Acquiring Capabilities July 15, 2005 Dr. Glenn F. Lamartin Director, Defense Systems Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Acquisition, Technology and Logistics
Current Situation What We Need to Do Better Requirements Acquisition • • Acquiring systems-of-systems • Making system decisions in a joint, mission context • Transitioning technology • Assessing complexity of new work and ability to perform it PPBES • Controlling schedule and cost • • Passing operational tests • Ensuring a robust industrial base • • Adapting to changing conditions Matching operational needs with solutions Overcoming biases of Services and others Moving to transform military Laying analytical foundation for budget Aligning budgets with acquisition decisions Sustainment Personnel and Readiness • Controlling O&S costs • • Reducing logistics tails Treating people as a resource 2
A Capabilities Approach to Acquisition • Extend focus beyond individual system acquisition • Apply a capabilities-based approach – Make decisions on systems within a capabilities context – Engineer the relationships across the set of systems that together satisfy the need – Synchronize the interaction among Fo. S/So. S to satisfy multiple capabilities • Influence other key Department processes - Shape strategic guidance - Inform development of joint concepts and requirements - Balance programming guidance 3
Do. D End-to-End Capabilities Based Planning Process Capability Area Reviews (CARs) • Strategic Planning Guidance • Defense Planning Scenarios • Family of Concepts • Transformation Strategic Develop Joint Planning Concept Guidance Concepts • Refined • Revise KPPs • LRIP • FOT&E • Affordable concept military • Detailed • IOT&E • Deploy. Capabilities Based Assessment • Analysis of useful design ment Alternatives • Non-materiel increment • LRIP • Sustain • Capabilities • Gaps • System • Technology solutions • Technology • FOT&E ment Strategy • Tasks • Shortfalls integration • Materiel demonstrated • DT&E/IOT&E • Attributes • Redundancies solutions • Systems • Disposal • Metrics • Risk areas Engineering • Initial KPPs • S+T initiatives Plan • Experimentation Full Rate Concept MS “A” MS “B” MS “C” Prod DR Decision Technology System Producti Functional Analysis of Technology CD System Producti Development CP CD Development CP on O&S Area Analysis Needs Analysis Solutions Analysis ICD Alternatives Development CDD Development CPD Production on D D Capability Based Assessment OSD/JCS COCOMs COCOM Navy FCB OSD (AT&L) OSD (NII) Sec. De f Air Force Services DIA OSD (PA&E) Joint Requirements Oversight Council Strategy Incremental Development OSD (AT&L)led Capability Roadmaps Army USMC Capabilities Definition Joint Staff / OSD (AT&L, PA&E), Services and OSD (DOT&E), Joint Staff (JROC) Concept Refinement Acquisition and Test Opns & Spt “as is” Roadmaps 4
Acquisition Engagement Capability Area Reviews ( CARs) Concept Decision Capabilities Based Assessment Strategic Planning Guidance Joint Concepts Functional Area Analysis Functional Needs Analysis USMC OSD/JCS COCOM s OSD (AT& L) Army ICD Analysis of Alternatives MS “B” Incremental Development Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution Systems and Mission Integration Operational Support Capability Based Assessments (FAA, FNA, FSA) Enterprise Define Relationships with Related Capabilities, Architectures (e. g. , GIG) Identify alternatives; Trade cost, sched, perf Full Rate Prod DR D D Air Forc e DIA OSD (PA&E) MS “C” Technology System Technology CD Development Productio CD System CP Productio Development n CPD Production CDD D Development CP Development n D Navy FCB OSD (NII) Functional Solutions Analysis MS “A” So. S Determine system performance parameters and verification plans Identify incremental, system specifications Systems Acquisition Demonstrate capabilities meet user needs Capability Based Acquisitio n Integrate So. S; Assess Cost, Sched, Perf Assess system performance against capability needs System Components Assess portfolio performance (CAR) Integrate and Test Develop, Test, and Assess Increments of Capability Systems Engineering O&S
