Скачать презентацию APPLYING STOCHASTIC LINEAR SCHEDULING METHOD TO PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION Скачать презентацию APPLYING STOCHASTIC LINEAR SCHEDULING METHOD TO PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION

ef299bc13442c98d1dc2a21c0b49a47c.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 19

APPLYING STOCHASTIC LINEAR SCHEDULING METHOD TO PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION ICCEM. ICCPM 2009 Fitria H. Rachmat APPLYING STOCHASTIC LINEAR SCHEDULING METHOD TO PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION ICCEM. ICCPM 2009 Fitria H. Rachmat Bechtel Corporation, Texas, U. S. Lingguang Song & Sang-Hoon (Shawn) Lee University of Houston, Texas, U. S.

Agenda • • • Linear Construction Linear Scheduling Method (LSM) Research Problem & Objectives Agenda • • • Linear Construction Linear Scheduling Method (LSM) Research Problem & Objectives Stochastic LSM (SLSM) Case Study – – – Pipeline Construction Data Collection Automated Input Modeling SLSM Modeling Outputs • Conclusions

Linear Construction Projects • Characteristics – Involve a large number of repetitive activities – Linear Construction Projects • Characteristics – Involve a large number of repetitive activities – Activities occur in succession – Subject to uncertainty and interruptions – E. g. high-rise, pipeline, and highway projects • Project Success – Effective project scheduling/control – Ensure continuous work flow w/o interruptions

Pipeline Construction “Assembly Line” Pipeline Construction “Assembly Line”

Linear Scheduling Method (LSM) • LSM – – Designed for linear construction 2 D Linear Scheduling Method (LSM) • LSM – – Designed for linear construction 2 D time-space graph Production line = repetitive task Line slope = productivity Location Formwork Floor 2 - 2 • Benefits – – Easily model repetitive tasks Both time & space data Visualize time/space buffers Visualize work continuity Rebar Time Buffer Interruption Space Buffer Floor 2 - 1 July 2 Electrical Calendar

A Demo of LSM Section 2 B Pour Section Layout Section 1 B Traditional A Demo of LSM Section 2 B Pour Section Layout Section 1 B Traditional Bar Chart Schedule

Schedule Delay - Elimination Floor 2 Formwork Rebar 2 B Electrical Concreting 1 B Schedule Delay - Elimination Floor 2 Formwork Rebar 2 B Electrical Concreting 1 B LSM Chart Pour section layout

Research Problem & Objectives Current Look-ahead Scheduling Practice Historical data Personal experience Deterministic schedule Research Problem & Objectives Current Look-ahead Scheduling Practice Historical data Personal experience Deterministic schedule (CPM or LSM) Proposed Look-ahead Scheduling Method • Use real project data Collect actual project data Automated input modeling Stochastic LSM simulation • Include uncertainty • Accurate schedules

Stochastic Linear Scheduling Method (SLSM) • Actual productivity data collection • Automated input modeling Stochastic Linear Scheduling Method (SLSM) • Actual productivity data collection • Automated input modeling – Determine distributions of activity productivity • Simulation Modeling – Simulation: a mathematic-logic model of a real world system – A linear project can be modeled using “Project” and “Activity” elements in SLSM • Simulation experiments & outputs

A Case Study • Case Study – Construction of ~130 miles of 30” pipeline A Case Study • Case Study – Construction of ~130 miles of 30” pipeline • Procedure – Data collection – Automated input modeling – Simulation models – Output schedules

Data Collection Sample Actual Productivity Data Date Task Station Footage Productivity (ft/d) From To Data Collection Sample Actual Productivity Data Date Task Station Footage Productivity (ft/d) From To 9/15 Stringing 5484+00 5636+00 15, 000 9/16 Stringing 5636+00 5705+83 6, 983 9/17 Stringing 5705+83 5806+00 10, 017 9/18 Stringing 5806+00 5972+00 16, 600 9/19 Stringing 5972+00 6140+00 16, 800

Automated Input Modeling • Input modeling – Determine the underlying statistical distribution’s of an Automated Input Modeling • Input modeling – Determine the underlying statistical distribution’s of an activity’s productivity rate Automated using Best. Fit ®

Automated Input Modeling Parameters for Fitted Distribution Actual Productivity Data Fitted distribution Automated Input Modeling Parameters for Fitted Distribution Actual Productivity Data Fitted distribution

Input Modeling Outputs Task Name Statistical Distributions Surveying Exponential with mean =16629 Clearing Exponential Input Modeling Outputs Task Name Statistical Distributions Surveying Exponential with mean =16629 Clearing Exponential with mean = 9527 Grading Normal with mean = 2874 and standard deviation = 1363 Trenching Triangular with low limit = 670, most likely = 1809, and high limit = 10720 Stringing Normal with mean = 4837 and standard deviation = 3011 Bending Beta with a = 2. 3, b = 3. 4, low = 670, and high = 13812 Welding Beta with a = 1. 2, b = 1, low = 700, and high = 9800 Lower-in Normal with mean = 5882 and standard deviation = 3033 Tie-in Exponential with mean = 2007 Backfill Beta with a = 1. 2, b = 2. 9, low = 804, and high = 15758 Clean up Normal with mean = 3688 and standard deviation = 1221

SLSM Modeling • Establish a “Project” element • Determine work scope • Add “Task” SLSM Modeling • Establish a “Project” element • Determine work scope • Add “Task” elements • Productivity rate • Time & space buffer • Start time

Experiment & Outputs Comparison of baseline schedule & simulated look-ahead schedule Experiment & Outputs Comparison of baseline schedule & simulated look-ahead schedule

Experiment & Outputs Uncertainty analysis of project total duration Individual activity performance range Experiment & Outputs Uncertainty analysis of project total duration Individual activity performance range

Conclusions • Actual project data can be used to enhance look-ahead scheduling accuracy • Conclusions • Actual project data can be used to enhance look-ahead scheduling accuracy • Automated input modeling makes simulation more accessible to industry practitioners • SLSM successfully incorporates uncertainty in traditional LSM method.

Thank You & Questions 19 Thank You & Questions 19