EPR Assessment 1 Overview u Review Of

EPR Assessment 1

Overview u. Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data u Section II: Job Description u Section III: Evaluation Of Performance u Section IV: Promotion Recommendation u Section V: Rater’s Comments u Appropriate Bullets u Inappropriate Bullets u. Overall FTO Assessment u EPR comparison (Sr. A Harris) 2

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT) I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39 -62 carefully before completing any item) 1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 7. PERIOD OF REPORT From: 4. DAFSC 6 a. PAS CODE 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION Thru: 6 b. SRID 9. REASON FOR REPORT II. JOB DESCRIPTION 1. DUTY TITLE 2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed) Inefficient. An unprofessional performer. 2. JOB KNOWLEDGE Good performer. Performs routine duties satisfactorily. Excellent performer. Consistently produces high quality work. The exception. Absolutely superior in all areas. Extensive knowledge of all primary duties and related positions. Excels in knowledge of all related positions. Mastered all duties. (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge) Lacking. Needs considerable improvement. Sufficient. Gets job accomplished 3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork) Gets satisfactory results. Ineffective. 4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS Exceptionally effective leader. Skillful and competent. Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities. Emphasizes logic and decision making. Highly respected and skilled. (Consider how well member uses time and resources) Manages resources in a satisfactory manner. Ineffective. 5. JUDGMENT Highly effective leader. (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions) Poor. Sound. 6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES (Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty) Unprofessional, unreliable. 7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS Meets expectations. Sets an example for others to follow. Epitomizes the Air Force professional. Organizes and expresses ideas clearly and concisely. Highly skilled writer and communicator. (Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas) Unable to communicate effectively. AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V 2) (Per. FORM PRO) Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily. 3

FOR TRAINING PURPOSES ONLY I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39 -62 carefully before completing any item) 1. NAME 2. SSN Climber, Cliff R. 123 -45 -6789 5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION From: 1 Jan Thru: 31 Dec SMSgt 4. DAFSC 2 A 690 6 a. PAS CODE 6 b. SRID 20 th Bomb Squadron, ACC, Fogler AFB OR 12345 7. PERIOD OF REPORT 3. GRADE 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION 365 MXOBR 549 OJ 2 MG 9. REASON FOR REPORT ANNUAL 4

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT) I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39 -62 carefully before completing any item) 1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 7. PERIOD OF REPORT From: 4. DAFSC 6 a. PAS CODE 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION Thru: 6 b. SRID 9. REASON FOR REPORT II. JOB DESCRIPTION 1. DUTY TITLE 2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed) Inefficient. An unprofessional performer. 2. JOB KNOWLEDGE Good performer. Performs routine duties satisfactorily. Excellent performer. Consistently produces high quality work. The exception. Absolutely superior in all areas. Extensive knowledge of all primary duties and related positions. Excels in knowledge of all related positions. Mastered all duties. (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge) Lacking. Needs considerable improvement. Sufficient. Gets job accomplished 3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork) Gets satisfactory results. Ineffective. 4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS Exceptionally effective leader. Skillful and competent. Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities. Emphasizes logic and decision making. Highly respected and skilled. (Consider how well member uses time and resources) Manages resources in a satisfactory manner. Ineffective. 5. JUDGMENT Highly effective leader. (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions) Poor. Sound. 6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES (Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty) Unprofessional, unreliable. 7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS Meets expectations. Sets an example for others to follow. Epitomizes the Air Force professional. Organizes and expresses ideas clearly and concisely. Highly skilled writer and communicator. (Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas) Unable to communicate effectively. AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V 2) (Per. FORM PRO) Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily. 5

II. JOB DESCRIPTION 1. DUTY TITLE NCOIC, Sortie Support Flight 2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES Supervises 24 People. Responsible for effective management of 2 facilities, 4 vehicles, and equipment account valued more than $5 million. Ensures capability to receive, inspect, store, and maintain over 350 line items. Provides guidance and establishes training standards necessary for effective planning and scheduling of all Sortie Support Flight functions in support of operational and contingency requirements. Ensures expedient completion of all Time Compliance Technical Orders. Establishes accountability for all aircraft training devises. Enforces safety and supply discipline. ADDITIONAL DUTY: Squadron Performance Measures Coordinator. 6

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT) I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39 -62 carefully before completing any item) 1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 7. PERIOD OF REPORT From: 4. DAFSC 6 a. PAS CODE 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION Thru: 6 b. SRID 9. REASON FOR REPORT II. JOB DESCRIPTION 1. DUTY TITLE 2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed) Inefficient. An unprofessional performer. 2. JOB KNOWLEDGE Good performer. Performs routine duties satisfactorily. Excellent performer. Consistently produces high quality work. The exception. Absolutely superior in all areas. Extensive knowledge of all primary duties and related positions. Excels in knowledge of all related positions. Mastered all duties. (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge) Lacking. Needs considerable improvement. Sufficient. Gets job accomplished 3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork) Gets satisfactory results. Ineffective. 4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS Exceptionally effective leader. Skillful and competent. Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities. Emphasizes logic and decision making. Highly respected and skilled. (Consider how well member uses time and resources) Manages resources in a satisfactory manner. Ineffective. 5. JUDGMENT Highly effective leader. (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions) Poor. Sound. 6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES (Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty) Unprofessional, unreliable. 7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS Meets expectations. Sets an example for others to follow. Epitomizes the Air Force professional. Organizes and expresses ideas clearly and concisely. Highly skilled writer and communicator. (Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas) Unable to communicate effectively. AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V 2) (Per. FORM PRO) Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily. 7

IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION RATER’S RECOMMENDATION NOT RECOMMENDED (Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities ) NOT RECOMMENDED READY CONSIDER AT THIS TIME IMMEDIATE PROMOTION 1 2 3 4 5 V. RATER’S COMMENTS Last feedback was conducted on: _______. NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DATE DUTY TITLE SSN VI. RATER’S COMMENTS SIGNATURE CONCUR NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION NONCONCUR DUTY TITLE DATE SSN SIGNATURE CONCUR DUTY TITLE NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION SSN VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE A B C D (N/A for CMSgt selectee) SENIOR RATER’S DEPUTY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL LOWER LEVEL NONCONCUR YES NO DATE SIGNATURE X. COMMANDER’S REVIEW CONCUR SIGNATURE NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77) 8

(Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities ) NOT RECOMMENDED READY CONSIDER AT THIS TIME IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION NOT RECOMMENDED RATER’S RECOMMENDATION IMMEDIATE PROMOTION 1 2 3 4 5 V. RATER’S COMMENTS Last feedback was conducted on: _______. NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DATE DUTY TITLE SSN VI. RATER’S COMMENTS SIGNATURE CONCUR NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DUTY TITLE DATE SSN SIGNATURE CONCUR VII. INDORSER’S COMMENTS NONCONCUR DUTY TITLE NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION SSN VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE A B C D (N/A for CMSgt selectee) SENIOR RATER’S DEPUTY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL LOWER LEVEL NONCONCUR AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (REVERSE) (EF-V 2) (Per. FORM PRO) YES NO DATE SIGNATURE X. COMMANDER’S REVIEW CONCUR SIGNATURE NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77) 9

Rater’s Comments u. Start with a strong impact statement! Single handedly spearheaded squadron ORI preparations, ensured "Outstanding" rating in June 200 X ORI 10

Rater’s Comments Personally created inspection checklists for all sections to ensure compliance with established directives Allowed sections to teach other sections their processes; improved working relations between sections Increased efficiency, eliminated duplication of effort, saved over $26, 000. . . decreased equipment support by 25%, pre flight inspection times by 50%, post flight inspections by 33%, and no shows by 73% 11

Rater’s Comments Constantly striving to improve quality of life for all members of the unit; personally undertook challenge of reducing dormitory problems. . . rid the dormitory of all incidents of underage drinking/property damage Incorporated inputs from dormitory members to ensure all issues were addressed; morale skyrocketed First dormitory to be selected Dorm of the Month; showcase for other units on base to emulate 12

Rater’s Comments Instilled pride of ownership across all sections; ensured all personnel in customer service positions received customer service training decreased customer wait time and increased customer satisfaction Greatly enhanced civil military relations…delivered a riveting presentation and was lauded by civic leaders Selected SNCO of the year exemplifies core values and instills pride promote to CMSgt immediately! 13

Rater’s Comments u. Weak comments would include: Elected President of Wing Top 3 organization, making the organization more responsive to enlisted personnel and community partnerships Organized the Top 3 children's Haunted House, manned the refreshment booth at the base picnic Organized renovation efforts for Bear Creek Elementary School, hard work praised by school leadership 14

Rater’s Comments Spearheaded squadron pre inspection barbecue to reward efforts of all members for preparation efforts POC for Wing POW/MIA day; largest crowd ever. . . emotional day of remembrance carried out to perfection 15

Rater’s Comments u. Inappropriate comments include: Submitted for Meritorious Service Medal for his consistently superior efforts and outstanding results 16

Feedback Dates u. Midpoint Feedback: 17 Jul 17

IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION NOT RECOMMENDED RATER’S RECOMMENDATION (Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities ) NOT RECOMMENDED READY CONSIDER AT THIS TIME IMMEDIATE PROMOTION 1 2 3 4 5 V. RATER’S COMMENTS Last feedback was conducted on: _______. NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DATE DUTY TITLE SSN VI. RATER’S COMMENTS SIGNATURE CONCUR NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DUTY TITLE DATE SSN VII. INDORSER’S COMMENTS SIGNATURE CONCUR NONCONCUR DUTY TITLE NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION SSN VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE A B C D (N/A for CMSgt selectee) SENIOR RATER’S DEPUTY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL LOWER LEVEL NONCONCUR YES NO DATE SIGNATURE X. COMMANDER’S REVIEW CONCUR SIGNATURE NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77) 18

