Computing 5 Years of Futures — Current Computing

Computing 5 Years of Futures - Current Computing - The Competitors - Computing Trends HP-UX Technology - Interesting will dominate - Paradigm Shifts the world - The Shape of Things to Come - The HP-UX Way 1

Current Computing - Pros - Cons - Gotchas 2

- Single image system - Partitioning Simple to manage, but inflexible to use - Groups of System Less expensive to buy, but complex to tune Easy to use Complex to manage - Minimal automation Expensive to buy and maintain Efficient on resource Isolated performance and environments - System Management compensates Flexible deployment maintenance than motor cars Computers take more Flexible ready to run Most computers can’t be taken out of - People centric model Scalable and redundentmanagement the box and used Improved multi-system not tune and fix themselves Usually computers will Improved multi-image management Usually computeroperations teamor patch themselves - Inflexible hardware Dependence on won’t upgrade Business objective using the current automation Customers to operate are not tuning Expensive One to many mapping - Proprietary execution environment Constant retain Difficult toupgrade cycle Runs only one OS UNIX (HP-UX, Solaris or AIX) - Enterprise Proprietary pricing Linux Redundant after two generations - Edge Windows whatever - Department 3

The Competitors - IBM - SUN - HP - Micro. Soft - Dell 4

Looks sound from business and finance perspective IBM Has good balance of services and products Is undermining current product set with Linux play, risky. . . A proprietary giant, won’t fly long term 5

Looks less than sound from business and finance perspective Sun Has a single product line and is building a second Is confused how to respond to Linux, embrace I guess…. Likely target for takeover 6

Looks sound from business and finance perspective HP Has large diverse product and services portfolio Is embracing multi-OS play with IPF Is integrating into the new HP, quite the challenge 7

Looks very sound from business and finance perspective Micro. Soft Has large diverse software product portfolio Has near monopoly in primary markets, but is struggling to become an IBM or HP Need to diversify out of just software into services. 8

Dell No IP…. (maybe they could buy Sun) 9

Computing Trends - Hardware - OS Software - Middleware and apps 10

Hardware trends Proprietary CPUs will be replaced by commodity devices- most likely IPF or derivatives of Hardware vendors will becomes platform vendors that differentiate themselves by integration of H/W and S/W components into a platform- e. g App servers Hardware will becomes less dependent on any single OSOS agnostic and/or multi-OS Specialized market slots will open up for optimized solutions based on specialist hardware Hardware will continue to becomes less expensive as the IPF commoditizes servers 11

OS Software trends Linux will continue to grow and improve it’s market share at low end Proprietary UNIX vendors will increase their value by improving the integration and amount of built in components Microsoft will continue to move against Linux at the low end and UNIX at the mid and high-end Linux will replace Solaris as the development platform of choice Software will get more complex and management and deployment systems will continue to lag behind undermining the improvements to software 12

Middleware and Apps trends Middleware components e. g apps server, AAA servers and Ldap servers will all be integrated into the OS software. H/W vendors will try and lock middleware and apps onto their platform Applications will start to move towards Linux as an exploratory step toward acceptance into the enterprise e. g SAP, Oracle and BEA Application vendors will loose their sense of humour at 20 cents on the dollar for Linux products Middleware and applications will continue to have UNIX and not Linux as there primary focus Microsoft will slowly consume any middleware and applications that look like they have value 13

Interesting Technology - Partitioning - Clustering - Multi-OS 14

What is Partitioning At the most granular level, it is the ability to divide a single CPU and it’s associated resources amongst various tasks to guarantee QOS levels On a server basis it is the ability to support multiple instances of the operating system, thus facilitating isolation and optimization of operating environment At the infrastructure level it is the ability to share and move resources and tasks to maximize utilization and hence ROI of computing systems 15

Partitioning Concepts There are four basic concepts of computer partitioning that need to be understood and grasped to effectively interpret the product offerings of the 4 main vendors. The concepts are: - Processor virtualization - Process affinity - Hard partitioning - Software Don’t you hate concepts partitioning that don’t mean anything to “normal” people 16

