Hot Topics in Federal Tax Controversy September 22, 2015 Matthew D. Lee Jed M. Silversmith Blank Rome LLP Philadelphia, PA
Title • All audio is streamed through your computer speakers. • There will be several attendance verification questions during the LIVE webinar that must be answered via the online quiz at the conclusion to qualify for CPE. • Today’s webinar will begin at 2: 00 pm EDT • Please note: You will not hear any sound until the webinar begins.
Learning Objectives • Upon completion of this webinar you will be able to: • Understand define current IRS enforcement priorities. • Define foreign asset & FBAR reporting requirements. • Define the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act FATCA and the Obligations of Foreign Financial Institutions and of U. S. Taxpayers to Report Foreign Assets. • Specify IRS audit rates and trends in audit procedures • Determine current IRS criminal enforcement trends • Understand IRS collection trends • Specify collection alternatives available to taxpayers
Matthew D. Lee Partner Blank Rome LLP 215. 569. 5352 Lee-M@Blank. Rome. com Matthew D. Lee is a former U. S. Department of Justice trial attorney who concentrates his practice on all aspects of white collar criminal defense and federal tax controversies. He has extensive experience in advising clients on issues regarding foreign bank account reporting (FBAR) obligations, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), and the Internal Revenue Service’s 2009 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program, 2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative, and 2012 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program. He has represented hundreds of U. S. taxpayers with undisclosed foreign bank accounts. Mr. Lee has published numerous articles regarding the IRS voluntary disclosure programs and FBAR and FATCA reporting obligations and speaks frequently on these topics. He has also represented clients in all stages of proceedings before the Internal Revenue Service, including audits, appeals, and collections, and Tax Court and district court litigation. Mr. Lee also has experience in conducting corporate internal investigations and advising clients as to corporate compliance issues involving the Bank Secrecy Act, the USA Patriot Act, FATCA, and anti-money laundering laws and regulations. Mr. Lee has represented both corporations and individuals in criminal investigations involving tax, money laundering, health care, securities, public corruption, and fraud offenses, and has significant experience in handling all stages of federal litigation including trials and appeals. Mr. Lee is the author of Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act Answer Book 2015 (Practising Law Institute) and publishes a blog devoted to addressing the latest developments in the tax controversy field at www. taxcontroversywatch. com.
Jed M. Silversmith Blank Rome LLP 215. 569. 5789 jsilversmith@Blank. Rome. com Jed M. Silversmith concentrates his practice in white collar litigation, with a particular focus on civil and criminal tax controversy matters. Prior to joining Blank Rome this April, he worked at the U. S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, where he served as a trial attorney for the Southern Criminal Enforcement Section from 2006 to 2014. At the Tax Division, he prosecuted a wide range of criminal tax cases in federal courts. The matters involved tax evasion, failure to pay employment taxes, money laundering, and bank fraud. Mr. Silversmith has tried over twenty cases including ten jury trials in federal district court. As part of his work at the Tax Division, Mr. Silversmith handled investigations of taxpayers with undisclosed foreign bank accounts and other offshore matters. He garnered significant experience working with the Tax Division’s Civil regional sections. He regularly counseled IRS agents and attorneys on collection matters including levies, foreclosure actions, jeopardy assessments, penalty litigation, and other issues. Mr. Silversmith received three outstanding attorney awards from the Tax Division during his tenure.
