Green Suppliers Network E 3: Columbus (Energy, Economy, Environment) NIST MEP
The Process REVIEW TYPE University of Dayton Industrial Assessment Center and Tech. Solve, the Ohio Manufacturing Extension Partnership. Green Suppliers Network Energy Assessments Energy assessments are conducted by the review team. The team will use tools from the Do. E’s Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy programs. Additionally, expertise from the Do. E’s Industrial Assessment Centers may be incorporated. Carbon Footprint Analysis 2 A “lean” and “clean” review is performed by the review team on a process or product line. The review will identify opportunities in k. Wh conservation, gallon reduction in water pollution, pounds reduction in air emissions and pounds reduction in solid waste. Manufacturers will be trained on Lean and Clean tools to build internal capacity for continuous improvement. Recently developed US EPA tools which provide assistance in Green House Gas (GHG) Management for small businesses and low emitters will be incorporated to ensure that those manufacturers less familiar with GHG analysis can provide meaningful data in support of the E 3 project and the City of Columbus. NIST MEP
The Players • • 3 USEPA USDOC – NIST MEP State of Ohio USDOE AEP – (utility) City of Columbus DOL, SBA SWACO NIST MEP
W 5 = Win Ohio Win City of Columbus Win Manufacturers Win Federal Partners Win AEP Wi n fo • Re r. C cog ity NIS nit of C • Ac T fo ion f olu ces r g rom mb fur s to ree US us EP • Re ther con ning p • Pr cogn ilot a gress Colu A, Do m oac itio E s i car tive n by socia onal f bus , and und bon ly a “Co ted pr s leg ddr n isla ess feren ogra to ms es tion ce in a upco of M via min ayo rs” g ble ma nor ers rtn Pa ork ral at de t th can w to e p F or nce cts ow in f f co proje on h y for W o f d g ne ate roo ing s p reen s lear n str e G vid y g on tio GH G Pro untar less enta • l of n GH l a o vo vides plem go ro ify im s cy ation n c • P od tie ge m re ci ith a d edu u fut ists w s an ss ction • A du re ions t op 4 012 y 2 er b or W om in f 0 M cust W 00 om 1 e r to e fr ativ niti ability ose com I l to in Pc bal AE (85% Glo susta hip by O ts s n o • Ge ving s) lint rs on zens PUC sa gram eet C sume te citi and pro s to m e con rpora ERES lp C co at • He educ good ls of ting a por o ers t go re st ng • Fo omoti CDP pr ports Win p • Inc for m • Su reas anu prod es p fact urer • Re uction roduct s duc ivity c whi prod es en osts le re • Pro uct cr vironm duc eati acti enta ing on carb vely l im add pac on l • Po ress t of egis te thei earl ntial co lation es upc r Win for State of Ohio omi y ad mpe in a ng viab opti t on a itive ad le m • Shovel ready project which may a ctiv v ities antag nor e du qualify for stimulus package money e to • Opportunity to partner with Obama administration • Paired with SB 221 proves Ohio’s focus on developing a green economy • Recognition from US EPA, Do. E, and NIST for greening Columbus P AE NIST MEP
Implementation Timeline Step 1: List of potential manufacturers generated based upon electricity demand (for those in the ‘large’ category’) and for supplier to AEP and/or affiliation with other GSN champions (for those in the ‘medium’ and ‘small’ categories). Target number would be approximately 35 manufacturers. Timeframe: December 2008 - January 2009 Step 2: Discuss benefits of E 3 project with Mayor’s office and AEP executives. E 3 project includes lean & clean review, energy audit and carbon footprint analysis for each company. Timeframe: January 2009 - February 2009 Step 3: Contact initial 5 companies, confirm interest and begin pilot performance to confirm proof of concept and develop “lessons learned” for future participants of the E 3 project. Carry out reviews, energy audit and carbon footprint analysis for 5 pilot companies. Timeframe: March 2009 – August 2009 Step 4: Gather data on proposed savings (WALE), and on carbon reporting for pilot group of E 3 manufacturers within City of Columbus. Publish report discussing project, savings and future implementation learnings. Timeframe: October 2009 Step 5: Contact additional potential companies and confirm participation for 25 to 35 manufacturers. Timeframe: November 2009 – December 2009 Step 6: Perform balance of project with 25 to 35 manufacturers using pilot’s lessons learned. Carry out reviews, energy audit and carbon footprint analysis for these 25 to 35 manufacturers. Timeframe: January 2010 – August 2010 Step 7: Gather data on proposed savings (WALE), and on carbon reporting for this larger group of E 3 manufacturers within City of Columbus. Publish final report discussing project, savings and future implementation learnings. Provide recognition to City of Columbus and to participating manufacturers as a E 3 participant by the US EPA. Timeframe: October 2010 5 NIST MEP
Project commitment • • AEP suppliers Substantial solid waste generators Greenhouse gas credits Confidentiality concerns – Pet food company – Steel foundry • Funding sources 6 NIST MEP
Project commit & delivery status • • • 7 Metal fabricator Bottling company Auto parts manufacturer Steel foundry Pharmaceutical manufacturer NIST MEP
Metrics and implementation • Post assessment assistance not yet resolved • Metrics reporting – Water use, air, solid & haz waste – Economic/lean metrics – Energy k. Wh, $, CO 2 • Intern stimulus funds (DOL) • Utility and state incentives 8 NIST MEP
Скачать презентацию Green Suppliers Network E 3 Columbus Energy Economy
14d11dadea87ce6b030f2a9eb13860b4.ppt