AMANAT TAHUNAN DEKAN RESETTING THE PRIORITY Hamidi Abdul Aziz Pusat Pengajian Kejuruteraan Awam, Kampus Kejuruteraan, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, MALAYSIA 18 February 2009 1
ORDER OF PRESENTATION 1. 0 APEX and our present KPI 2. 0 Our priority 3. 0 Approaches 4. 0 Challenges 5. 0 SKT 2009 6. 0 My words and my wish
1. 0 APEX AND OUR PRESENT KPI APEX Challenges under APEX: 8 pillars • Nurturing and learning. • Research and innovation. • Services and external activities. • Students and alumni services. • Graduate studies. • Concentration of talent. • Resources. • Supportive governance. 3
OUR PRESENT KPI • Everyone has given the best. Thank you so much for your contribution. • We are still behind. We need to work harder. 4
Kategori KPI RU Awards: Penerbitan: IF/staff atau cummulatif impact factor Non-cited indexed journal Buku Bab dalam buku Other publications Pencapaian 2006 2007 2008 1 antarabangsa -1 1 antarabangsa 2 kebangsaan antarabangasa (silver) -2 kebangsaan (2 gold) 10 paper 0. 6/staf 16. 937 KPI universiti Target 2009 >50 2 antarabangsa 2 kebangsaan >2/staf 0. 6/staf atau 15 10 paper 0. 53/staf 14. 907 15 paper 0. 321/staf 10. 904 52 papers 2. 08/staf 42 paper (Proceedings) 1. 27/staf 2. 0/staf 4 books 0. 14/staf 41 papers 1. 64/papers 2 buku 0. 06/staf 14 bab 0. 42/staf Editorial Board 12 Invited paper 32 Keynote 5 Presentation 21 National Proceedings 8 0. 15/staf 0. 2/staf 5
Geran (aktif pada tahun semasa) Kerajaan (Science Fund, FRGS, IRPA, RU) 22 projek 20 projek RM 787, 860. 0 RM 3, 135, 441 0 27 projek RM 4, 109, 448 RM 125 K/staf 40 K/staf Swasta (TNB) 1 projek RM 149, 000 RM 5, 960/staf 1 projek RM 149, 000 RM 5/staf 13. 35 K/staf 2 K/staf Antarabangsa 3 projek RM 48, 203 RM 1, 928/staf 6 projek RM 197, 730. 87 6 K/staf Jangka Pendek dan Kampus Sejahtera, Insentif 15 projek RM 185287. 00 29 projek RM 679, 122. 1 0 25 projek RM 746, 336 23 K/staf Tiada 1 Post-doctoral 1 projek/staf 20 K/staf 15/tahun 2 6
Kuantiti pelajar siswazah berijazah Ph. D. berijazah/staf 1 3 5 1: 5 2 1: 16 1: 18 7 1: 4 Nisbah pelajar siswazah: staf 5. 24: 1 4. 59/staf 3. 45/staf 3/staf 4. 59/staf Nisbah UG: PG (termasuk mod campuran) 4: 1 3. 2: 1 2. 85: 1 4: 1 2. 8: 1 Peratus pelajar luar negara 22% 23% 21. 34% >10% 34% 39. 7 42. 85 38. 66% >50% 45% 25. 8 26% >10% 26% Kualiti pelajar siswazah Kelayakan masuk CGPA>3. 0 Pelajar siswazah dengan fellow/grant 7
Paten 0 2 12 1 Produk komersial Perlesenan 0 - 7 0 IPR 0 - 12 0 16. 8 K > Awam 2007 3 2500 K/tahun 50 K 215, 679. 50 >1 juta RM 7, 598, 261. 66 (Aktif pada tahun semasa) RM 878, 270 (Baru) 500 K 10008. 22 < 10, 000 15, 000 MOU 0 Sama - 6 1 Staf terlibat dengan penyelidikan di luar 6 Sama 1 225 1 Perkhidmatan profesional Kursus Konsultansi, termasuk penyelidikan berkontrak Testing Jaringan luar 8
Pertukaran pelajar antarabangsa Latihan staf ke luar negara 0 Sama - 0 4 Sama - 2 Ahli persatuan profesional antarabangsa (kumulatif pada tahun semasa) 10 Sama 8 320 10 Ahli persatuan profesional kebangsaan (kumulatif pada tahun semasa) 41 Sama 52 590 41 Ahli persatuan profesional (kumulatif pada tahun semasa) dengan jawatan di Exco 3 Sama Technical committee member/panel International 7 National 30 3 9
ORDER OF PRESENTATION 1. 0 APEX and our present KPI 2. 0 Our priority 3. 0 Approaches 4. 0 Challenges 5. 0 SKT 2009 6. 0 My words and my wish
2. 0 OUR PRIORITY 2. 1 Teaching and supervision • We are here because of our students. • Quantity of teaching: – Workload is generally fair (<6 hours/week). – Relatively speaking, a lot can be done for the remaining 34 hours. – Loading is even lesser for staff without mixedmode programme. – Where does the remaining time go? 11
