Greetings and Welcome to the first Aqua Fish

Greetings and Welcome to the first Aqua. Fish CRSP annual meeting (next year’s meeting will be in Seattle USA in Feb 2009) hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Your affiliation (your organization/ university/center) One interesting thing you have learned from working on your CRSP activity (can be an anecdote, lesson, frustration, human interest experience, research breakthrough) How many CRSP annual meetings have you attended? (try to recall or give approximate number such as more than 3 but less than 10) hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Program Name: Aqua. Fish CRSP • Aquaculture & Fisheries CRSP - CA/LWA contract title from USAID RFA hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

• Logo and Acknowledgement Slide http: //pdacrsp. oregonstate. edu/afcrsp/info_pis. php • OR go to pdacrsp. oregonstate. edu and Link to new site, then link to Info for PIs hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Agenda • • • Changes Proxies Questions about the agenda hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Housekeeping • Lead HCPI luncheon by invitation 12 noon Peony Room Westin • Evening reception at APEC Sun 630 pm -- use path in front of hotel. Coupons, addnl guests • BEXCO bus Tues & Wed schedule • CRSP free (unguided) tours on Sun & Mon to UN Memorial (0900 -1030), and Beomeosa Temple (1300 -1700) -- for friends and family Sign up ASAP at CRSP registration desk hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

More Housekeeping • BEXCO bus route Monday after meeting. Free CRSP shuttle to BEXCO • Leave Westin at 520 pm for BEXCO • One more run after that • ~6 pm WAS Welcome reception and Registration at BEXCO hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Meeting Etiquette • • • Listen well Stay within your presentation time allotment Be respectful of others’ ideas and opinions • Notetakers, recorders, photos will document this meeting • Voting privileges hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Advisory Groups Flexible structure • External -EPAC policy-setting • Internal -DTAP -RCE • Other -EIP -IR hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

External Program Advisory Council (EPAC) • advice to the ME on global program direction input into CRSP RFPs • annual critiques of projects to assist ME • gaps and issues in global portfolio • proposal review process as needed, no COI • information on linkages (FAO, WB, IARCs…) No program evaluation by EPAC - USAID function hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Main Emphasis for DTAP and RCE: the two internal technical advisory groups build community among all CRSP participants identify potential additional partnerships bridge the knowledge gap from localregional to global development outcomes hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Internal DTAP and RCE • Private sector, NGO, and other nonawardee stakeholders - ex-officio members of the centers • Chairs - establish performance-based standards for rules of conduct by NOV 07 : ( [from Orientation meeting] • integrating cross-cutting needs across regions and themes • DTAP and RCE work together hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

DTAP : Development Themes Advisory Panel • Technical advice on emerging issues and gaps in the portfolio from a thematic perspective. • 4 DTAP panels gather information for reporting on biodiversity and biotechnology for USAID. • Not policy setting; no competitive proposal reviews hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

4 DTAP • DTAP A: Improved Health and Nutrition, Food Quality, and Food Safety • DTAP B: Income Generation for Small. Scale Fishers and Farmers • DTAP C: Environmental Management for Sustainable Aquatic Resources Use • DTAP D: Enhanced Trade Opportunities for Global Fishery Markets hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

DTAP Lead Coordinators • • • DTAP A (nutrition): Maria Haws DTAP B (income): Kwamena Quagrainie DTAP C (environment): Bob Pomeroy DTAP D (trade): Jim Diana (Yang Yi, proxy) DTAP Chair: Jim Diana (Maria Haws, proxy) hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

DTAP Lead Coordinators • assist the ME in cases where a screening process is required in advance of an Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) • reviewing WP/IP changes • recommend policies for technical hotissues hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

RCE: Regional Centers of Excellence • Provide technical advice on emerging issues and gaps in the portfolio from a regional perspective • Develop useful materials for Missions, regional stakeholders and end-users • Gauge opportunities for collaboration hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

3 RCE Lead Coordinators • • Asia: Remedios Bolivar Africa: Charles Ngugi LAC: Wilfrido Contreras RCE Chair: Remedios Bolivar hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

RCE Lead coordinators • assist ME when a screening process is required before IEE • integrate Associate Award partners into the portfolio and manage any Associate Awards that fall under RCE purview (e. g. Mali project) hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

EIP: Emerging Issues Panel • provides scientific advice to the Management Team and USAID • OSU faculty volunteers • not engaged in CRSP activities and not considered CRSP staff • non-voting, non-policy setting hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

IR: Institutional Representatives • named by each sub-award entity as an institutional back-up for administrative and financial control purposes • contact points in case a PI needs to be replaced; for handling emergencies/ disaster evacuations • typically Deans, VPs, Contracts Officers, or COOs from sub-award entities • non-voting, non-policy setting, not BOD hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

