Improving the Transition From High School to Community College Michael W. Kirst President, State Board of Education
Common Core could improve readiness of incoming CCC students. How? § By expanding the definition of college readiness beyond the A-G requirements. § By sending consistent signals to all high school students about readiness for non-remedial college work, regardless of their post-sec plans. § By elevating and making more visible the concept of community college readiness.
Common Core could create opportunities for earlier intervention and remediation. § Assessments will provide earlier and more specific information about community college readiness. § Useful for structuring K-16 partnerships, pathways, and bridge programs. § Common point of reference for K-16 faculty dialogue.
Common Core assessments could be useful for CCC course placement… Why? § Administered to all high school students, regardless of post-secondary plans; § Administered at an expected time, under consistent conditions; § Provide data on discrete content and levels, not just dispersion around single marker of grade level proficiency; § Will be explicitly evaluated on performance relative to SAT/ACT, ACCUPLACER, and other instruments.
…and improving CCC instruction and student services. Why? § Entering students will have a portfolio of assessment data on readiness in specific competency areas. § Data could be useful in designing basic skills modules and placing students. § Data also useful for improving instruction across the curriculum.
Common core could also strengthen career and CTE readiness… § Common Core standards and assessments also incorporate career readiness. § Assessments should capture students’ preparedness for CTE classes/programs better than CST/EAP. § Should provide a point of access for CTE faculty to engage in conversations and partnerships with K-12.
…but it will be important to get the details right. § Common Core standards appear to define college and career readiness as essentially the same thing—not necessarily the case. § National consortia have not clearly articulated their approach to measuring career/CTE readiness. § Not clear if the Common Core movement embraces a “multiple pathway” approach (robust CTE in high school while keeping door open for college).
Multi-state partnership may offer other advantages. § Tap into national expertise. § Allow us to buy more at lower development cost: assessments, test bank items, computer adaptive software, instructional materials, PD. § Help us compare the readiness of our high school students and the progress they are making. § Help us compare results of different strategies, programs, policies in other states.