BASIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
POLAND IN BALTIC SEA BASIN 40% of the cultivated fields and 50% of the population living in the Baltic Sea basin are to be found in Poland RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
BALTIC SEA POLLUTION Input of compounds coming from Polish territory into Baltic Sea(approximately): 40% of PHOSPHORUS 34, 7% of NITROGEN 21, 1% of organic compounds RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS Framework Directive Measures of classifying the water quality Nitrates Directive Reducing nitrate pollution from agriculture (directive from December, 1991 ) Helsinki Convention Reducing pollution from point and dispersed sources RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
POLISH LAW „Fertilisers and Fertilisation Law prepared by ” Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development states: . . . „obligation of animal wastes storage on manure pads and in slurry tanks which are tight and have capacity allowing for at least 4 months production of waste storage” (art. 18 p. 2 of the Law) . . . „ 8 YEARS SUSPENDING PERIOD FOR ADJUSTMENTTO THE OBLIGATION OF HAVING TIGHT DEVICES FOR ANIMAL WASTE STORAGE” 300 - 350 thousand investments in Poland (it means app. 170 thousand milk producers + app. 150 thousand of other stock-farmers) RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
EUTROPHISATION § Over enrichment of water by fertilisers l l increased plant biomass in the form of algae remineralisation of biomass § Oxygen deficit in water l l formation of hydrogen sulphide algal blooms RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
DRINKING WATER IN RURAL AREAS § can contain nitrates and nitrites § not comply with sanitary requirements § not proper insulation of the ground water RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
BALTIC SEA POLLUTION § disruptive reproduction cycles of fish species § decline in some fish stocks § changes in sea species composition § closing bathing beaches RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
POLLUTION ORIGINATED FROM AGRICUTURE 50 kg wastes/day from 1 Large Animal Unit thus in Poland 140 million tones of wastes per year RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
Out of 2 million farms in Poland only few have a proper devices for manure, and solid animal wastes storage RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
MILE STONES OF „RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION” PROJECT § Obtaining positive opinion of Steering Committee of GEF – Ministry of Foreign § § § § § Affairs Signing „Memorandum of Understanding” between NFEP and World Bank Application for State Treasury guarantees Application for government guarantees by NFEP to Ministry of Finance Negotiations with World Bank (with Ministry of Finance representative participation), resulting with signing documents: „Agreed Negotiations Protocol” and „Necessary Activities to be undertaken” Preparing „Project Appraisal Document” and „Operation Handbook” containing project description and detailed procedures of implementation Government Decree authorizing Minister of Finance to sign guarantee – agreement, providing that NFEP insures liabilities Acceptance of application by World Bank Supervisory Board Acceptance of application by NFEP Supervisory Board Signing guarantee – agreement with Finance Minister Signing loan agreement with World Bank and grant agreements with GEF and NEFCO July 1998 October 1998 Nov. -December ‘ 98 Dec. ‘ 98 -March ‘ 99 January 1999 Oct. -November ’ 99 November 1999 December 1999 13 January 2000 20 January 2000 RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
