Скачать презентацию Discourse Analysis Associate Professor Ph D Zhumaliyeva R Скачать презентацию Discourse Analysis Associate Professor Ph D Zhumaliyeva R

Lecture 1 DA.pptx

  • Количество слайдов: 21

Discourse Analysis Associate Professor, Ph. D Zhumaliyeva R. Z. Discourse Analysis Associate Professor, Ph. D Zhumaliyeva R. Z.

Discourse is the creation and organization of the segments of a language above as Discourse is the creation and organization of the segments of a language above as well as below the sentence. Its segments of language which may be bigger or smaller than a single sentence but the adduced (представленное) meaning is always beyond the sentence. The term discourse applies to both spoken and written language, in fact to any sample of language used for any purpose.

To modern science the term 'discourse' has taken various ideas. It occurs sometimes very To modern science the term 'discourse' has taken various ideas. It occurs sometimes very broad in meanings. Originally the word 'discourse' comes from Latin 'discursus' which denoted 'conversation, speech'. However, discourse refers to too wide an area of human existence. The study of discourse has developed in a variety of disciplines-sociolinguistics, anthropology, sociology, and social psychology. Therefore only discourse from the point of linguistics, and especially applied linguistics is explained in this course.

There is no conformity (согласованность; соответствие) in the middle of linguists to the use There is no conformity (согласованность; соответствие) in the middle of linguists to the use of the term discourse. Some scholars use it in reference to texts. But at the same time others claim it denotes speech which is illustrated by the following definition: "Discourse: A continuous stretch (especially spoken) language larger than a sentence, often constituting a coherent unit such as a sermon (проповедь, поучение, нотация), argument, joke, or narrative" (Crystal David, 1992. An encyclopedic dictionary of language and languages. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992, 428 pp. )

On the other hand some scholars, being aware of differences between kinds of discourses On the other hand some scholars, being aware of differences between kinds of discourses indicate the unity of communicative intentions as a vital element of each of them. Consequently they suggests using terms 'text' and 'discourse' almost interchangeably. According to Cook (1990: 7) novels, as well as short conversations might be equally rightfully named discourses. (Cook, G. Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press. )

“Discourse is a general term used in pragmatics to refer to language that has “Discourse is a general term used in pragmatics to refer to language that has been produced as the result of an act of communication. ” (Maniruzzaman, M. 2006. Introduction to Linguistics. ). In additional terms, discourse locates for a stretch of language with the intention of unity, meaningfulness, and purposefulnes, such asconversations, interviews, compositions.

What is “discourse”? Discourse is: language above the sentence or above the clause (простое What is “discourse”? Discourse is: language above the sentence or above the clause (простое предложение) a continuous stretch of spoken language larger than a sentence, often constituting a coherent unit a stretch of language perceived to be meaningful unified, and purposive; language in use (viewed) as social practice determined by social structures

Definitions of Discourse (1) Structural and functional definitions of discourse Structural or textual definition Definitions of Discourse (1) Structural and functional definitions of discourse Structural or textual definition of discourse: Discourse is a particular unit of language (above the sentence). Functional definition of discourse: Discourse is a particular focus of language use.

Discourse as structure ? Problem: you can have a unit which looks like a Discourse as structure ? Problem: you can have a unit which looks like a sentence but doesn’t mean anything e. g. Colourless green ideas sleep furiously (бешено, яростно, неистово; порывисто, бурно) … but on the other hand the units in which people speak do not always look like sentences. e. g. You can run a hou- whatcha- now whatcha you can run a house-you can run a house a- and do the job, which is important, y’ can’t y- a man can’t do it himself, and a woman can’t do it himself w- if y’ want it to be successful. In most cases. How do you analyse something which is not a sentence?

Discourse as a System of functions ? e. g. “what’s the time? ” Phatic Discourse as a System of functions ? e. g. “what’s the time? ” Phatic function (opens a contact) Emotive function (conveys the need of the speaker) Conative function (asks something of the addressee) Referential function (makes reference to the world outside the language) PROBLEM: Discourse analysis may turn into a more general and broader analysis of language functions.

