Скачать презентацию EUROnu Management Aspects Structure IAP Скачать презентацию EUROnu Management Aspects Structure IAP

a00d0c47d7ee922ae762f37672bcd9c0.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 22

EUROnu: Management Aspects • Structure • IAP • Internal and external collaboration • Reporting EUROnu: Management Aspects • Structure • IAP • Internal and external collaboration • Reporting • Administration and finance • Next steps • Conclusions EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011

Management Structure from original proposal. All exists and works as proposed, with small changes. Management Structure from original proposal. All exists and works as proposed, with small changes. 2 Interaction with other projects via different routes At least 4 EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011

Management Structure Coordinator Management Board Edgecock STFC Safety; SB Dracos CNRS Cost; BB Efthymiopoulos Management Structure Coordinator Management Board Edgecock STFC Safety; SB Dracos CNRS Cost; BB Efthymiopoulos CERN Long Imperial Perform. ; NF Coordination Board Work package Activity Coordinator WP 1 Management, etc Edgecock (STFC) WP 2 Superbeam Zito (CEA) Densham (STFC) WP 3 Neutrino Factory Pozimski (IC) Martini (CERN) WP 4 Beta beams Wildner (CERN) Hansen (CERN) WP 5 Detectors Soler (Glasgow) Cervera (CSIC) WP 6 Physics Hernandez (CSIC) Donini (CSIC) EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Deputy

International Advisory Panel (IAP) • International Advisory Panel: Ewart Blackmore (TRIUMF, Canada) Swapan Chattopadhyay International Advisory Panel (IAP) • International Advisory Panel: Ewart Blackmore (TRIUMF, Canada) Swapan Chattopadhyay (CI, UK) Steve Holmes (FNAL, USA) Hitoshi Murayama (Tokyo, Japan) Mike Zisman (LBL, USA) – chair • Have attended all three Annual Meetings: - verbal report to Governing Board - written report, to which we respond • Very helpful to have external view on progress • Helps to maintain contact with international activities EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011

International Advisory Panel (IAP) • All three reports on EUROnu website • Contain recommendations International Advisory Panel (IAP) • All three reports on EUROnu website • Contain recommendations and comments • No big problems identified • No major changes of direction recommended • Main recent concerns: - target work in WP 2 and WP 3 - baseline Beta Beam facility - resources for costing exercise EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011

Internal Collaboration • Three annual meetings so far: - March 2009 in CERN - Internal Collaboration • Three annual meetings so far: - March 2009 in CERN - June 2010 in Strasbourg - January 2011 in RAL • Next meeting(s): - May 2012 in Paris - 5 th meeting to finish off/plan next step? ? • Good attendance: e. g. 68 at RAL meeting • Agendas and talks kept in CERN Indico • GB and IAP meet during these EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011

Internal Collaboration • Internal meetings recorded on website • WP meetings often take place Internal Collaboration • Internal meetings recorded on website • WP meetings often take place in General meetings Work package Examples of types of meeting Number General Annual, meetings >2 WPs 14 WP 1 CB, etc 14 WP 2 WP meeting 14 WP 3 WP meeting 9 WP 4 WP meeting 14 WP 5 WP meeting 3 WP 6 WP meeting 8 Total 76 EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011

Internal Collaboration • Communication also by all usual methods • Interaction particularly important between Internal Collaboration • Communication also by all usual methods • Interaction particularly important between - WP 6 and others - WP 5 and others - costing, safety and others EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011

External Collaboration Country Associate • Mentioned many times already Canada TRIUMF • Very important External Collaboration Country Associate • Mentioned many times already Canada TRIUMF • Very important for EUROnu! France GANIL • Happens via - Associates (all WP) Germany Aachen GSI India INO Israel Weizmann Portugal Lisbon Russia IAP, Novgorad JINR, Dubna Switzerland Geneva UK Brunel USA Argonne Brookhaven FNAL Virginia Tech EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Muon Collaboration

External Collaboration Country Associate • Mentioned many times already Canada TRIUMF • Very important External Collaboration Country Associate • Mentioned many times already Canada TRIUMF • Very important for EUROnu! France GANIL • Happens via - Associates (all WP) - IDS (WP 3, 5, 6) Germany Aachen GSI India INO Israel Weizmann Portugal Lisbon Russia IAP, Novgorad JINR, Dubna Switzerland Geneva UK Brunel USA Argonne Brookhaven FNAL Virginia Tech EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Muon Collaboration