Partitioning Definitions Name Description • Processor virtualization Is the complete virtualization of the execution environment I. e. the execution environment executes on “virtual CPU" • Processor Affinity Is the association of a physical CPU with the execution environment I. e. the execution environment executes on a really CPU. • Hard partitions • Soft partitions Electrical isolation of groups of CPU and associated components and execution environment Programmatic isolation of group of CPU and associated component Complicated isn't it ? Bear with me for a moment longer 17

And onlyvirtualized a significant processor The the understand live in isis partitioning…. draw wonderful only 75% However, house backpartitioningasystems have So. The computerspace the a because you the Imaging you computer performance How toeffectiveis equivalent house…. of can processor they have to left totally “virtualized” rooms house is that manya highsystemthick Lpars over have as partitioning more forwant. . . use head of of allowing very like and virtualized the walls are as you processor the advantage 25%, house. . price partitions than about 25% of the. CPUsspace of the house total virtualization…. 18

And if the housewas that you magically penalty And the your new was there what no 25% combine But computer equivalent is a processor affinity upside was rule was you The the. Imaging house couldawould wanted… And only. So what is just alternativehave a “limit” you rooms house…. andto the separateofthe lessin the house then number bought when you wanted for the flexibility. . v. Pars partitioning system like more rooms or Opportunities 19

Processor virtualization verses processor affinity • Processor virtualization Is the complete virtualization of the execution environment I. e. the execution environment executes on “virtual CPU environment • Upside: You can have many more virtual executin environment than you have CPUs • Down side: You loose up to 25% of the power of the machine to the partitioning virtualization system. • Processor Affinity Is the association of a physical CPUs with the execution environment I. e. the execution environment executes on a really CPU. • Upside: There is little or no penalty for the partition system. • Down side: You can only have as many partitions as you have physical CPUs. 20

Andpartitioning provides electrically isolated even when you hard partitioning…. Hard was you bought an resources that can be Anditthesea understandchange the size of the And How topartition have apartment complex because you could Imaging special complex hard partitioning The computer equivalent is between apartments by movingthe same server them they partitions on them of each apartment movedchange the sizedynamically. . . between space dynamically remain completely isolated. . . Hard partitioning is like at will having several servers in So how are physical box. the same hard partitions different to virtual or Except that you can software partitions. . . dynamically change the size of the servers. 21

And the. Imagingwasthe house adjustedbe a And youdivision youthat the a was agreed and The computerof of house…. if And thedecided equivalent house wouldwith deal to share the purchase And the division bought is soft or virtual both would respect thethe twothe you not friend andbetween others of house partitioning in privacy, divided live together visiting…. someone had family withstanding the walls. . . 22

Hard partitions Electrical isolation Suitable for mixed environments Suitable for hosting multiple customers or entities Soft/virtual partitioning Software isolation Not suitable for mixing R&D and production environments Not suitable for mixing customers or different financial entities 23

What is Clustering Most common is HA clustering. Clustering to make sure your application is kept running even if the hosting system fails, via switch over Least understood is clustering for scalability or performance. The nature of clustering is such that in theory it is possible to add another node and thus capacity in minutes This is most important aspect of clustering as it reduces management by treating every node the same. Cluster management also enable the first two items as well. 24

HA Clustering Check Pointing 25

Performance or Scaling Cluster Application 1 st node OS image 2 nd node 3 rd node 4 th node Cluster Manager 26

Management Cluster App 1 App 2 1 st node 2 nd node OS image App 4 App 3 3 rd node 4 th node Cluster Manager 27

- HP-UX + Linux + Microsoft whatever - H/W server that can run all three Multi-OS and Partitioning - H/W platform that support partitioning become really interestingfor all three Oss when what exactly isinferstructure for all you can have more So - Single management Multi-OS three Oss them one OS running on the - Single set of deployment tools for all same box and dynamically three move resources data between all between - Interoperability suite for three partitions…. - Single support contract for all three 28

