6. EU Rahmen Program, Deutschland Und Deppendable embedded Systems sergio@first. fhg. de
sergio@first. fhg. de
AMSD Integrated Projects sergio@first. fhg. de
6. Rahmenprogramm 2003. . 2004: New Instruments (70% of the Budget) Integrated Projects Centers of Excellence Old Instruments (30%) Single Projects http: //www. rp 6 -online. de/ 11. -13. November 2002 in Brüssel Eröffnungsveranstaltung zum 6. Rahmenprogramm. http: //europa. eu. int/comm/research/conferences/2002/index_en. html BMBF: 3. /4. Februar 2003 Informationsveranstaltung "Das 6. Forschungsrahmenprogramm - Chance für Deutschland und Europa" Hannover http: //www. rp 6. de sergio@first. fhg. de
6. Rahmenprogramm - Stand der Dinge Frühjahr 2002 call for Interessenbekundungen (Expression of Interest) Feedback: 12000 Eo. I per Email Abzug von unvollständigen - 800 nur das Formblatt - über 11700 zur Bereichen: 1. 1. 1 Genomik 1. 1. 2 Informationsgesellschaft 1. 1. 3 Nanotechnologien 1. 1. 4 Luft- und Raumfahrt 1. 1. 5 Lebensmittel 1. 1. 6. 1 Energie (kurz/mittelfristig) 1. 1. 6. 1 Energie (mittel/langfristig) 1. 1. 6. 2 Verkehr 1. 1. 6. 3 Global Change 1. 1. 7 Bürger und Regieren 2. 2. Radioaktive Abfälle 2. 3. Strahlenschutz 1901 2591 1670 378 *** Spizenreiter von Industrie (kaum KMUs) **** 1008 478 452 480 1412 1187 103 99 Statistiken Integrierte Projekte Exzellenznetze Eo. I Wissenschaftseinrichtungen Forschungsorganisationen Industrie 65% 35% 46% 32% 14% sergio@first. fhg. de
Software, embedded systems & distributed systems 11% Industry (including SMEs) Public and private research organisations Universities / Educational establishments Other 25% 21% 41% 14% < 10 partners Between 10 and 50 > 50 Partners (IPs 68% No. Es 32%) 46% 43% 7% Embeedded Systeme 3000 Proposals, only 10% will be accepted (90% Rejected. . . ) 15 - 20 % der Eo. I den Anforderungen des 'Guide for Submitters' überzeugend entsprachen; -> Befähigung teilnehmen zu können. Die Kommission bezeichnet diese Eo. I als 'mature'. Analysis: List of Eo. I: Parner Boerse: Report: Nationale Koortinatiosstelle: http: //eoi. cordis. lu/search_form. cfm http: //2002. istevent. cec. eu. int/ http: //www. kp. dlr. de/IT-NCP/itncp/Eo. I_Final_Report_2002. pdf http: //www. kp. dlr. de/IT-NCP/ sergio@first. fhg. de
Integrated Projects "Inflated Projects" != Integrated Projects Integrated research + Vision Integration >> Impact (Industry) Focused (do not do every thing) Recommendation: Long Term -> low Competition else Parallel Development -> competition inside the consortium The IPs organizes itself, Brussels can not influence them. Academy, Industries, SME can lead an IP Priority: SME, Multidisciplinary non technical Part (eg Education) Networks of Excellence == Virtual Research Centers Bring the community together with workshops sergio@first. fhg. de
Work Program 2 x 2 Calls 1. 1 Dec. . April 2003 (no Embedded Systems) 1. 2 Jun. . oct. 2003 (with Embedded Systmes) 800 M Euro for each call 10 IP, 15 M Euro each (50% Fonding) Networks of Excellenz: 3. . 5 M Euro Safety & Security: 3 IPs (15 -50 MEuro each) 2 Networks of Excelenz (5 Meuro each) sergio@first. fhg. de
AMSD: Accompanying Measure in Systems Dependability www. am-ds. org Achieve a high level synthesis of the results of the many on-going road-mapping activities related to various aspects of system dependability, Develop a detailed road-map, covering the various aspects of dependability for one particular class of system, namely dependable embedded systems, Workshops with representatives from the research communities (i) Information Infrastructure Interdependencies and Vulnerabilities, (ii) Privacy and Identity Management, (iii) Trust and security in e-business processes e-commerce, e-laerning, e-government, (iv) Dependable embedded systems. e-motion Next Workshop: November 25 -27, probably in Pisa. sergio@first. fhg. de
AMSD: Accompanying Measure in Systems Dependability www. am-ds. org For a coherent major initiative in FP 6 encompassing a full range of dependability-related activities, e. g. availability safety security survivability etceterality education and training means for encouraging and enabling sector-specific IST RTD projects to use dependability best practice. Given the reactions from Brussels proposals which form part of a well-coordinated overall programme of dependability-related RTD will have increased chances of success i sergio@first. fhg. de
AMSD: Accompanying Measure in Systems Dependability Road-Maps types Science and Technology Industry applications Corporate Products Methodology pre-Study (generic view) Analysis of available road maps Take results from IPs Interviews Iteration Workshops Conferences Consolidate Material from other Road Maps Results Technical issues Socio-technical issues sergio@first. fhg. de
AMSD: Accompanying Measure in Systems Dependability Road map of the Road map 1. Application Assessment, Taxonomy and Future Needs automotive aerospace railways medical process control 2. Technology Assessment, Taxonomy and Future Directions Semiconductor (So. C), Communication Dependability technology with particular emphasis on Real-time system and software technology: methods and tools for Interconnected networked dependable systems 3. Synthesis and Analysis of the Technology/Application Matrix sergio@first. fhg. de