MILE STONES OF „RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION” PROJECT § § § - § § § Obtaining positive opinion of Steering Committee of GEF – Ministry of Foreign Affairs Signing „Memorandum of Understanding” between NFEP and World Bank Application for State Treasury guarantees (it is obligatory for every subject in case of credit agreements with World Bank), NFEP gained proper support from: - Minister of Environmental Protection; - Minister of Agriculture and Food Administration; - Minister of Economy (letter from Minister of Economy to Minister of Finance); Application for government guarantees by NFEP to Ministry of Finance (application was dated on 31 th of December 1998, and supplementary information was sent on 8 th of March 1999); Negotiations with World Bank (with Ministry of Finance representative participation), resulting with signing documents: „Agreed Negotiations Protocol” and „Necessary Activities to be undertaken” Activities connected with gaining State Treasury guaranty: > Decree, that was mentioned in article 51, passage 2 of Low about Public Finance – amongdepartments settlements; > Consideration of mentioned decree by Government Economical Commission; > Consideration of mentioned decree by Government; > Consideration of NFEP motion for State Treasury Guaranty by Government Economical Commission; > Consideration of NFEP motion for State Treasury Guaranty by Government; Preparing „Project Appraisal Document” and „Operation Handbook” containing project description and detailed procedures of implementation. Government Decree authorizing Minister of Finance to sign guarantee – agreement, providing that NFEP insures liabilities; Acceptance of application by World Bank Supervisory Board Acceptance of application by NFEP Supervisory Board Signing guarantee – agreement with Finance Minister Signing loan agreement with World Bank and grant agreements with GEF and NEFCO RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT 30. 07. 1998 20. 1998 06. 11. 1998 12. 11. 1998 30. 12. 1998 31. 12. 1998 i 8. 03. 1999 18 -21. 01. 1999 15. 07. 1999 10/11. 1999 4. 11. 1999 30. 11. 1999 9. 12. 1999 13. 01. 2000 20. 01. 2000
PROJECT AIM § Presenting (in the selected areas), the modern approach to agriculture originated pollution solving method § With the help of pro-environmental investment subsidizing, for app. 1000 farms, decreasing fertilizers compounds load from agriculture production. § Application of experience gained from the pilot project in further, largerscale projects. RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
FINANCIAL STRUCTURE OF Project 25% 21% 2% 7% 21% 18% 6% RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
PROJECT STRUCTURE Farms environmental improvements Outreach and management (2, 0 million USD) (13, 9 million USD) - Operational support and training for farmers (1, 0 million USD) - Environmental investments in the farms (12, 9 million USD) - Project management (preparation and implementation of MIS) - Public Awareness and Outreach program - Social Assessment of the Project - Economic Assessment and Replication Strategy of the Project - Environmental Monitoring - Audit RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
PROJECT ORGANISATION STRUCTURE § Project Implementation Unit has been established and Project Steering Committee, consisting of Ministry of Agriculture (3 members), Ministry of Environment (2 members), NFEP (3 members), European Integration Committee (1 member), Ministry of Finance (1 member) and representatives of Chambers of Agriculture (one representative per one pilot region). § Steering Committee proposed selection criteria for choosing the regions for the project implementation. Basing on the criteria three regions were chosen (Elbląg region, Toruń region, and Ostrołęka/Łomża region). The decision was approved during the visit of the World Bank Mission (Oct. 10 -16. 1998). RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
PROJECT ORGANISATION STRUCTURE § Local Implementation Team (one per each pilot area), has been established, for project management on local level. As a result of the tender procedure, three LITs were appointed: 1. Around Toruń – Operational Unit of the Regional Agriculture and Rural Areas Development Center in Przysiek, 87 -134 Przysiek. 2. Around Elbląg – Operational Unit of the Regional Agriculture and Rural Areas Development Center in Stare Pole, 82 -220 Stare Pole, Marynarki Wojennej Str. 21. 3. Around Ostrołęka/ Łomża – Practical Training Center „Consrol”, Nowa Ruda, 18 -525 Turośl. RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
MAIN CRITERIA OF CHOOSING FARMS ELIGIBLE TO PROJECT Farm is owned by one family § Farm owns at least 10 LA (Large Animal units) § Stock does not exceed 1, 5 LA/hectare § § Farm has basic technical equipment and is economically effective RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
