Скачать презентацию GOES USERS CONFERENCE IV Discussion Highlights Concept of Скачать презентацию GOES USERS CONFERENCE IV Discussion Highlights Concept of

c9080fa6e3e20ff7cf0343573bb061ec.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 6

GOES USERS’ CONFERENCE IV: Discussion Highlights Concept of Operations – CONOPS Doris Hood GOES GOES USERS’ CONFERENCE IV: Discussion Highlights Concept of Operations – CONOPS Doris Hood GOES Users’ Conference IV May 1 -3, 2006 Broomfield, CO Prepared by Integrated Work Strategies, LLC 1

1) Should the requests for operational modes be prioritized and either granted or rejected 1) Should the requests for operational modes be prioritized and either granted or rejected by one single point of contact in order to maintain a swift and efficient process? If yes, where should this authority lie? If no, please provide alternative solutions. n n n A single point of contact for operational mode prioritization is most effective / efficient SDM is still the logical choice Requires automation to support the decision process GOES Users’ Conference IV May 1 -3, 2006 Broomfield, CO Prepared by Integrated Work Strategies, LLC 2

2) Please share your thoughts to help develop guidelines for prioritizing change requests. n 2) Please share your thoughts to help develop guidelines for prioritizing change requests. n n n ABI operational mode already defined Define and prioritize users and their respective requests Set up rules and business practices to anticipate decisions before event occurs Identify events which would drive automated changes to the standard schedule Life and property take precedence over scientific pursuits GOES Users’ Conference IV May 1 -3, 2006 Broomfield, CO Prepared by Integrated Work Strategies, LLC 3

3) Please provide suggestions on the process of issuing requests for GOES-R operational modes. 3) Please provide suggestions on the process of issuing requests for GOES-R operational modes. n n Assume question addresses overall semipermanent scan modes Post-launch review of products and system capabilities to refine operational modes ABI and HES probably have different request processes Create senior user advisory group to address new requirements for operational scan mode GOES Users’ Conference IV May 1 -3, 2006 Broomfield, CO Prepared by Integrated Work Strategies, LLC 4

4) Please provide suggestions on the synergistic use of GOES-R and NPOESS for your 4) Please provide suggestions on the synergistic use of GOES-R and NPOESS for your application. n n Synergistic coverage of severe weather Schedule GOES-R coverage to coincide (time and location) with NPOESS coverage – NPOESS cannot chose its time of coverage of an area • • • n Calibration Cloud clearing Data fusion / sharpening Prioritization of NPOESS product generation could be driven by GOES-R event tip-offs GOES Users’ Conference IV May 1 -3, 2006 Broomfield, CO Prepared by Integrated Work Strategies, LLC 5

5) What other questions or issues would you like the group to address regarding 5) What other questions or issues would you like the group to address regarding CONOPS? n n If orbit location is off, fixed grid format is still desirable rather than blacking out invalid pixels, and still archive limb data Geostationary microwave sounder- unfunded requirement; still desirable? HES CONOPS hard to develop due to the uncertainties of the HES instrument configurations based on budget and schedule uncertainties At 2008 GOES-R User’s Conference, define strawman schedule for instrument operations GOES Users’ Conference IV May 1 -3, 2006 Broomfield, CO Prepared by Integrated Work Strategies, LLC 6