895e37fd52e12220a308b0dc0eea71a9.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 13
Fiscal Year 2013 -14 Proposed Budget Presented by Superintendent Erroll B. Davis Jr. and Chief Financial Officer Charles A. Burbridge Atlanta Board of Education Budget Commission May 13, 2013
AGENDA 1. Where are we 2. Where we want to go 3. Financial challenges 4. Next steps 2
Situation Analysis Uncoordinated Acts Not Systemic 3
College & Career Performance Index (CCRPI) Results, District-Wide State Mean CCRPI Overall Score = 78. 5
Schools with Highest CCRPI (Top 5) • Charles Drew Elementary: 98. 0 • Lin: 97. 2 • West Manor: 97. 1 • Springdale Park: 97. 1 • Jackson: 96. 9 • KIPP Strive: 98. 1 • Inman: 97. 0 • Charles Drew Middle: 89. 3 • KIPP WAYS: 87. 6 • KIPP Vision: 87. 5 • Carver E. C. : 96. 3 • Washington E. C. : 82. 8 • KIPP Atlanta Collegiate: 79. 7 • Grady: 70. 5 • North Atlanta: 68. 0 Elementary Middle High
Schools with Lowest CCRPI (Bottom 5) • University Community Academy: 41. 6 • Scott: 42. 3 • Thomasville Heights: 42. 4 • Bethune: 44. 2 • Hutchinson: 47. 9 • University Community Academy: 47. 0 • The BEST Academy: 50. 4 • Price: 55. 4 • Harper-Archer: 55. 6 • M. L. King: 57. 8 • Crim: 29. 2 • Forrest Hill: 33. 7 • Washington Health: 46. 0 • The BEST Academy: 46. 3 • Therrell Health: 49. 2 Elementary Middle High
APS Strategy Map 7
THE GAP ($ MILLIONS) Revenues/Resources 2014 B/(W) 2013 2014 than 2013 $579. 7 $554. 0 $(25. 7) Expenditures/Appropriations 579. 7 614. 9 Gap (35. 2) $(60. 9) 8
FY 2014 Budget Proposal by Tiers ($ Millions) FY 13 Projected Expenditures FY 14 Proposed Budget Percentage 1 – Classroom $ 361. 2 62. 3% $ 370. 1 60. 2% 2 - School House 112. 5 19. 4% 127. 3 20. 7% $ 473. 7 81. 7% $ 497. 4 80. 9% $ 22. 5 3. 9% $ 20. 5 3. 3% 83. 5 14. 4% 97. 0 15. 8% $ 579. 7 100% $ 614. 9 100% Subtotal: Classroom and School House 3 - Direct Support of Schools 4 - Support of Schools Grand Total $35. 2 9
Programmatic vs. Non-Programmatic ($ Millions) Projected 2013 Expenditures Proposed 2014 Appropriation Net Increase $579. 7 614. 9 $(35. 2) Explained by: Non-Programmatic Changes: 3% Bonus No Furlough Charter Schools Unfunded Pension Health Insurance Employee Benefits Charter School Administration Net Increase $(9. 6) (6. 0) (2. 5) (5. 0) (12. 8) (0. 5) 0. 1 $(36. 3) Programmatic Changes Total $1. 1 $(35. 2) 10
Closing the Gap ($ Millions) Vacancy Management $ 3. 0 3 Furlough Days 4. 5 Property Sale 6. 0 Beltline Payments 8. 0 Bonus Elimination 9. 6 Fund Balance 20. 0 Program / Personnel Reductions 9. 8 Total $ 60. 9 11
Questions? 12
Next Steps 13
895e37fd52e12220a308b0dc0eea71a9.ppt