Скачать презентацию Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O Toole Deakin Скачать презентацию Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O Toole Deakin

2fbb1f43c297335c23693ee3a0284544.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 29

Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October Community Governance in Rural Australia Kevin O’Toole Deakin University CRRF Conference Tweed Ontario October 2004

Introduction q Background – Australian local govt q Governance as a concept q Types Introduction q Background – Australian local govt q Governance as a concept q Types of Governance at local level q Community governance and practice in Victoria 2

Australian Local Government Populations ‘ 000 NSW 6, 691. 8 Vic 142 74 175 Australian Local Government Populations ‘ 000 NSW 6, 691. 8 Vic 142 74 175 79 3, 774. 3 1, 951. 3 SA 1, 528. 2 Tas 157 Qld WA 66 4, 929. 8 476. 2 NT 197. 1 29 3

Distribution of urban, regional and rural local governing bodies (no. and %) by State, Distribution of urban, regional and rural local governing bodies (no. and %) by State, 2002 -03 Urban % Region & Rural % Total NSW Vic Qld WA SA Tas NT 1 Total 44 33 14 29 19 2 2 143 25% 42% 9% 20% 26% 7% 3% 20% 131 46 143 113 55 27 64 579 75% 58% 91% 80% 74% 93% 97% 80% 175 79 157 142 74 29 66 722 1 Includes Northern Territory Trust Account. Source: Department of Transport and Regional Services. 4

Scale of local government, by state 2002 State Number of Pop per % of Scale of local government, by state 2002 State Number of Pop per % of councils councillors councillor with wards NSW 175 37, 887 1771 3680 45 Vic 79 60, 962 593 8122 81 Qld 157 28, 898 1037 3483 53 WA 142 13, 409 757 2515 70 SA 74 22, 079 694 2163 85 Tas 29 16, 216 280 1680 0 5

Governance q Origins in the Greek word for the ‘steering’ of boats - mainly Governance q Origins in the Greek word for the ‘steering’ of boats - mainly been limited to the ‘affairs of state’ q governance = the types and processes of governing q government refers to the institutions that are required to carry out the governing functions. 6

Governance as Structure q The organizational and institutional arrangements of state and non-state actors Governance as Structure q The organizational and institutional arrangements of state and non-state actors q The formal partnership arrangements between the public and private sectors q Encompasses both the state and civil society where government involves only the state q Has shifted from a hierarchical model to a more flexible approach and a greater sharing of power between the state and the market 7

Governance as Process Where the ‘government’ acted in a commanding, controlling and directing manner Governance as Process Where the ‘government’ acted in a commanding, controlling and directing manner ‘governance’ involves the processes of leading, facilitating, collaborating and bargaining 8

Local Governance q Local government has shifted from a relatively basic system of administration Local Governance q Local government has shifted from a relatively basic system of administration to new styles of public management q Some services may no longer be in public hands but they are still part of local governance q Eg under contract to private or voluntary groups 9

Governance Forms at Local Level in Victoria 1. Corporate Governance 2. Participatory Governance 3. Governance Forms at Local Level in Victoria 1. Corporate Governance 2. Participatory Governance 3. Community Governance 10

Local Governance 1 Corporate governance State government Local Council Board of Directors Local services Local Governance 1 Corporate governance State government Local Council Board of Directors Local services Clients Share holders Voting Decision Making Accountability 11

‘Corporate’ Representation q Representatives are ‘acting for’ the electorate as a whole q ‘Acting ‘Corporate’ Representation q Representatives are ‘acting for’ the electorate as a whole q ‘Acting for’ = the placement of ‘experts’ in the political process to ‘do the job for us’ q Involves a notion of ‘trusteeship’ 12

Putting the systems together Corporate governance State government Unsubdivided Corporate Represent Local Council Board Putting the systems together Corporate governance State government Unsubdivided Corporate Represent Local Council Board of Directors Voting Proportional Quota Local services Clients Share holders Reduces Property Franchise Voting Decision Making Accountability 13

Local Governance 2 Participatory governance State government Local council Local services Clients Citizens Voting Local Governance 2 Participatory governance State government Local council Local services Clients Citizens Voting Decision Making Accountability Influence Special Interests 14

‘Interest’ Representation q Elected representatives q Personal advocates q Sectional interests q Accountable at ‘Interest’ Representation q Elected representatives q Personal advocates q Sectional interests q Accountable at elections q. As individuals q. As members of group q Central notion ‘Accountability’ 15

Putting the systems together Participatory governance State government Increases Property Franchise Vote Subdivided Interest Putting the systems together Participatory governance State government Increases Property Franchise Vote Subdivided Interest Represent Local council Voting Majority Preference Local services Clients Citizens Voting Decision Making Accountability Influence Special Interests 16