Overall FTO Assessment A R 134 AF RA AF 67 67 134 RA AF 67 134 RA 1 AF 67 34 19

Mediocre EPR u. What would a “middle of the road” performer’s EPR look like? 20

SENIOR ENLISTED PERFORMANCE REPORT (MSGT thru CMSGT) I. RATEE IDENTIFICATION DATA (Read AFR 39 -62 carefully before completing any item) 1. NAME 2. SSN 3. GRADE 5. ORGANIZATION, COMMAND, AND LOCATION 7. PERIOD OF REPORT From: 4. DAFSC 6 a. PAS CODE 8. NO. DAYS SUPERVISION Thru: 6 b. SRID 9. REASON FOR REPORT II. JOB DESCRIPTION 1. DUTY TITLE 2. KEY DUTIES, TASKS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES III. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE 1. DUTY PERFORMANCE (Consider quality, quantity, and timeliness of duties performed) Inefficient. An unprofessional performer. 2. JOB KNOWLEDGE Good performer. Performs routine duties satisfactorily. Excellent performer. Consistently produces high quality work. The exception. Absolutely superior in all areas. Extensive knowledge of all primary duties and related positions. Excels in knowledge of all related positions. Mastered all duties. (Consider whether ratee has technical expertise and is able to apply the knowledge) Lacking. Needs considerable improvement. Sufficient. Gets job accomplished 3. LEADERSHIP (Consider whether ratee motivates peers or subordinates, maintains discipline, sets and enforces standards, evaluates subordinates fairly and consistently, plans and organizes work, and fosters teamwork) Gets satisfactory results. Ineffective. 4. MANAGERIAL SKILLS Exceptionally effective leader. Skillful and competent. Dynamic, capitalizes on all opportunities. Emphasizes logic and decision making. Highly respected and skilled. (Consider how well member uses time and resources) Manages resources in a satisfactory manner. Ineffective. 5. JUDGMENT Highly effective leader. (Consider how well ratee evaluates situations and reaches logical decisions) Poor. Sound. 6. PROFESSIONAL QUALITIES (Consider ratee’s dedication and preservation of traditional military values - integrity and loyalty) Unprofessional, unreliable. 7. COMMUNICATION SKILLS Meets expectations. Sets an example for others to follow. Epitomizes the Air Force professional. Organizes and expresses ideas clearly and concisely. Highly skilled writer and communicator. (Consider ratee’s ability to organize and express ideas) Unable to communicate effectively. AF FORM 911, JUN 95 (EF-V 2) (Per. FORM PRO) Organizes and expresses thoughts satisfactorily. 21

IV. PROMOTION RECOMMENDATION RATER’S RECOMMENDATION NOT RECOMMENDED (Compare this ratee with others of the same grade and AFS. For CMSgts, this is a recommendation for increased responsibilities ) NOT RECOMMENDED READY CONSIDER AT THIS TIME IMMEDIATE PROMOTION 1 2 3 4 5 V. RATER’S COMMENTS Last feedback was conducted on: _______. NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION DATE DUTY TITLE SSN VI. RATER’S COMMENTS SIGNATURE CONCUR NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION NONCONCUR DUTY TITLE DATE SSN SIGNATURE CONCUR DUTY TITLE NAME, GRADE, BR OF SV, ORGN, COMD, & LOCATION SSN VIII. FINAL EVALUATOR’S POSITION IX. TIME-IN-GRADE ELIGIBLE A B C D (N/A for CMSgt selectee) SENIOR RATER’S DEPUTY INTERMEDIATE LEVEL LOWER LEVEL NONCONCUR YES NO DATE SIGNATURE X. COMMANDER’S REVIEW CONCUR SIGNATURE NONCONCUR (Attach AF Form 77) 22

Rater’s Comments - Received laudatory comments for response to a mobility exercise scenario -- Flawlessly processed over 50 Emergency Notification Data Cards for mobility personnel -- Contributed directly to squadron earning overall "Excellent" rating - Innovative customer service representative -- Devised new method for recording customer request -- Reduced customer waiting time by 25 percent 23

Rater’s Comments - Accomplished checklist to compare current operating procedures with governing regulations -- Found and corrected several problem areas reducing time lost due to duplication of efforts - Completed Community College of the Air Force English course -- Improved her written communications skills -- Reduced grammatical errors on correspondence - Completed Airman Leadership School. . . improved overall knowledge for the Air Force - Displays behavior appropriate for a senior airman; recommend for promotion 24

Summary u. Review Of Epr For SMSgt Climber u Section I: Ratee Identification Data (Not Assessed) u Section II: Job Description (Not Assessed) u Section III: Evaluation Of Performance u Section IV: Promotion Recommendation u Section V: Rater’s Comments u Appropriate Bullets u Inappropriate Bullets u. Overall FTO Assessment u EPR Comparison 25

EPR Assessment 26