Consumers and risk of nanomaterials marjana peterman zps si

Consumers and risk of nanomaterials marjana. peterman@zps. si CONFERENCE ON NANO-SAFETY 22 -24. April, Slovenia, Ljubljana

Consumers n ZPS n BEUC n CONSUMERS INTERNATIONAL n TACD n ANEC

Consumers by definition buy products for own use. .

Consumers and risk poor knowledge - limits to choice n Which? Consumer survey : 61% of people surveyed had never heard of nanotechnologies n Slovene consumer hasn’t been asked yet

Consumers and risk who is a consumer? Consumers are not a statistical test n Child n Youth n Elderly n Sick n …….

Consumers and health risk communication on the labell – is it enough? Toothpaste with Ca n Limited use – labelling n ? bleeding gums n Ca blood homeostasis – 48 h n Too much Ca in blood: respiratory and heart failure

Consumers and health risk communication on the labell – is it enough? Silicon dioxide : E 551, aditive n Can penetrate human epithelial cell Titanium dioxide: E 171 n Lethal to water fleas (only? ) Carbon nano tubes n C 60 in bass penetrates blood brain barriers Zinc oxide n Phototoxic effect of nano zinc oxide is known

Consumer and gap in communication nano risk Warning labell: n May cause. . . n Use only if. . Need for Education n Information n Empowerment n But when? ?

Nano and the environment (end of consumer product use) Socks with nano silver washed out n Sewer treatment problems n Ecotoxic/toxic heavy metal n Biocide n Already widely used (wash mashines, fridges. . )

Research: Tekstilec, vol 51/2008 n Elementary nano silver as antibacterial agent – original scientific paper n No benefit shown: n The bacterial reduction was too low to assure effective antimicrobial activity

Gaps or limited understanding of the potential effects Numerous warnings tabled: n n n n UK Royal society and Royal Academy of Engineering (2004) SCENIHR (2006) UK Council for Science and Technology (2007) SCCP (2007) + DG Enterprise recent letter to cosmetics sector FP 7 research Bf. R Defra n Etc…………… n ………………. .

Gap - consumer vs. product use Risk of nano particles vs benefit of consumer product use Should be demonstrated!

After market useage gap What is risk? harmful, undesired product properties and/or harmful, undesired product useage properties Hazard can be intrinsic, extrinsic, technological , environmental and also moral (malpractice) n

Gap – Consumer - complex and diverse is a risk In the context of risk, consumers and specially vulnerable groups should present a measure to limits n Elderly population that is on the rise, n Children, n Pregnant women n Sick n …. .

Bridgeing the gaps – legislation as a minimum Cosmetics directive/regulation – consumer NGO’s welcome inclusion of nano n Labelling n Catalogueing chemicals, substances and products But there is not enough regulation in: n Definition of nano only covers biopersistent and insoluble nanomaterials n Risk assessed for certain specific purposes, but not for all nano in cosmetics n We regret that the safety requirements will only start in 2012

Regulatory aspects of nanomaterials (COM 2008) consumer NGO view 1. immediate review ought to be addressed also in: REACH, Novel Foods, Cosmetics, quality of water and waste. . 2. Coherent and comprehensive approach needed ( now it is fragmented and limiting, i. e. cosmetics. . ) 3. “no data no market” principle 4. Common harmonised definition for all relevant EU legislation: - size: 100 nm or less - Substances having nanomaterilas properties included - All, not just insoluble and bioacumulative 5. transparancy, traceability and information to consumers through labelling and mandatory inventory public registry of products and nanomaterials

Thank you ? will legs be enough? ? will precautionary principle be enough?

John F. Kennedy, 15 th March 1962 «Consumers by definition, include us all. They are the largest economic group, affecting and affected by almost every public and private economic decision. Yet they are the only important group. . . whose views are often not heard»