cd20bbb131db585b8f31b1603e208513.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 9
GGF 4 Toronto, Canada February 2002
Welcome to GGF-3 • Canadian National Research Council § Roger Impey and Claudette Tourigny • GGF Secretariat § Mary Spada, Julie Wulf, Lisa Guarnieri, Clare Spartz • Hosting Sponsors Platform Computing § Avaki Corporation § • GGF 4 Program Committee Roger Impey, NRC Program Co-Chair Malcolm Atkinson, EPSRC, GGF 5 Program Co-Chair Kyriakos Baxevanidis, CEC Alan Blatecky, NSF Randy Butler, NCSA Catherine Carter, Platform Computing Vladimir Getov, Univ. of Westminster Geoff Jordan, Level 3 Communications www. gridforum. org Domenico Laforenza, CNUCE Paul Messina, Caltech Jeffrey Nick, IBM Alexander Reinfeld, ZIB Berlin Mary Anne Scott, DOE Satoshi Sekiguchi, AIST Mary Spada, GGF Executive Director, ANL GGF 4 Toronto, Canada February 2002
Why Are We Here? • An Open Process for Development of Standards Grid “Recommendations” process modeled after Internet Standards Process (IETF) § Persistent, Reviewed Document Series (similar to RFC series) initiated October 2001 § • A Forum for Information Exchange Experiences, patterns, structures § Useful even if every application & Grid were completely separate and not interoperable…but ideally will result in interoperability! § • A Regular Gathering to Encourage Shared Effort In code development: libraries, tools… § Via resource sharing: shared Grids § In infrastructure: consensus standards § www. gridforum. org GGF 4 Toronto, Canada February 2002
GGF in Context • “Grid Computing” has much in common with major industrial thrusts § Business-to-business, Peer-to-peer, Application Service Providers, Internet Computing… • Distinguished primarily by more sophisticated sharing modalities E. g. , “run program X at site Y subject to community policy P, providing access to data at Z according to policy Q” § Secondarily by unique demands of advanced & high-performance systems § • Industry: Grids, Web Services, Peer-to-Peer § New Productivity Initiative (NPI) Ø § Aurema, Cadence, Compaq, HP, Platform) Peer-to-Peer Working Group (Pt. PWG) Ø Ø Avaki, Blue Falcon Networks, Center. Span Communications Corp. , CCL/ITRI , Data Synapse, Endeavors Technology, Entropia, Inc. , Fujitsu PC Corporation, Global Network Computers, Grid. Node, Inc. , Groove Networks, Hewlett Packard, Hitachi, Ltd. , Intel Corporation, Invisible Worlds, J. D. Edwards, Legend Computer Systems, Next Page, Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT), Open. Cola, Inc. , O'Reilly & Associates, Outhink, Inc. , Peer. Global Technologies, Inc. , Symbiant Group, Texar Corporation, 3 Path, United Devices, Uprizer, Inc. , XDegrees, Inc. BCL Computers, BIAP Systems Inc. , Cisco Systems, Colligo Networks, Inc. , Event. Xperts, Interface Dynamics, Othnet, Inc. , Structural Analysis Tech. Inc. , Thinkstream www. gridforum. org Adapted from Ian Foster, ANL/UC GGF 4 Toronto, Canada February 2002
GGF Sponsors 2002* • “Charter” (≥$50 k) § § § Argonne National Laboratory NASA US DOE Ø § Office of Scientific Computing Research US NSF Ø Division for Advanced Computational Infrastructure and Research (ACIR) • Platinum ($25 -49 k) § § § § • Gold Sponsors ($10 -24 k) Compaq IBM Intel Hewlett-Packard Microsoft Platform Computing Qwest Sun Microsystems www. gridforum. org Level(3) § NCSA § SDSC • Silver Sponsors ($5 -9 k) § Avaki § Entropia § Fujitsu America § In. SORS § Johnson & Johnson § United Devices § University of Virginia § *as of Feb 2002 GGF 4 Toronto, Canada February 2002
