How managers can make a decision in risk

Скачать презентацию How managers can make a decision in risk Скачать презентацию How managers can make a decision in risk

5_constant_of_variation_sensitivity_analysis_psychological_aspects_of_risk.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 30

>How managers can make a decision in risk – and uncertainty environment? (continuation)‏ How managers can make a decision in risk – and uncertainty environment? (continuation)‏

>What project is more risky? 2 What project is more risky? 2

>If taking into account root-mean-squire deviation, the first (bigger) project is more risky But If taking into account root-mean-squire deviation, the first (bigger) project is more risky But if taking into account project’s dimension, than relative risk will be lower for this project (1 pr.) 3

>4 In order to compare the risk of projects with very different values of 4 In order to compare the risk of projects with very different values of investments, outcomes and expected value, you need to use relative index rather than absolute measurements

>Relative risk measurement: constant of variation 5 Relative risk measurement: constant of variation 5

>Relative root-mean-squire deviation or constant deviaton – an index for projects with very different Relative root-mean-squire deviation or constant deviaton – an index for projects with very different values of investments, outcomes and expected value. Constant deviation – ratio of root-mean-squire deviation to expected value Root-mean-squire deviation Expected value 6

>S1 – 33, для S2 – 100. 7 S1 – 33, для S2 – 100. 7

>

>9 Expected values, root-mean-squire deviation, constant of variety Risk analysis for 2 projects 9 Expected values, root-mean-squire deviation, constant of variety Risk analysis for 2 projects

>A higher root-mean-squire deviation means a higher absolute risk A higher constant of variety A higher root-mean-squire deviation means a higher absolute risk A higher constant of variety indicates a higher relative risk (risk per dollar of expected value). 10

>Sensitivity analysis The sensitivity analysis associated with the identification of dependencies: how much will Sensitivity analysis The sensitivity analysis associated with the identification of dependencies: how much will the effectiveness of the project change with a given modification of initial parameters of the project The analysis allows to determine the most significant for project input variables that should be controlled firstly

>Select the basic indicator on to conduct the calculations (NPV or IRR) Further components Select the basic indicator on to conduct the calculations (NPV or IRR) Further components are selected, which are not reliable from the experts point of view (investment in current assets, construction costs, sales, price) Set limits on numeric values of these indicators on both sides NPV is calculated at each value of the variable The measure of sensitivity is the elasticity To compare the sensitivity of several projects construct risk-rose; the number of rays equals the number of varying variables (compare the square of roses) Sensitivity analysis

>On the basis of calculations for the project the following values were obtained : On the basis of calculations for the project the following values were obtained : • NPV = 3900 rubles.; • IRR = 30%; • DPP = 4.5 years. During the stress test and variables modification influencing the project were obtained new values Conduct a sensitivity analysis of the project according to the criterion of NPV and on the basis of calculations build the rose (star) of project risks.

>What index I’m taking into account and what decision I make? Depends on the What index I’m taking into account and what decision I make? Depends on the attitude to risk in connection with the return + General financial situation 11

>Functions of risk-profit ratio for manager Psychological aspects of risk Functions of risk-profit ratio for manager Psychological aspects of risk

>Отношение к риску -- это понятие в экономике, характеризующее склонность потребителей и инвесторов к Отношение к риску -- это понятие в экономике, характеризующее склонность потребителей и инвесторов к принятию того или иного решения в условиях риска. Например, инвестор, не приемлющий риск, скорее положит свои деньги на банковский счет с более низкой, но гарантированной процентной ставкой вместо того, чтобы вложить свои деньги в акции, которые в среднем обеспечивают более высокую доходность, но и несут в себе высокий риск потери значительной части инвестиций. Curves A, B – functions of risk-profit ratio for manager. It is profit demanded as risk function Risk rejection Risk loyalty 12 Profit Absolute and relative risk

>In the vast sea of human personalities, there are people who take risks, and In the vast sea of human personalities, there are people who take risks, and people who try to avoid it 13

>To risk or not to risk? Most investors and managers try to avoid risk To risk or not to risk? Most investors and managers try to avoid risk Why? 14

>Theory of utility 15 Theory of utility 15

>Company 1 Assets – 50 m $ Company 2 Assets – 10 m. $ Company 1 Assets – 50 m $ Company 2 Assets – 10 m. $ Cost of preparation– 1 m. $ (will not compensated)‏ Profit – 25 m. $ If both companies are involved: Е (profit) = 0,5 (-1) +0,5 (25) = 12 Contest for the best designed specification 16

>Despite 12 million $ a smaller firm may prefer not to take part in Despite 12 million $ a smaller firm may prefer not to take part in the contest Real life = 1 experiment If the loss of 1 million $ will lead the firm into bankruptcy, it may take risk, regardless of the potential benefits! 17

>Conclusion: the conversion of dollar returns in some other incentive structure may be necessary Conclusion: the conversion of dollar returns in some other incentive structure may be necessary before you can conduct analysis 18

>Managers use this concept when choosing from a number of alternatives The dollar return Managers use this concept when choosing from a number of alternatives The dollar return does not reflect adequately the feelings of the person making the decision 19 Conceptual unit measuring instrument – utility (units of utility)

>Profits and losses should be measured from the point of view of marginal utility Profits and losses should be measured from the point of view of marginal utility (not from the point of view of absolute value in dollars) Marginal utility is defined as the change in the overall utility, which occurs when another monetary unit gaining or losing 20

>The smaller company has appointed a greater marginal utility to the potentially lost dollars, The smaller company has appointed a greater marginal utility to the potentially lost dollars, not to the dollars that may gain in case of winning 21

>Utility of revenue 22 Utility Utility Revenue (000$) Revenue (000$) Utility of revenue 22 Utility Utility Revenue (000$) Revenue (000$)

>Revenue (000$) Utility Revenue (000$) Utility 23 Ordinary investor tries to avoid risk. The Revenue (000$) Utility Revenue (000$) Utility 23 Ordinary investor tries to avoid risk. The reason is expressed by declining marginal utility first 1000$ - 16 units (urgent needs)‏ second 1000$ - 9 units (desired, but not so necessary)‏ The marginal utility decreases with increasing income, which has a decisive influence on the behaviour of the investor

>Revenue (000$) Utility 24 Investor-player set greater utility to potential incoming dollars, not leaving Revenue (000$) Utility 24 Investor-player set greater utility to potential incoming dollars, not leaving Utility Revenue (000$) The marginal utility becomes higher with increasing income first 1000$ - 3 units second 1000$ - 6 units

>Leaders may be of different types Most of the leaders belong to type Leaders may be of different types Most of the leaders belong to type "a". They feel the risk business: more suffer from the loss of the dollar than happy to its acquisition The utility function of most of the leaders demonstrates decreasing marginal utility

>This behavior prevails to such an extent that the assumption of diminishing marginal utility This behavior prevails to such an extent that the assumption of diminishing marginal utility is one of the two cornerstones of economic theory *The decreasing marginal profit in relation to the input factors of production