Скачать презентацию ASSOCIATION OF CERTIFIED CHATERED ECONOMIST ACCE BUSINESS ETHICS Скачать презентацию ASSOCIATION OF CERTIFIED CHATERED ECONOMIST ACCE BUSINESS ETHICS

59699b61fa3131abcd2e944d529c9147.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 31

ASSOCIATION OF CERTIFIED CHATERED ECONOMIST (ACCE) BUSINESS ETHICS and ECONOMIC GROWTH ASSOCIATION OF CERTIFIED CHATERED ECONOMIST (ACCE) BUSINESS ETHICS and ECONOMIC GROWTH

STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION: 1. Economic growth 2. Business Ethics 3. Linking Business Ethics to STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION: 1. Economic growth 2. Business Ethics 3. Linking Business Ethics to Economic growth 4. Assess the impact of Business Ethics on the Economy. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 2

THE BASICS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH Economic growth is a sustained expansion of production measured THE BASICS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH Economic growth is a sustained expansion of production measured as the increase in real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over a given period. Rapid economic growth maintained over a number of years can transform a poor nation into a rich one. Slow economic growth or absence of growth can a nation into poverty. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 3

CALCULATION OF GROWTH RATES The economic growth rate is expressed as the annual percentage CALCULATION OF GROWTH RATES The economic growth rate is expressed as the annual percentage change of real GDP. Formula: T 2 - T 1 Growth rate = x 100 T 1 Where: T 1 is the real GDP in previous year and T 2 is the real GDP in the current year August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 4

GROWTH RATE CALCULATION: EXAMPLE We assume that a country has real GDP of GH¢ GROWTH RATE CALCULATION: EXAMPLE We assume that a country has real GDP of GH¢ 80 bn in the 2008, and real GDP of GH¢ 75 bn in 2007. Required Calculate the growth rate of real GDP in 2008. GH¢ 80 bn – GH¢ 75 bn Growth rate = x 100 GH¢ 75 bn Growth rate = 6. 7% August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 5

SOURCES OF ECONOMIC GROWTH Real GDP grows when the factors of production grow or SOURCES OF ECONOMIC GROWTH Real GDP grows when the factors of production grow or when persistent advances in technology make them increasingly productive. Why are we interested in real GDP v Because it contributes to improvement in our standard of living. Our standard of living improves only if we produce more goods and services with each hour of labor. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 6

The real GDP depends on: i. Aggregate lab our hours ii. Labor productivity depends The real GDP depends on: i. Aggregate lab our hours ii. Labor productivity depends on: i. The amount of physical capital ii. The human capital iii. The state of technology Growth in aggregate hours and growth in labor productivity bring real GDP growth. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 7

Population growth Labor force participation Average hours per worker = Physical capital growth Human Population growth Labor force participation Average hours per worker = Physical capital growth Human capital growth: Education and = training Job experience Technological advances August 2009 Aggregate hours growth = Labor productivity growth F. T. Agyepong Real GDP growth 8

THEORIES OF ECONOMIC GROWTH 1. Classical growth / Malthusian/ Doomsday theory: The theory that THEORIES OF ECONOMIC GROWTH 1. Classical growth / Malthusian/ Doomsday theory: The theory that the clash between an exploding population and limited resources will eventually bring economic growth to an end. 2. Neoclassical theory: The theory that real GDP person will increase as long as technology keeps advancing. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 9

Growth theory cont. 3. New growth theory: The theory that our unlimited wants will Growth theory cont. 3. New growth theory: The theory that our unlimited wants will lead us to ever greater productive and perpetual economic growth. **** making choices and innovations • Human capital expands because of choices. • Discoveries results from choices • Discoveries bring profit. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 10

PRECONDITIONS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH 1. Economic Freedom: A condition in which people are able PRECONDITIONS FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH 1. Economic Freedom: A condition in which people are able to make personal choices, their private properties are protected, and they are free to buy and sell in markets. 2. Property rights: The social arrangements that govern the protection of private property. 3. Free markets: Buyers and sellers get information and do business with each other in markets. And market prices send signals to buyers and sellers that create incentives to increase or decrease the quantities demanded. Markets enable people to trade and to save and invest. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 11