2. 1 Teaching and supervision (cont’d) • Quality of teaching: – Does the teaching effective and attractive or have become culture? – PPT vs OHP vs internet vs OBE? – Integration of other teaching and learning approaches? – Have me moved forward? – Recycled exam question? – Have we returned the script on time? – Have we been innovative enough? – Niche programme/syallabus? 12
2. 1 Teaching and supervision (cont’d) • Quality of teaching: – Have we marked where the mistakes are? – Have we given enough tutorials? – Have we prepared model answer for test, exam papers? – How much time have we given to our students for consultation? – PR with our students-all levels? 13
2. 1 Teaching and supervision (cont’d) • Supervision: – Having good quality? – How long do we need to read thesis? – Have we thoroughly checked thesis? – Students graduated on time? – Good to have many students but have we been fair to each one of them? – Have we given enough? – Do not copy the old traditions when we were studying and apply them to our students. 14
2. 1 Teaching and supervision (cont’d) • Mixed-mode: – Not very popular? – Possibility to offer full-time/part time on weekdays? – Less number of international students? – Should we continue? – If we stop, can we promise that we will improve on the other KPI’s? – Should we extend to other areas? 15
2. 2 Research and publication • Research: – Good number of USM grants. – Comfortable number of national grant. – Poor performance of international grant. – Main researcher or still menempek? – Experience staff should become a role model! – Complacency culture? – Why the same person? – Why need to extend? – Why the given money does not tally with KPI: • Papers? • Graduated Ph. D. /M. Sc. students? – Please muhasabah diri. What went wrong? 16
2. 2 Research and publication (cont’d) • Publication: – Poor performance on impact factor journals. – Still giving so much priorities on conferences. – SKT has been so tolerable to date. – By setting the right priority, we can succeed! – Students mush publish. 17
2. 3 Consultancy/testing/Courses • Consultancy/contract research: – Fair performance and can do more. – Same person. – Project leader? – All disciplines must contribute. • Testing: – Starting 2008, the number has increased. – All disciplines must contribute. – Are we competent enough? – How do we share the cakes? 18
2. 3 Consultancy/testing/Courses (cont’d) • Short courses/seminar/conferences: – Why only AWAM’x? – We have been so active on short courses, why not now? – Without not doing this, the KPI still the same? • Testing: – Starting 2008, the number has increased. – All disciplines must contribute. – Are we competent enough? – How do we share the cakes? 19
2. 4 Services to community and university • Services to community: – Does the local community aware of our presence? – How much they benefitted from our presence? – What can we contribute? – KPI vs contribution to community? • Services to university: – We are doing ok on this. Many have been involved – However, it is sometimes limited to the same person. 20
2. 5 Priority: My wish • Do the best for our teaching and supervision. – Be innovative – Narrowing the gap between lecturer/staff-students. • Conduct quality research and produce tangible outputs: – ISI papers. – Quality Ph. D. and M. Sc. Graduates, on time. 21
INTRODUCTION • Under the APEX Programme, PG education plays a pivotal role in USM’s Transformation Plan • PG Education as the frontier of research directly affects: 1. Student Quantity and Quality 2. Publications 3. Commercialization Agenda 4. Patents
