Скачать презентацию 2007 PAVEMENT MARKING ACTIVITIES AND PERFORMANCE April 25 Скачать презентацию 2007 PAVEMENT MARKING ACTIVITIES AND PERFORMANCE April 25

d19977804252ef0d2050cd9acbf66d01.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 30

2007 PAVEMENT MARKING ACTIVITIES AND PERFORMANCE April 25, 2008 Operations Division 1 2007 PAVEMENT MARKING ACTIVITIES AND PERFORMANCE April 25, 2008 Operations Division 1

PAVEMENT MARKING SUMMARY µ µ Customer Satisfaction ¯ Customers are positive but not completely PAVEMENT MARKING SUMMARY µ µ Customer Satisfaction ¯ Customers are positive but not completely satisfied ¯ Continue to investigate new materials and methods to improve visibility, especially at night and wet weather conditions Pavement Marking Tech Memo Compliance: ¯ The Tech Memo expired in December 2007 ¯ New Tech Memo issued soon ¯ 99. 7% compliant April 25, 2008 Operations Division 2

PAVEMENT MARKING SUMMARY (Continued) µ Pavement Marking Performance: ¯ Pavement ¯ Proposed µ Marking PAVEMENT MARKING SUMMARY (Continued) µ Pavement Marking Performance: ¯ Pavement ¯ Proposed µ Marking Inventory System plan for ’ 08 measuring Central Business Activities: ¯ Material ¯ Central Costs are rising sharply Business generating savings through efficiencies and identified best practices April 25, 2008 Operations Division 3

PAVEMENT MARKINGS OUTLINE µ Importance of Pavement Markings µ Pavement Marking Policy, Measures, Targets PAVEMENT MARKINGS OUTLINE µ Importance of Pavement Markings µ Pavement Marking Policy, Measures, Targets µ Research µ Central Business Activities µ Construction Activities April 25, 2008 Operations Division 4

IMPORTANCE OF PAVEMENT MARKINGS µ Market research µ Supports TZD by improving traffic safety IMPORTANCE OF PAVEMENT MARKINGS µ Market research µ Supports TZD by improving traffic safety µ Driving population is aging µ Recent research April 25, 2008 Operations Division 5

MARKET RESEARCH Pavement Marking Customer Satisfaction Rating Scale 1 -10 Positive Acceptable = 8 MARKET RESEARCH Pavement Marking Customer Satisfaction Rating Scale 1 -10 Positive Acceptable = 8 7 Neutral April 25, 2008 Operations Division From Omnibus Survey was not done in 2007 6

PAVEMENT MARKINGS POLICY, MEASURES, TARGETS µ Policy: ¯ µ Provide appropriate pavement markings to PAVEMENT MARKINGS POLICY, MEASURES, TARGETS µ Policy: ¯ µ Provide appropriate pavement markings to provide presence and retro-reflectivity (RR) on all highways 365 days a year. Measures: Percent of system compliant with Tech Memo requirements ¯ Minimum Retro-reflectivity ( 80 -100 MCD/m 2/lux ) ¯ Cost and productivity ¯ Customer Satisfaction ¯ µ Targets: 100 Percent compliant with TM by Dec 2008 ¯ 100 Percent line miles meeting minimum RR or scheduled for replacement ¯ April 25, 2008 Operations Division 7

PAVEMENT MARKING TECH MEMO Technical Memorandum 03 -08 -T-03 “Mn/DOT Policy for Pavement Marking PAVEMENT MARKING TECH MEMO Technical Memorandum 03 -08 -T-03 “Mn/DOT Policy for Pavement Marking Operations” µ Issued May 2, 2003 and expired December 31, 2007. µ New Technical memorandum to be issued soon. µ With New Construction and Retrofit should have substantial compliance by 2008 µ April 25, 2008 Operations Division 8

NON-COMPLIANT ROADWAYS Need 25 Miles to Epoxy, 73 Miles to CL Tape/EL Epoxy 0. NON-COMPLIANT ROADWAYS Need 25 Miles to Epoxy, 73 Miles to CL Tape/EL Epoxy 0. 3% of 36, 900 Line Miles State-wide April 25, 2008 Operations Division 9

NON - COMPLIANT ROADWAYS Need 12 Miles to Epoxy, 35 Miles to CL Tape/EL NON - COMPLIANT ROADWAYS Need 12 Miles to Epoxy, 35 Miles to CL Tape/EL Epoxy 0. 3% of 16, 773 CL Miles State-wide Non-Compliant April 25, 2008 Operations Division 10

PAVEMENT MARKING RETRO-REFLECTIVITY µ The ability of the pavement markings to reflective light back PAVEMENT MARKING RETRO-REFLECTIVITY µ The ability of the pavement markings to reflective light back to its source. ¯ µ Headlights bounce off of tiny glass beads directly back to the driver instead of scattering. Wear (vehicles, weather) and Tear (snow plows) reduces Pavement Marking Retro-reflectivity Comparison 1200 800 300 100 40 mcd/m 2/lux April 25, 2008 Operations Division 11

2007 RETRO-REFLECTIVITY TOTAL READINGS 6, 465 Total Line Miles read in 2007 April 25, 2007 RETRO-REFLECTIVITY TOTAL READINGS 6, 465 Total Line Miles read in 2007 April 25, 2008 Operations Division 12

RETRO-REFLECTIVITY ISSUES µ Concentrating more on markings with suspected deficiencies. µ Incomplete and uneven RETRO-REFLECTIVITY ISSUES µ Concentrating more on markings with suspected deficiencies. µ Incomplete and uneven coverage of projects and striping crews. µ Increase in Preventative Maintenance hampering performance Crack sealing and patching over markings ¯ Marking durability poor on chip seals ¯ Chip Seal markings that look good are still measuring low ¯ April 25, 2008 Operations Division 13