Setting the Stage: The Tax Gap
Background: The Tax Gap
Components of the Tax Gap
Criminal Tax Update
IRS Investigations
IRS Staffing Levels
Key data • Over 1, 000 Identity Theft prosecutions • Over 1, 000 “questionable refund program” (i. e. , refund fraud) • Over 1, 300 money laundering cases • Over 300 return preparers • Over 225 international investigations • Not too many garden variety tax cases
• 23 people killed by lightning in 2013 in the United States • 400 personal tax evasion cases in 2014
How does this impact Taxpayer? • Not many investigations per taxpayer • High likelihood of criminal case developing once subject investigation is initiated • 93. 4% conviction rate
Extensive Review Process by IRS • Cases initiated by IRS Criminal Investigation Division • All cases must undergo extensive review process by the IRS. I. R. M. § 9. 5. 12. 2 • IRS Special Agents write Special Agent Reports (“SARs”) – Document is 20+ pages – Attached is a copy of each piece of evidence, organized by witness
Extensive Review Process by DOJ • The Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division, has responsibility for all criminal proceedings arising under the internal revenue laws, …. The Tax Division must approve any and all criminal charges that a United States Attorney intends to bring against a defendant in connection with conduct arising under the internal revenue laws. U. S. A. M. § 6 -4. 200 • Within 90 days of receiving a designated non-complex matter, a United States Attorney must either initiate proceedings or request that the Tax Division decline the matter or handle it. U. S. A. M. § 6 -4. 244
Complete Review Process IRS Special Agent IRS Supervisory Special Agent Centralized Case Review IRS Criminal Tax Counsel DOJ Line Attorney DOJ Assistant Chief DOJ Chief Prosecuted by USAO
Personal Tax Evasion • The General Tax Fraud investigations are the backbone of Criminal Investigation's enforcement program and has a direct influence on the taxpaying public’s compliance with the Internal Revenue Code. Compliance with the tax laws in the United States depends heavily on taxpayer selfassessment of the amount of tax, voluntary filing of tax returns and remittance of any tax owed. This is frequently termed “voluntary compliance. ”
Overview of Tax Crimes • All tax crimes require proof of “willfulness” • “Willfulness” means violation of a known legal duty • Subjective intent of the taxpayer • Highest legal standard • Cheek v. United States, 498 U. S. 192, 201 (1991)
Dr. Mark Hopkins, Carlsbad, NM • Failed to file tax returns since 1996 • Wrote many letters to the IRS asking the Agency to show him the duty to file • Picture taken outside Post Office on April 15
Willfulness examples • A consistent pattern of underreporting large amounts of income • Providing accountant or return preparer with inaccurate and incomplete information • False statements to IRS agents
Willfulness examples • Making or using false documents • Use of Nominees • Extensive use of currency or cashier’s checks. • Background and experience of defendant. • Undisclosed overseas bank accounts • Inconsistent statements about income (e. g. , loan applications)
Defense of Good Faith • Most courts have pattern instructions that mandate a good faith defense • Defense applies to truthful disclosures to licensed professionals
Tax Evasion (26 U. S. C. § 7201) • “Cadillac” charge • Maximum 5 year term of incarceration and $250, 000 fine per count of conviction • Charged as evasion of assessment – Charged by year – Automatic waiver of statute of limitations for civil collection and 75% fraud penalty • Charged as evasion of payment – Brought after taxes are assessed for failing to pay tax debts
Tax Evasion (26 U. S. C. § 7201) • Defendant had a substantial income tax deficiency; • Defendant made an affirmative attempt to evade or defeat the assessment or payment of the income tax; and • Defendant acted willfully.
Evasion of Assessment examples • Filing a false tax return • Failing to file tax return and depositing business receipts into account in relative’s name • Failing to file tax return and working extensively in cash
Evasion of Payment examples • After IRS sends 90 day letter, transferring house to a relative • Asking an employer to pay Taxpayer in cash to avoid an IRS levy • Failing to report assets on a Form 433 -A
Willful Failure to File (26 U. S. C. § 7203) • Maximum one-year term of incarceration and $100, 000 fine per count of conviction • Misdemeanor • No collateral civil consequence
Willful Failure to File(26 U. S. C. § 7203) • Defendant was required to file an income tax return • Defendant did not file a tax return at or before the time required by law or regulation • Defendant’s failure to file was willful
Who Must File?