External Collaboration Steering committee Physics performance A. Blondel Geneva S. Choubey Harish M. Zisman External Collaboration Steering committee Physics performance A. Blondel Geneva S. Choubey Harish M. Zisman LBNL A. Gouvea Northwestern Y. Kuno Osaka A. Donini Madrid K. Long (chair) Imperial P. Huber (chair) Virginia Tech J. Kopp MPI Accelerator conveners S. Berg BNL S. Parke FNAL J. Pozimski Imperial S. Pascoli Durham Y. Mori Kyoto W. Winter (co-chair) Wuerzburg C. Prior STFC O. Yasuda Tokyo Detector conveners A. Bross FNAL P. Soler Glasgow N. Mondal Mumbai A. Cervera Valencia EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011

External Collaboration Steering committee Physics performance A. Blondel Geneva S. Choubey Harish M. Zisman External Collaboration Steering committee Physics performance A. Blondel Geneva S. Choubey Harish M. Zisman LBNL A. Gouvea Northwestern Y. Kuno Osaka A. Donini Madrid K. Long (chair) Imperial P. Huber (chair) Virginia Tech J. Kopp MPI Accelerator conveners S. Berg BNL S. Parke FNAL J. Pozimski Imperial S. Pascoli Durham Y. Mori Kyoto W. Winter (co-chair) Wuerzburg C. Prior STFC O. Yasuda Tokyo Detector conveners A. Bross FNAL P. Soler Glasgow N. Mondal Mumbai A. Cervera Valencia EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011

External Collaboration • Mentioned many times already • Very important for EUROnu! • Happens External Collaboration • Mentioned many times already • Very important for EUROnu! • Happens via - Associates (all WP) - IDS (WP 3, 5, 6) - Contact with other FP 7 neutrino projects NEU 2012 (in Eu. CARD) LAGUNA-LBNO - Collaboration of EUROnu members with projects - Collaboration on related accelerator projects • Plus dissemination activities described by Christian • In particular, reporting to - CERN Council via Strategy Group, SPC, etc - ECFA via ECFA panel EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011

Administration • Annual reports: - 1 st was somewhat delayed as new experience - Administration • Annual reports: - 1 st was somewhat delayed as new experience - 2 nd was much better - (SESAM is awful!) • Payment of EC contribution: - prepayment was distributed promptly - 1 st annual was delayed, because of late report and a new STFC financial system - 2 nd annual payment is almost ready and will be distributed promptly • Changes to the Consortium: - CSIC 3 rd party (UAM) has never taken part in EUROnu - it could be removed from GA (if required) EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011

Financial Report Total staff months from GA Workpackage WP 1 WP 2 WP 3 Financial Report Total staff months from GA Workpackage WP 1 WP 2 WP 3 STFC CEA CERN Glasgow Imperial CSIC CNRS CUT UDUR INFN MPG UOXF. DL Uni. Sofia Warwick UCL TOTAL 13/68 74/137 28/46 94/78 4/12 25/74 WP 5 3/34 55/80 WP 6 0/1 6/57 46/84 4/12 38/102 8/48 0/12 49/78 10/47 16/44 11/60 13/32 28/56 4/57 10/18 0/6 48/51 26/28 21/92 148/333 191/282 22/85 139/295 EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 80/199 56/206 TOTAL per Beneficiary 181/283 31/80 84/167 6/57 46/84 21/107 107/248 8/48 13/32 38/74 4/57 0/6 48/51 26/28 22/85 635/1407

Financial Report Staff months 1. 000 SM so far/ SM total 0. 900 0. Financial Report Staff months 1. 000 SM so far/ SM total 0. 900 0. 800 0. 700 0. 600 0. 500 Series 1 0. 400 0. 300 0. 200 0. 100 0. 000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Partner EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Total

Financial Report Staff months 0. 800 0. 700 SM so far/ SM total 0. Financial Report Staff months 0. 800 0. 700 SM so far/ SM total 0. 600 0. 500 0. 400 Series 1 0. 300 0. 200 0. 100 0. 000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Work Package EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Total