RETRO-REFLECTIVITY PLAN µ Sampling plan to measure the health of the state-wide pavement marking RETRO-REFLECTIVITY PLAN µ Sampling plan to measure the health of the state-wide pavement marking system. µ Increase the use of Handheld readings on new projects and 2 L 2 W roads. µ Timely reporting from contractors and Mn/DOT crews. µ Researching solutions to preventative maintenance issues including literature review. µ State-wide Pavement Marking Inventory System. April 25, 2008 Operations Division 14

RETRO-REFLECTOMETER READING PLAN µ Improve District confidence in data and prove effectiveness of equipment RETRO-REFLECTOMETER READING PLAN µ Improve District confidence in data and prove effectiveness of equipment and procedures. µ Establish a shared state-wide pavement marking inventory system. µ Resolve installation issue prior to payment. April 25, 2008 Operations Division 15

PROPOSED STATE-WIDE PAVEMENT MARKING INVENTORY SYSTEM (PMIS) July 2008 Contract Completion. µ May 7, PROPOSED STATE-WIDE PAVEMENT MARKING INVENTORY SYSTEM (PMIS) July 2008 Contract Completion. µ May 7, 2008 Statewide Training and District Feedback. µ April 25, 2008 Operations Division 16

PMIS CAPABILITIES & BENEFITS µ Inventory of pavement markings in the State µ Easy PMIS CAPABILITIES & BENEFITS µ Inventory of pavement markings in the State µ Easy access to retro-reflectivity data state-wide µ Easy access to installation history statewide µ Quick assessments of pavement markings state-wide µ Correlation between planned striping and planned construction activities April 25, 2008 Operations Division 17

PAVEMENT MARKING RESEARCH PROJECTS µ Wider Markings µ Rubber Snow Plow Blades µ Wet PAVEMENT MARKING RESEARCH PROJECTS µ Wider Markings µ Rubber Snow Plow Blades µ Wet Reflective Markings µ Rumble Strip. Es µ Late Season/Cold April 25, 2008 Operations Division Weather Markings 18

CENTRAL STRIPING BUSINESS LINE MAINTENANCE µ Saved $2, 234, 089 in 2007 µ 2005 CENTRAL STRIPING BUSINESS LINE MAINTENANCE µ Saved $2, 234, 089 in 2007 µ 2005 to 2007 outsourcing pavement marking maintenance in Metro area to increase the efficiency of in-house crews. µ Material Costs increasing due to increase in fuel costs. April 25, 2008 Operations Division 19

CENTRAL STRIPING BUSINESS LINE MAINTENANCE µ µ µ Material cost reduction ¯ Started in CENTRAL STRIPING BUSINESS LINE MAINTENANCE µ µ µ Material cost reduction ¯ Started in 2003 ¯ Reduced line thickness for liquid markings from 15 to 12 mils. ¯ Reduced glass beads in epoxy from 30 lbs/gal to 15 lbs/gal. Latex Performance ¯ Performing similarly at 12 and 15 mils. Epoxy Performance ¯ Performing similarly at 12 and 15 mils. April 25, 2008 Operations Division 20

MAINTENANCE STRIPING BUSINESS* * Does not include Pavement Messages April 25, 2008 Operations Division MAINTENANCE STRIPING BUSINESS* * Does not include Pavement Messages April 25, 2008 Operations Division 21

MAINTENANCE STRIPING EXPENDITURES* * Does not include Pavement Messages April 25, 2008 Operations Division MAINTENANCE STRIPING EXPENDITURES* * Does not include Pavement Messages April 25, 2008 Operations Division 22

Expenditures MAINTENANCE STRIPING COSTS PER YEAR Year April 25, 2008 Operations Division 23 Expenditures MAINTENANCE STRIPING COSTS PER YEAR Year April 25, 2008 Operations Division 23

MAINTENANCE STATE-WIDE STRIPING & SPENDING* April 25, 2008 Operations Division 24 * Does not MAINTENANCE STATE-WIDE STRIPING & SPENDING* April 25, 2008 Operations Division 24 * Does not include Pavement Messages

CONSTRUCTION STRIPING BUSINESS* * Does not include Pavement Messages April 25, 2008 Operations Division CONSTRUCTION STRIPING BUSINESS* * Does not include Pavement Messages April 25, 2008 Operations Division 25

CONSTRUCTION STRIPING EXPENDITURES* April 25, 2008 * Does not include Pavement Messages Operations Division CONSTRUCTION STRIPING EXPENDITURES* April 25, 2008 * Does not include Pavement Messages Operations Division 26

TOTAL STRIPING BUSINESS* (Construction + Maintenance) * Does Not Include Pavement Messages April 25, TOTAL STRIPING BUSINESS* (Construction + Maintenance) * Does Not Include Pavement Messages April 25, 2008 Operations Division 27

TOTAL STRIPING EXPENDITURES* (Construction + Maintenance) April 25, 2008 * Does not include Pavement TOTAL STRIPING EXPENDITURES* (Construction + Maintenance) April 25, 2008 * Does not include Pavement Messages Operations Division 28

PAVEMENT MESSAGE BUSINESS April 25, 2008 Operations Division 29 PAVEMENT MESSAGE BUSINESS April 25, 2008 Operations Division 29

PAVEMENT MESSAGE EXPENDITURES April 25, 2008 Operations Division 30 PAVEMENT MESSAGE EXPENDITURES April 25, 2008 Operations Division 30