Self-employed 26 U. S. C. § 6017
Recent cases • Steven Siff (S. D. Fla. )(plea) – – Partner at AM 100 law firm Non-filer since 1997. Tax Loss of $2, 000 13 months incarceration • Jimmie Ross (E. D. Tenn. )(trial) – $530, 000 tax loss – 51 months • Eric Platenberg (D. Or. )(plea) – $360, 000 tax loss – 12 months and 1 day
Filing a false income tax return (26 U. S. C. § 7206(1)) • Defendant made and subscribed and filed an income tax return • The tax return contained a written declaration that it was made under the penalties of perjury • That the return was false regarding a material matter • That Defendant did not believe the return was true and correct as to that material matter; and • Defendant acted willfully.
Filing a false income tax return (26 U. S. C. § 7206(1)) • Maximum term of incarceration is three years and $250, 000 fine • Materiality ≠ tax due and owing – Failure to report a business – Failure to identify a foreign bank account on a Schedule B • Conviction carries minimal collateral civil consequences
Employment Taxes (26 U. S. C. § 7202) • Criminalizes the Responsible Person Penalty (26 U. S. C. § 6672) – Harvey G. Bitler, Sr. (E. D. Pa. ) • $5, 078, 897 • 46 months – Larry Kimes/Charles Pircher (W. D. Tex. ) • $130 million PEO • 144 months/132 months – Stephen Gregoryn (D. Or. ) • $481, 517 • 19 months
What makes a “good” tax case? • Multi-year case • Tax loss above $30, 000/$80, 000 • Strong willfulness evidence (i. e. , multiple badges of fraud) • Significant personal expenditures • Jury appeal of defendant • Venue considerations
Investigative Techniques
The most common technique: Subject Interview • “In most administrative investigations, the subject should be contacted for an initial interview to confront him/her with the allegations and to identify potential defenses or other weaknesses in the case before making further investigative contacts. ” • Contact with the subject should be made within the first 30 days of numbering a subject criminal investigation. • I. R. M. § 9. 5. 1. 2. 1. 1
How to handle the subject interview
Other IRS CI Investigative Tools • Credit reports • Financial databases • Undercover operations • Search warrants • Trash runs • Mail covers (39 C. F. R. § 233. 3) • Search warrants of ISPs (Electronic Communication Privacy Act)
IRS Fraud Technical Advisor • Revenue agents and revenue officers must work with fraud technical advisors • IRM sets forth timelines, specific actions to be taken by IRS-CI and SB/SE
Subject interview • Taxpayer does not know what the IRS knows • Powerful admissions that can be used against Taxpayer • Taxpayer does not get copy of the IRS agent’s notes until after indictment • Conversation are not recorded
Fifth Amendment Privilege • Applies in both summons and grand jury investigations • Act of production immunity • Does not apply to custodians of corporate records – Generally solely owned corporate owners do not have to admit that the documents are business records
Direct evidence • Government calls witnesses who testify about income • Examples – Employer who issued Form W-2 – Insurance company issued Form 1099 -Int – Employees testified that they were paid cash
Indirect Methods of Proof • Significant issues – Taxpayer must have had income generating activity – IRS needs to establish cash on hand at beginning of time period – IRS must investigate all reasonable leads • Bank Deposit Analysis – Reconstructs all deposits • Net Worth/Expenditures – Measures a change in taxpayers’ net worth or unexplained expenditures
What can I do? • Voluntary Disclosure Program – Must be before an audit • Shadow investigation – Track summons sent to third-party record keepers • FOIA requests – IRS offers a number of records that a representative can request • Retain Kovel accountant
Request a Conference IRS Special Agent IRS Supervisory Special Agent Centralized Case Review IRS Criminal Tax Counsel DOJ Line Attorney Taxpayer Conference DOJ Assistant Chief DOJ Chief Prosecuted by USAO
Expedited plea program • Available in administrative investigations • Advantageous for non-filers • Early resolution limits the number of stakeholders • Brings closure • May be optimal if the IRS has only uncovered a small portion of the tax loss
Should client pay the tax? • Amended tax returns can be used as an admissions • Lessens the jury appeal and likelihood of prosecution • Mitigating factor at sentencing
International Tax Enforcement
Obligation to Report Worldwide Income • United States law has always obligated U. S. citizens (including dual citizens) and U. S. residents to declare and pay taxes on all of their worldwide income, regardless of where those earnings have been derived. • Historically, some U. S. taxpayers have attempted to avoid or evade reporting income earned outside of the U. S. because of the U. S. government’s inability to identify those earnings from overseas banks and other financial institutions.