Key Activity: Capability Area Reviews USD(AT&L), as DAE, leads reviews of select capability areas to: • Provide mission area context – from a top-down perspective • Implement capability-based methodology on provider side • Link policy, capability generation, acquisition, and budget processes • Identify joint solutions and added work to be done (across DOTMLPF) • Reveal need for management, engineering, and testing across an area • Help align individual program expectations • Provide basis to set metrics and gauge progress over time • Assess the cumulative effect of individual program decisions But…wide participation is essential 6
Key Activity: Roadmaps and Roadmapping Roadmaps provide a framework for decision making – prompt discussion, inform decisions, and capture decisions made • Lay out Department’s strategic plan considering: - Materiel and non-materiel solutions - Capability that only exists at Family/System-of-Systems level - What to expect from each system - Cross-cutting management, engineering, and testing - Network enablers - Affordability • Nature of Roadmaps will vary by topic • Start with the “as is” and show where we want to go But… must balance decisions across capability areas 7
Key Activity: System Decisions in Context Weapons: . 50 cal/7. 62 mm Guns 2. 75” Rockets Hellfire Net Centric Warfare: Supporting Hosting Replacing: Platforms: IDM Platforms OH-58 D BFT LHA/D C-17 A Have Quick C-130(J) SATCOM Air Complementary Platforms: C-5 SINCGARS AH-64 JTRS (Cluster UH-60 1) CH-47 Link-16 A 2 C 2 S ISR: (w/JTRS) Ground Complementary JSTA Platforms RS Land Warrior AWAC S M-1 Tank GPS M-2 Bradley AMPS Fire Support ABCS Stryker Armed Reconnaissance DCGSFCS A Helicopter Capability Area: FORCE APPLICATION Current schedule and performance support fielding GCSS Roadmaps: Army Aviation Modernization Plan A Performance issues with interface MOSA Rating: Satisfactory Performance and schedule coordination required for future systems SOLID DENOTES CURRENT SYSTEM DASH DENOTES FUTURE SYSTEM Arrow to ARH denotes receiving other program’s technology or capability Arrow from ARH denotes technology or capability recipients from ARH OSD DAES Rating: Fielded C S P Not Rated 8
System-of-Systems (So. S) Systems Acquisition Functions • Align expectations of AT&L, the Joint Staff and the Services for joint capability to be fielded over time (requirements, etc) • Synchronize efforts/programs across the Services to produce the desired capabilities (e. g. , development activities, testing) • Conduct systems engineering and integration across Service and joint programs to ensure interoperability • Develop and execute properly phased and focused test and evaluation plans for So. S components and overall joint capability • Establish mechanism for allocating resources among component programs and activities – including making needed tradeoffs • Coordinate activities in all the DOTMLPF areas, to create the enablers associated with fielding a capability in packages (hardware, software, training, spares, etc. ) • Sustain capability over time 9
So. S Example: Integrated Air and Missile Defense Challenges 2010 Joint Engagement Zone q Single Integrated Air Picture q Combat ID q Integrated Fire Control q Automated Battle Management Aids 10
Capabilities So. S Example: Integrated Air and Missile Defense Roadmap ses o Systems tiv ra na io for l- ot N *Version 1 ust Ill urp e. P
Current Challenges • Plan for a budget constrained environment and impact on potential solutions – new vs. re-engineered vs. DOTMLPF • System complexity and interdependency is increasing – Family of Systems and System of Systems interdependencies • Balancing joint needs with cost and schedule • Demand for network centric capability drives higher levels of program coordination • Development of capabilities that do not fit well in current management structures • Effective application of systems engineering to streamline acquisition process and meet performance objectives • Maintaining an expert workforce, trained for the above challenges 12
Скачать презентацию Acquiring Capabilities July 15 2005 Dr Glenn F
4e96491d7253ccd34685f3a932edf246.ppt