Скачать презентацию International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis IIASA Multi-pollutant Скачать презентацию International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis IIASA Multi-pollutant

ae729bc4a0178ef89628798eeb4e9a9e.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 31

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis IIASA Multi-pollutant / multi-effects: Cost-effectiveness Analysis for the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis IIASA Multi-pollutant / multi-effects: Cost-effectiveness Analysis for the 2 nd NOx Protocol

A multi-pollutant/multi-effect problem IIASA A multi-pollutant/multi-effect problem IIASA

Emission densities in 1990 IIASA NOx SO 2 Emission densities in 1990 IIASA NOx SO 2

Emission densities in 1990 IIASA NH 3 VOC Emission densities in 1990 IIASA NH 3 VOC

Environmental targets IIASA In the year 2010, reduce • health-relevant excess ozone exposure by Environmental targets IIASA In the year 2010, reduce • health-relevant excess ozone exposure by 2/3, • the area of ecosystems not protected against acidification by 1/2, • vegetation-relevant excess ozone exposure by 1/3, • excess nitrogen deposition (eutrophication) by 60%. Additional targets for ‘hot-spots’

The model: RAINS IIASA Energy/agriculture projections Emission control options Emissions Costs OPTIMIZATION Atmospheric dispersion The model: RAINS IIASA Energy/agriculture projections Emission control options Emissions Costs OPTIMIZATION Atmospheric dispersion Environmental impacts Environmental targets

Input assumptions IIASA Energy projections: ‘Pre-Kyoto’, – EU: 10 national, 5 DG-XVII ‘Business as Input assumptions IIASA Energy projections: ‘Pre-Kyoto’, – EU: 10 national, 5 DG-XVII ‘Business as usual’, consistent with EU NEC scenarios – Non-EU: National projections via UN reporting Agricultural projections: – Reviewed by Member States

Input data IIASA Emission inventories: CORINAIR’ 90/94 Cost curves: Developed by IIASA, reviewed by Input data IIASA Emission inventories: CORINAIR’ 90/94 Cost curves: Developed by IIASA, reviewed by countries Atmospheric dispersion characteristics: EMEP model results Critical loads/levels: National data based on common methodology, collected and reviewed by CCE

Emission control options SO 2 IIASA Low sulfur coal, coke Low sulfur heavy fuel Emission control options SO 2 IIASA Low sulfur coal, coke Low sulfur heavy fuel oil Low sulfur gas oil Limestone injection/Fluidized bed combustion Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) Advanced flue gas desulfurization

Emission control options IIASA NOx - Stationary sources Combustion modifications - Low NOx burners, Emission control options IIASA NOx - Stationary sources Combustion modifications - Low NOx burners, exhaust gas re-circulation, staged combustion, etc. Selective catalytic reduction (SCR) for large boilers Non-selective catalytic reduction (SNCR) for medium and large boilers Control of industrial process emissions

Emission control options Transport sector IIASA Gasoline cars Euro-III, Euro-IV (post 2005 standards), small Emission control options Transport sector IIASA Gasoline cars Euro-III, Euro-IV (post 2005 standards), small carbon canisters Diesel cars Euro-III, Euro-IV (post 2005 standards) Diesel heavy duty vehicles Euro-III, Euro-IV (post 2005 standards) Two-stroke engines Oxidation catalysts Off-road machinery Standards equivalent to Euro-III, Euro-IV

Emission control options VOC Stationary sources (1) IIASA Dry cleaning: Good housekeeping and adsorption, Emission control options VOC Stationary sources (1) IIASA Dry cleaning: Good housekeeping and adsorption, closed circuit machines Degreasing: Primary measures, carbon adsorption, conveyored degreaser with integrated adsorption, water based systems, low temperature plasma Domestic solvents: Reformulation Non-industrial paint use: Low solvent paints Industrial paint use: Water based-, high solid-, powderpaints, application modifications, adsorption, incineration

Emission control options VOC Stationary sources (2) IIASA Production of rubber, paint, ink, etc. Emission control options VOC Stationary sources (2) IIASA Production of rubber, paint, ink, etc. : Substitution, solvent plans , ‘end-of-pipe’ Application of glues, adhesives (in industry): Housekeeping, substitution, incineration Printing: Housekeeping, water-based ink, ‘end-of-pipe’ Wood preservation: Double vacuum impregnation, dryer enclosure, ‘end-of-pipe’ Refineries, chemical industry: Regular inspection & maintenance, internal floating covers, vapor recovery Fuel storage and distribution: Internal floating covers, Stage II

