Скачать презентацию 8 Location Strategies Power Point presentation to accompany Скачать презентацию 8 Location Strategies Power Point presentation to accompany

59c76d6ff63cf9f9061d214fa0307109.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 49

8 Location Strategies Power. Point presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10 8 Location Strategies Power. Point presentation to accompany Heizer and Render Operations Management, 10 e Principles of Operations Management, 8 e Power. Point slides by Jeff Heyl © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 -1

Outline u Global Company Profile: Fed. Ex u The Strategic Importance of Location © Outline u Global Company Profile: Fed. Ex u The Strategic Importance of Location © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 -2

Outline – Continued u Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Labor Productivity u Exchange Outline – Continued u Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Labor Productivity u Exchange Rates and Currency Risks u Costs u Political Risk, Values, and Culture u Proximity to Markets u Proximity to Suppliers u Proximity to Competitors (Clustering) © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 -3

Outline – Continued u Methods of Evaluating Location Alternatives u The Factor-Rating Method u Outline – Continued u Methods of Evaluating Location Alternatives u The Factor-Rating Method u Locational Break-Even Analysis u Center-of-Gravity Method u Transportation Model © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 -4

Outline – Continued u Service Location Strategy u How Hotel Chains Select Sites u Outline – Continued u Service Location Strategy u How Hotel Chains Select Sites u The Call Center Industry u Geographic Information Systems © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 -5

Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to: 1. Identify Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to: 1. Identify and explain seven major factors that effect location decisions 2. Compute labor productivity 3. Apply the factor-rating method 4. Complete a locational break-even analysis graphically and mathematically © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 -6

Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to: 5. Use Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to: 5. Use the center-of-gravity method 6. Understand the differences between service and industrial-sector location strategies © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 -7

Federal Express u Central hub concept u Enables service to more locations with fewer Federal Express u Central hub concept u Enables service to more locations with fewer aircraft u Enables matching of aircraft flights with package loads u Reduces mishandling and delay in transit because there is total control of packages from pickup to delivery © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 -8

Location Strategy The objective of location strategy is to maximize the benefit of location Location Strategy The objective of location strategy is to maximize the benefit of location to the firm © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 -9

Location Strategy u One of the most important decisions a firm makes u Increasingly Location Strategy u One of the most important decisions a firm makes u Increasingly global in nature u Significant impact on fixed and variable costs u Decisions made relatively infrequently u The objective is to maximize the benefit of location to the firm © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 10

Location and Costs u Location decisions based on low cost require careful consideration u Location and Costs u Location decisions based on low cost require careful consideration u Once in place, location-related costs are fixed in place and difficult to reduce u Determining optimal facility location is a good investment © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 11

Location and Innovation u Cost is not always the most important aspect of a Location and Innovation u Cost is not always the most important aspect of a strategic decision u Four key attributes when strategy is based on innovation u High-quality and specialized inputs u An environment that encourages investment and local rivalry u A sophisticated local market u Local presence of related and supporting industries © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 12

Location Decisions u Long-term decisions u Decisions made infrequently u Decision greatly affects both Location Decisions u Long-term decisions u Decisions made infrequently u Decision greatly affects both fixed and variable costs u Once committed to a location, many resource and cost issues are difficult to change © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 13

Location Decisions Country Decision Key Success Factors 1. Political risks, government rules, attitudes, incentives Location Decisions Country Decision Key Success Factors 1. Political risks, government rules, attitudes, incentives 2. Cultural and economic issues 3. Location of markets 4. Labor talent, attitudes, productivity, costs 5. Availability of supplies, communications, energy Figure 8. 1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 6. Exchange rates and currency risks 8 - 14

Location Decisions Region/ Community Decision Key Success Factors 1. Corporate desires 2. Attractiveness of Location Decisions Region/ Community Decision Key Success Factors 1. Corporate desires 2. Attractiveness of region 3. Labor availability and costs MN 4. Costs and availability of utilities WI 5. Environmental regulations MI IL IN OH 6. Government incentives and fiscal policies 7. Proximity to raw materials and customers Figure 8. 1 8. Land/construction costs © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 15

Location Decisions Site Decision Key Success Factors 1. Site size and cost 2. Air, Location Decisions Site Decision Key Success Factors 1. Site size and cost 2. Air, rail, highway, and waterway systems 3. Zoning restrictions 4. Proximity of services/ supplies needed 5. Environmental impact issues Figure 8. 1 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 16

