Benchmarking Summit Policy & Management Meeting Thursday, February 21, 2008 Douglas Mahone, Moderator Chair, Benchmarking Work Group February 21, 2008
Introduction and Overview n n n Who’s here What we’re covering today Logistics for the meeting February 21, 2008 2
Agenda February 21, 2008 3
State Goals for Benchmarking n n Develop infrastructure for automated benchmarking Benchmark all state buildings Make benchmarking universally available Use benchmarking to track progress toward energy use reduction goals February 21, 2008 4
Next Presenter n n Tracy Narel, US EPA National Benchmarking Overview: Conditioning the C&I Market for Energy Efficiency - The Role of ENERGY STAR February 21, 2008 5
Why Benchmarking in CA? n n n Governor’s Executive Order Energy efficiency programs Help owners manage their energy use AB 1103 Strategic Plan February 21, 2008 6
Executive Order S-20 -04 Governor California Energy Commission Benchmarking Work Group February 21, 2008 7
S-20 -04 Directives for California Buildings n State Bldgs Benchmarked by 2007 ¡ n Reduce state bldg energy use 20% by 2015 ¡ n With energy use data back to 2003 From the 2003 baseline Encourage all commercial buildings to do likewise February 21, 2008 8
S-20 -04 Directives for the California Energy Commission Develop: n Benchmarking system n Benchmarking plan ¡ n to include all State and private commercial buildings in California Information system ¡ for disclosing the benchmarking information to lenders and tenants, and to buyers at the time of sale February 21, 2008 9
California Energy Commission n Recommended U. S. EPA’s Portfolio Manager ¡ ¡ n National benchmarking tool Online at http: //www. energystar. gov/benchmark Formed the Benchmarking Work Group ¡ ¡ US EPA California state agencies California energy utilities Private sector February 21, 2008 10
Benchmarking Work Group n Facilitating development of the California benchmarking and infrastructure ¡ ¡ ¡ n Collecting and organizing state facility data Modifying PM to meet California-specific needs Automating energy data upload from utilities to PM Extending benchmarking to all buildings ¡ Today’s discussion February 21, 2008 11
PART 2 California Benchmarking Process February 21, 2008
Process Flow Agencies or Companies • Data request • Account info 2 Energy use Account info 1 Set up PM Account (done by user, or by utility) February 21, 2008 Utilities 4 • Facility names & addresses • Square footage • Account info 3 U. S. EPA Portfolio Manager 13
1. Initial Account Info n n n Facility identification (name, location, year built, square footage) Optional info (# of people, # of computers, op hours) Billing Meter identification (one or more utilities) Not as easy as it sounds where multiple facilities Process should be as automated as possible February 21, 2008 14
2. Energy usage (utility) data n n Need monthly data (back to 2003 & forward) Utility data transfer options ¡ Automated monthly upload (best) n ¡ Manual monthly upload (okay) n n PG&E, SMUD SCE, SDG&E, So. Cal. Gas Customer data transfer options ¡ ¡ ¡ Utility-provided Excel spreadsheet (workable) Manually-entered energy-bill data (ouch) Non-automated utilities: n LADWP, all other POUs State bldgs - doing everything possible to avoid this last option February 21, 2008 15
3. Data Release Forms (1) n n n Agreed to by IOUs & SMUD Required to automate data upload Customer gets: ¡ ¡ ¡ n Up-to-date benchmarking data Automated billing data tracking Assurance of data confidentiality Utility gets: ¡ ¡ ¡ Assurance of customer authorization Liability protection Access to customer benchmarking data February 21, 2008 16
State Bldg. Benchmarking Status n n State Facility Data – nearly 100% Done Utility Energy Data – about 70% Done Data Quality Control – about 40% Done Reporting – (Need to do) February 21, 2008 17
State Facility Data February 21, 2008 18
Utility Energy Data: Jan 2003 - Dec 2007 February 21, 2008 Note: Excludes 2000 residential HCD meters 19
State Bldgs: Next Steps and Schedule n February 2008: Benchmarking Summit n March 2008: Finalize data ¡ n PG&E residential, MUNIs, State Natural Gas Program April 2008: Final report for all State buildings February 21, 2008 20
PART 3 What you can with Portfolio Manager data February 21, 2008
Tracking the 20% Savings Goal… February 21, 2008 22
