Скачать презентацию Hoarding in the Elderly A Challenge to Home Скачать презентацию Hoarding in the Elderly A Challenge to Home

1c63d2ace094d0610739b3b006d79aac.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 47

Hoarding in the Elderly: A Challenge to Home Care Mary Ann Forciea MD, FACP Hoarding in the Elderly: A Challenge to Home Care Mary Ann Forciea MD, FACP Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine Division of Geriatric Medicine UPHS

Why am I (or my team) here? • This is a common and frustrating Why am I (or my team) here? • This is a common and frustrating problem for us • Hoping to learn some diagnostic tips • Hoping to learn some management tips • Want a chance to vent frustration at the system of care available to these patients. • Like to see my colleagues. • Always wanted to try this restaurant

Why am I (or my team) here? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. This is Why am I (or my team) here? 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. This is a challenging problem for us Want a chance to vent about these patients Like to see my colleagues Always wanted to try this restaurant Want to see if UPHS has any better ideas than we do

Key questions for this seminar • Is hoarding in older patients different than in Key questions for this seminar • Is hoarding in older patients different than in younger patients • What are the critical clinical questions in the evaluation of patients with hoarding? • What treatment strategies can be attempted? • What resources are available in the Delaware Valley?

Case- DR • 78 yr old lady, widow with 2 children • Living in Case- DR • 78 yr old lady, widow with 2 children • Living in Senior housing • Call from facility SW (Friday at 4 PM) – Increasing complaints from neighbors about ‘cleanliness’ of apartment – Apartment visit that day • Toilet overflow, clutter, attire – Home health aide refusing to return – Facility considering eviction

Case continues 2 • >40 yr history of bipolar disorder – Has medications – Case continues 2 • >40 yr history of bipolar disorder – Has medications – Multiple barriers to ongoing psychiatric care • Diabetes mellitus with peripheral neuropathy] • Venous stasis • DJD of knees, hips, LS spine – increasing immobility

Case 3 – prior history • Third dwelling while part of our primary care Case 3 – prior history • Third dwelling while part of our primary care program (8 yrs) • ‘Clutter’ an issue in each site – Mania associated with requests for DME • Progressive mobility dependence – Third move precipitated by loss of driving privileges

Added information • Visited patient one week ago • Called patient after SW call Added information • Visited patient one week ago • Called patient after SW call – Admits to overwhelming apartment ‘situation’ – Blame exclusively on building management – Admits to progressive URI over past week – Reluctant to agree to ED or hospital visit • Home care team urgent conference call

Living room (close to hers –google images) Living room (close to hers –google images)

Bedroom (close to hers – google images) Bedroom (close to hers – google images)

Options 1. 2. 3. 4. Sign out to weekend covering partner Temporize by offering Options 1. 2. 3. 4. Sign out to weekend covering partner Temporize by offering a Monday medical house call visit by your team Arrange transport to ED for evaluation Directly admit to your inpatient service

Hoarding – Definition Saxena 2007 • Collecting – excessive quantities of – Poorly useable Hoarding – Definition Saxena 2007 • Collecting – excessive quantities of – Poorly useable items – Of little value • Failing to discard items • Interference with function

Excessive acquisition • Buying • Accumulation of ‘free’ things – Received – Sought out Excessive acquisition • Buying • Accumulation of ‘free’ things – Received – Sought out (dumpster diving • Motivation – “thrill” – ‘therapy’ for unpleasant feelings (? ‘retail’ therapy) – Fear of missed opportunities

Failure to discard • Most easily recognized • Motivation – Sentimental value – Wasteful Failure to discard • Most easily recognized • Motivation – Sentimental value – Wasteful to discard – Might be useful in the future • Decreased ability to group/sort items • Poor organizational skills

Interference with function • Clutter – cannot use space or object for its intended Interference with function • Clutter – cannot use space or object for its intended purpose • Functional status – cannot walk through apartment, bathe, cook • Consequences – Eviction, health concerns, fire risks

Risks of hoarding • • • Social dysfunction Functional disability Falls Fires Unsanitary conditions Risks of hoarding • • • Social dysfunction Functional disability Falls Fires Unsanitary conditions

Is hoarding a psychiatric disorder? • Associations: – OCD – Schizophrenia – Dementia (especially Is hoarding a psychiatric disorder? • Associations: – OCD – Schizophrenia – Dementia (especially fronto-temporal) – Mood Disorders • Not currently listed in DSM-IV, will likely be listed in DSM-V • Little attention to older patients with hoarding behaviors

FTD vs AD Miller et al Neurology 1997 Symptom Insidious onset Early loss of FTD vs AD Miller et al Neurology 1997 Symptom Insidious onset Early loss of personal & social awareness hyperorality Perseverative behavior Emotional unconcern Progressive reduction in speech Stereotypy of speech Praxis FTD +/30 29 22 22 19 24 24 20 29 AD +/30 30 1 6 0 2 5 NS <0. 0001 “ “ “

Natural history of hoarding • Chronic problem with gradual worsening across lifespan – 80% Natural history of hoarding • Chronic problem with gradual worsening across lifespan – 80% of patients report symptoms by age 18 • Late onset patients more often have a stressful life event at initiation • Familial component – 85% of hoarders describe a 1 st degree relative as a ‘packrat’

Distinctions in Older Patients with ‘Terrible Decline” • Hoarding versus self care deficit? – Distinctions in Older Patients with ‘Terrible Decline” • Hoarding versus self care deficit? – Or both • Long term or acute? • Decisional capacity? • Severe enough to warrant coercive action?