AMSD: Accompanying Measure in Systems Dependability Technology 1. Semiconductor (So. C), smart transducers, sensors and actuators, hardware/software co-design 2. Communication wire-bound / wire-less, autonomous mobile devices, remote control, ad hoc networking and seamless connectivity 3. Dependability technology with particular emphasis on fault tolerance, functional safety, security, timeliness, dynamic reconfiguration, validation and verification, system integration (composability), maintenance/enhancement assurance of dependability properties. 4. Real-time system and software technology: methods and tools for analysis, specification, design, verification/validation certification 5. Interconnected networked dependable systems, intelligent environemnt sergio@first. fhg. de
AMSD: Accompanying Measure in Systems Dependability Vision: Automotive: Accident free driving Medical: Dependable Robot surgeon Aerospace: Safe Sky Railways: . . Automation: . . IPs DES (Dependable Systems) > 100 Eo. I DECOS (Dependable Embedded components and systems) > 100 Eo. I ARTIS STORK Reset BVN Rapid ACIP PAMPAS Nex. TTA EWICS OLOS. . . sergio@first. fhg. de
The Immediate Challenge Can the (rival) proposers of each of these three IPs agree to co-operate? Will they make this an explicit agreed part of their proposals? Will Brussels be able to help with, and complement, such a planned co-operation scheme, e. g. during the proposal preparation period, and by setting up appropriate arrangements for IP monitoring, under the guidance of a mutually-acceptable senior (and pro-active) advisory group for the DTA? sergio@first. fhg. de
AMSD: Accompanying Measure in Systems Dependability Partners University of Newcastle (UK) ARC Seibersdorf research (A) CNRS-LAAS (F) CNUCE-CNR (I) Joint Research Centre (I) Adelard (UK) Advisory Board (9 People) Consultant (UK) Gemplus (F) France Telecom (F) Daimler. Chrysler (D) Fh. G (D) Siemens (I) Infineon (D, A) Bull (F) Air Traffic Services (UK) Technical Board (50 People) Senior technical representatives industry academia government policy sergio@first. fhg. de
sergio@first. fhg. de
Software for Embedded Systems Rationals: Software plays the major role in real world systms. . and failures. . 99 % of all microcomputers produced today (over eight billion processors) are in embedded systems. It is an enabling technology the economic impact of which reaches far beyond its immediate market size, the success of many industrial products depends on control systems Perform critical control functions Automotive Aerospace Transport Automation Medical devices But. . . Embedded systems becomes diffuse (where is it? ): As networking becomes pervasive, the boundaries of the field both grow, and become less distinct. sergio@first. fhg. de
Embedded Systems What makes them different? . . Alle sind unterschiedlich. . . nur ich nicht. . . Embedded Systems processors, sensors, actuators. . intensive interaction with environment. . faults. . . noise Real time operation Many sets of constraints on designs Computer purchased as part of some other piece of equipment Typically dedicated software (may be user- customizable) Often replaces previously electromechanical components Often no real keyboard Often limited display or no general- purpose display device Small Size, Low Weight Low Power Harsh environment Radiation, Heat, vibration, shock, Power fluctuations, RF interference, lightning, Water, corrosion, physical abuse Safety- critical operation Must function correctly, Must not function incorrectly Extreme cost sensitivity behavior adapts dynamically, reconfigurable, intelligent sergio@first. fhg. de
Embedded system designers are different (jede entwickler ist anderes, genau wie die andere 8 milliarden) Know the big picture Appreciation for multi- disciplinary nature of design Both hardware & software skills Understanding of engineering beyond digital logic Ability to take a project from specification through production Communication & teamwork skills Work with other disciplines, manufacturing, marketing Work with customers to understand the real problem being solved Technical skills too Low level: Micro controllers, FPGA/ ASIC, assembly language, A/ D, D/ A High level: Object- oriented Design, C/ C++, Real Time Operating Systems Tools Real Time Tools. . ? ? . Meta level: . . sergio@first. fhg. de
sergio@first. fhg. de
Fault -> Error -> Failure Fault (Deviation of function) -> error (manifestation) -> Failure . . sergio@first. fhg. de
sergio@first. fhg. de
Es gibt Fehler die sich nicht bemekrbar machen, bis man wo anderst etwas aendert, ide scheiber nichts damit zu tun hat. z. B. ein Timing hat sich gaeendert und dadruch wird sichtbar ein Sycrhonisationsfehler woanders. Failures in million operation hours Military cpu 0. 022 Automotive cpu 0. 12 Electric motor 2. 17 battery 16. 9 Pumps 37. 3 Auto. Wiring harness (luxus) 775 Software ? ? ? (Bigger than all other) Be awere: Statistics. . 82. 839% of all statistics are controlled. Design dependability into the system, not on top of the system sergio@first. fhg. de
Dependability matters! Most computing system projects fail Cancelled before delivery Exceeded timescales & costs and reduced functionality On time and budget Mean time overrun Mean cost overrun Mean functionality delivered 31% 53% 16% 190% 222% 60% large companies much worse than smaller latest (2001) data better, but still poor source: The Chaos Report http: //www. standishgroup. com $60 B annual cost of poor quality software in the USA source: Microsoft 2002 sergio@first. fhg. de
how to do it better Professional systems engineering Rigorous requirements capture formal development methods ISO 9001 quality assurance static analysis/proof/focused testing Effective system fault tolerance, e. g via middleware -> Much better quality and lower costs and risks sergio@first. fhg. de
Скачать презентацию 6 EU Rahmen Program Deutschland Und Deppendable embedded
facec2da4af70ddb3f11de71eb07ef98.ppt