CONTENT ANALYSIS VLADIMIR PUTIN PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA FEDERATION

CONTENT ANALYSIS VLADIMIR PUTIN PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA FEDERATION Made by: Tastemirov Rustem, Tabildiev Adil

The frequency content analysis of speech of prime minister Putin carried out by me during his last straight line-2013 showed that it never used the word "has to" (0 uses). At the same time the similar analysis of speeches of president Medvedev revealed a high rating of the use of this word (86 uses in the message of the president, etc. speeches), that is a certain psychological complex of the obligation, based that Medvedev, probably, has to justify trust of the ex-president, voters, etc. takes place. Probably, this consequence and Medvedev's other hidden debts about which we never learn. After all speech — it always a consequence of subconscious mechanisms which are often hidden from the observer.

In what are solidary Putin and Medvedev, so it in the frequency of the use of the words "us", "ours", "we" (about 90 uses at Putin). At the prime minister much more considerably a rating of the use of the word it "is necessary" (48 uses). The ratio "is necessary" Putin and "owes" Medvedev, in my opinion, says that the last still stays in a condition of adaptation and a vrashchivaniye in the true power in spite of the fact that, it seems, it has. This conclusion is confirmed also by that in Putin's speech the rating of the use of the word "I" (47 uses) is much higher, than at Medvedev. Putin speaks from himself, than Medvedev more surely. In other used words, "Russia" (30 uses by Putin), "people" (26 uses), "about new" (15 uses), "state" (12 uses), "countries" (10 uses), "development" (9 uses), "crisis" (2 uses), Putin and Medvedev practically coincide. It and is clear, it is a consequence of a symmetric tandem Putin-Medvedev.

The visual analysis of a straight line of Putin showed that it became ironichny in comparison with last year. It develops, becomes every year more plastic, sociable, wise and ironic. He acted in a role more psychologist, the astute politician. It showed that can change perception of a problem by means of dialogue and by means of financial means. Putin sincerely worried, his skin color changed. It was visible that it carries out a lot of work. Many questions were rather radical, and I don't exclude that they were a surprise for the prime minister. Most likely not all questions were preparations, and were set and obeyed on the air for the first time. About it says that fact that all leaders of "Conversation" were very strained during air: on the one hand, they had a certain scenario of transfer, well and on the other hand, a large number of people who wanted to snatch out a microphone, why they couldn't but worry.