f6b80a701578a7730f52aaea4e5d4665.ppt
- Количество слайдов: 46
Blade with Shear Web bonded to Spar Cap Upper (LP) Spar Cap Sandwich Shell Trailing Edge Leading Edge TE Shear Web Sandwich Shell LE Shear Web Lower (HP) Spar Cap 2
Source: http: //www. compositesworld. com/articles/wind-blade-manufacturing-targeting-cost-efficiencythrough-materials-based-strategies. aspx 4/5/2009
Blade Objectives Figure from GE
Blade Objectives • • • Maximize annual energy yield (limit maximum power) Resist extreme and fatigue loads Restrict tip deflections Avoid resonances Minimize weight and cost Burton, Sharpe, Jenkins, Bossanyi: “Wind Energy Handbook”
UTS UCS/sg Fatique % Stiffness/ of UCS sg E/UCS^2 880 720 390 19 20 . 07 Glass/poly 700 ester 580 310 21 18 . 1 Carbon/ep 1830 oxy 1100 700 32 90 . 12 Birch/epo xy 81 121 20 22 2. 3 Glass/X 117 Steel: fatigue and mfgblty
Blade Materials • compressive strength-to-weight ratio, • fatigue strength as a percentage of compressive strength, • stiffness-to-weight ratio, • a panel stability parameter, E/(UCS)2.
19 March 2018 Courtesy: Nolet, TPI 8
Power, Length and Weight Burton, Sharpe, Jenkins, Bossanyi: “Wind Energy Handbook”
Polymer Matrix Composites & Processes
General Composite Information • Composites: 2 or more physically distinct phases • Properties are better than the constituents • High strength to weight ratio • Also. . Corrosion, fatigue, toughness, surface finish
Why nots. . . • (many have) anisotropic properties • Polymer based may be subject to chemical attack • Cost? • Manufacturing process often slow and costly (Groover p 177)
2 or more phases • Matrix (primary phase) – Polymer, metal, or ceramic • Reinforcing agent (imbedded phase) – Polymer, metal, ceramic, or element – Fibers, particles, . . .
Possible combinations for 2 phases Matrix Ceramic Polymer Metal Reinforcement Metal PM infiltrate w/ 2 nd metal n/a Steel belted tire Ceramic Cutting tool Si. C in Al 2 O 3 ‘fiberglass’ Polymer PM part w/ polymer n/a Kevlar reinforced epoxy Element Fiber reinforced metals n/a Carbon fiber reinforced polymer
Fiber reinforcement • Diameters of 0. 0001 to 0. 005 inches • As D ↓, orientation ↑, probability of defect↓ – tensile strength↑ ↑ • Orientation: – Unidirectional, planar, 3 dimensional
Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites • Short fibers: – Open mold: spray up – Closed mold processes • Long fibers: – Open mold: hand, automated tape machines – Closed mold – Filament winding – Pultrusion
Materials • Polymer matrix – Thermosets: most common – Thermoplastics • Reinforcing – Glass – Carbon – Kevlar (polymer)
Composing Composites. . . • Molding compounds – Mix short fibers and matrix • Prepegs – Fibers impregnated with partially cured TS matrix – Allows fibers to ‘stay put’ – Continuous fibers • Or done in the mold
Open Mold Process • Spray up – Requires mold – Discontinuous fibers // random orientation – Mixture of fiber and matrix deposited in mold • Automated tape laying machine – Requires mold – Requires use of prepeg – CNC control Image sources: http: //www. bauteck. com/manufacture/Manufacture 2. htm 4/5/9 http: //www. mmsonline. com/articles/getting-to-know-black-aluminum. aspx 4/5/9
Filament Winding • Wound around mandrel or part of final component • Continuous fibers – Matrix added before or after winding • Automation controls wrap pattern Source: http: //sacomposite. com/filament_winding_carbon_fiber. html 4/5/9
