Скачать презентацию EXP 482 Corporate Financial Policy Clifford W Smith Скачать презентацию EXP 482 Corporate Financial Policy Clifford W Smith

7829172e57e0411ef772e73f16348da6.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 33

EXP 482 Corporate Financial Policy Clifford W. Smith, Jr. Winter 2007 - Overhead 4 EXP 482 Corporate Financial Policy Clifford W. Smith, Jr. Winter 2007 - Overhead 4 * Covers readings on course outline through Smith/Warner (1979)

Bond Contracts Conflicts of Interest v Dividend payouts v Claim dilution v Asset substitution Bond Contracts Conflicts of Interest v Dividend payouts v Claim dilution v Asset substitution v Underinvestment

Bond Covenants Restrictions on: v Investment policy v Dividend policy v Financing policy v Bond Covenants Restrictions on: v Investment policy v Dividend policy v Financing policy v Required bonding activities

Bond Covenants v Restrictions on Investment – Direct restrictions on investment of physical assets Bond Covenants v Restrictions on Investment – Direct restrictions on investment of physical assets seldom observed – Restrictions on financial investments – Restrictions on disposition of assets – Security provisions (i. e. mortgage loans) – Asset maintenance – Restrictions on mergers

Mergers Under what circumstances are bondholders made better off or worse off by a Mergers Under what circumstances are bondholders made better off or worse off by a merger?

Mergers v Under what circumstances are bondholders made better off or worse off by Mergers v Under what circumstances are bondholders made better off or worse off by a merger? v Suppose bondholders in the old firms receive bonds in the new firm with equal priority and the same contract provisions as before. BA(V, F, T, σ2 , r, DIV) vs BAB(V, F, T, σ2, r, DIV)

Mergers Benchmark Case: VA + VB = VAB FA / VA = FAB / Mergers Benchmark Case: VA + VB = VAB FA / VA = FAB / VAB = FB / VB TA = TB σ2 A = σ2 AB = σ2 B; ρAB = 1 DIVA = DIVAB = DIVB In this benchmark case, the merger should leave the value of the bonds roughly unchanged

Mergers Deviations from the benchmark case. Suppose: BA VA + VB < VAB FA Mergers Deviations from the benchmark case. Suppose: BA VA + VB < VAB FA / VA < FAB / VAB < FB / VB TA < T B σ2 A < σ2 AB < σ2 B σ2 A > σ2 AB < σ2 B DIVA < DIVAB < DIVB BB

Mergers Deviations from the benchmark case. Suppose: BA + BB + FA / VA Mergers Deviations from the benchmark case. Suppose: BA + BB + FA / VA < FAB / VAB < FB / VB - + TA < T B + - σ2 A < σ2 AB < σ2 B - + σ2 A > σ2 AB < σ2 B + + DIVA < DIVAB < DIVB - + VA + VB < VAB

Mergers In what type of firms will bondholders be most concerned about mergers? v Mergers In what type of firms will bondholders be most concerned about mergers? v low debt v low variance v low dividend v bonds with long maturity

Solutions to the Underinvestment Problem Restrictions on dividends v Suppose I agree to a Solutions to the Underinvestment Problem Restrictions on dividends v Suppose I agree to a maximum dividend payment of $25 period until the bond is repaid.

Dividend Restrictions Time Project 0 1 2 A -50 100 50 B – -75 Dividend Restrictions Time Project 0 1 2 A -50 100 50 B – -75 100 Bond 120 -100 Max Div = 25

Dividend Restrictions Time Project NVP 0 1 2 A -50 100 50 B – Dividend Restrictions Time Project NVP 0 1 2 A -50 100 50 B – -75 100 Bond 120 -100 25 25 75 Max Div = 25 Div(A+B) = 125

Dividend Restrictions Time Project NVP 0 1 2 A -50 100 50 B – Dividend Restrictions Time Project NVP 0 1 2 A -50 100 50 B – -75 100 Bond 120 -100 DIV(A+B) 25 25 75 = 125 DIV(A-) 25 25 50 = 100 Max Div = 25