Emission control options NH 3 IIASA Low nitrogen feed - multi-phase, synthetic amino acids Emission control options NH 3 IIASA Low nitrogen feed - multi-phase, synthetic amino acids Bio-filtration - bio scrubbers Animal house adaptation - improved design, floor modifications, low NH 3 poultry housing, etc. Covered outdoor storage of manure - rigid lids, floating covers Low ammonia application techniques - immediate incorporation, deep and shallow injection, etc. Fertilizers - urea substitution

The starting point (REF) IIASA National legislation of countries + for EU Member States: The starting point (REF) IIASA National legislation of countries + for EU Member States: present EU legislation and recent Commission proposals/Council agreements – – – – Auto-Oil 1 Solvents Directive Sulfur in liquid fuels Directive Off-road machinery Directive IPPC Heavy duty vehicles post-2005 standards LCP-II, etc.

Results: The G 5/2 scenario IIASA Results: The G 5/2 scenario IIASA

Country results: G 5/2 IIASA Country results: G 5/2 IIASA

Main measures in EU countries IIASA SO 2: Control of existing boilers, low sulfur Main measures in EU countries IIASA SO 2: Control of existing boilers, low sulfur fuels NOx: Control of existing boilers, small sources, off-road machinery VOC: Low solvent paints, application of glues and adhesives, Stage II for gasoline stations NH 3: Urea substitution, low emission animal houses, low ammonia application techniques

Modified ambition levels Acidification IIASA Modified ambition levels Acidification IIASA

Modified ambition levels Population exposure index IIASA Modified ambition levels Population exposure index IIASA

Per-capita costs IIASA EU countries, EU Scenario H 1 Per-capita costs IIASA EU countries, EU Scenario H 1

Uncertainty treatment IIASA • Standard uncertainty analysis is time consuming • Potential influence of Uncertainty treatment IIASA • Standard uncertainty analysis is time consuming • Potential influence of uncertainties minimized by – Explicit model confidence intervals – Integral functions for environmental exposure – Compensation mechanism for targets – Excluding extreme situations – Use of ‘gap closure’ targets (relative improvements) • Identification of potential biases

Potential biases (1) IIASA • Critical loads could be stricter. . . – Dynamic Potential biases (1) IIASA • Critical loads could be stricter. . . – Dynamic effects ignored – Limited spatial resolution • Critical levels for vegetation (ozone) could be too strict. . . – Level 2 approach • Population exposure (ozone) … – overestimated in city centers – underestimated in suburbs

Potential biases (2) IIASA • Constant background ozone …. – ignores decreasing emissions in Potential biases (2) IIASA • Constant background ozone …. – ignores decreasing emissions in Europe and N. America – ignores increasing emissions in Asia • Emission control costs too high … – ‘Pre-Kyoto’ energy projections – Add-on technologies only • Emission control potential too small … – Technological progress ignored – No structural changes considered

Sensitivity analyses IIASA ‘Post-Kyoto’ energy projections ‘Low NH 3’ agriculture ‘High SO 2’ energy Sensitivity analyses IIASA ‘Post-Kyoto’ energy projections ‘Low NH 3’ agriculture ‘High SO 2’ energy scenario ‘High NH 3’ agriculture

Sensitivity analysis - results IIASA Variations in SO 2 reductions Sensitivity analysis - results IIASA Variations in SO 2 reductions

Environmental impacts Days with ozone above WHO guideline (60 ppb) IIASA G 5/2 - Environmental impacts Days with ozone above WHO guideline (60 ppb) IIASA G 5/2 - 2010 1990

Environmental impacts % Ecosystems not protected against acidification IIASA G 5/2 - 2010 1990 Environmental impacts % Ecosystems not protected against acidification IIASA G 5/2 - 2010 1990

Environmental impacts % Ecosystems not protected against eutrophication IIASA G 5/2 - 2010 1990 Environmental impacts % Ecosystems not protected against eutrophication IIASA G 5/2 - 2010 1990

Uniform or effect-based scenarios? IIASA Uniform or effect-based scenarios? IIASA

Documentation IIASA • Methodology papers • Latest databases • All scenario analyses, interim reports Documentation IIASA • Methodology papers • Latest databases • All scenario analyses, interim reports to ECE and EU • On-line model (web version) available at http: //www. iiasa. ac. at/~rains