CRISTAL-MED ADS-B 1090 ES MEDITERRANEAN solution for local

CRISTAL-MED ADS-B 1090 ES: MEDITERRANEAN solution for local operational needs ASAS-TN 2 Second Workshop Rome, April 2006 ENAV S. p. A. CNS/ATM Experimental Center CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006

Summary General outline: Ø ADS-B addressed as a problem solver at local level but also as a future enabler Ø Harmonized set of activities lead to: ü faster overall operational acceptance and ü expedite local implementation Ø Continuous feedback with ongoing standardisation process CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 2

CRISTAL MED Objectives Validation of the following ADS-B Out services: Ø Ground ATC surveillance in non radar airspaces Ø Ground ATC surveillance in radar airspaces Ø Airport Surface Surveillance Ø Provision of Aircraft Derived Data (ADD) – (only local objective) The Programme: two different phases: Ø PHASE 1 (September 2005 - June 2006) Ø PHASE 2 (2006 -2008, to go into a stable pre-operational phase) CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 3

CRISTAL MED Consortium Ø ENAV S. p. A. (Co-ordinator) - Italy Ø DSNA - France Ø HCAA - Greece LV DK LT IE Ø MATS - Malta BY GB DE NL BE BE Ø DCAC - Cyprus PL PL UA CZ LU LU FR FR SK AT CH CH SI CR HR HU BA IT IT PT ES MD RO YU MK AL GR BG TR SY SY MA DZ TN MT CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 CY 4

CRISTAL-MED phase 1 WP 0. - Management Phase 1 WBS: key points Ø Delivery of ATM operational concepts and scenarios (global/local) ü Related discrepancies from RFG work Ø Delivery of system architecture and specifications ü Ø Site surveys PMP & budget estimation for Phase 2 WP 1. - Operational Framework Specification Define Operational Environment and Scenarios Define Operational constraints and benefits Define operational assumptions for validation activities Actual stage: ongoing WP 2. - Validation Specification Define Validation Objectives and Methodology Define Validation Plan Delivery of Validation Objectives and Validation Plans (global/local) Ø Actual stage: completed WP 3. - Infrastructure Specification Actual stage: ongoing Define Overall Architecture Produce System Specifications Produce External Interfaces Specifications Prepare Development, Installation and Integration Plan Perform Site Survey WP 4 - Phase 2 preparation Develop outline PMP Produce budget estimations CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 5

CRISTAL-MED site deployment plan CRISTAL MED CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 6

CRISTAL-MED candidate sites – IT example ADS-B-NRA: Alghero (North Sardinia) ADS-B-RAD: Rome – Fiumicino International Airport ADS-B-RAD: Caraffa di Catanzaro (SE part of IT FIR) CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 7

Candidate sites – IT: NRA example RDA (PSR+SSR) FL 245 3 Real Operational need Rome FIR Alghero North - West Area Under Rome ACC jurisdiction EW SECTOR FL 120 2 FL 095 NRA RDA (PSR+SSR) FL 085 1 GND/MSL NRA CTR Alghero 1 and 2 AREAS ADS – B Sole means of surveillance CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 4 CTR Olbia 3 and 4 AREAS ADS – B Secondary means of surveillance 8

CRISTAL-MED candidate sites Ø France ü ADS-B-RAD: Ajaccio (Corsica) ü ADS-B-APT: Marseille Ø Greece ü ADS-B-RAD: (Monastiri, Karpathos) SW, SE part of Greek FIR CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 9

CRISTAL-MED candidate sites Ø Malta ü ADS-B-RAD: (Dingli) NE and NW part of the FIR ü ADS-B-APT: Malta International Airport Ø Cyprus ü ADS-B-RAD: (Pafos) Western part of Cypriot FIR / boundaries with Greek FIR ü ADS-B-APT: Pafos/Larnaca International Airport CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 10

Validation design: ADS-B-RAD / NRA / APT Ø Adoption of CASCADE validation plan Ø National validation exercises following: ü Joint validation of technical issues ü Definition of a proper timescale ü Use of Model Based Simulations for first evaluation ü Use of cockpit simulator / equipped aircraft / opportunity traffic ü Bear in mind mixed environment ü Set-up of a Shadow Mode system ü Validation of related procedures / control phases [… It should be further discussed whether reliance on the displayed ADS-B identity without the need for controller correlation with visual observation or reported position is acceptable in future procedures…] Ø Next future: continuous coverage from Cyprus to France - possible improvement reaching two different goal: ü Join local requirements (solution for local constraint) ü Improve and harmonise the overall 1090 ES coverage CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 11

Improved coverage for ADS-B-RAD LV DK DK LT LT IE BY GB GB DE NL PL PL Rome BE BE FR FR Thassos CZ Genova LU LU Marseille UA UA SK AT AT CH CH SI MD MD HU Caraffa – Faco RO RO del soldato CR HR BA YU IT IT PT PT Athens BG MK ES TR TR AL AL Ajaccio GR SY SY Monte Codi Ustica MA MA Pafos/Larnaca DZ CY TN MT Malta APT/Dingli Monastiri CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 Karpathos 12

Summary of Operational Acceptance steps Ø Evaluation of RFG proposed procedures ü No relevant discrepancies found ü Additional local recommendations in terms of: plot symbol / outage prediction / local situation analysis (collected for OHA) Ø Higher detail for operational procedures Phase 1 Ø Case study: OHA ü Target: to maintain existing safety levels Ø Operational acceptance for: ü Detailed procedures proposed ü Mitigations introduced on the hazard basis CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 Phase 2 13

Conclusion Ø Project added value: ü Definition of a common strategy for implementation ü Use of common guidelines for any project activity ü Common approach for benefit identification but focus on local improvements (with shared feedback) ü Harmonisation for the overall infrastructure ü Strong cooperation with standardisation activities ü Easy “plug&play” model to be reused at local level CRISTAL-MED at ASAS-TN 2, March 2006 14