Скачать презентацию Comparisons of Salespeople in ML vs SL Direct Скачать презентацию Comparisons of Salespeople in ML vs SL Direct

aa78e44029ebf03f947a2e6570ad61a0.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 19

Comparisons of Salespeople in ML vs. SL Direct Selling Organizations Mia Yan Jake Raynard Comparisons of Salespeople in ML vs. SL Direct Selling Organizations Mia Yan Jake Raynard

Background of Study • Purpose: – Determine whether ML and SL salespeople differ on Background of Study • Purpose: – Determine whether ML and SL salespeople differ on behavioral, motivational, or descriptive characteristics ØImplications for managers and organizations

Sample & Data Collection • Sample: 22 member companies of the Direct Selling Association Sample & Data Collection • Sample: 22 member companies of the Direct Selling Association in the UK • Questionnaire - salespeople in 1 st month with the company • 4050 questionnaires sent - 673 usable responses (response rate of 18%)

Multilevel: • • • • Amway Cabouchon Dorling Kindersley Herbalife Kleeneze Mary Kay Cosmetics Multilevel: • • • • Amway Cabouchon Dorling Kindersley Herbalife Kleeneze Mary Kay Cosmetics Nature’s Sunshine NSA Nu. Skin Nutri. Metics Oriflame Studio Dee World Book Learning Journey Single Level: • • • Ann Summers Betterware Encyclopedia Britannica Kirby Pippa Dee Princess House Tupperware Vorwerk World Book Childcraft

Research Methodologies Variables: • Job characteristics – Proving oneself to others; personal feelings of Research Methodologies Variables: • Job characteristics – Proving oneself to others; personal feelings of success; work rewards and career growth; being in control • Job satisfaction • Organizational commitment – Involvement and loyalty; propensity to leave • Met expectations – Personal growth and well-being; achieving and accomplishing results; job and its image and rewards; undesirable job characteristics • Image of direct selling – Hard sell, misleading, illegal; advantages to buyers and sellers; better salespeople than retail stores

Characteristics of Respondents Characteristic ML SL Total Significance of Difference Percent full-time or self-employed Characteristics of Respondents Characteristic ML SL Total Significance of Difference Percent full-time or self-employed prior to start of direct selling activity 50. 9 24. 0 42. 7 0. 0001 Percent with previous selling experience 42. 6 51. 7 45. 4 0. 034 Percent with five years or more work experience prior to direct selling activity 73. 8 63. 5 70. 7 0. 035 Percent with other job in addition to direct selling 64. 3 34. 5 55. 2 0. 0001 Percent for whom direct selling is primary work activity 32. 4 62. 4 41. 4 0. 0001 Percent who would seek another work activity if no longer involved in direct selling 20. 6 9. 0 17. 0 0. 001 Percent who work with more than one direct selling company 15. 2 10. 9 13. 9 0. 092 Percent female 71. 2 73. 5 71. 9 0. 297 Percent with college or post graduate degree 26. 3 11. 5 21. 8 0. 0001 Percent married or living as married 69. 5 67. 1 68. 8 0. 207 Median hours per week devoted to direct selling 6. 7 9. 4 7. 6 0. 0001 Mean intention to quit (where 1=never thought about quitting; 6=no longer active) 1. 8 2. 1 1. 9 0. 011 37. 3 33. 3 36. 0 0. 013 £ 21, 229 £ 15, 351 £ 19, 212 0. 0001 Median age Median income

Comparison of Salespeople Comparison of Salespeople

Comparison of Salespeople Comparison of Salespeople

Comparison of Salespeople Comparison of Salespeople

Comparison of Salespeople Comparison of Salespeople

Comparison of Salespeople Single Level Salespeople • median age 33. 3 • median income Comparison of Salespeople Single Level Salespeople • median age 33. 3 • median income – 15, 351 • education – 11. 5% college or post graduate • work experience – 63. 5% (5+ years) • primary job – 65. 5% • Prior selling experience – 51. 7% • Median hours a week for DS – 9. 4 • Mean intention to quit – 2. 07 Multilevel Salespeople • median age 37. 3 • median income – 21, 229 • education – 26. 3% college or post graduate • work experience – 73. 8% (5+ years) • Primary job – 35. 7% • Prior selling experience – 42. 6% • Median hours a week for DS – 6. 7 • Mean intention to quit – 1. 75

Discussion: SL Salespeople • importance of proving themselves – desire to increase selfconfidence (younger, Discussion: SL Salespeople • importance of proving themselves – desire to increase selfconfidence (younger, less educated, less experienced, lower income) • importance of selling a • highly competitive product (boost their confidence) independent contractor – simply sells the product/ service – do not assemble a cadre of salespeople/ downlines – Consider DS as their primary work activity (more hrs) – Equates success with personal sales levels

Discussion: ML Salespeople • personal selling is not the only focus – build and Discussion: ML Salespeople • personal selling is not the only focus – build and maintain one’s organization, a network of downlines. • attains success through • intrinsic feelings of personal satisfaction (recruiting, training, and motivating others) MLs move beyond a tactical focus on completing tasks (SLs) – strategic focus on facilitating the completion of plans through others

Implications for Managers • Single Level DS companies: – Focus on recruiting younger, less Implications for Managers • Single Level DS companies: – Focus on recruiting younger, less highly educated, less experienced people who view direct selling as their primary work activity • Multilevel DS companies: – Recruit older, more highly educated people with greater full-time experience who wish to maintain another job in addition to DS work

Single Level Organizations • Training focus: – – – sales skills product knowledge Competitive Single Level Organizations • Training focus: – – – sales skills product knowledge Competitive advantage Self-motivation Confidence building activities • Shorter-term sales goals – build their confidence incrementally

Single Level (cont’d) • Recognition programs • • highlighting achievements Compensation payments should be Single Level (cont’d) • Recognition programs • • highlighting achievements Compensation payments should be given frequently Stress individual performance rather than competition with a whole group

Multilevel Organizations • Training focus: – Activities building organizational commitment – Communications or newsletters Multilevel Organizations • Training focus: – Activities building organizational commitment – Communications or newsletters to highlight group achievements – Group meetings for those within a person’s downline – Any type of social activities

Amway team activity (Germany) Amway Team (Taiwan) Amway team activity (Germany) Amway Team (Taiwan)