Citation The Bluebook 20 th Edition Professor

Citation & The Bluebook 20 th Edition Professor Aliza Kaplan

Why the Bluebook? Widely used Uniformity Job/Intern/Extern/Clerkship expectations

Citations Basic elements of a case citation Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson, 477 U. S. 57, 60 (1986). United States v. Mac. Donald, 531 F. 2 d 196, 199 - 200 (4 th Cir. 1976). Docherty v. Sadler, 689 N. E. 2 d 332, 333 (Il. App. Ct. 1997). Peery v. Hanley, 897 P. 2 d 1189, 1191 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

Bluebook • • • • Bluepages Where you’ll spend most of your time first year Practitioner’s guide – basic rules on everyday citation needs Cases = B 10, Short cites & Id. = B 4, Statutes = B 12, Quotes = B 5 Whitepages In-depth citations, mostly for law journals, but can help answer questions about specific citation needs Caution! Different typeface rules between Blue/Whitepages Cases = R 10, Statutes/FRCP= R 12 Other useful rules: Quotes = R 5, Abbreviations and Spacing = R 6 Tables T 1: U. S. Jurisdictions, what reporters to use, court abbreviations T 6: Words to abbreviate in case names T 10: Geographic abbreviations Index!

Anatomy of a citation CASE NAME, REPORTER INFORMATION, COURT, and YEAR State Reporter: House v. Hicks, 218 Or. App. 348, 358 (2008). Regional Reporter: House v. Hicks, 179 P. 3 d 730, 736 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). Full Parallel Citation House v. Hicks, 218 Or. App. 348, 358, 179 P. 3 d 730, 736 (2008). Which one do you use? HBB Rule B 10. 1. 3 + T 1/OR = House v. Hicks, 179 P. 3 d 730, 736 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). Regional Reporters Atlantic (A. , A. 2 d, A. 3 d), Northeast (N. E. , N. E. 2 d, N. E. 3 d), Northwest (N. W. , N. W. 2 d), Pacific (P. , P. 2 d, P. 3 d), Southeast (S. E. , S. E. 2 d), Southwest (S. W. , S. W. 2 d, S. W. 3 d) , Southern (So. , So. 2 d, So. 3 d)

When to cite Quote “Whether conduct is an extraordinary transgression is a fact-specific inquiry, to be considered on a case -by-case basis, based on the totality of the circumstances. ” House v. Hicks, 179 P. 3 d 730, 736 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). Paraphrase The specific facts of a case determine whether the conduct rises to the level of an extraordinary transgression. House v. Hicks, 179 P. 3 d 730, 736 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). Identify a Source The court in Mc. Ganty examined the analysis from Pakos v. Clark, 453 P. 2 d 682 (Or. 1969). Mc. Ganty v. Staudenraus, 901 P. 2 d 841, 849 -50 (Or. 1995).

Citation sentences & clauses Sentence: citation supports the full assertion/sentence The plaintiff asserted four claims against two defendants. Mc. Ganty v. Staudenraus, 901 P. 2 d 841, 849 (Or. 1995). Clause: citation only supports part of the sentence The plaintiff in Mc. Ganty asserted four claims against two defendants, Mc. Ganty v. Staudenraus, 901 P. 2 d 841, 849 (Or. 1995), while in House the plaintiff asserted three claims against three defendants, House v. Hicks, 179 P. 3 d 730, 735 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

First time cited HBB Rule B 4, R 10 “Whether conduct is an extraordinary transgression is a fact-specific inquiry, to be considered on a case-by-case basis, based on the totality of the circumstances. ” House v. Hicks, 179 P. 3 d 730, 736 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). Full name of the case, underlined or italicized (Rule B 2) Reporter name, volume number, first page of the decision, pinpoint citation ◦ Make sure your pages line up! Not House v. Hicks, 179 P. 3 d 730, 351 (Or. Ct. App. 2008). Parenthetical information (court & year, quoting or citing) ◦ HBB Rule B 10. 1. 3, B 10. 1. 5, B 10. 1. 6, B 1. 3, R 10. 6. 2 ◦ Must include the court, unless the citation clearly conveys it Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S. 714 (1877). ◦ Quoting or citing: Mc. Ganty v. Staudenraus, 901 P. 2 d 841, 849 (Or. 1995) (quoting Patton v. J. C. Penney Co. , 719 P. 2 d 854, 857 (Or. 1986)).

First time cited cont’d 4) Significant subsequent history – HBB Rule B 10. 1. 6, R 10. 7 ◦ ◦ Omit denial of cert/similar appellate discretionary appeals, unless than 2 years old, particularly relevant (there are other exceptions, see Rule 10. 7) Omit history on remand or denial of rehearing, unless particularly relevant Use explanatory phrases, abbreviate pursuant to T 8, underline or italicized (aff’d, rev’d, vacated) Jackson v. Metro. Edison Co. , 348 F. Supp. 954 (M. D. Pa. 1972), aff’d, 483 F. 2 d 754 (3 d Cir. 1973), aff’d, 419 U. S. 345.

Case names Only include first party listed Kraemer v. Harding, 159 Or. App. 90; not Kraemer v. Harding, Lundberg and Lundberg For individuals, use surnames only People v. Murray; not People v. William F. Murray Omit words indicating multiple parties (don’t use et al) National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012); Not National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al. Abbreviate any words listed in Table 6 (there are more than you think!) Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012) “United States” – abbreviate if part of name, don’t if a named party Smith v. United States; Doe v. U. S. Dep’t of Justice For more guidance, see HBB Rule B 10. 1. 1

What’s gone wrong? “The court must ask itself whethere was a natural and continuous sequence between cause and effect. ” Helen Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Company, 248 N. Y. 339, 162 N. E. 99. Palsgraf v. Long Island R. R. Co. , 162 N. E. 99, 104 (N. Y. 1928).