Global Competitiveness Index of Countries Country Switzerland USA Japan Canada UK Israel China Italy Global Competitiveness Index of Countries Country Switzerland USA Japan Canada UK Israel China Italy India Mexico Russia © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 2009 Rank 1 2 8 9 13 27 29 48 49 60 63 2005 Rank 4 1 10 13 9 23 48 38 22 59 53 Table 8. 1 8 - 17

Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Labor productivity u Wage rates are not the Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Labor productivity u Wage rates are not the only cost u Lower productivity may increase total cost Labor cost per day = Cost per unit Productivity (units per day) Connecticut Juarez $70 = $1. 17 per unit 60 units $25 = $1. 25 per unit 20 units © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 18

Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Exchange rates and currency risks u Can have Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Exchange rates and currency risks u Can have a significant impact on costs u Rates change over time u Costs u Tangible - easily measured costs such as utilities, labor, materials, taxes u Intangible - less easy to quantify and include education, public transportation, community, quality-of-life © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 19

Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Exchange rates and currency risks u Can have Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Exchange rates and currency risks u Can have a significant impact on cost Location structure decisions u Rates change over time based on costs alone u Costs can create u Tangible - easily measured costs such as difficult ethical utilities, labor, materials, taxes u Intangible - less easysituations to quantify and include education, public transportation, community, quality-of-life © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 20

Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Political risk, values, and culture u National, state, Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Political risk, values, and culture u National, state, local governments attitudes toward private and intellectual property, zoning, pollution, employment stability may be in flux u Worker attitudes towards turnover, unions, absenteeism u Globally cultures have different attitudes towards punctuality, legal, and ethical issues © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 21

Ranking Corruption Rank 1 2 5 6 8 Country 10 12 14 16 24 Ranking Corruption Rank 1 2 5 6 8 Country 10 12 14 16 24 32 43 60 75 112 © 2011 Pearson Education Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Education, 143 2011 CPI Score (out of 10) New Zealand 9. 5 Least Corrupt Demark, Finland 9. 4 Singapore 9. 2 Norway 9. 0 Australia, Switzerland 8. 8 Canada 8. 7 Hong Kong 8. 4 Germany, Japan 8. 0 UK 7. 8 USA 7. 1 Taiwan 6. 1 Most South Korea 5. 4 Malaysia. Corrupt 4. 3 China 3. 6 Vietnam 2. 9 Russia 2. 4 8 - 22

Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Proximity to markets u Very important to services Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Proximity to markets u Very important to services u JIT systems or high transportation costs may make it important to manufacturers u Proximity to suppliers u Perishable goods, high transportation costs, bulky products © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 23

Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Proximity to competitors u Called clustering u Often Factors That Affect Location Decisions u Proximity to competitors u Called clustering u Often driven by resources such as natural, information, capital, talent u Found in both manufacturing and service industries © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 24

Clustering of Companies Industry Locations Reason for clustering Wine making Napa Valley (US) Bordeaux Clustering of Companies Industry Locations Reason for clustering Wine making Napa Valley (US) Bordeaux region (France) Natural resources of land climate Software firms Silicon Valley, Boston, Bangalore (India) Talent resources of bright graduates in scientific/technical areas, venture capitalists nearby Race car builders Huntington/North Hampton region (England) Critical mass of talent and information © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Table 8. 3 8 - 25

Clustering of Companies Industry Locations Reason for clustering Theme parks (Disney World, Universal Studios) Clustering of Companies Industry Locations Reason for clustering Theme parks (Disney World, Universal Studios) Orlando, Florida A hot spot for entertainment, warm weather, tourists, and inexpensive labor Electronics firms Northern Mexico NAFTA, duty free export to US Computer hardware manufacturers Singapore, Taiwan High technological penetration rate and per capita GDP, skilled/educated workforce with large pool of engineers © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Table 8. 3 8 - 26

Clustering of Companies Industry Fast food chains (Wendy’s, Mc. Donald’s, Burger King, and Pizza Clustering of Companies Industry Fast food chains (Wendy’s, Mc. Donald’s, Burger King, and Pizza Hut) Locations Sites within 1 mile of each other Reason for clustering Stimulate food sales, high traffic flows General aviation Wichita, Kansas aircraft (Cessna, Learjet, Boeing) Mass of aviation skills Orthopedic device manufacturing Ready supply of skilled workers, strong U. S. market Warsaw, Indiana © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Table 8. 3 8 - 27