INVESTMENTS COVERED WITH PROJECT Project subsidizes the following environment protection investments included in the Farm Management Plan: Tanks for liquid animal waste and connections between tanks and pads § Manure pads § Buffer strips on the edge of creeks and water reservoirs § Environmental equipment for common usage by groups of farmers § RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
PRINCIPLES OF INVESTMENT COFINANCING WITHIN THE PROJECT Max. 70% Min. 30% GRANT FROM NFEP FARMER’S INPUT Maximum grant level per one farm amounts 10, 000 USD RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
FARMERS’ INPUT § 30% of all costs ü ü ü § § § labor materials cash Participation in trainings Commitment to undertake measures to implement Good Agriculture Practice Agreement to participate in monitoring and demonstration activities RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPMENT FOR COMMON USAGE BY GROUP OF FARMERS Cisterns with dispensers § Equipment for manure spreading § Mixers § Tillage equipment for buffer strips § § Equipment for 0 -tillage sowing and renovation of permanent grasslands RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
PRINCIPLES OF INVESTMENT COFINANCING § In case of special equipment purchase for farmers’ organizations, grant amounts up to 50% of the cost of purchasing § In case of purchase of seed and seedlings necessary for buffer strips, NFEP covers up to 100% of costs (providing that there is guarantee of proper purchasing procedure and seeding design) RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
STEPS ACCORDING TO QCBS PROCEDURE TENDER PHASE LIT ENV. MONITORING ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT Press advertisement 25. 05. 99 17. 08. 99 06. 10. 99 „No objections” from World Bank to short list of consultants 29. 07. 99 21. 10. 99 27. 02. 00 „No objections” from World Bank for Terms of reference sent to shortlisted consultants 27. 07. 99 14. 12. 99 28. 03. 00 Deadline for proposal 01. 09. 99 16. 02. 00 31. 05. 00 opening 04. 10. 99 16. 02. 00 06. 00 assessment 20. 10. 99 18. 02. 00 13. 06. 00 Financial proposals assessment 09. 11. 99 17. 03. 00 27. 00 „No objections” from World Bank for report on technical and financial proposals assessment 24. 11. 99 13. 04. 00 (08. 11. 00) 13. 01. 00/ 14. 01. 99 02. 08. 00 Technical proposals assessment „No objections” from World Bank for proposed form of contract Date of signing contract 10. 02. 2000 16. 02. 2000 17. 02. 2000 (21. 06. 01) 31. 08. 00 RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
STEPS ACCORDING TO QCBS PROCEDURE Tender Phase Replication strategy Social Assessment Public Awareness and Outreach Press advertisement 11. 10. 01 06. 10. 99 02. 11. 99 „No objections” from World Bank to short list of consultants 16. 11. 01 27. 02. 00 „No objections” from World Bank for Terms of reference sent to shortlisted consultants 16. 11. 01 28. 03. 00 Deadline for proposal 8. 01. 02 08. 06. 00 10. 05. 00 24. 05. 00 Opening 8. 01. 02 16. 00 31. 05. 00 assessment 8. 01. 02 20. 06. 00 08. 06. 00 Financial proposals assessment 13. 02 10. 07. 00 17. 00 „No objections” from World Bank for report on technical and financial proposals assessment 8. 03. 02 13. 07. 00 27. 00 „No objections” from World Bank for proposed form of contract 26. 04. 02 01. 12. 00 28. 12. 00 Date of signing contract 24. 05. 02 23. 01 15. 02. 01 Technical proposals assessment RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
STEPS ACCORDING TO CQ PROCEDURE TENDER PHASE (CONTRACTS <100 000 USD) Management Information System TENDER PHASE (CONTACTS >100 000 USD) LIT training Sending invitation for letter of commitments 29. 03. 00 Sending invitation for letter of commitments 09. 06. 99 16. 06. 99 Letters of commitment gathering 12. 04. 00 Letters of commitment gathering 23. 06. 99 Appointment of a company by the Application Assessment Committee 18. 04. 00 12. 07. 99 Sending Invitation to Tender 23. 01 Appointment of a company by the Application Assessment Committee and Terms of Reference sending Delivery of technical and financial proposal by the chosen firm 07. 02. 01 Delivery of technical and financial proposal by the chosen firm 30. 08. 99 Negotiations with the chosen firm 09. 02. 01 14. 02. 01 19. 02. 01 22. 01 Negotiations with the chosen firm 08. 09. 99 12. 09. 99 21. 09. 99 10. 12. 99 09. 02. 00 Date of signing contract 06. 03. 01 „No objections” from World Bank for the contract Contract acceptance by World Bank before the first payment 25. 01 Date of signing contract RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