POLICIES TO ACHIEVE FASTER GROWTH 1. Create Incentive Mechanisms: Incentives to save, invest , POLICIES TO ACHIEVE FASTER GROWTH 1. Create Incentive Mechanisms: Incentives to save, invest , and innovate. 2. Encourage savings: Savings finances investment, which brings capital accumulation. So encouraging savings can increase the growth of capital and stimulate economic growth 3. Encourage Research and Development: Everyone can use the fruits of basic research and development efforts. 4. Encourage International Trade: Free international trade stimulates economic growth by extracting all the available gains from specialization and trade. 5. Improve the Quality of Education: The free market would produce too little education because of it brings social benefits beyond the benefits to the people who receive the education. By funding education and by ensuring high standards in skills such as language, mathematics, and science, governments can contribute enormously to a nation’s growth potential. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 12

ETHICS 1. Gibson (2005) defines ethics as ‘ the practice of studying morality’. 2. ETHICS 1. Gibson (2005) defines ethics as ‘ the practice of studying morality’. 2. Doing the right thing August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 13

BUSINESS ETHICS Definition Business ethics is a system of moral principles applied in the BUSINESS ETHICS Definition Business ethics is a system of moral principles applied in the commercial world. (Business the ultimate resource 2006) v. Business ethics provide guidelines for acceptable behavior by organizations in both their strategy formulation and day – to – day operations. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 14

THE THEORETICAL BACKDROP OF BUSINESS ETHICS THE FOUR CONCEPTS BY ETHICAL THEORIST 1. Ethical THE THEORETICAL BACKDROP OF BUSINESS ETHICS THE FOUR CONCEPTS BY ETHICAL THEORIST 1. Ethical Relativism: Ethics is a question of individual choice and preference; we may not agree with others, but we have no right to impose our views on them. This view suggests there are no universal or absolute values on which people can agree. However, we should not take disagreement over values to suggest there are none. Thomas Beauchamp points out that the fact that people follow different religions does not lead them to believe that religion should be abandoned altogether. Humans live in societies and at a basic level maintain contracts to coexist. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 15

2. Impartiality: Most classical theories suggest that we should treat one another as equals 2. Impartiality: Most classical theories suggest that we should treat one another as equals where every one counts for one and none for more than one. The goal here is to maximise the happiness of the maximum number, relies on us caring about everyone else in a significant way. 3. Sympathy: One way of understanding sympathy is as the imaginative to put yourself in someone else’s shoes. In ethical theory we are often asked to care about the rest of humanity, often to the extent that we love our neighbors as ourselves. In business terms, this may amount to a company being concerned with the welfare of individuals who may never be paying customers. 4. Moral sufficiency: What separates the morally decent from the morally heroic? If we are required, for example, to produce the maximum good for the maximum number, is there a place that one can stop on the grounds that we have done as much as could be reasonably expected? August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 16

THINKING ETHICALLY: A FRAMEWORK FOR MORAL DECISION MAKING FIVE APPROACHES TO DEAL WITH MORAL THINKING ETHICALLY: A FRAMEWORK FOR MORAL DECISION MAKING FIVE APPROACHES TO DEAL WITH MORAL ISSUES 1. The Utilitarian Approach: Utilitarianism was conceived in the 19 thcentury by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. They suggested that ethical actions are those that provide the greatest balance of good and evil. To analyze an issue using the utilitarian approach: i. First , we identify the various courses of action available to us. ii. Second, we ask who will be affected by each action and what benefits or harms will be derived from each. iii. And third, we choose the action that will produce the greatest benefits and the least harm. The ethical action is the one that provides the greatest good for the greatest number. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 17

FIVE APPROACHES TO DEAL WITH MORAL ISSUES Cont. 2. The Right Approach: This approach FIVE APPROACHES TO DEAL WITH MORAL ISSUES Cont. 2. The Right Approach: This approach to ethics has its roots in the philosophy of the 18 th century thinker Immanuel Kant and others like him, who focused on the individual’s right to choose for himself or herself. According to these philosophers , what makes human beings different from mere things is that people have dignity based on their ability to choose freely what they will do with their lives, and they have a fundamental moral right to have these choices respected. Other rights that humans have include: § The right to the truth § The right of privacy § The right not be injured § The right to what is agreed August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 18

FIVE APPROACHES TO DEAL WITH MORAL ISSUES: Cont . 3. The Fairness or Justice FIVE APPROACHES TO DEAL WITH MORAL ISSUES: Cont . 3. The Fairness or Justice Approach: The fairness approach to ethics has its roots in the teachings of the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, who said that “equals should be treated equally and unequals unequally. ” The basic moral question in this approach is: How fair is an action? Does it treat everyone in the same way, or does it show favoritism and discrimination? Favoritism gives benefits to some people without a justifiable reason for singling them out. Discrimination imposes burdens on people who are no different from those on whom burdens are not imposed. Both favoritism and discrimination are unjust and wrong. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 19

