peskin, M. Ratner, D. Segal, T. Seideman, H. Tal-Ezer
A. Nitzan (nitzan@post. tau. ac. il; http: //atto. tau. ac. il/~nitzan/nitzan. html) Introduction to electron transport in molecular systems PART A: Introduction: electron transfer in molecular systems PART B: Molecular conduction: Main results and phenomenology PART C: Inelastic effects in molecular conduction http: //atto. tau. ac. il/~nitzan/tu 04 -X. ppt (X=A, B, C) © A. Nitzan, TAU
Molecules as conductors © A. Nitzan, TAU
Molecular Rectifiers Aviram Ratner Arieh Aviram and Mark A. Ratner IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598, USA Department of Chemistry, New York University, New York 10003, USA Received 10 June 1974 Abstract The construction of a very simple electronic device, a rectifier, based on the use of a single organic molecule is discussed. The molecular rectifier consists of a donor pi system and an acceptor pi system, separated by a sigmabonded (methylene) tunnelling bridge. The response of such a molecule to an applied field is calculated, and rectifier properties indeed appear. © A. Nitzan, TAU
Xe on Ni(110) © A. Nitzan, TAU
Feynman © A. Nitzan, TAU Chad Mirkin (DPN)
Moore’s “Law” © A. Nitzan, TAU
Moore’s 2 nd law © A. Nitzan, TAU
Molecules get wired © A. Nitzan, TAU
© A. Nitzan, TAU Cornell group
Science, Vol 302, Issue 5645, 556 -559 , 24 October 2003 MOLECULAR ELECTRONICS: Next-Generation Technology Hits an Early Midlife Crisis Robert F. Service Researchers had hoped that a new revolution in ultraminiaturized electronic gadgetry lay almost within reach. But now some are saying the future must wait Two years ago, the nascent field of molecular electronics was riding high. A handful of research groups had wired molecules to serve as diodes, transistors, and other devices at the heart of computer chips. Some had even linked them together to form rudimentary circuits, earning accolades as Science's 2001 Breakthrough of the Year (Science, 21 December 2001, p. 2442). The future was so bright, proponents predicted that molecular electronics-based computer chips vastly superior to current versions © A. Nitzan, TAU would hit store shelves in 2005 Now, critics say the field is undergoing a much-needed reality check. This summer, two of its most prominent research groups revealed that some of their devices don't work as previously thought and may not even qualify as molecular electronics. And skeptics are questioning whether labs will muster commercial products within the next decade, if at all
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES VOL. 43 OCTOBER 1996 1637 Need for Critical Assessment Rolf Landauer, Life Fellow, IEEE Abstract Adventurous technological proposals are subject to inadequate critical assessment. It is the proponents who organize meetings and special issues. Optical logic, mesoscopic switching devices and quantum parallelism are used to illustrate this problem. This editorial, disguised as a scientific paper, is obviously a plan for more honesty. We do not, in the long run, build effective public support for science and technology by promising more than we can © A. Nitzan, TAU deliver.
Feynman • For a successful Technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled © A. Nitzan, TAU
First Transport Measurements through Single Molecules Adsorbed molecule addressed by STM tip Molecule between two electrodes Self-assembled monolayers Break junction: dithiols between gold Molecule lying on a surface Single-wall carbon nanotube on Pt Pt/Ir Tip ~1 -2 nm 1 nm SAM Au(111) Dorogi et al. PRB 52 (95) @ Purdue Reed et al. Science 278 (97) @ Yale Nanopore C 60 on gold STM tip Joachim et al. PRL 74 (95) Dekker et al. Nature 386(97) Nanotube on Au Au Reed et© A. Nitzan, TAU al. APL 71 (97) Lieber et al. Nature 391 (98)
Park et. al. Nature 417, 722 -725 (2002) © A. Nitzan, TAU Datta et al
Weber et al, Chem. Phys. 2002 © A. Nitzan, TAU
Electron transfer in DNA © A. Nitzan, TAU
b=0. 43Å-1 Xu et al (Tao), Nano. Let (2004) loge of GCGC(AT)m. GCGC conductance vs length (total number of base pairs). The solid line is a linear fit that reflects the exponential dependence of the conductance on length. The decay constant, , is determined from the slope of the linear fit. (b) © A. Nitzan, TAU Conductance of (GC)n vs 1/length (in total base pairs).