STEPS ACCORDING TO LCS PROCEDURE TENDER PHASE OF LSC PROCEDURE Short list presenting during negotiations with World Bank and obtaining „no objections” from World Bank AUDITING SERVICES (LCS) 1999 Approval of first draft of Invitation to Tender 07. 10. 99 Approval of final draft of Invitation to Tender 25. 01. 00 Sending of Invitation to Tender to shortlisted firms 15. 02. 00 Gathering proposals from shortlisted firms 21. 03. 00 Appointment of a company by Application Assessment Committee 17. 04. 00 „No objections” by World Bank and signing proposed form of contract with the chosen firm 10. 08. 00 Date of signing contract 29. 08. 00 RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
STEPS ACCORDING TO ICB AND NCB PROCEDURE NCB LSIF 9912/03 (ICB) NEFCO (ICB) GEF II (NCB) GEF III (ICB) Approval of tender documentation 28. 09. 00 05. 03. 01 13. 09. 01 29. 01. 02 13. 02 Advertisement in press 19. 10. 00 13. 01 17. 10. 01 08. 02 28. 03. 02 16. 04. 02 Deadline for proposals 01. 12. 00 23. 04. 01 27. 11. 011 11. 03. 02 16. 05. 02 Opening of proposals 01. 12. 00 23. 04. 01 27. 11. 01 11. 03. 02 16. 05. 02 Approval of tender results 13. 12. 00 18. 05. 01 02. 01. 02 04. 02 10. 06. 02 Approval of contract form 20. 12. 00 18. 05. 01 17. 01. 02 04. 02 10. 06. 02 Date of contract signing 21. 12. 00 12. 06. 01 21. 02 14. 03. 02 27. 05. 02 12. 07. 02 PHASE TENDER RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
AIM OF THE PROJECT (investment part) Delivery of necessary training for farmers advisors from LITs (concerning environment protection) Training of participating farmers by advisors and operational consulting Fertilization Plans preparing for farms and collecting necessary data for preparing Farm Management Plans Preparing Farm Management Plans according to Polish Good Agriculture Practice Code Estimation of animal breeding level in farms Assessment of necessary capacity of animal wastes storages for min. 6 months period [assuming app. 50 kg/ 24 h/LA] Construction of at least 1100 storages [with capacity from 35 m 3 t to 650 m 3] for manure in three pilot areas (around Elbląg, around Toruń and around Ostrołęka /Łomża) Our „Eco-agriculture stairs”, or how to access EU in clean shoes RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
STATE OF ENGAGEMENT OF REPP ACTIVITIES for 1 st of September 2002. Prepared Fertilization Plans (No. of farms per area) Implemented Fertilization Plans (No. of farms/area) No. of advisors’ visits on farms No. of persons/ hours of trainings No. of permits for building No. of signed contracts No. of built tanks No. of built manure pads 200 per 5741 ha 5755 7188 299 299 228 per 4870 ha 150 per 4870 ha 3983 6288 175 195 81 10 325 327 per 6049 ha 290 per 5248 ha 11944 9843 302 326 217 27 Ostrowski powiat - - - 706 594 - 31 - - Węgrowski powiat - - - 267 514 - 31 - - Sokołowski powiat - - - 190 464 - 32 - - Together 677 776 per 18755 ha 640 per 15859 ha 22831 24891 776 914 597 265 Area of activity No. of PUG LIT Toruń 243 LIT Elbląg 109 LIT Ostrołęka/ Łomża 299 per 7836 ha 150 RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT state for 1 st of September 2002 1) Capacity of liquid manure tanks: - Ostrołęka/Łomża region 90 000 m 3 - Elbląg region 10 027 m 3 - Toruń region 30 841 m 3 Together 2) Area of built manure pads: - Ostrołęka/Łomża region - Elbląg region - Toruń region Together 130 868 m 3 3 091 m 2 (a lot of cowsheds without beddings) 1 502 m 2 33 261 m 2 37 763 m 2 3) 55 cisterns with dispensers, 12 pieces of manure spreading equipment and 3 mixers have been bought. 4) Arable lands area of farms taking part in The Project: 28 645 ha 5) Arable lands area with prepared FP: 18 755 ha 6) Arable lands area with implemented FP: 15 859 ha 7) Number of rural advisors visits on farms: 22 831 8) Person/hours number of farmers’ schooling on rural environmental protection: 24 891 RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