OUR TARGET Student Number PG Student Population
Our Target s To increase Research Mode students from 3000+ to 7000 by 2010 (Av. 300 new enrollments/mth) PG student : Staff ratio to increase from 2: 1 to 4: 1
The Reality PG student: Staff Ratio According to School/Centre @ Aug. 2008*
% PG intake with CGPA ≥ 3. 0 or equivalent* NOTE: An Incentive Grant of RM 5, 000 every year, 2 yrs for Masters and 3 years for Ph. D student, will be given to the Main Supervisor for every registered Postgraduate student with a CGPA 3, effective Aug. 2008. Procedure: 1. IPS to send list of registered PG students with CGPA 3 (equivalent 85% or 18/20) to RCMO monthly 2. RCMO sends list to Bendahari to deposit fund of individual Main Supervisor 3. Fund managed by Main Supervisor, Bendahari and RCMO. 4. Technically can be used for anything including equipment. Standard purchasing procedures
TABUNG SISWAZAH RU ALLOCATION Local Int. 1. Fellowship (CGPA 3. 00) √ √ 2. GA (CGPA 3. 00) √ √ 1. Attending Conferences √ √ √ * √ X 2. RO/RA (funded by RU Research Grant held by PI) √ √ √ 3. Research Grant PG as PI (RM 10, 000) - Seed Money - Completion of Research 1. Fellowship (CGPA 3. 00) √ 2. Attachment Int. 3. USM-PGRS (PG as PI) (RM 10, 000 for Masters & RM 20, 000 for Ph. D) Research Fund (Dana Penyelidikan) Local √ * Regardless of candidature, (Bachelor CGPA must be 3. 00) Bottom line, Fellowships are available to local and international students
The Reality Fellowship Holders According to Schools/Centres: Local & Int’l
To be presented to MPSU Candidature End of 1 st year 2 nd year Upon submission of Thesis No funding - Published 1 paper preferably in IFJ RO - Published 1 paper preferably in IFJ GA Masters Criteria - Published 1 paper preferably in IFJ Fellowship Holder 1. Submit at least paper for publication in Journal or 2. Presented a Paper at a conference. Full paper to be submitted to IPS or 3. Published in a peer reviewed proceedings Published 1 paper preferably in IFJ FH + PGRS 1. Submit at least paper for publication in Journal or 2. Presented a Paper at a conference. Full paper to be submitted to IPS or 3. Published in a peer reviewed proceedings Published 1 paper preferably in IFJ PRGS - Published 1 paper preferably in IFJ
Candidature End of 1 st year 2 nd year 3 rd year Upon submission of Thesis No funding - Published 1 st paper preferably in IFJ Published 2 nd paper preferably in IFJ Published 2 papers preferably in IFJ RO - Published 1 st paper preferably in IFJ Published 2 nd paper preferably in IFJ Published 2 papers preferably in IFJ GA Ph. D Criteria - Published 1 st paper preferably in IFJ Published 2 nd paper preferably in IFJ Published 2 papers preferably in IFJ 1. Submit at least paper for publication in Journal or 2. Presented a Paper at a conference. Full paper to be submitted to IPS or 3. Published in a peer reviewed proceedings Published 1 st paper preferably in IFJ Published 2 nd paper preferably in IFJ Published 2 papers preferably in IFJ FH + PGRS 1. Submit at least paper for publication in Journal or 2. Presented a Paper at a conference. Full paper to be submitted to IPS or 3. Published in a peer reviewed proceedings Published 1 st paper preferably in IFJ Published 2 nd paper preferably in IFJ Published 2 papers preferably in IFJ PRGS - Published 1 st paper preferably in IFJ Published 2 nd paper preferably in IFJ Published 2 papers preferably in IFJ Fellowship Holder (FH)
