Action Item 9 Organizational Chart Who does what

Action Item 9 Organizational Chart, Who does what NSIDC DAAC will supply Po. DAG with an organizational chart (in FTEs by function) by the next Po. DAG meeting. Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Some notes on following material • You may recall that NSIDC has been undergoing re-organization. The following chart reports the current status on NSIDC organizational change. § Matrixed approach § 3 service groups (Info Technology, Info Services, Archive Services) Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

NSIDC’s latest reporting structure diagram Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Who does what in the DAAC • The DAAC organizational Structure mirrors NSIDC. • The DAAC is 65% of the data center and DAAC staff are imbedded throughout NSIDC. • In addition to acquiring direct services from the Service Groups, the DAAC has project management staff • Tables and charts presented below are derived data covering the period July 2002 through June 2003 (the CU fiscal year) Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Who Works at the DAAC? • • All staff part of the NSIDC staffing matrix (the DAAC is 65% of the Center) Senior Management § DAAC Manager, § DAAC Scientist, § DAAC Senior Engineer/Deputy DAAC Manager Program/Project Leads § MODIS, AMSR, GLAS, Heritage Data Technical Staff from Service Groups § Scientific/Application Programmers, § Operations, § Systems Administration § Administration, § Communications/Writers, § User Services and Outreach Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Approximate FTE % by Function or Project Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Staff Roster Funct Grp Average FTE Barry, Roger ADM M 0. 21 Brekke, Cindy ADM M 0. 29 Green, Linda ADM M 0. 60 Kohlerschmidt, Daryl ADM M 1. 00 Takamura, Les ADM M 0. 91 Weaver, Ron ADM M 1. 00 Casey, Amy COM PM 0. 73 Cheshire COM SIP 0. 08 Geiger Wooten, Nancy COM U 0. 92 Meshek, Mike COM WEB 0. 90 Schmidt, Laurie COM SIP 0. 90 Scott, Michon COM SIP 1. 00 Unger, Marikje COM U 0. 69 Webster, Keri COM G 0. 04 Welsh, Robin COM SIP 0. 07 Wolfe, Jason COM MOD 0. 83 Yohe, Lyne COM A 0. 46 Hofman, Pat USO U 0. 42 Mullins, Teresa USO U 0. 63 Ballagh, Lisa OPS MOD 0. 96 Duerr, Ruth OPS A 1. 00 Maurer, John OPS A 1. 00 Paserba, Amanda OPS G 1. 00 Schumacher, Heidi OPS MOD 1. 00 Wygant, Mike OPS V 1. 00 Bohlander, Jennifer PGM SIP 0. 35 Brodzik, Mary Jo PGM A 0. 58 PGM MOD 0. 88 Knowles, Ken GP GP Haran, Terry Name M = management PM = passive microwave SIP = special information products U = user support WEB = DAAC web products G = GLAS MOD = MODIS A = AMSR V = validation Funct Grp Name PGM V 0. 94 Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Staff Roster, Continued Name GP Funct Grp Average FTE Raup, Bruce PGM MOD 0. 08 Name Savoie, Matt PGM A 0. 21 Stowe, Mike SYS SEC 1. 00 Smith, Jeff PGM A 0. 75 Swick, Ross SYS DSE 0. 94 Armstrong, Richard SCI PM 0. 21 Troisi, Vince SYS M 1. 00 Parsons, Mark SCI CLP 0. 43 Painter, Tom SCI CLP 0. 17 Wang, I-Pin SYS A 0. 92 Scambos, Ted SCI AVHRR 0. 29 Young, Doug SYS SA 0. 97 Scharfen, Greg SCI MOD 0. 29 Zaffino, Paul SYS WEB 0. 89 Stroeve, Julienne SCI PM 0. 46 Daniels, Kate USO A 0. 92 Zhang, Tingjun SCI V 0. 29 Holm, Michelle USO M 1. 00 Fowler, Cathy SYS MOD 1. 00 Gentsch, Karen SYS ECHO 1. 00 Machado, Alex USO V 0. 75 Groth, Jeff SYS SA 1. 00 Mc. Lean, Brad USO MOD 1. 00 Kaminski, Marilyn SYS MOD 0. 60 Scott, Donna USO G 1. 00 Marquis, Melinda SYS A 1. 00 Sheffield, Betsy USO U 0. 75 Pitre, Rick SYS MOD 1. 00 Priestley, Tom SYS SA 1. 00 Soja, Julie SYS EDG 0. 90 CLP = Cold Lands Processes ECHO = EOS metadata Clearing House SA = systems administration EDG = EOS data gateway SEC = security coordination Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Approximate FTE % by Resource or Functional Groups CU-FY 02 (July to June), ~42 FTE Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Quick View: FY 2002 actual staffing levels Data ADM COM OPS PGM SYS ENG SCI USO Grand Total Sum of Jul-02 4. 85 5. 75 6 4. 35 2. 65 12. 7 6. 5 42. 8 Sum of Aug-02 4. 75 6. 5 6 4. 35 2. 75 12. 9 6. 5 43. 75 Sum of Sep-02 4 7. 25 6 3. 85 1. 8 12. 9 6. 5 42. 3 Sum of Oct-02 4 7. 5 6 3. 85 1. 8 13. 45 6. 5 43. 1 Sum of Nov-02 4 6. 8 6 3. 45 1. 85 13. 45 6. 5 42. 05 Sum of Dec-02 4 6. 8 6 3. 45 1. 75 13. 45 6. 5 41. 95 Sum of Jan-03 4 6. 8 6 2. 95 1. 75 13. 45 6. 75 41. 7 Sum of Feb-03 3. 5 6. 3 5. 9 3. 5 1. 45 12. 91 6. 75 40. 31 Sum of Mar-03 3. 5 6. 3 5. 9 4 1. 7 13. 15 6. 75 41. 3 Sum of Apr-03 3. 5 6. 3 5. 9 4. 25 2. 2 13. 3 6. 75 42. 2 Sum of May-03 3. 5 6. 8 5. 9 3. 75 3. 2 13. 4 5. 75 42. 3 Sum of Jun-03 4. 5 6. 3 5. 9 3. 75 2. 7 13. 6 5. 75 42. 5 TOTALS 4. 0 6. 6 6. 0 3. 8 2. 1 13. 2 (Add 6 FTE for Raytheon EMD contractor staff) Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure 6. 5 42. 2