Electron transmission processes in molecular systems Electron transfer n Electron transmission n Conduction n Parameters that affect molecular conduction n Eleastic and inelastic transmission n Coherent and incoherent conduction n Heating and heat conduction n © A. Nitzan, TAU
Activated rate processes Diffusion controlled rates KRAMERS THEORY: Low friction limit (action) High friction limit Transition State theory © A. Nitzan, TAU
The physics of transition state rates Assume: (1) Equilibrium in the well (2) Every trajectory on the barrier that goes out makes it © A. Nitzan, TAU
Theory of Electron Transfer Activation energy n Transition probability n Rate – Transition state theory or solvent controlled n © A. Nitzan, TAU
Electron transfer in polar media • Electron are much faster than nuclei • Electronic transitions take place in fixed nuclear configurations • Electronic energy needs to be conserved during the change in electronic charge density Electronic transition Nuclear relaxation © A. Nitzan, TAU
Electron transfer Nuclear motion Electron transition takes place in unstable nuclear configurations obtained via thermal fluctuations © A. Nitzan, TAU
Electron transfer © A. Nitzan, TAU
Transition state theory of electron Alternatively – transfer solvent control Adiabatic and non-adiabatic ET processes Landau-Zener problem © A. Nitzan, TAU
Electron transfer – Marcus theory We are interested in changes in solvent configuration that take place at constant solute charge distribution They have the following characteristics: (1) Pn fluctuates because of thermal motion of solvent nuclei. (2) Pe , as a fast variable, satisfies the equilibrium relationship (3) D = constant (depends on only) Note that the relations E = D-4 P; P=Pn + Pe are always satisfied per definition, however D s. E. (the latter equality holds only at equilibrium). © A. Nitzan, TAU
The Marcus parabolas Use q as a reaction coordinate. It defines the state of the medium that will be in equilibrium with the charge distribution rq. Marcus calculated the free energy (as function of q) of the solvent when it reaches this state in the systems q =0 and q=1. © A. Nitzan, TAU
Electron transfer: Activation energy © A. Nitzan, TAU
Electron transfer: Effect of Driving (=energy gap) © A. Nitzan, TAU
Experimental confirmation of the inverted regime Miller et al, JACS(1984) Marcus Nobel Prize: 1992 © A. Nitzan, TAU
Electron transfer – the coupling • From Quantum Chemical Calculations • The Mulliken-Hush formula • Bridge mediated electron transfer © A. Nitzan, TAU
Bridge assisted electron transfer © A. Nitzan, TAU
© A. Nitzan, TAU
Effective donor-acceptor coupling © A. Nitzan, TAU
Marcus expresions for non-adiabatic ET rates Donor-to-Bridge/ Acceptor-to-bridge Bridge Green’s Function Franck-Condonweighted DOS Reorganization energy © A. Nitzan, TAU
Bridge mediated ET rate b’ (Å-1)= 0. 2 -0. 6 for highly conjugated chains 0. 9 -1. 2 for saturated hydrocarbons ~2 for vacuum © A. Nitzan, TAU
Incoherent hopping constant STEADY STATE SOLUTION © A. Nitzan, TAU
ET rate from steady state hopping © A. Nitzan, TAU
Dependence on temperature The integrated elastic (dotted line) and activated (dashed line) components of the transmission, and the total transmission probability (full line) displayed as function of inverse temperature. Parameters are as in Fig. 3. © A. Nitzan, TAU
The photosythetic reaction center Michel - Beyerle et al © A. Nitzan, TAU
Dependence on bridge length © A. Nitzan, TAU
DNA (Giese et al 2001) © A. Nitzan, TAU
Steady state evaluation of rates Rate of water flow depends linearly on water height in the cylinder h Two ways to get the rate of water flowing out: (1) Measure h(t) and get the rate coefficient from k=(1/h)dh/dt (2) Keep h constant and measure the steady state outwards water flux J. Get the rate from k=J/h -- Steady state rate © A. Nitzan, TAU
Steady state quantum mechanics Starting from state 0 at t=0: P 0 = exp(-G 0 t) V 0 l G 0 = 2 |V 0 l|2 L (Golden Rule) Steady state derivation: © A. Nitzan, TAU
pumping damping © A. Nitzan, TAU
Resonance scattering V 1 l V 1 r © A. Nitzan, TAU
Resonance scattering For each r and l j = 0, 1, {l}, {r} © A. Nitzan, TAU
SELF ENERGY © A. Nitzan, TAU
© A. Nitzan, TAU
Resonant tunneling V 1 l V 1 r © A. Nitzan, TAU
Resonant Tunneling Transmission Coefficient © A. Nitzan, TAU
Resonant Transmission – 3 d 1 d 3 d: Total flux from L to R at energy E 0: If the continua are associated with a metal electrode at thermal equilibrium than (Fermi-Dirac distribution) © A. Nitzan, TAU
CONDUCTION L R m – |e|f m f(E 0) (Fermi function) 2 spin states Zero bias conduction © A. Nitzan, TAU
Landauer formula For a single “channel”: (maximum=1) Maximum conductance per channel © A. Nitzan, TAU