Who Benefits from Dividend Restrictions v Without Restriction Bond 70 -20 -50 DIV 20 Who Benefits from Dividend Restrictions v Without Restriction Bond 70 -20 -50 DIV 20 80 – v = 100 = 125 With Dividend Restriction Bond DIV (A+B) 120 -100 25 25 75

Bond Covenants Restrictions on Dividends Earnings and Stock Sales Dividend Reservoir Dividends Bond Covenants Restrictions on Dividends Earnings and Stock Sales Dividend Reservoir Dividends

Dividend Restrictions v Inventory for Dividends v Dividend Constraint Dt < max [ 0, Dividend Restrictions v Inventory for Dividends v Dividend Constraint Dt < max [ 0, Dt* ]

Dividend Restrictions v Cash Flow Identity Uses of Funds = Sources of Funds Dt Dividend Restrictions v Cash Flow Identity Uses of Funds = Sources of Funds Dt + Rt + Pt + It = CFt + St + Bt

Dividend Restrictions v Cash Flow Identity Uses of Funds = Sources of Funds Dt Dividend Restrictions v Cash Flow Identity Uses of Funds = Sources of Funds Dt + Rt + Pt + It = CFt + St + Bt CFt = Et + DEPt + Rt + Lt Þ Dt = Et + DEPt + Lt + St + Bt - Pt - It

Dividend Restrictions v Combining the cash flow identity with the dividend constraint yields* * Dividend Restrictions v Combining the cash flow identity with the dividend constraint yields* * Assuming the Dip, D = 0

Dividend Restrictions v Combining the cash flow identity with the dividend constraint yields Dividend Restrictions v Combining the cash flow identity with the dividend constraint yields

Dividend Restrictions v Combining the cash flow identity with the dividend constraint yields Book Dividend Restrictions v Combining the cash flow identity with the dividend constraint yields Book Value of Debt of Assets

Dividend Restrictions v Combining the cash flow identity with the dividend constraint yields Book Dividend Restrictions v Combining the cash flow identity with the dividend constraint yields Book Value of Debt of Assets v Placing a ceiling on dividends effectively places a floor on real investment

Dividend Restrictions v Improve dividend payout problem v Improve claim dilution problem v Improve Dividend Restrictions v Improve dividend payout problem v Improve claim dilution problem v Improve underinvestment problem v May exacerbate asset substitution problem

Restrictions on Financing v Option pricing analysis might lead you to predict Restrictions on Financing v Option pricing analysis might lead you to predict "me first" rules in bond contracts v Instead, we observe restrictions on financial ratios such as: funded debt net tangible assets interest expense earnings

Restrictions on Financing Use of balance sheet vs income statement for financing restrictions Restrictions on Financing Use of balance sheet vs income statement for financing restrictions

Other Financing Issues v Leasing v Convertible Bonds v Callable Bonds v Sinking Funds Other Financing Issues v Leasing v Convertible Bonds v Callable Bonds v Sinking Funds

Solutions to the Underinvestment Problem Sinking fund provisions v A bond with a sinking Solutions to the Underinvestment Problem Sinking fund provisions v A bond with a sinking fund provides for the repayment of some of the principle before expiration

Sinking Funds Time Project 0 1 2 A -50 100 50 B – -75 Sinking Funds Time Project 0 1 2 A -50 100 50 B – -75 100 120 -60 Bond

Sinking Funds Time Project 0 1 2 A -50 100 50 B – -75 Sinking Funds Time Project 0 1 2 A -50 100 50 B – -75 100 120 -60 Bond DIVA+B= 35 +0 + 90 = 125

Sinking Funds Time Project 0 1 2 A -50 100 50 B – -75 Sinking Funds Time Project 0 1 2 A -50 100 50 B – -75 100 120 -60 DIVA+B = 35 +0 DIV A- = 70 +40 + Bond + 90 = 125 0 = 110

Bonding Activities v All financial statements sent to stockholders must also be sent to Bonding Activities v All financial statements sent to stockholders must also be sent to bondholders v Specify accounting techniques (GAAP) v Financial Reports Audited by Independent Auditor v Officers Certificate of Compliance v Purchase of Insurance