Current GGF Groups (circa 1/2002) AREA • Working Groups (14) • Research Groups (9) Grid Information Services • Grid Object Specification • Grid Notification Framework • Metacomputing Directory Services • Relational Database Information Services Scheduling and Resource Management • • Security • Grid Security Infrastructure • Grid Certificate Policy Performance • Grid Perf Monitoring Architecture • Network Monitoring/Measurement Architectures • JINI • NPI Architecture • Grid Protocol Architecture • Accounting Models Data • Grid. FTP • Data Replication Applications, Programming Models, and User Environments www. gridforum. org Grid Resource Management Distrib Resrc Mgmt Application API Scheduling Dictionary Scheduler Attributes • • • Applications Grid User Services Grid Computing Env. Adv Programming Models Adv Collaboration Env GGF 4 Toronto, Canada February 2002
Proposed GGF Groups (circa 1/2002) AREA • Proposed Working Groups (8) • Proposed Research Groups (7) Scheduling and Resource Management • Scheduling Command Line API • Scheduling Optimization Performance • Sensor Management • Grid Event Service Architectures • Open Grid Services Architecture • Grid Economies • Software Licensing Data • Archiving Command Line API • Persistent Archives • Data. Grid Schema • Application Metadata • Network Storage Area TBD… • Open Source Software Licensing • Cluster Standardization • High-Performance Networks for Grids Group Formation process is 3 -steps*: (1) Develop a Charter, (2) Hold a BOF at a GGF meeting for community input (3) Steering Group approval (review of proposed charter & BOF results) (4) *steps 1 & 2 can happen in any order www. gridforum. org GGF 4 Toronto, Canada February 2002
GGF Steering Group (GFSG) • Steering Group Area Directors § § § § Ruth Aydt (UIUC) Charlie Catlett (ANL) [Chair] Andrew Chien (Entropia) Ian Foster (ANL/UC) Andrew Grimshaw (Avaki) Marty Humphrey (UVa) Bill Johnston (LBL) Domenico La. Forenza (CNUCE) Satoshi Matsuoka (Tokyo Inst. Tech) Jarek Nabrzyski (PSNC) Jenny Schopf (ANL) Steve Tuecke (ANL) Satoshi Sekiguchi (ETL) www. gridforum. org • Proposed New Members Jeff Nick (IBM) § Cees De. Laat (UVA/NL) § Ian Baird (NPI) § Bill Nitzberg (Veridian) § Peter Clarke (UCL/UK) § Ken Klingenstein (Internet 2) • Structure § Two area directors per area § Liaisons with Other Groups § Ø IETF/IRTF, Internet 2, Pt. PWG GGF 4 Toronto, Canada February 2002
Recommendations Track Documents • Objectives Individual or non-GGF group submits Draft to GFD Editor as candidate Community Practice Document (GFSG annual review of progress) GFD Editor review s draft GGF WG submits GFD-R. P + GFD-E docs to AD’s GFD Editor returns draft GFD Editor posts & announces GWD-R. P GFD Editor submits draft to WG or RG for consideration GFD Editor submits draft to GFSG Area Director(s ) review request AD(s) and GFD Editor Conduct Formal External Review N Y Area Director( s) Provide Feedbac k to WG Chairs 60 -day Public Comment Area Director(s) submit request to GFSG 15 -day GFSG Comment GFD Edito r revie ws com ment s N GFD Editor returns draft Y N GFD Edito r revie ws com ment s Y GFS G revie ws requ est Y GFD Editor posts & announces GFD-R. P C. Catlett 12 -Oct-2001 Proposed www. gridforum. org • Process 4 -Month Formal Review and Public Comment § § § Area Director(s) Summarize External Review § § N Area Director( s) Provide Feedbac k to WG Chairs GFD Editor returns draft, removes from GWD index GGF Document Process Recommendations Track Drafts To document a particular technical specification or a particular set of guidelines for the application of a technical specification. § To guide interoperability and promote standard approaches. § Does not necessarily imply exclusivity § GGF WG or RG chairs submit Draft to GFD Editor as candidate Community Practice Document (minimum 6 months) GFS G Exa mine s Revi ews N Y GFD Editor posts & announces GFD-R 15 d GFSG Review 60 d Public Comment ≥ 6 month experience in field ≥ 2 interoperable implementations 4 month formal external review • Review Relevance, intellectual and technical quality § Evidence of wide applicability and practice § Final GGF 4 Toronto, Canada February 2002
cd20bbb131db585b8f31b1603e208513.ppt