Why the Focus on International Tax Compliance? • IRS/DOJ have intense focus on curtailing offshore tax avoidance –U. S. Tax Gap: $450 billion –U. S. Senate PSI Report (2/26/14): Offshore tax schemes cause $150 billion in lost tax revenue per year • How? –using “carrot and stick” approach
The Carrot: Voluntary Disclosure Programs • 2014 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) which follows highly successful 2009, 2011, and 2012 amnesty programs – Provides participating taxpayers with amnesty from criminal prosecution by filing of amended tax returns and payment of taxes, interest, and penalties – 50, 000 voluntary disclosures since 2009 (versus 100 annually under traditional voluntary disclosure program) – Over $7 billion in additional revenue collected to date • Also “Expanded Streamlined Filing Compliance Procedures” for non-willful taxpayers
The Stick: Unprecedented Enforcement • “Today’s agreements reflect the Tax Division’s continued progress towards reaching appropriate resolutions with the banks that self-reported and voluntarily entered the Swiss Bank Program. The department is currently investigating accountholders, bank employees, and other facilitators and institutions based on information supplied by various sources, including the banks participating in this Program. Our message is clear – there is no safe haven. ” (DOJ Tax May 29, 2015) • “These four additional bank agreements signal a change in terrain for offshore banking. No longer is it safe to hide money offshore and expect that it will not be discovered. IRS CI Special Agents will continue to follow the money to find those who circumvent the offshore disclosure laws and hold them accountable. ” (IRS-CI May 29, 2015)
Enforcement Efforts to Date (through May 29, 2015) • UBS Deferred Prosecution Agreement (Feb. 2009) • Approximately 117 individual account holders have been criminally charged to date – 90 guilty pleas – 12 convictions following trial – 5 fugitives from justice • Numerous prosecutions of facilitators – 12 guilty pleas – 2 convictions following trial – 23 fugitives from justice
Enforcement Actions Against Banks • Bank Leumi (Israel) – December 2014; deferred prosecution agreement. $270 million penalty and turn over of more than 1, 500 names of account holders. • Credit Suisse (Switzerland) – May 2014; guilty plea. $2. 6 billion penalty. • LLB-Vaduz (Liechtenstein) – July 2013; non-prosecution agreement. $23 million penalty. • Wegelin Bank (Switzerland) – January 2013; guilty plea. $58 penalty and $16. 2 forfeiture.