GLOBAL BENEFITS (for the Country) § Decreasing amount of nitrates in water ü ü § § Better water quality Cleaner lakes, rivers, and Baltic Sea Progress in Poland’s implementation of requirements of international conventions (nitrate directive, Helsinki Convention) Replication Strategy („instruction” for environment protection investments in agriculture) RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
BENEFITS FOR FARMERS § Savings on fertilizers, app. 150 -200 USD yearly (stored § Liquidation of odours Better sanitary and hygienic conditions in farms Decreasing polluting compounds entering surface and ground water Health improvement of farmers and families drinking water from own sources Incentive for farmers co-operation manure can be used as a fertilizer) § Better efficiency (implementation of better method of management, cultivation, and fertilization) § § RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
MOTTO OF THE RURAL ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION PROJECT In polish agriculture, it is high time to treat animal wastes as fertilizers instead of treating it as a pollution (i. e. burden for environment) RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
INVESTMENTS – SOCIAL FUNDS APPROACH Project investments are designed according to the „social fund” approach. The principles are described in the Project Operational Manual. The idea of the funds is to establish „demand driven financing”. According to the principles: . . . ”are not intended for in advance decided investments but are locally prepared application are awarded. They promote certain activities framing projects (and sub-projects) assessment criteria. The criteria include efficiency measurement and implementation monitoring. The idea of the project is based on social funds but its goals are more environmental than social”. . . - citation from Operational Manual, Appendix 16, p. 3. RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT Example of estimated investment costs for a farm with 20 LAU (livestock housing with straw bedding) n Contribution of NFEP Manure tank, underground covered, capacity 60 m 3 – app. 25. 500, 00 zł n n (66%) Farmer contribution Construction design – app. 600, 00 zł Sewage connection to manure pad and cow barn to storage – app. 1. 300, 00 zł Manure pad, 70 m 2 – app. 11. 000, 00 zł (33%) Local-government contribution Site map 1: 500 Construction supervision (1%) RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
BUILDING MANURE PADS AND SLURRY TANKS – assessment of the costs N List Input in investment Value 1 Unit Price zł 600 22 732 Num. VAT % Total (in zł) Farmer Finan. 1 Construction design 2 Manure pad (concrete or reinforced concrete) m 2 70 130 9 100 22 11 102 3 Manure storage, underground m 3 60 424 25 440 0 25 440 Manure storage covered/opened m 3 4 Sewage connection with pipe: 150 mm diameter m 5 Collection pit. . . m 3 6 Electric pump for manure. . . k. W 7 Non-fin. NFEP Other costs piece 732 11 102 25 440 0 10 111 1 110 7 1 354 22 0 Total % whole investment 732 12 456 34% RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT 25 440 66%
REPLICATION STRATEGY of the PROJECT Experience gained Economic Assessment Local benefits assessment Social Assessment Country level benefits assessment Farmers assessment REPLICATION STRATEGY = GRAND SCHEME for supporting the environmental investments in agriculture RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT 2000 - 2003 REPP § § § consultancy financial help investments § observation § § project management outreach REPLICATION STRATEGY RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
SUBSIDISING LIMITS (a) Subsidizing environmental investments in farms is planned (manure pads, manure storages) up to the maximal subsidizing limit: Ø Up 10. 000 USD per one farm and with farmer input min. 30% The intention is to restrict participation of large farms, which can rather be called „meat factories than family farms. Project is directed to family farms, according to the decision of Steering Committee, approved by NFEP Managing Board and by World Bank. Farmers’ advisor from LIT, together with farmer, assess the current performance of a farm, prospect and needs concerning the size of a manure storage and/or manure pad. Basing on visits and data from Chambers of Agriculture, it can estimated that storages from 30 m 3 (cost, out of preliminary calculations, app. 15. 000 zł) up to 450 m 3 (cost about 65. 000 zł). Thus, subsidizing contribution starts from 10. 500 zł (i. e. 2. 600 USD), but not more than 40. 000 zł (i. e. Not more than 10. 000 USD) although from at the first sight it could be concluded that in such a case 70% gives bigger amount than equivalent of 10. 000 USD). RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
