Скачать презентацию Annual Review of Research Water Center University of Скачать презентацию Annual Review of Research Water Center University of

2a5d38cc4918d153738bacbeb88d7a22.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 1

Annual Review of Research Water Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA February 16, 2006 Annual Review of Research Water Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA February 16, 2006 1 Experimental Surface Water Monitor for the Continental US 2 OVERVIEW q We have implemented an experimental real-time surface water monitoring system that uses Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrology model (Liang et al. , 1994) for real-time estimation of soil moisture, snow water equivalent (SWE) and runoff over the continental U. S. at 1/2 degree spatial resolution. q The monitoring system will stage DROUGHT ANALYSIS PRODUCTS, including those described in Andreadis et al. (2005) in real-time, as well as maintain an archive of comparative products extending back to 1915. q The monitoring system is driven by daily precipitation, temperature minima and maxima from 2131 COOP stations, and has a 1 -day update lag, with updates each day by 2 p. m. PST. q The system will also stage weekly outlooks based on similar methods to the ensemble forecasting techniques used in the UW west-wide seasonal hydrologic forecast system. 3 Ali S. Akanda, Andy W. Wood, and Dennis P. Lettenmaier Methods 1930 s 1955+ NOAA ACIS Prcp Tmax Tmin Coop Stations Index Station Method Gridded Forcing Creation VIC Retrospective Simulation Daily, 1915 to Near Current Hydrologic values, anomalies, percentiles w. r. t. retrospective PDF Index Meth. Hydrologic State VIC Real-time Simulation (~1 month long) climatology (PDF) of hydrologic values w. r. t. defined period Hydrologic State (-1 Day) vals, anoms percentiles w. r. t. PDF A primary goal of this system was to ensure consistency between realtime and retrospective outputs, hence the input stations were limited to those with BOTH reliable real-time reporting and historical records extending back at least 40 years. Because this results in many fewer stations than are available with less stringent criteria, we use the input stations indirectly. First, we estimate precipitation percentile (for ~month long periods) and (daily) temperature anomalies and interpolate them to a 1/8 degree grid. Then we extract corresponding values from a 1/8 degree climatological forcing PDF created using a larger set of station inputs (e. g. , not all reporting in real-time, taken from the Andreadis et al. effort described in an associated poster). Finally, temporal disaggregation of the precipitation period values is needed. Currently, the PDF is based on 1915 -2003; however, this choice may be revisited. Examples of Current Products COUNTY BLOW-UPS CHANGES IN CURRENT CONDITIONS Clicking the main maps launches blow-up views showing the county delineations. Andreadis et al. The change in conditions over the past week, 2 weeks and one month help to characterize the evolving water balance. ARCHIVES March 1997: La Nina conditions bring the highest recorded snowfall to the PNW August 1993: the highest recorded flow on the Mississippi R. March 2002: Virginia experiences severe drought, many well failures In Development TIMESERIES ANAYSIS FOR PIXELS OR REGIONS Plots of current hydro-climatic conditions contrasted with other water years and with the daily climatological PDF. (temporal comparison, left) (spatial comparison, right) Index Station Forcing Approach Surface Water Monitoring System Products UW From a qualitative standpoint, we find good agreement with current real-time CPC soil moisture monitoring tool (recent plots shown at right) 4 Nowcast produced with 1 -2 day lag from current 5 CPC The Andreadis et al. retrospective soil moisture dataset shows good spatial and temporal consistency with the SW Monitor simulations VIC Hydrologic Model (Liang et al. , 1994) Real-time Nowcasting Information Flow Comparison with Other Datasets Colorado Cell (39. 25, -108. 25) Andreadis et al. SW Monitor Univ. of Washington Images with alternate scale bars (e. g. , that match the Drought Monitor categories) Current WEBSITE: http: //www. hydro. washington. edu/forecast/monitor/ The “first-cut” implementation of the system has a limited set of products – the primary results shown currently are nowcasts (with a 1 -2 day lag depending on time of day) of soil moisture and snow water equivalent percentiles. Other products are in development (see Section 5 at right). 1915 -2003 climatology period (PDF) OUTLOOKS In addition to soil moisture, current SWE and (soon) runoff percentiles Weekly outlooks based on similar methods to those used in the UW west-wide seasonal hydrologic forecast system (using CPC, CFS, NSIPP and ESP climate ensembles). Recent trends in relative soil moisture, SWE, runoff (At right are shown a sample ESP 3 -month outlook initialized Febr. 1) An archive from 1915 present of soil moisture and SWE percentiles on Day 1 of each month, with a simple interface for navigation Other Changes / Ongoing Work References / Acknowledgements q improving spatial resolution of the overall monitoring system to 1/8 degree. q the nowcast / real-time simulation / plot generations have been fully automated. q incorporating additional products (beyond percentiles), including runoff maps, cumulative departures from normal, and recovery probabilities (derived from the outlook products) q explore different PDF periods and station datasets. (It may be better to screen out more stations to achieve greater consistency with the pre-1950 record). Andreadis, K. M. , E. A. Clark, A. W. Wood, A. F. Hamlet, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2004, 20 th Century Drought in the Conterminous United States , Journal of Hydrometeorology (accepted). Liang, X. , D. P. Lettenmaier, E. F. Wood and S. J. Burges, 1994. A Simple hydrologically Based Model of Land Surface Water and Energy Fluxes for GSMs, J. Geophys. Res. , 99(D 7). The authors acknowledge the support of NOAA/OGP and the NASA Seasonal-to. Interannual Prediction Project (NSIPP).