Postgraduate Student Projection @ 31 Jan 2009* # Total Academic Staff Total PG Students Ratio Acad. Staff: PG Projected PG (1: 3. 25) '09 Projected PG (1: 4. 55) '10 Sains Kajihayat 49 337 6. 9 315 (157. 5)* 315. 0 Sains Farmasi 45 248 5. 5 221 (110. 5) 221. 0 PTJ Has Been Presented to Deputy Deans, Graduate Studies Total Academic Staff Total PG Students Ratio Acad. Staff: PG Projected PG (1: 3. 25) '09 Projected PG (1: 4. 55) '10 Kej. Elektrik & Elektronik 40 191 4. 8 172 (86) 182. 0 (91) Sains Komputer 38 173 4. 6 162 (81) 172. 9 (86. 5) Teknologi Industri 39 190 4. 9 163 (81. 5) 177. 5 (88. 7) Kej. Mekanik 28 128 4. 6 112 (56) 127. 4 (63. 7) PTPM 11 41 3. 7 44 (22) 50. 1 (25. 0) Ilmu Pendidikan 59 263 4. 5 228 (114) 268. 5 (134. 2) INFORMM 5 32 6. 4 19 (9. 5) 22. 8 (11. 4) Kej. Bahan & Sumber Mineral 38 182 4. 8 140 (70) 172. 9 (86. 5) Kej. Kimia 25 106 4. 2 83 (41. 5) 113. 8 (56. 9) Kej. Awam 28 112 4. 0 92 (46) 127. 4 (63. 7) Sains Kimia 36 120 3. 3 117 (58. 5) 163. 8 (81. 9) PTJ * 50% with CGPA 3. 00
Total Academic Staff Total PG Students Ratio Acad. Staff: PG Projected PG (1: 3. 25) '09 Ilmu Kemanusiaan 83 258 3. 1 269. 8 (135) 377. 7 (188. 8) Pengurusan 63 205 3. 3 204. 8 (102. 4) 286. 7 (143. 3) Pusat Penyelidikan Arkeologi Malaysia 4 13 3. 3 13. 0 (6. 5) 18. 2 (9. 1) Penyelidikan Dadah & Ubat-ubatan 6 23 3. 8 19. 5 (9. 75) 27. 3 (13. 6) Perumahan, Bangunan & Perancangan 65 187 2. 9 211. 3 (105. 6) 295. 8 (147. 9) Sains Kemasyarakatan 48 119 2. 5 156. 0 (78) 218. 4 (109. 2) Sains Fizik 47 136 2. 9 152. 8 (76. 4) 213. 9 (106. 9) Penyelidikan Dasar & Kajian Antarabangsa 8 15 1. 9 26. 0 (13) 36. 4 (18. 2) Pusat Bahasa & Terjemahan 10 17 1. 8 32. 5 (16. 25) 45. 5 (22. 75) Seni 33 53 1. 7 107. 3 (53. 6) 150. 2 (75. 0) IPPT 11 19 1. 6 35. 8 (17. 9) 50. 1 (25) Pendidikan Jarak Jauh 66 146 1. 6 214. 5 (107. 2) Komunikasi 21 40 1. 5 68. 3 (34. 1) Sains Matematik 45 67 1. 5 146. 3 (73. 1) 204. 8 (102. 4) REDAC 5 8 1. 2 16. 3 (8. 1) 22. 8 (11. 4) KANITA 6 10 1. 0 19. 5 (86) 27. 3 (13. 7) Kej. Aeroangkasa 13 11 0. 7 42. 3 (86) 59. 2 (29. 6) Sains Pergigian 60 40 0. 7 195. 0 (97. 5) 273. 0 (136. 5) Sains Kesihatan 90 67 0. 6 292. 5 (146. 25) 409. 5 (204. 8) Sains Perubatan 353 89 0. 3 1147. 3 (573. 6) 1606. 2 (803) Pusat Racun Negara 4 1 0. 3 13. 0 (6. 5) 18. 2 (9. 1) Pusat Kawalan Doping 4 1 0. 0 13. 0 (6. 5) 18. 2 (9. 1) PTJ* Projected PG (1: 4. 55) '10 300. 3 (150. 15) 95. 6 (47. 8)
2. 5 Priority: My wish • Involved in consultancies/testing/seminar/short courses/conferences: – Minimum 1 consultancy per year as project leader – Involved in testing – Minimum 1 Short course per discipline per year. 33
2. 5 Priority: My wish (cont’d) • Involved in community professional activities: services and – Technical committee member. – Reviewer of technical paper. – Keynote speaker. – Examiner. Maintain a good record. • Involved in university services. – Various committee member at USM, Engineering and PPKA. – Involved in sports. 34
2. 5 Priority: My wish (cont’d) • Closer relationship between staff/student – Kelab • Staff involves in riadah. 35
ORDER OF PRESENTATION 1. 0 APEX and our present KPI 2. 0 Our priority 3. 0 Approaches 4. 0 Challenges 5. 0 SKT 2009 6. 0 My words and my wish
3. 0 APPROACHES I will still maintain the 3 approaches: 1) Improving infrastructure and physical needs (Resources). 2) Maintaining adequate and quality human capital (Talent). 3) Improving good working environment (Governance). 37
3. 1 Improving infrastructure and physical needs (Resources) • Improving facilities to support teaching and learning. • Number of laboratories. • Laboratory facilities. • Pejabat Am and its accessories. • Graduate, RO/RA rooms. • Computer/printer and internet. • Lecture room facilities. • Meeting room. • Facilities for undergraduate students. 38 • Recreational facilities.