Financial Report Total Costs (€) Partner STFC CEA CERN Glasgow Imperial CSIC CNRS CUT Financial Report Total Costs (€) Partner STFC CEA CERN Glasgow Imperial CSIC CNRS CUT UDUR INFN MPG UOXF. DL Uni. Sofia Warwick UCL TOTAL Year 1 Year 2 Total to date 832970. 79 804139. 20 1637109. 99 56049. 93 202014. 60 258064. 53 341952. 85 1001316. 05 1343268. 90 24848. 40 33744. 30 58592. 70 83347. 68 188775. 73 272123. 41 59498. 54 82310. 37 141808. 91 346298. 80 742084. 25 1088383. 05 13041. 73 47135. 92 60177. 65 44856. 78 22887. 12 67743. 90 241462. 98 215133. 17 456596. 15 3536. 68 60188. 42 63725. 10 765. 66 0. 00 765. 66 17975. 73 48847. 94 66823. 67 79619. 10 109646. 59 189265. 69 46004. 74 153071. 95 199076. 69 2192230. 39 3711295. 61 5903526. 00 EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Total GA 3413269. 55 824330. 00 2086571. 20 318163. 20 769635. 70 508585. 00 2322419. 20 360843. 20 282128. 00 607000. 00 458657. 00 7838. 40 136000. 00 324739. 20 1070188. 80 13490368. 45 Ratio 0. 480 0. 313 0. 644 0. 184 0. 354 0. 279 0. 469 0. 167 0. 240 0. 752 0. 139 0. 098 0. 491 0. 583 0. 186 0. 438

Financial Report Total Costs (€) 0. 800 Total so far/ Total for EUROnu 0. Financial Report Total Costs (€) 0. 800 Total so far/ Total for EUROnu 0. 700 0. 600 0. 500 0. 400 Series 1 0. 300 0. 200 0. 100 0. 000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Partner EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 14 15

Financial Report EC Contribution (€) Partner STFC CEA CERN Glasgow Imperial CSIC CNRS CUT Financial Report EC Contribution (€) Partner STFC CEA CERN Glasgow Imperial CSIC CNRS CUT UDUR INFN MPG UOXF. DL Uni. Sofia Warwick UCL TOTAL Pre-finance 233269. 97 63062. 34 163083. 51 32260. 86 65332. 97 50923. 03 172857. 96 48884. 72 23736. 43 40731. 73 31648. 18 1329. 30 20785. 93 19045. 29 83047. 78 1050000. 00 Year 1 Year 2 Request 216572. 40 155000. 00 57384. 21 33162. 55 94069. 14 230672. 94 24945. 08 13034. 58 42301. 40 61050. 07 48498. 13 61732. 78 164626. 63 244352. 74 22077. 60 24326. 85 17107. 30 2505. 22 38792. 13 17999. 27 45141. 32 574. 25 0. 00 19796. 13 27100. 26 18138. 38 19267. 75 49850. 31 114803. 96 832732. 32 1070943. 15 EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011 Total GA Left 888647. 50 283805. 13 240237. 50 86628. 40 621270. 50 133444. 92 122898. 50 52657. 99 248887. 50 80203. 06 193992. 50 32838. 56 658506. 50 76669. 17 186227. 50 90938. 33 90424. 50 47075. 55 155168. 50 36852. 51 120564. 50 25775. 73 5064. 00 3160. 45 79184. 50 11502. 18 72553. 50 16102. 08 316372. 50 68670. 45 4000000. 00 1046324. 53

Financial Report EC Contribution (€) Fraction of EC 0. 7 contribution left 0. 6 Financial Report EC Contribution (€) Fraction of EC 0. 7 contribution left 0. 6 0. 5 0. 4 Series 1 0. 3 0. 2 0. 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Partner Total EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011

Conclusions • EUROnu is progressing well! • No major delays • All objectives, milestones Conclusions • EUROnu is progressing well! • No major delays • All objectives, milestones and deliverables will be met • All partners will meet their obligations • As always, some difficulties to be dealt with: - resources for costing • We have all learnt a lot since the start of EUROnu • Remainder will run even more smoothly EUROnu Review: 14 th April 2011