Скачать презентацию GEOG 80 Transport Geography Professor Dr Jean-Paul Скачать презентацию GEOG 80 Transport Geography Professor Dr Jean-Paul

66b695d92b236165c162818eaeabafeb.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 41

GEOG 80 – Transport Geography Professor: Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue Topic 3 – Transportation Modes GEOG 80 – Transport Geography Professor: Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue Topic 3 – Transportation Modes A. A Diversity of Modes B. Intermodal Transportation C. Passengers or Freight?

5. Air Transport ■ Context • Air routes are practically unlimited: • • North 5. Air Transport ■ Context • Air routes are practically unlimited: • • North Atlantic. Inside North America and Europe. Over the North Pacific. Inside Asia. • Multidimensional constraints: • Site (a commercial plane needs about 3, 300 meters of track for landing and take off). • Climate, fog and aerial currents. • Air activities are linked to the tertiary and quaternary sectors: • Finance and tourism that require movements of people. • Accommodating growing quantities of high value freight.

5. Air Transport ■ Air Space • Segment of the atmosphere that is under 5. Air Transport ■ Air Space • Segment of the atmosphere that is under the jurisdiction of a nation or under an international agreement for its use. • Two major components: • Land-based; takeoffs and landings. • Air-based; composed of air corridors. • Air corridors can superimpose themselves to altitudes up to 22, 500 meters. • Limited to the use of predetermined corridors. ■ Air space use • Air space exclusively belongs to the country under it. • Access to the land air-based components is dependent on agreements between nations and

Air Freedom Rights First Home Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Seventh Eight Ninth Country Air Freedom Rights First Home Second Third Fourth Fifth Sixth Seventh Eight Ninth Country B Country A

5. Air Transport ■ Development of air transportation • Technical improvements: • Jet engine 5. Air Transport ■ Development of air transportation • Technical improvements: • Jet engine considerably reduced distances, namely because of greater speeds and improved ranges. • Almost every part of the world can be serviced in less than 24 hours. • Rising affluence: • Linked with income and economic output growth. • Disposable income available for leisure. • International tourism and air transportation are mutually interdependent. • Globalization: • Trade networks established by multinational corporations. • About 40% of the value of global manufactured exports. • About 50% of the value of American overseas - non-NAFTA - exports.

Main Commercial Passenger Aircraft, 19352006 Aircraft Year of First Commercial Service Speed (km/hr) Maximum Main Commercial Passenger Aircraft, 19352006 Aircraft Year of First Commercial Service Speed (km/hr) Maximum Range at Full Payload (km) Seating Capacity Douglas DC-3 1935 346 563 30 Douglas DC-7 1953 555 5, 810 52 Boeing 707 -100 1958 897 6, 820 110 Boeing 727 -100 1963 917 5, 000 94 Boeing 747 -100 1970 907 9, 045 385 Mc. Donnell Douglas DC-10 1971 908 7, 415 260 Airbus A 300 1974 847 3, 420 269 Boeing 767 -200 1982 954 5, 855 216 Boeing 747 -400 1989 939 13, 444 416 Boeing 777 -200 ER 1995 905 13, 420 305 Airbus A 340 -500 2003 886 15, 800 313 Airbus A 380 2006 930 14, 800 555

Early Intercontinental Air Routes, 1930 s th A B rin Botwood Da ka r Early Intercontinental Air Routes, 1930 s th A B rin Botwood Da ka r Khartoum Juba Nairobi Mbeya Na tal Sa Rio nti ag o Bu e no s. A Pu nta ire Ar en as s de Harare Johannesburg Ja ne iro Cape Town h ar ja Sh K uw ai t New York D a B yr a ag z B as hd Za ra ad wr di s en i s London Amsterdam Paris Toulouse Lisbon Marseilles Ali Azores T c Ca ang ante Alexandria Ag sab ier Cairo Gaza ad la ir nc a Wadi Halfa Ja s G k w K ada ar r Jo ach d i A hp llh ur ah C ab M Pa al ed ad A cu le an ky tt m a R ba J an ab A Su aka ng B go an ra rta Si lur ba ng Se gk on ya ap ta ok K or r up e an W K g ai a ng M the ap ou ri Lo u ng nt ne D C ar ha re Isa w rle ac in Sy vi h lle dn ey B ris ba ne Eyeries Imperial Airways African Route (c 1933) Imperial Airways/Quantas Australian Route (c 1934) Aeropostale (1930) KLM Amsterdam – Jakarta (1935) Pan American Transatlantic Route (1939)

Flight Times by Piston and Jet Engines from Chicago Piston Engine 10 hours 15 Flight Times by Piston and Jet Engines from Chicago Piston Engine 10 hours 15 hours 20 hours 24 hours 30 hours rs 40 u ho urs 20 ho urs o 4 h 15 10 hours ho ur s Jet Engine 2

Average Airfare (roundtrip) between New York and London, 1946 -2004 Average Airfare (roundtrip) between New York and London, 1946 -2004

