314369c630535c74f53e31919207d47b.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 30
Country Club Creek Trail Preliminary Engineering Report Public Outreach Jessica V. Salinas COA Project Manager December 9, 2014
Country Club Creek Trail Agenda l l Introduction of Project Team Overall Program Goals for Urban Trails Country Club Creek Trail Summary Preliminary Engineering Report Overview – – – l l 2 Outline of PER Evaluation Criteria Recommended Route Next Steps Questions 12/9/14 jvsalinas
Project Team l l l City Project Sponsor – Nadia Barrera, PWD City Project Manager – Jessica Salinas, PWD Project Consultant & Subconsultants: – Civil Engineering Consultants – Gary Martin & Ken Thomas – CAS Consulting, Inc. – Cost Estimating and Utility Coordination Harutunian Engineering, Inc. – Lighting Options Hicks & Company – Environmental Investigation HVJ – Geotechnical Investigation Jaster Quintanilla San Antonio, LLP – Preliminary Structural Design Macias & Associates, L. P. – Surveying and Parcel Information – – – 3 12/9/14 jvsalinas
Program Goals for Urban Trails l l l 4 Easy access for transportation & recreation users. Link to bicycle & sidewalk network. Adequate size to accommodate recreation & transportation uses. Incorporate amenities & features that transform them into unique greenways that reflect the City around them. Provide adequate resources to maintain & operate. Ensure context-sensitivity & environmentally sustainability as well as preservation and improvement upon wildlife habitat. 12/9/14 nbarrera
Country Club Creek Trail Project Summary l l l Project Funded by 2010 Prop 1 & 2012 Prop 12 Preliminary Engineering Report: April 2014 – February 2015 Design Phase: Spring 2015 – Spring 2016 – l Construction – Pending Project Funding – l 5 Construction Estimate (w/20% Contingency) - $4, 519, 892 Anticipated start Fall 2016 Project website: http: //www. austintexas. gov/urbantrails 12/9/14 jvsalinas
Trail Vicinity Map 6 12/9/2014 jvsalinas
Country Club Creek Trail • Approximately 3 -mile multi-use path generally running along Country Club Creek connecting Lady Bird Lake to Mabel Davis Park in southeast Austin. • Two segments of the trail that need to be constructed • • • 7 0. 5 mile trail section - from Ventura Drive to Burleson Road through an existing City of Austin electric easement. Note: Existing segment along Pleasant Valley from Burleson Road to East Oltorf. 1 mile section - from East Oltorf to the existing gravel trail just north of Elmont Drive. 12/9/14 jvsalinas
Preliminary Engineering Report The Preliminary Engineering Report consists of the following sections: 8 Executive Summary Introduction Preliminary Trail Routes Evaluation Criteria Critical Water Quality Zone Erosion Hazard Zone Drainage and Floodplain Right-of-Way Trees Environmental Issues Utilities Impact Structural Preliminary Design Lighting Options Opinion Of Probable Cost Route Evaluation Recommended Option Summary & Next Steps 12/9/14 cec
Evaluation Factors The following factors were used to evaluate the different trail segments: Accessibility Connectivity Critical Water Quality Zone Erosion Hazard Zone Floodplain/Drainage Impacts 9 12/9/14 Right-of-Way Obstructions Tree Impacts Environmental Cost cec
TRAIL ROUTE 10 12/8/14 cec
SEGMENT 1 Austin Energy right-of-way (ROW) from Ventura Drive to Burleson Rd Existing Austin Energy Easement 11 12/9/14 jvsalinas
SEGMENT 1 Austin Energy right-of-way (ROW) from Ventura Drive to Burleson Rd Electric power ROW looking north from Ventura. 12 12/9/14 jvsalinas
Segment 2 – Existing Route along S. Pleasant Valley from Burleson to Oltorf 13 12/9/14 jvsalinas
SEGMENT 3 starting at S. Pleasant Valley Rd & E. Oltorf to Riverside Dr. 14 12/9/14 jvsalinas
SEGMENT 3 starting at S. Pleasant Valley Rd & E. Oltorf to Riverside Dr. Oltorf facing west towards Pleasant Valley 15 Looking south towards Riverside Dr. 12/9/14 jvsalinas
SEGMENT 3 B Segment near Sheringham Dr 16 12/9/14 jvsalinas
SEGMENT 4 Riverside Dr. & Wickersham Intersection 17 12/9/14 jvsalinas
SEGMENT 4 starting at Riverside Dr. to Elmont Dr. Northern Bridge of E. Riverside Dr from Wickersham Lane. 18 12/9/14 Wickersham Dr looking north from E. Riverside Dr. jvsalinas
SEGMENT 4 Riverside Dr. to Elmont Dr. 19 12/9/14 jvsalinas
SEGMENT 4 Riverside Dr. to Elmont Dr. 20 12/9/14 jvsalinas
SEGMENT 4 Wickersham Pavement Markings (West Side) 21 12/9/14 jvsalinas
SEGMENT 4 Wickersham Pavement Markings (West Side) 22 12/9/14 jvsalinas
SEGMENT 4 Wickersham Pavement Markings (East Side) 23 12/9/14 jvsalinas
Construction Estimate Section 1 & 2 Section Base Estimate 20% Contingency w/Lighting 1 $371, 575 $445, 890 $692, 644 2 $35, 362 $42, 435 $352, 345 24 12/9/14 jvsalinas
Construction Estimate Section 3 & 4 Section Base Estimate 20% Contingency w/Lighting 3 B 1 $1, 166, 366 $1, 399, 640 $1, 840, 336 3 C $1, 406, 156 $1, 687, 387 $1, 834, 286 4 B 1 $787, 116 $944, 539 $1, 549, 733 TOTAL $3, 766, 575 $4, 519, 891 $6, 269, 344 25 12/9/14 jvsalinas
Next Steps l Dec 2014: Collect Public Input to PER – – l l 26 Open House City Website Jan 2015: Project Team to incorporate Feedback and update PER Jan 2015: City Stakeholder Final Review of PER Feb 2015: Follow-up Open House to present Final PER Spring 2015: Design Phase 12/9/14 jvsalinas
QUESTIONS 27 12/9/14 jvsalinas
TRAIL ROUTE 28 12/8/14 cec
BACK-UP 29 12/9/14 jvsalinas
Evaluation Factors (continued) l l l l l 30 Accessibility – Primarily deciding how easy it is to comply with ADA requirements in a segment. Connectivity – The ease of reaching destinations from the proposed trail. Critical Water Zone (CWQZ) – Indicates whether or not the trail segment is located in this zone. Erosion Hazard Zone (EHZ) – Indicates whether the trail segment is in the EHZ or not. Floodplain/Drainage Impacts – Indicates whether or not the trail segment is located in the floodplain and if there any negative impacts to drainage. Right-of-Way – Indicates if a new easement is required in a trail segment. Obstructions – Indicates if there are features that would impact the location of the trail. Tree Impact – Indicates the impact to trees in a trail segment. Environmental – Indicates the whether or not environmental permits would be required. Cost – Indicates the relative cost in relation to the other options. 12/9/14 cec
314369c630535c74f53e31919207d47b.ppt