Belmont Learning Complex Request for Proposals Staff Overview of Process February 12, 2002
Overview of Presentation Ü Goals of “Request for Proposal” (RFP) Ü Recap of the RFP and Evaluation Process Ü Turn Over to the Evaluation Panel for their Report
We are facing a serious shortage of senior high school seats The Belmont attendance area currently buses out 5, 301 students per day. Ü Current projections indicate that as many as 4, 847 Belmont area high school students will not have classroom space in their neighborhood to accommodate them. Ü And Districtwide, our senior high school student growth tops out at 35, 000 by 2006, putting severe pressure on our Ü
We are examining all options on the Belmont Learning Center, primarily due to our serious need for senior high school space to: accommodate our growing enrollment provide an appropriate learning environment for our secondary students and assist in moving us toward a 180 day calendar for all students
Construction was halted on the Belmont Learning Center Designed as four academies on a 34 acre site, the Belmont Learning Complex was designed to provide up to 3600 senior high seats. Ü Construction was halted in 1999 due to concerns over the environmental conditions at the site. Ü The buildings are about 60% complete Ü LAUSD has invested about $154 million in the land construction Ü
Board Authorized RFP Ü At the request of Superintendent Romer, the Board authorized the issuance of an RFP to provide some options to assist the Board in determining the ultimate disposition of the project and property.
The RFP tried to assist us in answering the following: Can the Belmont Learning Complex be made safe for occupancy as a school, at a reasonable price, and a reasonable timeline? If the Board opts to sell the site, what interest on the part of the development or real estate community can we discern? What could we get for it?
Recap of the RFP and Evaluation Process
RFP Options Ü The RFP was drafted with three options. 1. Complete the BLC as originally designed, with appropriate modifications for environmental mitigation design elements 2. Deliver a senior high school on the site accommodating between 2500 and 4000 students; propose alternate use or development as part of the proposal 3. Express interest in buying the site from the District
RFP Process Ü Ü Ü The RFP was issued April 2001. Architectural drawings became available in June 2001. Three proposals were submitted on October 24, 2001. All three proposals would complete the BLC. No proposals were received on Option 3 – Sale of the site. Formal presentations by the proposers were made the first week in December 2001. Supplemental written information was provided by all three proposers. Proposers were given access to all BLC documents via a website and document repository and were encouraged to ask questions during the process.
The Three Respondents Alliance for a Better Community Ü Bryan A. Stirrat Ü Garcia, Mc. Coy & Lee Ü Matt Construction Ü Mc. Larand Vasquez Ü Excellent Education Development (EXED) Ü AIG/Marsh Komex H 2 O Ü Komex H 2 O (supplemented by Oil Field expertise) Ü Parsons Ü Ü Ü Mc. Larand Vasquez Seville Group Lee Andrews Group AIG/Marsh Environmental Oversight Panel Eastridge Ü Ü Ü LFR Levine Fricke Suffolk Construction Eastridge Mc. Larand Vasquez AIG/Marsh
The remaining proposals would be a starting point for negotiations should the Board opt to complete the school through this RFP process.
The Evaluation Panel Report
A final note on the Educational Plan we would pursue… The BLC is an opportunity to create a small school environment for students, while maintaining the benefits of a large school. Ü Academy Theme Houses Ü Grades 10, 11, 12 would be divided into four vertical Houses, each containing two career academies. Examples: Visual & Performing Arts, Business & Finance, and Health & Human Services Each house would contain its own faculty, deans, counselors and assistant principals 9 th Grade would be a transition year – students would be housed together to take general education courses and prepare to make their academy selection for the 10 th grade Ü Students could still take advantage of features accompanying “bigness” such as enhanced library, cafeteria, and health and human services
Next Steps February 26, 2002 Ü The Evaluation Panel will provide the panel’s recommendation with regard to the ranking of the proposers Ü Superintendent Romer will introduce a Board Report for first reading, including a recommendation to authorize staff to negotiate with a specified proposer.
Next Steps March 12, 2002 Ü The Board will have the opportunity to approve the Board Report authorizing the Superintendent to enter into negotiations with a specified bidder(s).
Скачать презентацию Belmont Learning Complex Request for Proposals Staff Overview
fef99743a093ee71e511295281d3805d.ppt