FIVE APPROACHES TO DEAL WITH MORAL ISSUES: Cont 4. The Common – Good Approach: FIVE APPROACHES TO DEAL WITH MORAL ISSUES: Cont 4. The Common – Good Approach: This approach to ethics presents a vision of society as a community whose members are joined in the shared pursuit of values and goals they hold in common. This community comprises individuals whose own good is inextricably bound the good of the whole. The common good is a notion that originated more than 2, 000 years ago in the writings of Plato, Aristotle, and Cicero. More recently John Rawls defined the common good as “certain general conditions that are …. . equally to everyone’s advantage. ” In this approach, we focus on ensuring that the social policies, social systems, institutions, and environments on which we depend are beneficial to all. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 20

FIVE APPROACHES TO DEAL WITH MORAL ISSUES: Cont 5. The Virtue Approach: The virtue FIVE APPROACHES TO DEAL WITH MORAL ISSUES: Cont 5. The Virtue Approach: The virtue approach to ethics assumes that there are certain ideals toward which we should strive, which provide for the full development of our humanity. These ideas are discovered through thoughtful reflection on what kind of people we have the potential to become. Virtues are attitudes or character traits that enables us to be and to act in ways that develop our highest potential. They enable us to pursue the ideals we have adopted. Honesty, courage, compassion, generosity, fidelity, integrity, fairness, self- control and prudence are all examples of virtues. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 21

ETHICAL PROBLEM SOLVING These five approaches suggest that once we have ascertained the facts, ETHICAL PROBLEM SOLVING These five approaches suggest that once we have ascertained the facts, we should ask ourselves five questions when trying to resolve a moral issues: i. What benefits and what harms will each course of action produce, and which alternative will lead to the best overall consequences? ii. What moral rights do the affected parties have, and which course of action best respects those rights? iii. Which course of action treats everyone the same, except where there is a morally justifiable reason not to, and does not show favoritism or discrimination? iv. Which course of action advances the common good? v. Which course of action develops moral virtue? August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 22

SOCIAL AND ETHICAL OBJECTIVES 1. Growing awareness of social and ethical responsibilities Whereas twenty SOCIAL AND ETHICAL OBJECTIVES 1. Growing awareness of social and ethical responsibilities Whereas twenty years ago many companies might have placed profits and growth at the top of their corporate objectives ranking list, few would do so nowadays: there are so many other issues to be taking into accounts. Not only doubts persist as to whether profits and growth are desirable ends in themselves, there is also skepticism about their practicality. Additional new measures related to pollution control, conservation of natural resources, avoidance of environmental disfigurement by companies, and so on are now highlighted. Over the past few decades a social conscience has developed in the corporate body even though it is often at the cost lower profits. 'The possibility that ethical and commercial considerations will conflict has always faced those who run companies. It is not a new problem. The difference now is that a more widespread and critical interest is being taken in all decisions and in the ethical judgements which he behind them. ’ (Source: Adrian Cadbury, Chairman, Cadbury Schweppes, (Harvard Business Review, September - October, 1987)) August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 23

Social and ethical objectives- contd As society changes, so do the organizations which are Social and ethical objectives- contd As society changes, so do the organizations which are its substance. The contemporary set of guidelines or prin ciples governing company actions are generally concerned with creating the correct public image, and anything likely to create a bad press is avoided at all cost. There are plenty of pressure groups, such as consumer protection societies and environmentalists, who stand watch dog and are , prepared to use political muscle against any erring organization. Commercial pressure and social responsibility are now inextricably intertwined. Andre Valldam summed it up, ‘ I would compare the relationship between companies and society to that between the African Buffalo Bird and the Rhinoceros: the bird lives on the back of the rhinoceros. In return for a gratis mobile home, it renders a valuable service. When danger impends, it emits a loud shriek and flies off the rhinoceros' back, thereby warning its host of the immediate peril. ' 'We know that a business cannot operate in a vacuum, concerned only with profits and markets and oblivious to the impact it has upon the rest of society. . Now, perhaps, for the first time, we are part of a real attempt to integrate two different value systems: those that are oriented toward making a living with those that are oriented toward making a life. ' (Robert, A. Beck, Chairman, Prudential Insurance) August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 24