SUBSIDISING LIMITS (b) Ø Another limit, restricting participation of too small and prosperous farms, is one that a farms need to have at minimum 10 LAU (i. e. cows more than 500 kg each or e. g. 20 young cows or 50 calves etc. ) Ø The last limit is the restriction of animals number by farm size. The limit is 1, 5 of LAU/ha. The limit is intended to eliminate the case of intensive animals waste production without possibility to proper usage of it. It would be incompatible with the aim of the project i. e. decreasing pollution entering surface and ground water. In other words, important is not only to store the animal waste properly but also to utilize it properly. RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
OUTREACH § Agriculture influence on environment Modern methods of agriculture management environment friendly § Positive and negative results of project § RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
HEALTHY AGRICULTURE § Providing animal livestock farms with animal wastes storage devices § Providing farms with devices for even distribution of natural fertilizers on lands § Designing and implementing proper crop rotation and nutrient management plan RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ISSUES RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT AND AGRICULTURE RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS of the farms § Declaration of sustaining a farm in medium and long time scope § Guarantee of farm development through age limitation of farmer and declared step owner, professionally prepared for agriculture business § Assessment of technical and marketing capabilities of farmer § Realistic farm development plan RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
PRINCIPLE OF TENDER for works All decisions within the project are based on tenders, according to the World Bank procedure. The construction firms are appointed through tenders, after public advertisement, checking their experience etc. Lower prices comparing with preliminary financial proposal are appreciated. More farms can be covered by the project! For storages construction, the cheapest proposal is chosen, but with keeping quality standards, which are precisely set, according to Polish Standards related to construction technologies (feasible technologies, if concrete storages than with the appropriate durability, proper concrete standard, proper steel reinforcement, i. e. concrete min. B 20, watertight level min. W 6, frost proof min. F 100). RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
FINAL CONCLUSION If a company or suggest that such investments could be done cheaper - they are invited for tender!!! (basing on open procedures and according with existing tendering procedure regulations). Of course, the only method of solution confirmation, is empirical test. The project is implemented in phases, which allows to adjust its elements, with the final solutions that can be a basis for investment and non-investment tasks of this type. RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
GOAL of the REPLICATION STRATEGY FARMER = environmental manager on the local level RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
PLAN FOR THE YEAR 2002 Building of the liquid manure tanks which total capacity will come to: § Elbląg 22271 m 3 § Łomża 81363 m 3 § Toruń 0 m 3 § Bug 23684 m 3 Together 127318 m 3 Building of manure pads which total area will came to: § Elbląg 26377 m 2 § Łomża 8960 m 2 § Toruń 31268 m 2 § Bug 12926 m 2 Together 79531 m 2 Preparation and implementation of Fertilization Plans for area of: § Elbląg 3589 ha § Łomża 2738 ha § Toruń 2520 ha § Bug 4250 ha Together 13097 ha Running trainings for farmers on ecological farming in number of 1988 person/hours. RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
Скачать презентацию BASIC INFORMATION ABOUT THE RURAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECT
aa0054df341cade1096434c5ad09e0cc.ppt