Use of “John Doe” Summonses • Used to obtain information about U. S. taxpayers through correspondent accounts • To date, such summonses have been issued for bank account information in Switzerland, India, the Bahamas, Barbados, the Cayman Islands, Guernsey, Hong Kong, Malta, and the United Kingdom • September 16, 2015: federal court in Miami authorizes IRS to serve “John Doe” summons seeking information about taxpayers with bank accounts in Belize
Swiss Bank Program Resolutions (as of May 29, 2015) • More than 100 Swiss Banks enrolled • More than 40 Swiss bank have reached resolutions with U. S. government to date • Over $300 million paid in penalties
United States v. Zwerner Jury Verdict May 28, 2014 • Zwerner failed to file FBARs for Swiss bank account with balance of $1. 4 million • Jury found Zwerner liable for willfully failing to file FBARs for 2004, 2005, and 2006 • Potential penalty: 50% of balance of account for each year (total 150% penalty) • Even though he filled out a tax organizer provided by his accountant, every year, Zwerner answered “no” to questions asking whether “you have an interest in or signature authority over a financial account in a foreign country, such as a bank account, securities account or other financial account” and whether “you have any foreign income or pay any foreign taxes. ”
Foreign Bank Account Reporting (FBAR)
Foreign Bank Accounting Reporting • Required as part of Bank Secrecy Act since 1970 s • U. S. taxpayers with foreign accounts have two obligations – Answer question “yes” on Form 1040, Schedule B, Part III (due April 15 or due date of extended return) or other applicable tax return – Electronically File Fin. CEN 114, Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (“FBAR”) (due June 30)
Form 1040, Schedule B
Breaking News: Modified FBAR Filing Deadlines • Due June 30 for all taxpayers – For 2015, FBAR is due June 30, 2016 – No extensions permitted • Starting 2016 tax year, due April 15 – New law, enacted early August 2015 – For 2016, FBAR is due April 15, 2017 – Now, eligible for six-month extension – to October 15 • Expect regulations on how to request an extension
Who is required to file an FBAR? • An FBAR must be filed if all of the following requirements are satisfied: – – The filer is a U. S. Person; The U. S. Person has a financial account; The financial account is in a foreign country; The U. S. Person has a financial interest in, or signature or other authority over, the financial account; and – The aggregate account balance of all such foreign accounts exceed $10, 000 (in U. S. dollars) at any time during the calendar year
FBAR Penalties for Non-Compliance • Criminal penalties for willful violations: – Up to 5 years imprisonment and $250, 000 fine • Civil penalties – Non-willful violation: Up to $10, 000 for each violation – Willful violation: Greater of $100, 000 or 50 percent of the balance in the account at the time of the violation • Both civil and criminal penalties can be imposed together.
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA)
Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) • “The Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) is an important development in U. S. efforts to improve tax compliance involving foreign financial assets and offshore accounts. ” (www. IRS. gov) • “FATCA was enacted in 2010 by Congress to target noncompliance by U. S. taxpayers using foreign accounts. FATCA requires foreign financial institutions (FFIs) to report to the IRS information about financial accounts held by U. S. taxpayers, or by foreign entities in which U. S. taxpayers hold a substantial ownership interest. ” (www. treasury. gov)
Two Primary FATCA Requirements • Foreign financial institutions are annually required to report directly to the U. S. government information about financial accounts held by U. S. taxpayers, or held by foreign entities in which U. S. taxpayers hold a substantial ownership interest. • U. S. taxpayers with specified foreign financial assets that exceed certain thresholds must report those assets to the IRS annually on an information return.
FATCA Policy in Context of U. S. Tax Laws • U. S. taxpayers’ investments have become increasingly global in scope • Recognition that foreign financial institutions (FFIs) are in best position to identify and report with respect to their U. S. account holders • Absent reporting by FFIs, some U. S. taxpayers may attempt to evade U. S. tax by hiding money in offshore accounts • “To prevent this abuse of the U. S. voluntary tax compliance system and address the use of offshore accounts to facilitate tax evasion, it is essential in today’s global investment climate that reporting be available with respect to both the onshore and offshore accounts of U. S. taxpayers. ” (Preamble to Final Regulations)
What Does FATCA Require of FFIs? • FATCA requires Foreign Financial Institutions (FFIs) to report to the IRS information about financial accounts held by U. S. taxpayers, or by foreign entities in which U. S. taxpayers hold a substantial ownership interest. In order to avoid withholding under FATCA, a participating FFI will have to enter into an agreement with the IRS to: – Identify U. S. accounts, – Report certain information to the IRS regarding U. S. accounts, and – Withhold a 30 percent tax on certain U. S. -connected payments to non-participating FFIs and account holders who are unwilling to provide the required information.