Definition of Discourse (2) Discourse – written and spoken Speaker/ writer Hearer/ reader Discourse Definition of Discourse (2) Discourse – written and spoken Speaker/ writer Hearer/ reader Discourse Context

Objects of discourse ‘Discourse’ refers to any utterance which is meaningful. These texts can Objects of discourse ‘Discourse’ refers to any utterance which is meaningful. These texts can be: - written texts - oral texts (‘speech’/’talk’) - mixed written/oral texts (e. g. Internet chat) Discourse does not depend on the size of a text (“P” and “Ladies” can both be analysed as discourse)

Definitions of ‘discourse’ (3) (a) A set of terms, metaphors, allusions (упоминание; ссылка), ways Definitions of ‘discourse’ (3) (a) A set of terms, metaphors, allusions (упоминание; ссылка), ways of talking, references and so on, which constitute an object (b) A to-and-fro (туда и сюда, взад и вперёд; из стороны в сторону, в разные стороны) of exchanges in talk (or text) that performs social actions

Doing discourse analysis Scope Influences Approaches Doing discourse analysis Scope Influences Approaches

The first linguist to refer to discourse analysis was Zellig Harris. In 1952, he The first linguist to refer to discourse analysis was Zellig Harris. In 1952, he investigated the connectedness of sentences, naming his study ‘discourse analysis. ’ Harris claimed explicitly that discourse is the next level in a hierarchy of morphemes, clauses and sentences. He viewed discourse analysis procedurally as a formal methodology, derived from structural methods of linguistic analysis: such a methodology could break a text down into relationships (such as equivalence, substitution) among its lower-level constituents.

According to Maniruzzaman, 2006, discourse analysis investigates how utterances in spoken language and sentences According to Maniruzzaman, 2006, discourse analysis investigates how utterances in spoken language and sentences in written language constitute larger units of language that is meaningful, unified, and purposeful. Discourse analysis concerns many things: The impact of the selection of grammatical items, like- verbs, tenses, determiners on the structure of the discourse. The relationship between utterances or sentences in the discourse.

Discourse analysis takes different theoretical perspectives and analytic approaches. Such as- speech act theory, Discourse analysis takes different theoretical perspectives and analytic approaches. Such as- speech act theory, interactional sociolinguistics, and ethnography of communication, pragmatics, conversational analysis, and variation analysis. Although each approach emphasizes different aspects of language use, they all view language as social interaction.

Discourse analysis is the examination of language use by members of a speech community. Discourse analysis is the examination of language use by members of a speech community. It involves looking at both language form and language functions. It includes the study of both spoken interaction and written texts.

The scope of discourse analysis Discourse analysis is not a discipline which exists on The scope of discourse analysis Discourse analysis is not a discipline which exists on its own. It is influenced by other disciplines and influences them as well. It is a two-way process … For this reason discourse analysis examines spoken and written texts from all sorts of different areas (medical, legal, advertising) and from all sorts of perspectives (race, gender, power) Discourse analysis has a number of practical applications - for example in analysing communication problems in medicine, psychotherapy, education, in analysing written style etc.

Influences on discourse analysis psycholinguistics sociolinguistics other nonlinguistic disciplines computational linguistics Discourse Analysis other Influences on discourse analysis psycholinguistics sociolinguistics other nonlinguistic disciplines computational linguistics Discourse Analysis other linguistic disciplines pragmatics

Approaches to Discourse Deborah Schiffrin “Approaches to Discourse” (1994) singles out 6 major approaches Approaches to Discourse Deborah Schiffrin “Approaches to Discourse” (1994) singles out 6 major approaches to discourse: the speech act approach; interactional sociolinguistics; the ethnography of communication; pragmatic approach; conversation analysis; variationist approach.