“Gliders for Research, Ocean Observation and Management” General Assembly FP 7 -Infra-2011 -2. 1. 1 : Design studies for European Research Infrastrutures 1 st October 2011 – 30 th september 2014 Duration 36 months – Periods : 2 (month 18 – month 36) Grant Agreement No: 284321 ; Total budget : 3, 5 M€ http: //www. groom-fp 7. eu 19 partners from cy, de, fr, gr, it, no, es, uk Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
WP 5 Observatory Infrastructure Daniel Hayes, Lucas Merckelbach, Angelos Hannides, Alberto Alvarez, Karim Bernadet, et al. Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
WP 6 Project Management WP 2 Integration in the GOOS WP 1 Project S/T Coordination WP 3 Scientific Innovation WP 4 Targeted Experiments WP 1. 1 Project coordination WP 1. 2 Internal & external communication WP 5 Observatory Infrastructure WP 2. 1 Assessment of a glider component in the GOOS WP 3. 1 New contributions of glider for marine research WP 4. 1 Endurance lines WP 2. 2 Legal framework WP 3. 2 Data flow and processing WP 4. 2 Fleet missions WP 5. 2 Glider payload assessment WP 2. 3 Financial framework WP 3. 3 Capacity building and training, outreach WP 4. 3 Synergies with other platforms WP 5. 3 Mission planning and analysis WP 5. 1 Ground segment description WP 5. 4 Estimated setup and running costs Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
Observatory Infrastructure Culmination of the entire project: characterize existing and future glider facilities in Europe Information gathering from partners and stakeholders, and building of summaries, glider tools and common and best practices: T 5. 1 Ground segment description T 5. 2 Glider payload assessment T 5. 3 Mission planning and analysis T 5. 4 Setup and running costs Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 1 Objectives: ground segment description Evaluate existing facilities, expertise, procedures capacities Recommend way forward to utilize those facilities efficiently and effectively Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 1 Progress: ground segment description Questionnaire formed and distributed, analyzed Booklet to summarize facilities and capabilities at present D 5. 1 Report on the design aspects of observatory ground segment Comment/input period now Gliders in Europe: >80 6 18 16 14 9 9 2 Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 1 Results: ground segment description LUCAS MODIFY? Could be organized by region Identify optimum mix of distributed, centralized, and virtual components How ports should be organized number, location, service level Stars are indicative How infrastructure accessed Discuss the JERICO TNA model Formalize and globalize EGO France – September 19, Final General Assembly – Paris, 2014
T 5. 2 Objectives: Glider payload assessment Evaluate observation capabilities and recommend new ones To assess the predominantly-measured parameters and the sensors used for them Space, power, communication requirements Review newer, recommended sensors Lab and field calibration/intercalibration protocols D 5. 2 Sensors for gliders: existing, under development, and future sensors D 5. 3 Best practices for glider missions and sensor use: preparation, operation, calibration, intercalibration/comparison, and recovery Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 2 Progress: Glider payload assessment D 5. 2 - Sensors for gliders: existing, under development, and future sensors: First complete draft (version 1) posted in July 2013 Now (September 2014) version 6 D 5. 3 - Best practices for glider missions and sensor use: preparation, operation, calibration, inter-calibration/comparison, and recovery: First complete draft (version 1) posted in September 2013 Now (September 2014) version 6 Comments welcome! Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 2 Results: Glider payload assessment D 5. 2 - Sensors for gliders: existing, under development, and future sensors | 37 sensors Developed, mission-proved, commercially available sensors for gliders: OS-TRL 4 or TRL 9 or Development status I | 25 sensors No. Parameter No. CTD 2 Dissolved oxygen 3 Chlorophyll a fluorescence 2 Phycobillins 1 Turbidity/backscatter 3 CDOM fluorescence 1 Current 4 Radiance/Irradiance/PAR 4 Animal biomass and presence 3 Marine mammal detection 2 Turbulence 2 Wind 1 Nitrate (UV) Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014 1
T 5. 2 Results: Glider payload assessment D 5. 2 - Sensors for gliders: existing, under development, and future sensors Prototypes and sensors in development for gliders: OS-TRL 2 -3 or TRL 5 -7 or Development status III | 3 sensors Readily adaptable sensors for glider use: Parameter No. OS-TRL 2 or TRL 4 or Development status IV | 10 sensors Nutrients (microfluidics) 3 Radioactivity 1 Nitrate (UV) 1 Unexploded ordnance 1 Multiple optical properties 1 Harmful algal (HAB) toxins 1 Methane 1 Carbon dioxide 1 Hydrocarbons Final General Assembly – 4 Paris, France – September 19, Bioluminescence 2014 1