Short form citation • • • Once a case has been fully cited, then a short cite is appropriate. How to form a short cite (HBB Rule B 4) Omit first page of case, court & year, subsequent history, and parentheticals Shorten or omit the case name Never use “supra” or “infra” to cite cases Mc. Ganty v. Staudenraus, 901 P. 2 d 841, 849 (Or. 1995). Becomes Mc. Ganty, 901 P. 2 d at 849. or Id. at 849. If you leave the party name in, don’t use the government party. People v. Sheirod, 510 N. Y. S. 2 d 945, 948 (N. Y. App. Div. 1987). Becomes Sheirod, 510 N. Y. S. 2 d at 948. NOT People, 510 N. Y. S. 2 d at 948.

Pincites When you refer to specific material in a case (with a quote or paraphrase), tell your reader what page to find it on (HBB Rule B 10. 1. 2) The first element of a constructive discharge claim is that the defendant intentionally created or maintained the complained-of condition. Mc. Ganty v. Staudenraus, 901 P. 2 d 841, 856 (Or. 1995). Same for short cites Mc. Ganty, 901 P. 2 d at 856. If info appears on the first page of the decision, put it twice. Mc. Ganty v. Staudenraus, 901 P. 2 d 841, 841 (Or. 1995). Page Range A plaintiff must prove four elements to succeed on a constructive discharge claim. Mc. Ganty, 901 P. 2 d at 856 -57. Note: can drop repetitive digits w/ 3 or more digits. Multiple, non-consecutive pages = separate with commas • Mc. Ganty v. Staudenraus, 901 P. 2 d 841, 849, 852 (Or. 1995). Finding pincite pages online to Westlaw Make sure your pages match up with the reporter you’re using!

Id. HBB B 4 and R 4. 1 Use Id. when the information comes from the same page of the immediately preceding authority. The house was fully furnished and could have been occupied at any time. People v. Sheirod, 510 N. Y. S. 2 d 945, 947 (N. Y. App. Div. 1987). Although the burglar broke in, he did not appear to take anything. Id. Add a pincite if the page is different. “[T]he ‘usually occupied’ element may be satisfied even though the residence is temporarily unoccupied at the time of the burglary. ” Id. at 947 -48. You can’t use id if you cite to a different source in between, or if the previous citation is to more than one source. The focus of the third element is the severity of the emotional distress, the duration and intensity of which are key considerations. Checkley v. Boyd, 170 Or. App. 721, 743 (2000); Kraemer v. Harding, 159 Or. App. 90, 111 -12 (1999). The plaintiff in Kraemer was not declared medically stable until eight months after his dismissal from the route. Kraemer, 159 Or. App. at 102.

Parenthetical information State v. Skinner, 172 S. E. 2 d 548, 551 (S. C. 1970) (holding that waiver can be implied). 1970) (“Waiver may be either explicit or implicit. ”).

Citing to Federal Court cases • • • • Supreme Court cases Use U. S. reporter if available; then S. Ct. , etc. (see HBB T 1) Nat’l Fed’n of Indep. Bus. v. Sebelius, 132 S. Ct. 2566 (2012) – too recent to be in the U. S. Reporter But Worldwide Volkswagon Corp. v. Woodson, 444 U. S. 286 (1980); not 100 S. Ct. 559 Fed. Court of Appeals (F. , F. 2 d, F. 3 d), Fed. District Court (F. Supp. , F. Supp. 2 d) 1 st time cited, must use parenthetical to identify court and year

Multiple authorities • • Multiple authorities for one assertion? HBB Rule B 1. 2, R 1. 4 Separated by semicolons; highest court first, federal before state; state courts sorted alphabetically, then by date Cases from same jurisdiction = most recent case first For citing purposes, all Fed. Courts of Appeal = same court (so just sort by date) • Bennet v. Berg, 685 F. 2 d. 1053 (8 th Cir. 1982); Segal v. Gordon, 467 F. 2 d 602 (2 d Cir. 1972) • Order? 1989 9 th Cir. , 2005 9 th Cir. , and 2006 District of Oregon

Statutes, Rules, Regulations • • HBB Rule B 12 Full citation: Official name, published source, year source published or statute passed Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U. S. C. § 1531 (2006) (Apple? Opt + 6 = §, Windows? Set a shortcut) No underlining or italics here. Multiple sections = §§ 1531 -1631 U. S. C. published every 6 years; cite to session laws if not yet published (See Rule B 12) When possible, cite to official code (NOT U. S. Code Annotated) If you do use U. S. C. A. , make sure to note the publisher 15 U. S. C. A. § 205 (West 2008) Some other examples: Or. Rev. Stat. § 221. 005 (2009) Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)

QUOTES • • • • HBB Rule B 5, R 5 50 or more words = block quote Indented, no quotation marks, citation on left side of page, not w/in the block 49 or fewer words = quotation marks. Don’t forget to cite! Quotation marks alone aren’t enough Substituting letters/words (HBB Rule 5, lots more here) Substituted words = brackets Omitted words/phrases = ellipses Note whether emphasis added or omitted “[T]o satisfy the intent element of [intentional infliction of severe emotional distress], a plaintiff must allege that the defendant acted with the purpose of inflicting severe emotional or mental distress on the plaintiff. ” Mc. Ganty v. Staudenraus, 901 P. 2 d 841, 849 (Or. 1995) (emphasis added). Be credible! Don’t use quotes out of context.