3f5f13a3a5968ab5807f00d07a16eeb4.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 11
FISCAL YEAR 2010 -2011 BUDGET CITY OF MONROE WASTEWATER DEPARTMENT BUDGET Presented by Barry S. La. Roy, P. E. Director of Water & Wastewater Utilities March 27, 2010 1
Wastewater Collection Service Area 17, 000 Customers, 303 Sanitary Sewer Miles 2
Fiscal Year 2009 -2010 Highlights l l l l l 27. 1 FTE – reduced from 31. 0 in 2008 Exceeded all water quality requirements of NPDES permit 4. 0 Billion Gallons of Sewage Transported & Treated 17, 400 feet of Root Treatment 90 Mini-Camera Jobs 400 Manhole & Sewer Inspections / Investigations 131, 700 feet of sewer jetted and or cleaned 2700 In-House Major Repair and CIP Project Hours Completed 5 CIP Projects 3
Fiscal Year 2010 -2011 Goals l l l 27. 1 FTE to maintain operations, service and project levels Exceed all water quality and regulatory compliance requirements of NPDES permit Educate customers of the benefits of removing floor / footing drains, sump pumps, and hung plumbing Continue implementing Preventative Maintenance Program (all facilities) Work on aggressive CIP schedule to complete 8 CIP Projects including the MDEQ SRF Loan project (WW Phase II Rehabilitation –Non Flow) 4
FY 2010 -2011 Revenue – Proposed Wastewater Rate Structure Increase Commodity Charge: $2. 57 / ccf Increase Quarterly Service Charge: $13. 59 / Read Maintain Septic Dumping Rate: $0. 056 / Gallon BOD Surcharge Rate for Wastewater >200 mg/l: $0. 29 per pound of BOD* TSS Surcharge Rate for Wastewater >750 mg/l: $0. 17 per pound of TSS* Nitrogen Surcharge Rate for Wastewater >40 mg/l: $0. 85 per pound of Nitrogen* *Requires ordinance change Previous Cost Proposed Cost (7. 3% INCREASE) Increase Quarterly Bill $67. 76 $72. 70 $4. 94 Annual Bill $271. 04 $290. 80 $19. 76 (Based on 23 ccf usage per Billing) 5
Sewage Rates Comparison Annual Cost for 23 ccf Maybee London $210. 00 $232. 50 *Monroe $290. 80 Howell Bedford Saline Ann Arbor Ida/Raisinville Dundee Petersburg Berlin Dexter La. Salle $290. 88 $312. 83 $313. 20 $327. 48 $350. 00 $392. 17 $396. 44 $484. 34 $504. 00 $1, 056. 00 6
FY 2010 -2011 Revenue l 7. 3% Increase Breakdown to Average Customer • • • l Debt Service Increase Depreciation Fringes City Fees / Meter Reading Labor 2. 8% 1. 6% 1. 3% 0. 3% Wastewater Sales Down • • Metropolitan down 6. 6% Frenchtown down 7. 6% • FY 2010 -2011 expect flat wastewater usage (<1% increase) • (68% of system) (32% of system) Average wastewater usage has dropped 5% since 2006 7
71, 500 71, 372 71, 200 71, 052 71, 100 No. of Reads 71, 000 71, 017 70, 900 70, 800 USAGE & METER READ TRENDS 71, 372 71, 400 70, 889 70, 700 70, 600 2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 1660 1, 647 1640 1620 1600 2010 -11 1, 627 1580 1, 549 1560 Usage (MG) 1540 1, 549 1, 533 1520 1500 1480 1460 2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 8
WASTEWATER EXPENSES & REVENUE TREND 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 DIVISION ADMINISTRATION TREATMENT & DISPOSAL SANITARY SEWER MAINTENANCE PUMP STATION MAINTENANCE DEBT SERVICE TOTAL EXPENSES ACTIVITY $2, 402, 133 $2, 971, 788 $394, 047 $441, 515 $0 $6, 209, 483 ACTIVITY $2, 419, 744 $2, 872, 699 $371, 982 $498, 933 $0 $6, 163, 358 PROJECTED BUDGET $2, 658, 686 $2, 691, 666 $357, 820 $434, 072 $126, 710 $6, 268, 954 REQUESTED BUDGET $2, 952, 640 $2, 840, 602 $352, 744 $452, 524 $435, 026 $7, 033, 536 TOTAL REVENUE $6, 030, 639 $6, 430, 053 $6, 621, 965 $7, 053, 576 $7, 200, 000 $7, 000 $6, 800, 000 $6, 600, 000 $6, 400, 000 $6, 200, 000 $6, 000 TOTAL EXPENSES $5, 800, 000 TOTAL REVENUE $5, 600, 000 $5, 400, 000 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 9
FY 2010 -2011 Expenditures Overall Budget l l l l Expenses reviewed / reduced Labor / OT Cost Increased 3% Employee Fringes Increased 17% City / Meter Reading Fees 14% Depreciation Increased 17% Operations & Maintenance Decreased 3% Debt Service Increased 243% Specific Areas l l l Increased Post Retirement Healthcare – 25% Increased Dental, Medical, Prescription Insurances – 15% Increased Chemical Cost – 16% Increased Sludge Disposal – 8% (May Increase) Efficiencies: v Utilize Wastewater Rate Model v WWTP Improvements – Reduced Electric & Water Usage v DTE Electric Rate Review v Work Order Coordination – Time / Fuel Savings v Reduced Staff to 27. 1 FTE v Single Operator Shifts / Call Back System v WWTP Operations using Cell Phones v Pump Station Radio System v Staff Usage for MCHD Testing 10
BUDGET ANALYSIS Income: $7, 053, 576 Expenditures: • • • Administration* Treatment & Disposal Sanitary Sewer Main. Pump Station Main. Debt Service TOTAL $2, 952, 640 (42%) $2, 840, 602 (40%) $352, 744 (5%) $452, 524 (7%) $435, 026 (6%) $7, 033, 536 *Includes Depreciation 11
3f5f13a3a5968ab5807f00d07a16eeb4.ppt