77 7 -1 A 3 B- 20 (3 , 70 0 k m ) 77 7 -1 A 3 B- 20 (3 , 70 0 k m ) Range from New York of Different Modern Commercial Jet Planes 00 ) (7, 40 00 0 k m) B- 7 0 40 47 ( , 4 11 km

World Air Travel and World Air Freight Carried, 1950 -2002 World Air Travel and World Air Freight Carried, 1950 -2002

5. Air Transport ■ Airline companies • Highly capital intensive segment of transport services. 5. Air Transport ■ Airline companies • Highly capital intensive segment of transport services. • Labor intensive, with limited room to lessen those labor requirements. • Around 900 airlines operating 11, 600 commercial aircrafts. • Average number of 200 seats per plane. • Dominant share of the traffic is assumed by large passengers and freight carriers. ■ Strategic alliances • Joint booking systems, exchange of shares, and a reorganization of their services in order to minimize redundancy. • Increased market dominance but also increased

World’s 10 Largest Passengers Airlines, 2000 (in 1, 000 passengers) World’s 10 Largest Passengers Airlines, 2000 (in 1, 000 passengers)

World’s 10 Largest Freight Airlines, 2000 (in 1, 000 tons) World’s 10 Largest Freight Airlines, 2000 (in 1, 000 tons)

Market Share of World Airline Traffic, 2003 Oneworld American Airlines, British Airways, Aer Lingus, Market Share of World Airline Traffic, 2003 Oneworld American Airlines, British Airways, Aer Lingus, Cathay Pacific, Finnair, Iberia, Lan. Chile, Quantas Star United Airlines, Lufthansa, Air Canada, Air New Zealand, ANA, Asiana, Austrian, bmi british midland, LOT Polish Airlines, Mexicana, SAS, Singapore, Spanair, Thai Airways, Varig, US Airways, TAM Sky. Team Air France, Delta Airlines, Aeromexico, Alitalia, CSA Czech Airlines, Korean Air, Northwest,

5. Air Transport ■ Flows • 1. 4 billion passengers traveled by air transport 5. Air Transport ■ Flows • 1. 4 billion passengers traveled by air transport (2000). • 2. 8 billion departures and arrivals supported by airports. • Equivalent of 23% of the global population. • 30 million tons of freight were transported. • Air traffic is globally highly imbalanced: • Distribution of the population. • Unequal levels of development. • Concentration of traffic in a limited number of hubs. • 80% of the global population lives in the Northern Hemisphere: • Air traffic is much denser north of the equator. • North America and Europe accounted for 70. 4% of all passenger movements in 2000.

Major Air Traffic Flows Between Regions, 2000 (% of IATA Scheduled Passengers) North America Major Air Traffic Flows Between Regions, 2000 (% of IATA Scheduled Passengers) North America 1. 7 3. 9 Europe 23. 2 35. 5 1. 8 15. 9 1. 3 Central America 1. 3 South America 1. 7 1. 9 1. 5 Middle East Asia 1. 1 Africa Southwest Pacific 3. 2 2. 6

6. Modal Competition ■ Integrated transportation systems • Requires maximum flexibility. • Modal competition 6. Modal Competition ■ Integrated transportation systems • Requires maximum flexibility. • Modal competition exists at various degrees and takes several dimensions. • Modes can compete or complement each other: • Cost, speed, accessibility, frequency, safety, comfort, etc. • Intermodal transportation: • Opened many opportunities for complementarity. • Intense competition over many modes in the transport chain.

Four Travel Options between New York and Boston, 2004 Mode Price (one way) Time Four Travel Options between New York and Boston, 2004 Mode Price (one way) Time Limo. Liner (luxury bus) $69 4 hours Acela (Amtrak train) $99 3 hours Greyhound bus $30 4 hours Air Shuttle $128 1 hour (plus check in)

6. Modal Competition ■ Three dimensions of modal competition • Modal usage: • Comparative 6. Modal Competition ■ Three dimensions of modal competition • Modal usage: • Comparative advantage of using a specific or a combination of modes. • Distance remains one of the basic determinant of modal usage. • The basic determinants of modal usage for passengers transportation. • For a similar distance, costs, speed and comfort can be significant factors. • Infrastructure usage: • Competition resulting from the presence of freight and passenger traffic on the same itineraries linking the same nodes. • Market area: • Competition being experienced between transport terminals

Modal Competition Infrastructure / Route Mode B 1 B 2 B B B A Modal Competition Infrastructure / Route Mode B 1 B 2 B B B A A 5 4 3 Market Area 6 A A A

Passenger Transport by Mode, Japan, 19501999 Passenger Transport by Mode, Japan, 19501999

B – Intermodal Transportation ■ 1. Intermodalism ■ 2. Containerization ■ 3. Modal Choice B – Intermodal Transportation ■ 1. Intermodalism ■ 2. Containerization ■ 3. Modal Choice and Intermodal Transport Costs

1. Intermodalism ■ Integrated transport systems • Use of at least two different modes 1. Intermodalism ■ Integrated transport systems • Use of at least two different modes in a trip from origin to destination through an intermodal transport chain. • Brought about in part by technology. • Techniques for transferring freight from one mode to another have facilitated intermodal transfers. • The container has been the major development: • Becoming a privileged mode of shipping for rail and maritime transportation.

