HPMS Software Demo and Program Status RPUG Stateline

HPMS: Software Demo and Program Status RPUG Stateline, NV September 27, 2011

Agenda n Brief demo of HPMS 8. 0 software (pavement) n HPMS Pavement data status n Current issues re: HPMS pavement-related data

HPMS 8. 0 Software ■ Controlled access via UPACS (User Profile Access Control System) ■ Limited to HPMS community ■ Quick Start Guide ■ Initial release (submittal capability, basic reports/tools/outputs) ■ Ongoing development…

HPMS Data Model (Geospatial) n State’s own geospatial network n Streamlines data submittal process • FHWA receives independent State geo-coded data items directly n Intended to improve data quality, minimize reporting burden, and enhance analytic capabilities n Expands possible uses of HPMS data • Easier link to other data files and routable networks (FAF, NBI, Safety data, etc. )

HPMS 8. 0 Software Tour

HPMS Pavement Data Status n Revised HPMS Field Manual • Completed (minor updates pending) n HPMS Training • Course development completed n 15 States submitted new format for 2009 (optional) n ~35 States submitted 2010 data, so far… – Fewer submitted pavement metadata

IRI_Equip_Type Interstate

Faulting_Method Interstate

Faulting_Equipment_Type Interstate

Cracking_Percent_Equip Interstate

Cracking_Length_Equip Interstate

Cracking_Method Interstate

Rutting_Equip_Type Interstate

Rutting_Method Interstate

Rutting_Num_Sensors Interstate

Current Issues n Complete reporting in the new format n Change in FHWA National Highway System (NHS) IRI performance measure n FHWA Pavement Monitoring Guide n FY 2012 NCHRP project proposed: HPMS pavement reporting (20 -24 (82))

Issue: HPMS IRI Section Length Reporting n Change in HPMS-reported IRI section lengths • Affects agency performance indicator %’s • Most States reporting shorter IRI sections • Reduced variability? Closer match to State PMS’s? n Should standard reporting length (0. 1 mi)/narrow range be recommended?

§ 3 §Miles § 54 Average § 51 Average § 49 Average § 47 Average § 46 Average § 40 Average § 38 Average § 37 Average § 36 Average § 35 Average § 34 Average § 33 Average § 31 Average § 30 Average § 29 Average § 28 Average § 27 Average § 26 Average § 25 Average § 24 Average § 21 Average § 20 Average § 19 Average § 18 Average § 17 Average § 16 Average § 15 Average § 13 Average § 12 Average § 10 Average § 9 Average § 8 Average § 6 Average § 5 Average § 0 § 2008 Avg. IRI Section Length (Int. ) § 6 § 5 § 4 § 2 § 1

§ 3 §Miles § 54 Average § 51 Average § 49 Average § 47 Average § 46 Average § 40 Average § 38 Average § 37 Average § 36 Average § 35 Average § 34 Average § 33 Average § 31 Average § 30 Average § 29 Average § 28 Average § 27 Average § 26 Average § 25 Average § 24 Average § 21 Average § 20 Average § 19 Average § 18 Average § 17 Average § 16 Average § 15 Average § 13 Average § 12 Average § 10 Average § 9 Average § 8 Average § 6 Average § 5 Average § 0 § 2010 Avg. IRI Section Length (Int. ) § 6 § 5 § 4 § 2 § 1

§ 2 § 1 §Miles § 54 Average § 51 Average § 49 Average § 47 Average § 46 Average § 40 Average § 38 Average § 37 Average § 36 Average § 35 Average § 34 Average § 33 Average § 31 Average § 30 Average § 29 Average § 28 Average § 27 Average § 26 Average § 25 Average § 24 Average § 21 Average § 20 Average § 19 Average § 18 Average § 17 Average § 16 Average § 15 Average § 13 Average § 12 Average § 10 Average § 9 Average § 8 Average § 6 Average § 5 Average §-3 §Difference 2008 & 2010 Avg. IRI Section Length (Int. ) § 6 § 5 § 4 § 3 § 0 §-1 §-2

Example: %IRI<95: 50. 0 IRI (in/mi) 87 0. 0 92 0. 1 100 0. 2 0. 3 122 75 0. 4 178 0. 5 0. 6 111 0. 7 90 91 0. 8 115 0. 9 1. 0 %IRI<95: 30. 0 IRI (in/mi) 0. 0 93 99 0. 3 178 0. 5 0. 6 102 1. 0

Pavement Monitoring Guide n Development contract currently underway (18 months total) n Literature review (HPMS and State practices) n Identify/develop protocols and relate to existing ones (LTPP, AASHTO, etc. ) n Engage stakeholders and providers for buy-in n Prepare draft then final Pavement Monitoring Guide

NCHRP 20 -24 (82) n “Increasing Confidence in the Highway Performance Monitoring System for Pavement Reporting” n Identify steps to increase confidence for: • State performance comparisons • State performance trends (Federal tracking) n Need for a universally accepted data source (HPMS) for States and FHWA

Conclusion Contact: Robert Rozycki FHWA (HPPI-20) Phone (202) 366 -5059 email: robert. rozycki@dot. gov

https: //fhwapap 03. fhwa. dot. gov/upacsp/tm? trans. Name=Me nu. System&action=build. HTML https: //fhwaapps. fhwa. dot. gov/upacsp