ANTI-DUMPING IN COUNTRIES
Let`s talk about anti-dumping in China. One reason for this special status is because the People’s Republic of China (PRS) is one of the world’s lowest. Because of the cost structure of its industries and economy, as well as the fact that it tends to manufacture products at the low end of quality and thus is able to sell a wide range of products at a lower price than most producers. Over the years China has had a total of 640 anti-dumping cases about 20% of the world total most of them initiated by U. S, European Union, Japan, India and Argentina. 70% of cases involve base metal, chemical, machinery, electrical appliances and textiles. At this time, China has become party to thirteen anti-dumping cases in the WTO (in six as defendant and in six as defendant). Three lawsuits against China had been decided in favor of the plaintiff and three more cases are under consideration. However, knowing the gaps that still existed in the judicial practice of China, we cannot exclude the possibility that this case may not be resolved in his favor.
Russia has just become a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Anti-dumping Measures in International Practice: Prospects for Russia Abstract Russia has just become a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Today, different measures of national firms support should meet the WTO rules and regulations. Anti-dumping measures are one of the possible ways to protect domestic producers. Moreover, it is necessary not only to cope with unfair competition but help national exporters which face anti-dumping measures on foreign markets. Russia modestly applies anti-dumping duties but some positive changes are foreseen. In this sense, international experience could improve Russian practice of anti-dumping initiations and protection of national interests in anti-dumping actions.
The Special Import Measures Act (SIMA), Canada's anti-dumping and countervailing legislation, protects Canadian manufacturers and producers from unfair competition from certain goods. Specifically, these sources of unfair competition are from harm or injury caused by the dumping or subsidization of goods imported into Canada. Dumping of goods occurs when goods are imported into Canada at a lower price that its normal value (i. e. , generally, the price that the good is sold in its home market or at a price below total cost). The procedure under SIMA for determining whether such duties are to be levied is divided into two stages: Stage 1 - The first stage is carried out by the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) and generally involves an investigation into whether dumping or subsidizing has occurred. Stage 2 - The second stage is an economic inquiry conducted by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (CITT) and determines whether the dumping or subsidizing is causing injury. The balance of this article provides an overview to the two stages involved in the SIMA process.
Geography of application of anti-dumping measures by member countries of the WTO in 1995 and 2011. Country The number anti-dumping measures, used country The number of antidumping the measures imposed against exports India 458 93 USA 304 131 EC 275 54 China 148 612 Brazil 111 82 Republic of Korea 72 169 Japan 7 116 Thailand 32 103 Taiwan 14 136 Turkey 143 27
Скачать презентацию ANTI-DUMPING IN COUNTRIES Let s talk about anti-dumping
Positive externalities.pptx