Social and ethical objectives- contd 2. The srtakeholder Approach The 'stakeholder' approach suggests that Social and ethical objectives- contd 2. The srtakeholder Approach The 'stakeholder' approach suggests that corporate objectives, are, or ought to be, shaped and influenced by the collective pressures of those internal and external organisations or coalitions of people which have sufficient involvement or interest in the company's operational activities, such as: Entrepreneurs who wish to 'do their own thing' become financial magnates, develop their own technical or commercial ideas, be independent. Investors who are concerned with return on investment and capital appreciation and who probably want information and participation in decision making additional to the minimum legal requirement (entitlement). Managers often preoccupied with their own status measured in terms of size of office, type of company car, number of staff working for them, sales turnover of their operation, etc. Non-managerial employees normally concerned with improving pay and conditions and (particularly in the current economic situation), job security. Safety at work, freedom from discrimination and industrial democracy are also concerns of employees. Customers and final consumers interested in value of money, ethical advertising and consumer protection. Suppliers wanting a fair price, regular business and payment on time. Government seeking finance through taxation and other means, as well as often seeking political support for its legislated activities. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 25

Smith and Johnson (1996) differentiate three general approaches that organizations take to corporate responsibility: Smith and Johnson (1996) differentiate three general approaches that organizations take to corporate responsibility: i. Social obligation: the company does only what is legally required. ii. Social responsiveness: the company responds to pressure from different stakeholder groups. iii. Social responsibility: the company has an agenda of proactively improve society. Depending on the Smith and Johnson approach, we can assess the impact of business ethics on economic growth. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 26

SOCIAL OBLIGATION Examples • Standard and certified products • Issue VAT receipts • Paying SOCIAL OBLIGATION Examples • Standard and certified products • Issue VAT receipts • Paying SSNIT contribution on time • Declare full income for tax purposes • Health and safety at work • No damage to the environment August 2009 Impact 1. Encourages International Trade 2. Government revenue goes up. 3. Government expenditure on health etc goes down. 4. Excess revenue could be directed to other sectors or for PSDR F. T. Agyepong 27

SOCIAL RESPONSIVENESS Examples • Sponsoring education • Quality products • Green environment • Funding SOCIAL RESPONSIVENESS Examples • Sponsoring education • Quality products • Green environment • Funding public R&D • Employing local people • No fatty bonuses and fees for directors • Respect human and animal rights August 2009 Impact 1. Human capital expands. 2. Sales increases locally / int. 3. Local products stand foreign competition. 4. Government expenditure on environment. etc goes down. 5. New findings from research lead to new technology. 6. Quality of lives improves 7. Shareholders (investors) are happy. 8. Labor grows. F. T. Agyepong 28

SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Examples • Building schools, hospital • Helping the police to fight crime SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Examples • Building schools, hospital • Helping the police to fight crime • Staff development plan August 2009 Impact • Improve lives of end users • Crime reduction • Skills and experience labor F. T. Agyepong 29

Corporate social obligation, social responsiveness and social responsibility will improve lives of citizens which Corporate social obligation, social responsiveness and social responsibility will improve lives of citizens which will eventually lead to economic growth. As from today , perhaps, we shall consider no organization successful unless it is able to: show continuous growth in operational performance, continuous contribution to develop the community in which it operates, and above all contribute to growth of the economy. Let us do things right to grow our businesses, improve our communities and above all develop our dear nation. August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 30

BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Appiah Kubi, K. (2008), Principles of Macroeconomics, Sundel Services, Ghana 2. Bade, BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Appiah Kubi, K. (2008), Principles of Macroeconomics, Sundel Services, Ghana 2. Bade, R. and Parkin, M. (2007), Foundations of Macroeconomics, Pearson/ Addison Wesley 3. Drucker, P. F. (1982), The Changing World of Executives, Heineman 4. Kanatas, G, and Stefanadis C, (2008), Ethics, Property Rights Institutions and Economic Growth, Research Paper 5. Kast, F. E and Rosenzweig, J. E (1988), Organisation and Management: A Systems and Contigency Approach. Mc. Graw Hill Int. 6. Ross, I. How Lawless are Big Companies? (1980), Fortune 1 st Dec. 7. Shorris, E. (1981), The Oppressed Middle, Anchor/Doubleday 8. Taylor, J. F. A (1965), Is the Corporate Above the Law. Harvard Business Review, March April 9. Vardy, P. (1989), Business Morality, Marshall Pickering August 2009 F. T. Agyepong 31