Factor-Rating Method u Popular because a wide variety of factors can be included in Factor-Rating Method u Popular because a wide variety of factors can be included in the analysis u Six steps in the method 1. Develop a list of relevant factors called key success factors 2. Assign a weight to each factor 3. Develop a scale for each factor 4. Score each location for each factor 5. Multiply score by weights for each factor for each location 6. Recommend the location with the highest point score © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 28

Factor-Rating Example Key Success Factor Labor availability and attitude People-tocar ratio Per capita income Factor-Rating Example Key Success Factor Labor availability and attitude People-tocar ratio Per capita income Tax structure Education and health Totals Scores (out of 100) Weight France Denmark Weighted Scores France Denmark . 25 70 60 . 05 50 60 . 10. 39 85 75 80 70 (. 10)(85) = 8. 5 (. 10)(80) = 8. 0 (. 39)(75) = 29. 3 (. 39)(70) = 27. 3 . 21 60 70 (. 21)(60) = 12. 6 (. 21)(70) = 14. 7 1. 00 (. 25)(70) = 17. 5 (. 25)(60) = 15. 0 (. 05)(50) = 2. 5 70. 4 (. 05)(60) = 3. 0 68. 0 Table 8. 4 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 29

Locational Break-Even Analysis u Method of cost-volume analysis used for industrial locations u Three Locational Break-Even Analysis u Method of cost-volume analysis used for industrial locations u Three steps in the method 1. Determine fixed and variable costs for each location 2. Plot the cost for each location 3. Select location with lowest total cost for expected production volume © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 30

Locational Break-Even Analysis Example Three locations: Selling price = $120 Expected volume = 2, Locational Break-Even Analysis Example Three locations: Selling price = $120 Expected volume = 2, 000 units Fixed Variable Total City Cost Akron $30, 000 $75$180, 000 Bowling Green $60, 000 $45$150, 000 Chicago $110, 000 $25$160, 000 Total Cost = Fixed Cost + (Variable Cost x Volume) © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 31

Annual cost Locational Break-Even Analysis Example Figure 8. 2 – $180, 000 – – Annual cost Locational Break-Even Analysis Example Figure 8. 2 – $180, 000 – – $160, 000 – $150, 000 – urve – st c o co $130, 000 – icag – Ch $110, 000 – n ree – g G ve lin cur – w t o $80, 000 – B cos t s – co $60, 000 – on ve r – Ak cur – Akron Bowling Green $30, 000 – lowest cost – cost $10, 000 – | | | – 0 500 1, 000 1, 500 2, 000 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Chicago lowest cost | | 2, 500 3, 000 Volume 8 - 32

Center-of-Gravity Method u Finds location of distribution center that minimizes distribution costs u Considers Center-of-Gravity Method u Finds location of distribution center that minimizes distribution costs u Considers u Location of markets u Volume of goods shipped to those markets u Shipping cost (or distance) © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 33

Center-of-Gravity Method u Place existing locations on a coordinate grid u Grid origin and Center-of-Gravity Method u Place existing locations on a coordinate grid u Grid origin and scale is arbitrary u Maintain relative distances u Calculate X and Y coordinates for ‘center of gravity’ u Assumes cost is directly proportional to distance and volume shipped © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 34

Center-of-Gravity Method x - coordinate = ∑dix. Qi i ∑Qi i y - coordinate Center-of-Gravity Method x - coordinate = ∑dix. Qi i ∑Qi i y - coordinate = ∑diy. Qi i ∑Qi i where dix = x-coordinate of location i diy = y-coordinate of location i Qi = Quantity of goods moved to or from location i © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 35

Center-of-Gravity Method North-South New York (130, 130) Chicago (30, 120) 120 – Pittsburgh (90, Center-of-Gravity Method North-South New York (130, 130) Chicago (30, 120) 120 – Pittsburgh (90, 110) 90 – 60 – 30 – | – Atlanta (60, 40) | 30 Arbitrary origin | | 60 90 120 150 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall East-West Figure 8. 3 8 - 36