International Coordination and Model Intergovernmental Agreements • Treasury is collaborating with foreign governments to develop two alternative model intergovernmental agreements that facilitate the effective and efficient implementation of FATCA. • Model 1 IGA: FFIs in jurisdictions that have signed Model 1 IGAs report the information about U. S. accounts required by FACTA to their respective governments who then exchange this information with the IRS. • Model 2 IGA: A partner jurisdiction signing an agreement based on the Model 2 IGA agrees to direct its FFIs to register with the IRS and report the information about U. S. accounts required by FATCA directly to the IRS.
International Coordination (continued) • To date, 112 countries have either signed IGAs or are actively in negotiations with United States • Including Bermuda, Canada, Cayman Islands, Chile, Costa Rica, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Guernsey, Honduras, Hungary, Ireland, Isle of Man, Italy, Japan, Jersey, Luxembourg, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Switzerland, and United Kingdom
FATCA Also Requires Reporting of Foreign Assets by U. S. Taxpayers • U. S. taxpayers with “specified foreign financial assets” that exceed certain thresholds must now report those assets to the IRS. • A specified foreign financial asset includes (1) financial accounts maintained by foreign financial institutions and (2) other foreign financial assets held for investment such as foreign stocks or securities, interests in a foreign entity, any financial instrument or contract that has as an issuer or counterparty that is other than a U. S. person, foreign pensions and deferred compensation plans, and certain foreign trusts and estates • Form 8938, “Statement of Foreign Financial Assets, ” must be filed with the tax return.
Who Is Required to File Form 8938? You must file Form 8938 if: 1. You are a “specified individual. ” AND 2. You have an interest in “specified foreign financial assets” required to be reported. AND 3. The aggregate value of your specified foreign financial assets is more than the reporting threshold that applies to you.
What is a “Specified Foreign Financial Asset”? A specified foreign financial asset (SFFA) is: • Any financial account maintained by a foreign financial institution – – – Foreign bank accounts Foreign mutual funds Foreign hedge funds Foreign private equity funds Certain foreign insurance products
What is a SFFA? (continued) • Other foreign financial assets held for investment that are not in an account maintained by a U. S. or foreign financial institution, namely: – Stock or securities issued by someone other than a U. S. person – Any interest in a foreign entity – Any financial instrument or contract that has as an issuer or counterparty that is other than a U. S. person – Foreign pensions and deferred compensation plans – Foreign trusts and estates (if “specified individual” is aware of its existence)
What are the reporting thresholds for domestic taxpayers? • Unmarried taxpayers living in the U. S. : The total value of specified foreign financial assets is more than $50, 000 on the last day of the tax year or more than $75, 000 at any time during the tax year. • Married taxpayers filing a joint income tax return and living in the U. S. : The total value of specified foreign financial assets is more than $100, 000 on the last day of the tax year or more than $150, 000 at any time during the tax year. • Married taxpayers filing separate income tax returns and living in the U. S. : The total value of specified foreign financial assets is more than $50, 000 on the last day of the tax year or more than $75, 000 at any time during the tax year.
What are the reporting thresholds for taxpayers living abroad? • Taxpayers living abroad. You are a taxpayer living abroad if: – You are a U. S. citizen whose tax home is in a foreign country and you are either a bona fide resident of a foreign country or countries for an uninterrupted period that includes the entire tax year, or – You are a U. S. citizen or resident, who during a period of 12 consecutive months ending in the tax year is physically present in a foreign country or countries at least 330 days. • A taxpayer living abroad must file if: – You are filing a return other than a joint return and the total value of your specified foreign assets is more than $200, 000 on the last day of the tax year or more than $300, 000 at any time during the year; or – You are filing a joint return and the value of your specified foreign asset is more than $400, 000 on the last day of the tax year or more than $600, 000 at any time during the year.
Penalties for Non-Filing of Form 8938 • Failure to file Form 8938 may result in a $10, 000 civil penalty as well as an additional $10, 000 continuation penalty for each 30 day period after the taxpayer is notified by the IRS of the failure to file (not to exceed $50, 000) • Exception if failure to file is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect • The fact that a foreign jurisdiction would impose a civil or criminal penalty for disclosing the required information is NOT reasonable cause • Criminal penalties may also apply • Failure to file Form 8938 or certain assets on Form 8938 may keep the statute of limitations open for ALL items on a return until 3 years after Form 8938 is filed.