Pultrusion • Continuous fibers • Dipped into matrix • 2 options: – Pulled through die and cured – Laid up into an open mold (and later cured) http: //www. tangram. co. uk/TI-Polymer-Pultrusion. html Source: http: //www. ale. nl/ale/data/i mages/Pultrusion. jpeg 4/5/9
Open Mold Processes • Hand lay up – Oldest, labor intensive – Mold required – Fibers placed in mold: • Dry fibers placed and then matrix added – Pour or brush or spray >> rolled to achieve mixture – Vacuum used to ‘pull’ matrix into fiber • Prepeg placed in mold
Burton, Sharpe, Jenkins, Bossanyi: “Wind Energy Handbook”
Burton, Sharpe, Jenkins, Bossanyi: “Wind Energy Handbook”
Source: www. tpicomposites. com 3/2008
Source: www. tpicomposites. com 3/2008
Source: www. tpicomposites. com 3/2008
Reusable Silicon Bag Technology for ® SCRIMP o Silicone bags are rapidly fitted to the infusion tool o Feed lines, vacuum lines and embossed distribution channels are integrated into the bag improving the repeatability of the process (TPI Patented Technology) 19 March 2018 Courtesy: Nolet, TPI 28
Fibers • Woven Fabrics – Higher cost, less applicable as structural components for blades • Non-woven Multiaxials – Most widely used in VARTM processes – Low-cost, non-crimp form results in superior performance – “Uni-directional”, Biaxial, Double Bias, Triaxial and Quadraxial material forms available. Courtesy of Saertex USA 19 March 2018 Courtesy: Nolet, TPI 29
Resin Matrices • Epoxies remain a primary resin of use in European based blade designs • Vinyl-esters are attracting much interest by blade designers • Polyester resins are still prominent in the industry. • Thermoplastics and other matrices 19 March 2018 Courtesy: Nolet, TPI 30
http: //www. compositesworld. com/articles/carbon-fiber-in-the-wind. aspx
Blade Components Infused Together • Skin – Composite – Core • Spar cap – Composite • Shear web – Composite – Core • Root Section – composite Other Materials Bond paste Hardware Balance box Paint Lightening protection system • Platform • • •
Quality Issues • Waves – Aspect ratio (L/a) • • • Bond failure Dry infusion Lack of continuous fibers Geometrical errors Fabric assembly errors Figures from: “Yerramalli, Miebach, Chandraseker, Quek: “Fiber Waviness Induced Strength Knockdowns in Composite Materials Used in Wind Turbine Blades”. 2010
Process Steps • Cut fabric • Preforms – – Layup Infuse Inspect Trim • Shell – Layup – Install preforms – Infuse • Assembly – Shear web – 2 shells • Finishing – Finish edges – Wet layup • • • Final cure Drill and cut end square Finishing and painting Hardware Balance box Final inspect
Burton, Sharpe, Jenkins, Bossanyi: “Wind Energy Handbook”
Burton, Sharpe, Jenkins, Bossanyi: “Wind Energy Handbook”
Mark Higgins 9/15/2011 Presentation at ISU
Mark Higgins 9/15/2011 Presentation at ISU
Mark Higgins 9/15/2011 Presentation at ISU
Mark Higgins 9/15/2011 Presentation at ISU
Mark Higgins 9/15/2011 Presentation at ISU
Mark Higgins 9/15/2011 Presentation at ISU
Assembly Variation • Maintain +-mm across 50 m assembly • Joints are critical 43
Future Automation Systems? Rapid Material Placement Systems (RMPS) Automated blade molding Automated root end machining for wind blades Machine adapts automatically to blade position Machining processes: Sawing, milling, boring and trimming http: //mag-ias. com/index. php? id=308&L=2
Options for Large(r) Blades • Manufacturing – Make at point of use – Make in region of use – Import • Design – Flatback design – Design in 2 pieces – Materials to reduce weight
Remote Blade Manufacturing Demonstration – Sandia 2003
f6b80a701578a7730f52aaea4e5d4665.ppt