Assessment tools Clutter Hoarding Scale Institute for Challenging Disorganization Assessment tools Clutter Hoarding Scale Institute for Challenging Disorganization

In treating these patients, we have tried: 1. SSRIs 2. Cholinesterase Inhibitors 3. Cognitive/behaviro In treating these patients, we have tried: 1. SSRIs 2. Cholinesterase Inhibitors 3. Cognitive/behaviro al therapy 4. Occupational therapy consultation

I have been satisfied with the outcomes of my therapy 1. Yes 2. No I have been satisfied with the outcomes of my therapy 1. Yes 2. No

My patients have been happy with the outcomes of therapy 1. Yes 2. No My patients have been happy with the outcomes of therapy 1. Yes 2. No

Treatment • Medications – SSRI – possibly less effective in older patients • Cognitive Treatment • Medications – SSRI – possibly less effective in older patients • Cognitive behavioral therapy – Information processing deficits • Help sort into larger clusters – Maladaptive beliefs • I am a craftsman because I own tools – Attachment to possessions • Sentiment, control • Interprofessional team management

Self care deficit “The result of an adult’s inability due to diminished capacity to Self care deficit “The result of an adult’s inability due to diminished capacity to perform essential self-care tasks such as providing essential food, clothing, shelter, and medical care; obtaining goods and services necessary to maintain physical health, mental health, emotional well-being and general safety; and/or manage financial affairs. ” -APS

Self-Neglect – Definition Pavlou and Lachs JGIM 2008 • A Self-neglector is a person Self-Neglect – Definition Pavlou and Lachs JGIM 2008 • A Self-neglector is a person who exhibits 1 or more of the following: – 1) persistent inattention to personal hygiene and/or environment – 2) repeated refusal of some/all indicated services which can reasonably be expected to improve quality of life – 3) self endangerment through the manifestation of unsafe behaviors (e. g. persistent refusal to care for a wound, creating fire hazards in the home)

Self-neglect Annual incidence: 5. 2 per 1000 elders Self-neglect 50 -75% of elder mistreatment Self-neglect Annual incidence: 5. 2 per 1000 elders Self-neglect 50 -75% of elder mistreatment 90% of all self-neglect APS ≥ 65 y/o ♀>♂ Decreased survival 40. 3% died within 13 years follow-up • Self-neglect patients more likely to die in NH • • • Lachs et al. JAMA 1998

Clinical evaluation • Dementia • Depression • If acute, look for medical problem – Clinical evaluation • Dementia • Depression • If acute, look for medical problem – Stroke, infection, medication effect • Determination of decisional capacity

Treatment • Often emergency-related – Hip fracture, pneumonia, police incident • If incapable of Treatment • Often emergency-related – Hip fracture, pneumonia, police incident • If incapable of decisions – Refer for competency determination and guardianship • Placement likely • If capable – Inform of helpful services – Documentation of preferences for Advance Directive

Assessment tools Self neglect severity scale -Houston Geriatrics group Assessment tools Self neglect severity scale -Houston Geriatrics group

Personal appearance of subject Hair Personal appearance of subject Hair

Nails Nails

House House

Home Environment Home Environment

Bathroom Bathroom

Self Neglect Severity Scale Self Neglect Severity Scale

Decisional capacity • Competence – a legal determination in court – Appointment of a Decisional capacity • Competence – a legal determination in court – Appointment of a guardian • Of the person (medical decisions) • Of finances • Decisional capacity – a clinical decision – Decision specific – “Hierachies” of decisions • Most basic decisions honored even in presence of some impairment • May make ‘low stakes’ decisions even if unable to make ‘high stakes’ decisions

Elements of Decision Making • Ability to communicate a choice • Ability to understand Elements of Decision Making • Ability to communicate a choice • Ability to understand retain relevant information • Ability to appreciate the situation and consequences for oneself • Ability to manipulate information rationally

Ability to appreciate situation for oneself • Acknowledge that condition is present • Realizes Ability to appreciate situation for oneself • Acknowledge that condition is present • Realizes that risks and benefits apply to him/her • May involve understanding of motives for choices • What will happen if you refuse treatment? If you accept?

Manipulates information rationally • Reaches conclusions that are logically consistent with starting premises • Manipulates information rationally • Reaches conclusions that are logically consistent with starting premises • Again, may involve description of motives • Please help me to understand why you decided to accept/refuse treatment

Summary • Older patients with hoarding behaviors have higher likelihood of co-existing dementia – Summary • Older patients with hoarding behaviors have higher likelihood of co-existing dementia – Time course of progression is critical information • Hoarding and self neglect frequently co-exist in older patients – Assessment tools can help guide team planning and followup • The determination of decisional capacity is often critical • Local regulation about safety standards is important in action steps

The Eye of the Beholder The Eye of the Beholder

Resources/References • The Institute for Challenging Disorganization: – www. challengingdisorganization. org • Valente, Sharon. Resources/References • The Institute for Challenging Disorganization: – www. challengingdisorganization. org • Valente, Sharon. The Hoarding Syndrome. Home Health Care Nurse 27: 432. 2009 – WWW. homehealthcarenurseonline. com • Guilliam, CM and Tolin, DF. Compulsive Hoarding. Bulletin of the Menniger Clinic 74: 93. 2010. • Dyer, CB et al. Self-neglect among the elderly; Am J of Public Health 97: 1671. 2007