Options for U. S. Taxpayers with Undisclosed Foreign Assets
Option 1 – Streamlined Domestic Offshore Procedures • Penalty of 5%. • Look back period of three years for amended returns and six years for FBARs. • Penalty is on assets which are reportable on FBAR or Form 8938 during the relevant lookback period. – Includes value of foreign bank accounts, foreign securities accounts, foreign stock, etc. – Does not include signature authority accounts or assets not reportable on FBAR or 8938 (e. g. , income producing real estate). • Best Option For: – – – U. S. residents for last three years; and Filed U. S. income tax returns last three years; and Need to pick up taxable income on an amended return from a foreign asset; and Needs to file an FBAR, 8938 or other information return; and Acted non-willfully.
How to Determine Willfulness • • • Unreported income in the offshore account; Use of structure/entity to hold offshore account; Use of non-U. S. identification to open account; Checking the box “no” on Schedule B; Failing to advise return preparer of existence of offshore account; Transferring offshore funds to another institution or safe deposit box to avoid detection; Sophistication of taxpayer; Hold mail instruction; Willful blindness to tax/FBAR reporting obligations.
Required Certification of Non-Willfulness • “My failure to report all income, pay all tax, and submit all required information returns, including FBARs, was due to non-willful conduct. I understand that non-wilful conduct is conduct that is due to negligence, inadvertence, or mistake or conduct that is the result of a good faith misunderstanding of the requirements of the law. ” • “I recognize that if the Internal Revenue Service receives or discovers evidence of wilfulness, fraud, or criminal conduct, it may open an examination or investigation that could lead to civil fraud penalties, FBAR penalties, information return penalties, or even referral to Criminal Investigation. ” • “Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this certification and all accompanying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, they are true, correct, and complete. ”
Option 2 – Streamlined Foreign Offshore Procedures • No Penalty. • Look back period of three years for amended returns and six years for FBARs. • Best Option For: – U. S. taxpayer who was a non-resident for one of the last three years; and – Needs to pick up taxable income on an amended return from a foreign asset; and – Needs to file an FBAR, 8938 or other information return; and – Acted non-willfully.
OPTION 3 – Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program – Penalty between 27. 5% and 50% - depends on where the taxpayer banked and whether the taxpayer acted willfully. – Look back period of 8 years. – Penalty is on non-compliant assets (e. g. , foreign accounts, income producing real estate, artwork purchased with funds escaping U. S. taxation, foreign businesses, etc. ) – Best Option for: • Willful taxpayers with “bad facts”. • FBARs and information returns not filed. • Significant taxable income to pick up.
OVDP – 50% Penalty 50% penalty in OVDP if foreign financial institution is: – (1) under investigation by the IRS or Department of Justice (see list at www. irs. gov), – (2) cooperating with the IRS or Department of Justice in connection with accounts beneficially owned by a U. S. person, or – (3) has been identified in a court-approved issuance of a summons seeking information about U. S. taxpayers who may hold financial accounts (a “John Doe summons”) at the foreign financial institution
Questions? Matthew D. Lee Blank Rome LLP One Logan Square Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 569 -5352 (215) 832 -5352 (facsimile) Jed M. Silversmith Blank Rome LLP One Logan Square Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 569 -5789 (215) 832 -5789 (facsimile) JSilversmith@Blank. Rome. com Lee-M@Blank. Rome. com www. taxcontroversywatch. com
Thank you for participating in this webinar. National Society of Accountants 1010 North Fairfax Street Alexandria, VA 22314 -1574 Phone: (800) 966 -6679 members@nsacct. org
Скачать презентацию Hot Topics in Federal Tax Controversy September 22
3fdc3d1245817eef436e43222ba83ce3.ppt