T 5. 2 Results: Glider payload assessment D 5. 2 - Sensors for gliders: existing, under development, and future sensors Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 2: Glider payload assessment D 5. 3 - Best practices for glider missions and sensor use: preparation, operation, calibration, inter-calibration/comparison, and recovery Previous title: Protocols for sampling, sample analysis, inter-calibration of missions, and data analysis for the recommended parameters “Best practices” highlights why procedures are important. “Glider missions and sensor use” reflect the two main parts of the report, and the various stages of the mission Final in the report France – September 19, addressed. General Assembly – Paris, are itemized. 2014
T 5. 2: Glider payload assessment D 5. 3 - Best practices … Recommendations at three levels: (a) “strongly recommended” - fundamental/important/widely-used; (b) “Recommended” - feasible, improve performance and usability; Mission procedures Sensor procedures and • Glider inspection and preparation, • CTD (c) “Suggested” - (mostly sensors) improve data utility/applicability mission planning, deployment • Dissolved oxygen • Operation • Optical properties – general comments • Data management • Chlorophyll a fluorescence • Recovery • CDOM fluorescence • Compass calibration • Turbidity/backscatter • Pressure verification • Current • Endurance • Photosynthetically available radiation • Battery handling • Zooplankton presence/abundance • Turbulence Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 2: Glider payload assessment D 5. 3 - Best practices … Summarized in table and described in detail in text with photos and figures, if Inter-comparison design (Garau et al. 2011) Compass calibration platform (CSIC/SOCIB) appropriate. Examples: Pressure testing (CSIC/SOCIB) Inter-comparison of sensors on multiple gliders and other platforms Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014 HZG CMRE
T 5. 3 Objectives: Mission planning + analysis UPDATE! To develop a mission planning tool for fleet of gliders to maximize the information of the collected data and minimizing mission risks Develop approaches for optimal sampling strategies Investigate environmental thresholds for mission safety Risk assessment related to marine and littoral human activities Integration of mission planning tool into observatories Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 3 Objectives: Mission planning and analysis GROOM-REP 13 -Experiment FP 7 -GROOM-T 4. 2 Fleet missions and OSSEs (CMRE, DT-INSU, UPMC, SOCIB) Time: August 13 th –August 18 th Objective: Plan and execute a field trial with 3 gliders, defining optimal sampling strategies and test of automatic programs and adaptive sampling (as it is required in the GROOM Do. W) Technical approach: An automated control, navigation and supervision system for glider fleets was be tested and validated during REP 13. The system is constituted by two modules: the first module determines the optimum sampling strategy of the glider network. It also generates the navigation files encoding the commanded waypoints for all platforms in the fleet. These files are automatically transmitted to gliders by the second module of the system. This module performs the real time navigation of glider platforms by providing in an automatic way the commands needed when the platform surfaces. It also automatically detects anomalies in the mission execution producing the corresponding alerts. Deliveries: D 4. 4 Field trial of multi-glider campaign and dossier of lessons learned. D 4. 5 Evaluation of glider fleet mission planning tool, D 4. 8 Report on the acoustic component in glider observatory. Links: D 5. 6 Prototype glider mission planning White Line- Boundary of the area (~90 x 70 Km 2) Orange Line- Optimum glider trajectories (only for graphical representation) Isobaths correspond to 100, 200, 300, 400 and 1000 m depth Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 3 Progress: Mission Network Topology Glider Mission Optimum Sampling Glider Mission Optimum-Adaptive Sampling Uncertainty Gliders Sophie Elettra Zoe SCHEDULE OF ACTIONS FOR A 2 -DAY CYCLE Cycles Aug 14 -16 Aug 16 -18 Day 2 07: 00 Day 0 08: 00 Gliders surfacing positions Assembly –gliders France – September 19, Final General Start Paris, new mission Starts optimal sampling design Receive model run 2014 Starts optimal sampling design
T 5. 3 Progress: Optimum sampling and automated piloting R- Real Path P- Planned-Path Commanded to go to recovery point Discrepancies observed between automatic and possible human decision Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 3 Progress: Optimum glider network T 5. 3 Mission planning and analysis Time: 2012 Objective: Designing optimum glider network configuration for the Mediterranean and Artic Seas Deliveries: D 5. 4 Optimal design methods for North Atlantic/Artic and Mediterranean Seas Monthly uncertainty expected with Links: D 5. 6 Prototype glider mission planning Glider Ports Initial uncertainty Posterior uncertainty and optimum glider tracks (white lines) (blue) and without (black) the glider network Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 3 Results: Mission Planning T 5. 