Paradigm Shifts - Blades - Grids - Utility - UDC 29

hp utility pricing solutions for systems consolidation unique · align your costs to revenues · reduce risk · improve your service levels · simplify planning & operations lease purchase fl xi e il b ity pay per forecast for on-demand capacity via planned usage capacity on demand for on-demand capacity when activated pay per use for on-demand capacity via metered usage With HP Financing, consolidatio n pays for itself! 30

value-add “beyond the box” Utility Data. Center intrane t internet high availability hp partitioning continuum utility pricing utility controller automatic workload management network /server virtualization switching pool firewall pool server pool load balancer pool NAS pool storage virtualization switching pool storage pool ultimate flexibility, uptime, value from assets 31

The Shape of Things to Come. . . Adaptive infrastructures (take a look at UDC) 32

The HP-UX Way 33

hp-ux 11 i on PA-RISC the best os for the new enterprise over 40, 000 copies shipped Competitive advantage scalability up to 64 cpus single system ha dynamic kernel tuning ol* pci i/o i. COD utility computing manageability hard partitions Vx. VM volume management virtual partitions security intrusion detection buffer overflow - ipfilter linux affinity networking performance ipv 4, ipv 6, mobile ipv 4/ipv 6 operating environments ease of installation and administration 34

Ranks HP-UX 11 i “clearly reflecting hp’s increased investment in its Unix product line, hp-ux moves to the head of the class for UNIX operating systems functions. hp-ux occupies the top spot in every studied category, with a particularly strong lead in internet and web application services, and an impressive surge forward in the intensely competitive RAS category” ranked #1 in all five categories Quote Attributed to D. H. Brown Associates HP-UX 11 i Ranks #1 HP-UX 11 i Solaris 8 IBM AIX 5 L Tru 64 5. 1 #1 scalability #1 reliability, availability and serviceability #1 #1 systems management #1 internet and web Overall application services #1 directory and security services 35

2 H’ 05 hp-ux 11 i v 3 • Dynamic Always On §Self Tuning, Self Healing 1 H’ 04 11 i v 2 T hp-ux 11 i releases versions and highlights Q 2’ 03 11 i v 2 • Tru 64 integration • Enterprise IA & PA • Dynamic Systems Q 3’ 02 Hardware independent 11 i v 1. 6 for Itanium 2 Q 2’ 01 • 1 st to market • Mission Critical stacks • HP ISUs Mission critical • ISV support 11 i v 1. 5 for ISV friendly Itanium Q 4’ 00 11 i v 1 PA 11 i on • 1 st to market § Technical stacks § Encryp. performance APA binary support § market first hp-ux for Itanium § Scalability § High Availability The new model, § Quality easyramp (over 1000) § ISV to use, backward compatible § Super. Dome s el e r wa ft od en M So. Self-tun ele t. R e as lem b a en W ry Mission 64 /odel l Tru Critica firs m. H t ing t rke Hardware na A manew SW e and ing , io Self-heal ! se th egr. Pu n t Int r ctive lu t atio fo y Ho independent ible e vo s lfriendly at ea. C l E ISVo. X for IPp -U HPrward com F e k ly bacrt a Qu 36

Releases and New Functionality Version 1. 6 Availability Features • MC/Service. Guard • High Performance clustering 64 way Hyperfabric II • Vx. VM with rootability* Performance • Mx. N threads (JVM yay!) • Even more kernel tunables (60% more) Security • Ultra Fast Encryption/Decryption Intrusion Detection ISV support • Complete compatibility to all • future IPF systems • Complete Source Compatibility • Cross compilers to generate IPF • binary with PA-RISC systems • Linux API and ABI(Q 4) • Secure Web Serving with Apache, Zeus Hardware Enablement • Mc. Kinley Platform Mission Critical and ISV friendly Version 2 Hardware Independent • Supports PA-RISC and IPF Always On for the Internet • 10 gigabit ethernet • IPv 6 2. 0, Router Discovery • MCast , Default Route, Multipathing Availability Features • Cell OLA • Full Processor Deallocation and i. COD • PCI I/O error recovery ISV support • 20, 000 and counting due to binary compatibility Hardware independent • Kernel Driver ABI • Linux ABI and API • Aries 32 and 64 bit PA apps Support Version 2 T Version 3 Version 4 • Self-tuning • Tru-Clusters integration • Net scaling • Self-healing • Net centric • Net agile Mission Critical • Hyper-frame Computing and Hardware friendly ISV independent Tru 64 Integratio n Mainframe Dynamic Replacement always on 37

