Скачать презентацию Case Study History Ft Hood Texas Ft Hood Скачать презентацию Case Study History Ft Hood Texas Ft Hood

25265cf4392f6323b633a38bfc200c08.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 13

Case Study/History Ft Hood, Texas Case Study/History Ft Hood, Texas

Ft. Hood, Texas 199, 541 acres not including the cantonment area III Corps (-) Ft. Hood, Texas 199, 541 acres not including the cantonment area III Corps (-) 1 st Cavalry Division 4 th Infantry Division (-) Corps Support Command Other Corps Units 49 th Armored Division, ARNG

Internal Pressures 8 Km 5 B 2 5 4 A 5 C 2 5 Internal Pressures 8 Km 5 B 2 5 4 A 5 C 2 5 A 1 5 1 C 4 A 5 4 A 8 4 B 5 4 D 4 C 5 5 4 3 C 4 3 A 4 2 A 4 C 2 3 A 3 3 C 4 3 1 B 2 3 3 C 0 B 0 3 A 0 B 9 3 9 2 9 1 1 0 9 5 A 5 B 1 A 1 1 8 1 9 1 2 B 1 B 1 3 B 6 A 4 B 1 A 2 9 0 50 Km 3 A 4 A 7 6 8 4 3 4 D 1 B 7 5 8 3 3 4 B 3 4 A 3 A 2 1 C 8 1 8 9 3 C 6 3 A 1 1 A 3 B 6 3 5 C 3 A 5 3 C 3 73 B 8 2 4 B 2 3 6 A 3 B 3 7 A 3 6 6 4 C 4 8 0 4 A 1 7 2 6 5 4 C 1 3 B 5 6 4 12 Km 7 0 B 7 1 B 7 4 4 B 1 3 D 5 6 2 5 B 3 4 C 8 4 B 4 4 4 A 7 A 1 6 3 4 8 B 4 B 3 4 D 1 5 A 3 7 0 A 6 1 5 3 C 5 B 1 WW II 1 A 3 8 8 1 B 3 1 A 5 1 4 A 1 B 4 1 A 6 1 5 B 1 B 6 1 7 Ft. Hood 65 Km The Evolving Brigade Battlefield Desert Storm

Clean Water – Erosion Control Ft. Hood, Texas No Dig Area 127, 546 acres Clean Water – Erosion Control Ft. Hood, Texas No Dig Area 127, 546 acres 64% of tng land • No digging vehicle fighting positions, survivability positions, obstacles, or individual fighting positions. • No digging within 50 m of riparian areas. • Units must gain environmental division approval before they dig anywhere.

Endangered Species Ft. Hood, Texas Core Habitat Golden Cheeked Warbler Black Capped Vireo 52, Endangered Species Ft. Hood, Texas Core Habitat Golden Cheeked Warbler Black Capped Vireo 52, 269 acres 26% of tng land YEAR ROUND • No digging • No open fires • No tree or brush cutting • No destruction of habitat MAR thru AUG • No vehicle or dismounted maneuver • Vehicles stay on established trails • 2 hour limit on trails in habitat • No arty firing, smoke ops, or chem Grenades within 100 m of habitat • No use of camo nets in habitat • No bivouac in habitat

Endangered Species Ft. Hood, Texas Non-Core Habitat Golden Cheeked Warbler Black Capped Vireo 19, Endangered Species Ft. Hood, Texas Non-Core Habitat Golden Cheeked Warbler Black Capped Vireo 19, 005 acres 10% of tng land • No digging • No open fires • No tree or brush cutting • No destruction of habitat Core and non-core totals 71, 274 or 36% of tng land This could increase if Army exceeds allowable “take” for species habitat. Take upper limit is 1, 850 acres of core/ non-core Habitat per year over 5 years. Fire is threat.

Archeology Ft. Hood, Texas Cultural Sites 1, 178 Sites • No digging • Others Archeology Ft. Hood, Texas Cultural Sites 1, 178 Sites • No digging • Others currently being negotiated

Clean Air Ft. Hood, Texas Smoke Restrictions 46, 215 acres 23% of tng land Clean Air Ft. Hood, Texas Smoke Restrictions 46, 215 acres 23% of tng land • No use of smoke, flares, chem grenades, or pyrotechnics.

Population Density - Noise • No artillery or MLRS firing. Ft. Hood, Texas Noise Population Density - Noise • No artillery or MLRS firing. Ft. Hood, Texas Noise Restrictions 1, 082 acres • 154, 053 acres with training restrictions- 77% of tng land • 30, 827 acres of maneuver land without training restrictions

UXO/Munitions Ft. Hood, Texas Impact Areas Ranges FY 01 STRAC Auth = 35. 4 UXO/Munitions Ft. Hood, Texas Impact Areas Ranges FY 01 STRAC Auth = 35. 4 M Rounds • 33 Small Arms Ranges • 24 Major Weapons Ranges • + FA/Mortar Firing Point

Environmental Contamination (EC) • Adverse impacts to natural resources my result from EC • Environmental Contamination (EC) • Adverse impacts to natural resources my result from EC • Installations have Restoration Programs to respond to EC/CERCLA releases • INRMP not required to provide EC/CERCLA actions • INRMP can provide a link (integration) • Core Group is considering an acceptable INRMP statement

Fort Hood INRMP • Land management effort multi-faceted in past • Work now controlled Fort Hood INRMP • Land management effort multi-faceted in past • Work now controlled through INRMP • Contracted with NRCS • Contractor coordinated with State and Federal agencies during development • In-house expertise guided document • Delivered draft product in October 1999 • Staffed inside and outside Fort Hood • Simultaneous development of INRMP document and EA • Public review period in April 2000 • Finial review with outside agencies in October 2000 • USFWS concurred in January 2001 • State has not replied

INRMP • INRMP contains other plans and documents • 1996 training fire • Training INRMP • INRMP contains other plans and documents • 1996 training fire • Training continued • Focused consultation away from training • Influenced BO through negotiation of ESMP • Continuing pro-active approach