CRSP Management & Organization • OSU Lead; HSE Lead PI • Central Admin; CAS; EIP - OSU • MT staff: Director (OSU) Hillary Egna RPM (CRSP) TBD Office/Business Manager (FT CRSP) Dwight Brimley Outreach & Capacity Bldg Coordinator (FT CRSP) Jim Bowman Lisa Riefke MS degree student Communications & Publications (FT CRSP) temp, Laura Morison hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Reporting Lines • • DTAP, RCE, EPAC, EIP report to Director ME reports to USAID Projects report to MT (Director & staff) MT staff report to Director; Director reports to CAS • Missions, RO -- EGAT -- MT (context) hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Synthesizing findings across the global portfolio • Participatory planning to refine results framework • Pre-synthesis workshop • Use DTAP & RCE to synthesize findings across regions & themes • Dedicated synthesis project • ME synthesis on global data on training & capacity building • ME coordination of lessons learned & Synthesis activities above hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Synthesis & Lessons Learned • Active participation from DTAP and RCE, and all project participants • M&E system based on USAID goals and on 2 factors for data collection • Requires clear guidance from USAID – Moving target so set some goals now hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Sun 5/18 1445 h Indicators USAID Program Area: Agriculture Feb 2008 • Program Area: Agriculture • EGAT Goal (OP 2007): • ｷ Increasing per capita food production and rural incomes • ｷ Raising agriculture value added • ｷ Development and delivery of new and improved technologies, products, and management practices; • ｷ Consolidation and dissemination of best practices; piloting new approaches; and field support. • F 3 rd party indicators: • ｷ Percent change in growth in agriculture value added • ｷ Percent change in per capita food production index • ｷ Percent change in rural income of targeted population hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

performance, and securing access to and building assets ｷ Pilot, consolidate and disseminate best practices and new approaches to institutional capacity building ｷ Undertake policy assessments and increasing capacity in areas such as biosafety and trade to increase participation in hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Program Element: 4. 5. 2; Agriculture Sector Productivity EGAT Goal (OP 2007): ｷ Mobilizing global scientific expertise to maintain and enhance sector productivity, using new tools to achieve breakthroughs in key traits such as drought tolerance, disease resistance and nutritional quality, in crops and livestock ｷ Facilitating private and public sector cooperation to bridge private sector investment—much of it proprietary—with the needs of lower income producers ｷ Building human capacity in science and technology, including agribusiness and management skills ｷ Working with producers and local organizations to link producers to markets and to agro-enterprises that enhance product value, quality and safety. hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Program Element 4. 5. 3: Program Support EGAT Goal: ｷ Bring the global power of science and technology to the country level through partnerships with the private sector and advanced research institutions ｷ Provide technical leadership and field support for Agency efforts to improve the capabilities of rural producers and agroenterprises to increase their agricultural sector productivity. ｷ Assist governments to provide technology, strengthen human and institutional capacity, reform food policy, rebuild markets and establish a secure environment for agriculture investment. ｷ Assessments and evaluations to help guide the best use of funds. hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

AG_ATGO_AF_5. 1_Rev 4 -2 -08. doc Section 5: Implementing Mechanism Prime Partner Name: A prime partner is an entity which receives funding directly from, and has a direct contractual relationship (contract, cooperative agreement, grant, etc. ) with, the USG Agency. Oregon State University Implementing Mechanism Name: The Implementing Mechanism Name is the name given to the award. This could also be considered the “project” name. This cell should include the contract/agreement number and the name. EPP-A-00 -06 -00012 -00, Aquaculture and Fisheries Collaborative Research Support Program Implementing Mechanism Location: The selection here should answer the question of “where is the procurement for this specific funding action taking place? ” 1. Central/Functional 2. Central/Regional 3. Field/Regional 4. Field/Bilateral Implementing Mechanism Type: The Implementing Mechanism Type (or instrument) is a contract, grant, bilateral agreement, or other mechanism that obligates or sub-obligates funds. Program Element: 4. 5. 1 Agricultural Enabling Environment hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07

Mali Indicators and Targets Mali EG 5. 2 Agricultural Sector Productivity Baseline FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 15. Number of new technologies or management practices under field testing as a result of USG assistance. /IEHA same as FACTS Indicator 0 0 6 6 16. Number of new technologies or management practices made available for transfer as a result of USG assistance. /IEHA same as FACTS Indicator 0 0 2 2 0 15 75 65 Number of farmers who have adopted new technologies or new management practices as a result of USG assistance. 0 0 8 8 Number of processors who have adopted new technologies or new management practices as a result of USG assistance. 0 0 2 2 26. Number of individuals who have received USGsupported short-term agricultural sector productivity training/Male attendance at ST training; Female attendance at ST Training, on agricultural sector productivity IEHA hse, Aqua. Fish DC 5. 21. 07