HP-UX 11 i Operating Environments HP-UX 11 i Mission Critical Operating Environment delivering Every year customers spend million of dollars testing values HP-UX 11 i Enterprise Operating Environment • mc/serviceguard • and 11 i. Operating various software hp-ux workload into integrating Environments are: products • Robust • online JFS 3. 3 HP-UX Operating manager mirror disk/UX Environment (Base/Internet) • deploy - a something they can • integrated offering • serviceguard golden image • process and tested toolkit NFS so pre-integrated resource • Enterprisecustomers can • ease of mgmt. • system • hp-ux os manager (PRM) • • network drivers theydeploya • glance plus of the Cluster - configuration them out purpose solution need general box • installation repository • web qos peak • openview Management • hp apache ws • software use them to build a more (ECM) toolkit • upgrades - theyor need an performance enterprise solution distributor/ux • ignite/ux agent integrated and reliable golden image • support • netscape • java RTE • single-system - and they need a mission critical solution. LDAP server • java JDK event and • pam keberos • java JPI • ems framework • cifs client • netscape • cifs server • service control communicator manager availability management • Event monitoring services (EMS) HA monitors HP responded by developing • global media • no codewords • simplified license HP-UX 11 i Operating Environments management 38

39

40

releases timelines 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2009 2013 2007 2011 hp-ux releases timelines for PA-RISC and IPF hp-ux 11 i version 2 Now Shipping hp-ux 11 i version 1. 6 hp-ux 11 i version 1. 5 hp-ux 11 i version 3 hp-ux 11 i version 4 hp-ux 11 i 7 8 version 6 5 PA-RISC ONLY IPF ONLY PA-RISC and IPF hp-ux 11 i hp-ux 11. 0. Note: HP-UX future plans subject to change One major release every 18 – 24 months 41

2002 Unix Function Review HP-UX 11 i ranked #1 in all five categories #1 scalability #1 reliability, availability and serviceability #1 systems management #1 internet and web application services #1 directory and security services 42

2002 Unix Function Review Overall Ranking (160+ Functions) • HP-UX 11 i • Solaris 8 • IBM Aix 5 L • Tru 64 Unix 5. 1 HP-UX 11 i: The Leader of UNIX Servers 43

HP-UX scales up your E-services ü Extreme Super. Dome OLTP scalability ü Captured >30% of the Top 500 supercomputing list ü Proven performance for Oracle 9 i (RAC) Real Application Clusters Scalability HP-UX 11 i Tru 64 UNIX 5. 1 Solaris 8 AIX 5 L 44

HP-UX delivers highest reliability & availability to the enterprise ü Dynamic CPU, memory, I/O & network resiliency ü Complete partition continuum only from HP-UX - n. Pars, v. Pars, & v. Pars in n. Pars ü Instant Capacity On Demand for Utility Data Center ü Leadership goal-based workload management Reliability, Availability & Serviceability HP-UX 11 i Solaris 8 Tru 64 UNIX 5. 1 AIX 5 L 45

HP-UX means data center manageability ü Web/GUI-based Service Control Manager for multisystem manageability ü Ignite-UX for large scale instant installations ü Instant enterprise support via real-time event notification to HP & remote monitoring services ü Support of dual logical volume managers – LVM & Vx. VM System Management HP-UX 11 i Tru 64 UNIX 5. 1 AIX 5 L Solaris 8 46

HP-UX: leader of pervasive connectivity ü Comprehensive suite of IPV 6 support ü Carrier-grade mobile Internet services platform ü Unmatched UNIX Windows interoperability - authentication & file/printer server ü World-leading Apache Web Server - enterprise-ready with exceptional security & scalability Internet & Web Application Services HP-UX 11 i Solaris 8 AIX 5 L Tru 64 UNIX 5. 1 47

HP-UX secures the data center & network üSuperior support for LDAP directory services üBullet-proof host security - unique intrusion detection & prevention (IDS/9000) üProtect your network with highest security - IPSec, IPFilter & Kerberos Directory & Security Services HP-UX 11 i Solaris 8 AIX 5 L Tru 64 UNIX 5. 1 48