Portfolio Targets Report February 21, 2008 23
EUI Reductions (Excel) February 21, 2008 24
Electric/Gas Site Savings (Excel) February 21, 2008 25
Summary Performance Summary Energy Performance Report Facilities included: Sacramento Group Date Generated: 11/2/06 Number of facilities: 36 Total Floorspace (sq. ft. ) 2005 11, 037, 609 Average Rating 77 Number of Facilities with a Rating 24 Total Site Energy Use (k. Btu) Total Weather Normalized Source Energy Use (k. Btu) Site Energy Intensity (k. Btu/Sq. Ft. ) February 21, 2008 972, 537, 263 2, 077, 065, 465 88. 1 26
Benchmarking Utility Uses for the Data n Use benchmarking results to target products and services. n Look for relatively low Energy Star scores (<80) or high Energy Utilization Intensity (EUI) values. n EUI converts to common measure (BTUs) per building square foot per year. n Assist energy managers look for trends and persistence of efficiency goals. n Mine buildings data (new, valuable source) February 21, 2008 27
PART 4 Other Reasons for Benchmarking February 21, 2008
AB 1103 - effective Nov 2007 n n Title: Energy Efficiency; Nonresidential Benchmarking (Soldaña) By 2009 (10 months from now): ¡ n electric utilities shall provide automated billing information for nonresidential buildings in a format that is compatible for uploading onto the Energy Star system (upon owner authorization) By 2010 (22 months from now): ¡ when a nonresidential building is put up for sale or lease, or when it is financed or refinanced, the benchmarking data and scores generated by the Energy Star system must be disclosed February 21, 2008 29
CA Energy Efficiency Strategic Planning (CEESP) n Utilities’ plans thru 2020 ¡ ¡ n Plans for 2009 -11 ¡ n Respond to Big Bold Initiatives Incorporate into efficiency programs Start progress toward strategic goals Commercial sector ¡ ¡ Benchmarking is one of the key strategies May become the ultimate metric of program performance and evaluation February 21, 2008 30
Status Updates n n State agency experiences & perspectives Utilities - present and future BM activities February 21, 2008 31
LUNCHTIME! n n Cafeteria on ground floor Reconvene in 45 minutes February 21, 2008 32
Q&A and Wrap-Up n n Doug Mahone Benchmarking your knowledge ¡ ¡ ¡ n What’s benchmarking? What’s retrocommissioning? What’s retrofitting? Why should you be interested? Why do you have to be interested? Do you know what to do next? February 21, 2008 33
Universal Benchmarking n How do we make it happen? n Who needs to make what decisions? n What are next steps? February 21, 2008 34
Paying for Benchmarking n n Need to make it PERMANENT Options ¡ ¡ ¡ Provide it as a basic customer service (embedded in rates)? Provide it as an energy efficiency service (embedded in program budgets)? Provide it as an optional service (customer fee)? Leave it to 3 rd party, fee-for-service providers? Other? February 21, 2008 35
Estimated Cost to Automate If 100, 000 customers, $2. 40/month February 21, 2008 36
How to link BM to other activities? n Efficiency programs ¡ ¡ ¡ n AB 1103 activities ¡ ¡ n sign up all participants? require as condition of rebates? use as enticement to participate? Due diligence disclosures Factor in appraisals Others? February 21, 2008 37
Who takes the lead? n n Utility customer service (routine) Utility website sign-up (automated) Utility program application process Send customers to EPA’s PM website What’s the best user interface? Should it be consistent statewide? or nationwide? February 21, 2008 38
How do we engage the POUs? n n n So far, only SMUD ~30% of CA customers served by POUs Mechanisms ¡ ¡ ¡ AB 1103 to force action? Provide tech support (as BMWG has done for IOUs)? Let EPA set up the system? February 21, 2008 39
Technical / Procedural Issues n Customer service ¡ ¡ ¡ n billing data errors account changes etc. IT issues ¡ see tomorrow’s agenda February 21, 2008 40
Questions/Comments n Douglas Mahone, Chair Benchmarking Work Group or Karen Herter n n n Heschong Mahone Group, Inc . 11626 Fair Oaks Blvd. #302 Fair Oaks, CA 95628 (Sacramento area) (916) 962 -7001 dmahone@h-m-g. com or herter@h-m-g. com BM Project web page at: www. h-m-g. com February 21, 2008 41
Скачать презентацию Benchmarking Summit Policy Management Meeting Thursday February
a644417febae80807d41f75ea08da866.ppt