3. 2 Maintaining adequate and quality human capital (Talent) • Keeping the existing staff. • Continuous recruiting. • New ASTS and maintaining good contact with existing ones. • Selecting the best. CGPA>3. 0. • Only appoint productive contract staff. • Increasing the number of Ir’s. • Sending all non-Ph. D. staff to further their studies asap. • Above 90% Ph. D. holder in 5 years. 39
3. 3 Improving good working environment (Governance) • Reassignment of administrative staff. • Reshuffle of exco member. • Strengthening the technical team with backup system. • Involvement of all staff in PPKA system. • Think-tank group. • Empowerment with KPI and responsibility. • Narrowing the gap between staff/management team, between staff/student: – Sports – Hari keluarga 40
3. 3 Improving good working environment (Governance) (cont’d) – Kenduri – Rakan masjid – Helwa 41
ORDER OF PRESENTATION 1. 0 APEX and our present KPI 2. 0 Our priority 3. 0 Approaches 4. 0 Challenges 5. 0 SKT 2009 6. 0 My words and my wish
4. 0 CHALLENGES • • Old timer teaching style? Old timer supervision style? Late to office and not compensated? Late to lecture? Punch and out? Long tea break and in group? Lab cannot start at 0810 am? Many days out of office uninformed (missing in action). 43
4. 0 CHALLENGES (cont’d) • Difficult to comply with due dates: – Exam question – Course plan/teaching plan – Updating of folio – Coursework and exam mark. – Returning the course work/assignment/test. – Late to provide response. • Do not sensitive to PPKA’s activities – Staff activities – Student activities 44
4. 0 CHALLENGES (cont’d) • Do not involve in sport or similar activities. • Seniors do not really become a good role model to juniors. • Juniors are not really eager/keen to learn from seniors. • Respect: – Junior respects the senior, senior cares the junior. – Admin respects the academic, vice-versa. – Respect the superior. – Positive working environment. – Student respects staff, staff cares and loves the 45 students.
4. 0 CHALLENGES (cont’d) • Do not involve in students’ activities. • Complacency • Unequal loading vs KPI 46
ORDER OF PRESENTATION 1. 0 APEX and our present KPI 2. 0 Our priority 3. 0 Approaches 4. 0 Challenges 5. 0 SKT 2009 6. 0 My words and my wish
5. 0 SKT 2009 • Maintaining the last criteria for academics. • Admin and technical-at least a project is expected for everyone, apart from the normal duty. • Involvement in students’ activities. • Involvement in Schools’ activities, including sport. • Involvement in community services. • Please set the SKT and fill in online before 15 March 2009. 48
CRITERIA FOR RESEARCH GRANTS PPKA, 2009 STAFF Contract lecturer Local lecturer (Professor) Local lecturer (Assoc. Prof. ) Senior lecturer Local lecturer Guru REQUIREMENT (AS HEAD) PEAR YEAR To obtain at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent To be involved in at least one external fund (research or consultancy) To obtain 1 USM Short Term To obtain at least 2 Science Fund or Equivalent To obtain two external fund (research or consultancy) To obtain at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent To obtain one external fund (research or consultancy) To obtain 1 USM Short Term To obtain at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent To head or be involved in at least one external fund (research or consultancy) To obtain 1 USM Short Term To apply at least 1 Science Fund or Equivalent To be involved in at least one external fund (research or consultancy) To obtain 1 USM Short Term 49 To obtain 1 USM Short Term
CRITERIA FOR PUBLICATIONS PPKA, 2009 STAFF Contract Local lecturer (Professor) Local lecturer (Assoc. Prof. ) Senior lecturer Local lecturer Teacher CRITERIA (AS HEAD) PER YEAR To submit 3 papers to international journal factor To publish 2 of them To submit 2 papers to international journal factor To publish 1 of them To submit 1 paper to international journal factor To publish 1 paper in national journal To submit 1 paper to national conference with impact with impact 50
ORDER OF PRESENTATION 1. 0 APEX and our present KPI 2. 0 Our priority 3. 0 Approaches 4. 0 Challenges 5. 0 SKT 2009 6. 0 My words and my wish
6. 0 MY WORDS AND WISH • I am serious of what has been presented. • I am ready to make a change. I am ready to sketch the fail peribadi. Else, we are at square one, forget about APEX. • I am ready to be unpopular. • I am prepared to change the exco if it needs be. • I am ready to change the admin/technical staff if it needs be. • Empowerment with responsibility. • My SOP, maximum of 3 days of all letters in. 52
6. 0 MY WORDS AND WISH • PPKA will be the first choice of student. Requires syallabus review. • I support students and staff activities within my means. • Staff involves in all events. • Staff removes culture of pahat and penukul. • No. 1 in services. • Share findings among staff/group. • Good ukhwah between all. • No culture of resilient among staff. 53 • Please help me and the School.
6. 0 MY WORDS AND WISH • Young staffs…… • We do work for the seek of Allah SWT and not for the Dean/VC…. • I do not carrots to give. I leave it to Allah SWT to reward you. 54
Скачать презентацию AMANAT TAHUNAN DEKAN RESETTING THE PRIORITY Hamidi Abdul
4aabbc3dd3e7878daf500a3998ef8693.ppt