Intermodal Transport Chain Interchange Composition Connection Local / Regional Distribution National / International Distribution Intermodal Transport Chain Interchange Composition Connection Local / Regional Distribution National / International Distribution Transport Terminal Decomposition

40 -Foot Containers Doublestacked on a Rail Car 40 -Foot Containers Doublestacked on a Rail Car

Multimodal and Intermodal Transportation Multimodal Point-to-Point Network C A Intermodal Integrated Network C A Multimodal and Intermodal Transportation Multimodal Point-to-Point Network C A Intermodal Integrated Network C A B B Transshipment Rail Road D D Transshipment F E

2. Containerization ■ Container • Load unit that can be used by several transport 2. Containerization ■ Container • Load unit that can be used by several transport modes. • Usable by maritime, railway and road modes. • Foremost expression on intermodal transportation. • Rectangular shape that can easily be handled. • Reference size is the Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit (TEU). • The most common container is the 40 footer (12 meters)

2. Containerization ■ Advantages of containers • Standard transport product: • Can be manipulated 2. Containerization ■ Advantages of containers • Standard transport product: • Can be manipulated anywhere in the world (ISO standard). • All segments of the industry have access to the standard. • Specialized ships, trucks and wagons. • Flexibility of usage: • • Transport a wide variety of goods ranging. Raw materials, manufactured goods, cars to frozen products. Liquids (oil and chemical products). Perishable food products (“reefers”; 50% of all refrigerated cargo). • Management: • Unique identification number and a size type code. • Transport management no not in terms of loads, but in terms of unit.

2. Containerization • Costs: • Low transport costs, • Speed: • Transshipment operations are 2. Containerization • Costs: • Low transport costs, • Speed: • Transshipment operations are minimal and rapid. • Containerships are on average 35% (19 knots versus 14 knots) faster than regular freighter ships. • Warehousing: • Its own warehouse. • Simpler and less expensive packaging. • Stacking capacity on ships, trains (doublestacking) and on the ground. • Security: • Contents of the container is unknown to shippers. • Can only be opened at the origin, at customs and at the destination. • Spoilage and losses (theft), especially those of valued

Five Generations of Containerships First Generation (1956 -1970) Length Draft Converted Cargo Vessel Converted Five Generations of Containerships First Generation (1956 -1970) Length Draft Converted Cargo Vessel Converted Tanker 135 m TEU 500 <9 m 800 200 m Second Generation (1970 -1980) Cellular Containership 215 m 10 m 1, 000 – 2, 500 Third Generation (1980 -1988) 3, 000 250 m 11 -12 m Panamax Class 290 m 4, 000 Fourth Generation (1988 -2000) Post Panamax 275 – 4, 000 – 11 -13 m 5, 000 305 m Fifth Generation (2000 -? ) Post Panamax Plus 335 m 13 -14 m 5, 000 – 8, 000

Stacked 40 -Foot Containers Stacked 40 -Foot Containers

20 -Foot Container on Truck 20 -Foot Container on Truck

20 -Foot Tank Containers 20 -Foot Tank Containers

40’ Reefer 40’ Reefer

“Kegger” “Kegger”

4 th Generation Containership 4 th Generation Containership

2. Containerization ■ Disadvantages • Consumption of space. • Infrastructure costs: • Container handling 2. Containerization ■ Disadvantages • Consumption of space. • Infrastructure costs: • Container handling infrastructures, such as giant cranes, warehousing facilities and inland road and rail access, represent important investments for port authorities and load centers. • Stacking. • Management logistics: • Requires management and tracking of every container. • Empty travel. • Illicit trade: • Common instrument used in the illicit trade of drug and weapons, as well as for illegal immigration. • Worries about the usage of containers for terrorism.

3. Modal Choice and Intermodal Transport Costs ■ Modal choice • Relationship between transport 3. Modal Choice and Intermodal Transport Costs ■ Modal choice • Relationship between transport costs, distance and modal choice: • Road transport is usually used for short distances (from 500 to 750 km). • Railway transport for average distances. • Maritime transport for long distances (about 750 km). • Intermodalism: • The opportunity to combine modes. • Find a less costly alternative than an unimodal solution. • Efficiency of contemporary transport systems: • Capacity to route freight. • Capacity to transship it.

Transport costs per unit Distance, Modal Choice and Transport Costs C 1 Road C Transport costs per unit Distance, Modal Choice and Transport Costs C 1 Road C 2 C 3 Rail D 1 Maritime D 2 Distance

Intermodal Transportation Cost Function C(T) Decomposition. C(dc) Local / Regional Distribution Cost National / Intermodal Transportation Cost Function C(T) Decomposition. C(dc) Local / Regional Distribution Cost National / International Distribution Costs Connection C(cn) C(I) Interchange C(cn) Connection C(cp) Composition Origin Transshipment Destination