Center-of-Gravity Method Number of Containers Store Location Shipped per Month Chicago (30, 120) 2, Center-of-Gravity Method Number of Containers Store Location Shipped per Month Chicago (30, 120) 2, 000 Pittsburgh (90, 110) 1, 000 New York (130, 130) 1, 000 Atlanta (60, 40) 2, 000 (30)(2000) + (90)(1000) + (130)(1000) + (60)(2000) 2000 + 1000 + 2000 = 66. 7 x-coordinate = (120)(2000) + (110)(1000) + (130)(1000) + (40)(2000) y-coordinate = 2000 + 1000 + 2000 = 93. 3 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 37

Center-of-Gravity Method North-South New York (130, 130) Chicago (30, 120) 120 – Pittsburgh (90, Center-of-Gravity Method North-South New York (130, 130) Chicago (30, 120) 120 – Pittsburgh (90, 110) + 90 – Center of gravity (66. 7, 93. 3) 60 – 30 – | – Atlanta (60, 40) | 30 Arbitrary origin | | 60 90 120 150 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall East-West Figure 8. 3 8 - 38

Transportation Model u Finds amount to be shipped from several points of supply to Transportation Model u Finds amount to be shipped from several points of supply to several points of demand u Solution will minimize total production and shipping costs u A special class of linear programming problems © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 39

Worldwide Distribution of Volkswagens and Parts Figure 8. 4 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Worldwide Distribution of Volkswagens and Parts Figure 8. 4 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 40

Service Location Strategy 1. Purchasing power of customer-drawing area 2. Service and image compatibility Service Location Strategy 1. Purchasing power of customer-drawing area 2. Service and image compatibility with demographics of the customer-drawing area 3. Competition in the area 4. Quality of the competition 5. Uniqueness of the firm’s and competitors’ locations 6. Physical qualities of facilities and neighboring businesses 7. Operating policies of the firm 8. Quality of management © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 41

Location Strategies Service/Retail/Professional Location Revenue Focus Volume/revenue Drawing area; purchasing power Competition; advertising/pricing Physical Location Strategies Service/Retail/Professional Location Revenue Focus Volume/revenue Drawing area; purchasing power Competition; advertising/pricing Physical quality Parking/access; security/lighting; appearance/image Cost determinants Rent Management caliber Operations policies (hours, wage rates) Goods-Producing Location Cost Focus Tangible costs Transportation cost of raw material Shipment cost of finished goods Energy and utility cost; labor; raw material; taxes, and so on Intangible and future costs Attitude toward union Quality of life Education expenditures by state Quality of state and local government Table 8. 6 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 42

Location Strategies Service/Retail/Professional Location Techniques Regression models to determine importance of various factors Factor-rating Location Strategies Service/Retail/Professional Location Techniques Regression models to determine importance of various factors Factor-rating method Traffic counts Demographic analysis of drawing area Purchasing power analysis of area Center-of-gravity method Geographic information systems Goods-Producing Location Techniques Transportation method Factor-rating method Locational break-even analysis Crossover charts Table 8. 6 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 43

Location Strategies Service/Retail/Professional Location Assumptions Location is a major determinant of revenue High customer-contact Location Strategies Service/Retail/Professional Location Assumptions Location is a major determinant of revenue High customer-contact issues are critical Costs are relatively constant for a given area; therefore, the revenue function is critical Goods-Producing Location Assumptions Location is a major determinant of cost Most major costs can be identified explicitly for each site Low customer contact allows focus on the identifiable costs Intangible costs can be evaluated Table 8. 6 © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 44

How Hotel Chains Select Sites u Location is a strategically important decision in the How Hotel Chains Select Sites u Location is a strategically important decision in the hospitality industry u La Quinta started with 35 independent variables and worked to refine a regression model to predict profitability u The final model had only four variables u Price of the inn u Median income levels u State population per inn u Location of nearby colleges © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall r 2 =. 51 51% of the profitability is predicted by just these four variables! 8 - 45

The Call Center Industry u Requires neither face-to-face contact nor movement of materials u The Call Center Industry u Requires neither face-to-face contact nor movement of materials u Has very broad location options u Traditional variables are no longer relevant u Cost and availability of labor may drive location decisions © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 46

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) u Important tool to help in location analysis u Enables Geographic Information Systems (GIS) u Important tool to help in location analysis u Enables more complex demographic analysis u Available data bases include u Detailed census data u Detailed maps u Utilities u Geographic features u Locations of major services © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 47

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 Geographic Information Systems (GIS) © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 48

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 8 - 49