Community Governance q The state has shifted various forms of responsibility onto the private Community Governance q The state has shifted various forms of responsibility onto the private and voluntary sectors q Self-organising networks develop their own policies and help to shape their own environments. q ‘an arena of participation …[embracing] all activity which involves either the provision of public services within the community, or the representation of community interests to external agencies’ (Woods, Edwards, Anderson, & Fahmy, 2001). 17

Local Governance 3 Community governance State government Local council Local services Communities Clients Citizens Local Governance 3 Community governance State government Local council Local services Communities Clients Citizens Voting Decision Making Accountability Influence Special Interests 18

‘Mirror’ Representation q Depends upon the representatives’ characteristics as a reflection of those groups ‘Mirror’ Representation q Depends upon the representatives’ characteristics as a reflection of those groups in the community q A ‘politics of presence’ that includes representatives of minority characteristics such as gender or ethnicity 19

Putting the systems together Community governance State government Local council Local services Communities Clients Putting the systems together Community governance State government Local council Local services Communities Clients Citizens Voting Decision Making Accountability Influence Unsubdivided Mirror Represent Voting Proportion Quota Special Interests 20

Integrated Community Governance q Focuses on the way local groups are integrated into the Integrated Community Governance q Focuses on the way local groups are integrated into the structure of local government itself q consultative mechanisms where there are various q public meetings q public hearings q discussion groups q partnership arrangements where local government establishes q community forums q local committees q local advisory boards 21

Examples of integration 1. Local government advisory committees 2. Consult with small rural towns Examples of integration 1. Local government advisory committees 2. Consult with small rural towns four times a year 3. Assist in kind and sometimes with finance 22

Independent Community Governance q claim to represent the interests of local people and independent Independent Community Governance q claim to represent the interests of local people and independent of local government q may develop specific partnerships with local government but control over many local decision-making mechanisms of their local communities q not simply working at community level but also negotiating relationships with other levels of governance q varies according to social, demographic, historical, economic and biographical factors 23

Examples of Independence 1. Create own shop front 2. Buy their own community assets Examples of Independence 1. Create own shop front 2. Buy their own community assets 3. Create their own local festivals 24

Organizational Role q Act as local ‘representatives’ q. Some seen as ‘mini’ councils q Organizational Role q Act as local ‘representatives’ q. Some seen as ‘mini’ councils q ‘Umbrella’ organisation for the town q Information channels q Local newsletters q Various forms of membership q Who turns up through to small payment q Some independent finance 25

Community Processes q Advocacy and fund raising q Submission Skills q Fitting the funding Community Processes q Advocacy and fund raising q Submission Skills q Fitting the funding templates q State and Federal funding prerequisites – community groups apply though local government q Reconstructing local needs to fit funding criteria q Partnerships q. Local government q Community asset building for local and tourist consumption 26

Processes at Other Levels q More ‘efficient’ outcomes by using the volunteer capacities of Processes at Other Levels q More ‘efficient’ outcomes by using the volunteer capacities of local community organizations q Promoting sustainability as the responsibility of the local townspeople, eg q. Regional Solutions at federal level q. Building Great Communities at state level q. Community Building consultants at local government q Outcome: community associations become the avenues for local governance activities 27

Conclusions q Local community groups q have replaced some of the governance functions of Conclusions q Local community groups q have replaced some of the governance functions of local government authorities q now lead, facilitate, collaborate and bargain as q A consultative mechanism for local decision-making q Partners with a range of outside agencies q Advocates for local needs q This may be called a new community governance that is both q an outcome of the ‘minimal state’ approach of the higher levels of government in Australia q the desire of local development groups to ensure a sustainable level of services for their communities. 28

Further References q O’Toole, K & Burdess, N. 2004 New community governance in small Further References q O’Toole, K & Burdess, N. 2004 New community governance in small rural towns: the Australian experience. Journal of Rural Studies Vol 20, No 4, 433 -443. q Burdess, N. & O’Toole K, 2004 Elections and representation in local government: a Victorian case study, Australian Journal of Public Administration Vol 63, No 2, 66 -78 q O’Toole, K. & Burdess, N. 2003 Municipal Wards in Victoria, 1982 -1999, The Electronic Journal of Australian and New Zealand History, http: //www. jcu. edu. au/aff/history/articles. htm, pp 1 -12 q O’Toole K. & Macgarvey A. 2003, Rural women and local economic development in south-west Victoria, Journal of Rural Studies, Vol 19, No 2, pp 173 -186 29