3 Mission planning and analysis Time: 2013 Objective: Development of a module for glider mission risk assessment based on My. Ocean output Deliveries: D 5. 5 Environmental conditions and glider mission risk assessment tool Links: D 5. 6 Prototype glider mission planning Input Glider trajectories Automatic Request Mission Time Currents, Density AIS information Output Risks to timely perform the mission Risk areas for buoyancy Risk of collision Global mission risk assessment Time: 2014 Objective: Integrated system with modules optimal sampling, risk assessment tool, automated control Deliveries: D 5. 6 Prototype glider mission planning Links: D 5. 4 Optimal design methods for North Atlantic/Artic and Mediterranean Seas D 5. 5 Environmental conditions and glider mission risk assessment tool Automatic Request Currents, Density AIS information Risk assessment tool Automated navigation system Optimal sampling tool Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 3 Results: Mission Planner GROOMGRAAT and GROOM Mission Planner Fleet definition Area of Operations Historical AIS Database Mission Planner Risk Assessment Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014 Gliders risk and reliability (Smeed at al. , NOC)
T 5. 3 Results: Optimum mission planner GROOMGRAAT and GROOM Mission Planner Output Report for: Optimum Sampling Risk Assessment Environment info: @int. Depth 180, dens range: 1025. 1016 1026. 8234 @int. Depth 180, salt range: 36. 8565 38. 1576 @int. Depth 180, temp range: 13. 3199 23. 8789 @int. Depth 180, u range: -0. 17769 0. 40017 @int. Depth 180, v range: -0. 29847 0. 22805 @int. Depth 1000, dens range: 1025. 1016 1026. 8234 @int. Depth 1000, salt range: 36. 8565 38. 1576 @int. Depth 1000, temp range: 12. 9077 23. 8789 @int. Depth 1000, u range: -0. 17769 0. 24078 @int. Depth 1000, v range: -0. 19675 0. 22805 Risk assessment report: Glider name : Noa Collision probability : 5. 751288 e-11 Instrument failure probability : 0. 040042 Bad ballasting : no Glider name : Elettra Collision probability : 2. 710440 e-10 Instrument failure probability : 0. 065842 Bad ballasting : no Glider name : Laura Collision probability : 8. 410647 e-10 Final General Assembly – Paris, France –failure probability : 0. 065842 September 19, Instrument 2014 Bad ballasting : no
T 5. 4 Objectives: Setup and running costs Estimate costs: What is essential to deploy a glider What is useful (intensive use of gliders) Infrastructure set-up costs: Vehicle and Sensor Hardware Laboratory facilities: hardware development, maintenance, calibration, tools Laboratory: e-infrastructure (servers, software) Using the infrastructure: preparing and operating gliders Engineering and IT staff, hardware, software, pilots, seagoing Communications, batteries, transport & customs, fieldwork Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 4 Progress: Setup and running costs Inputs: based on existing, historical figures Online questionnaire to get data for the years 2011, 2012 and 2013 (12 partners operate gliders) Results from the JERICO survey for the year 2011 and for OC-UCY, AWI, CNRS, CMRE, CSIC and SAMS Second short survey by email Email exchange to correct/complete the answers Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 4 Results: Setup and running costs Answers vary by fleet size and use of gliders, e. g. , process studies, endurance lines, geographical area of interest Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 4 Results: Setup and running costs Use of local resources (? ? ? ) – Dan, I’m not sure about this or where it came from Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 4 Results: Setup and running costs Main investments: gliders and sensors Main running costs: salaries, then consumables (batteries, data transfer costs, parts/repairs). Insurance is rare. Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 4 Results: Setup and running costs Estimation in terms of investments and running costs : What is essential to deploy a glider What would be very useful to have (intensive use of gliders) Refurbishment / owner One month mission cost – Will be completed by Friday Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 4 Results: Setup and running costs Warnings It is an estimation Numbers from partners not always precise (differences between JERICO and GROOM survey for the same question) Data hard to extract from the partners : salaries, infrastructure costs often ill-defined Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
T 5. 4 Results: Setup and running costs Needed Use cases to estimate one mission month cost Those having gliders and use refurbishment Those having gliders, prepare gliders themselves and calibration of the sensors by the manufacturer Those having gliders, prepare gliders themselves and calibrate themselves the sensors Conclusion to write: help of Geoffrey Mestchersky 1 Sep. 2014 Need feedback for. . [complete here] Final General Assembly – Paris, France – September 19, 2014
Скачать презентацию Gliders for Research Ocean Observation and Management General
0d0864b490962af3794937a30fdb4256.ppt