DAAC FTE by Month CU-FY 02 Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

How we will organize our work under the new contract We have transitioned to a new Contract, as of July 1, 2003. Descriptions that follow are organized by the new contract Basis of Estimate (BOE) categories, which are part of our new work breakdown structure (WBS) • WBS categories: § § § Management Infrastructure User Support Engineering Science Operations o We have several BOES under Science operations, see following slides Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Science Operations WBS categories • Passive Microwave • • § Special Sensor Microwave Imager (DMSP) § Scanning Multichannel Microwave Radiometer (NIMBUS 7) § Electrically Scanning Microwave Radiometer (NIMBUS AMSR-E (AQUA), AMSR (ADEOS II) • VIS/IR Moderate Resolution • • § Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (NOAA series) NOAANASA Pathfinder MODIS (TERRA, AQUA) Snow and Ice Products Geoscience Laser Altimeter System, L 0, L 1 A, L 1 B, L 2+ • ACTIVE Microwave § RAMP, limited distribution, Version 2 products § Digital Elevation Model Products (Those in red are ECS supported data collections) Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Science Operations (continued) • IN SITU Data § see our on-line data catalog § (for example) Historical Arctic Rawindsonde Time Series • VALIDATION § Campaign data sets o Cold Land Processes Experiment § Instrument AMSR-E validation data sets o GLAS o MODIS o Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Science Operations (continued) • Special Information Projects § DAAC Annual o Published 5 annual volumes to date § DAAC Alliance Web site Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Science Operations (continued) • Special Science Projects § GLIMS DAAC hosts metadatabase for GLIMS project o (GLIMS follow-on just funded as a REASON CAN) o § AMSR-E EASE Gridded Brightness Temperatures o Planning continuation of this data series, should funding be unavailable from other sources Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Science Operations (continued) • DAAC Website Content § General User Web Content § State of the Cryosphere (SOTC) § Catalog-Metadata Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure

Science Operations (continued) • Long Term Archival § Off-site Data Repository § Data Management Policies published for internal use § Continued (low level) discussions with NOAA, especially NGDC § Working with NOAA CLASS on CLASS requirements for ECS data in the W. VA. RDS facility Po. DAG 21: Action Item 9 Organization Structure