Скачать презентацию Aeronautics and Air Transport The 2 nd Call Скачать презентацию Aeronautics and Air Transport The 2 nd Call

4e2348a4acf5d7e8bff333d9c9492628.ppt

  • Количество слайдов: 45

Aeronautics and Air Transport The 2 nd Call for Proposals and beyond Dietrich Knörzer Aeronautics and Air Transport The 2 nd Call for Proposals and beyond Dietrich Knörzer DG RTD-H. 3 - Aeronautics Wien, 10. Januar 2008 DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 1

Content l l The 7 th Research Framework Programme The First Call for Proposals Content l l The 7 th Research Framework Programme The First Call for Proposals 2007 – Results and Lessons Learnt – Changes against FP 6 l l l The 2 nd Call for Proposals 2008 The Joint Technology Initiative “Clean Sky” Single European Sky ATM Research (SESAR) DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 2

Participation in FP 7 EU of 27 Candidate countries: • Croatia • Turkey Associated Participation in FP 7 EU of 27 Candidate countries: • Croatia • Turkey Associated Countries: • Island • Israel • Norway • Switzerland All countries contributed to the financing of the Framework Programme by a fraction of their gross national DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 3

 7 th Framework Programme Four Specific Programmes Corresponding to four major objectives of 7 th Framework Programme Four Specific Programmes Corresponding to four major objectives of European research policy l Cooperation (32413 million Euro) Support will be given to the whole range of research activities carried out in trans-national cooperation l Ideas (7510 millon Euro) An autonomous European Research Council will be created to support investigator-driven “frontier research”. l People (4750 million Euro) The activities support training and career development of researchers, referred to as “Marie Curie” actions, l Capacities (4097 million Euro) Key aspects of European research and innovation capacities will be supported: research infrastructures; research for the benefit of SMEs; regional research driven clusters. DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 4

7 th Research Framework Programme Budget Breakdown Budget 2007 - 2013: 50. 521 million 7 th Research Framework Programme Budget Breakdown Budget 2007 - 2013: 50. 521 million Euro (+ nuclear JRC and DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 5 EURATOM)

European Aeronautics: A Vision for 2020* The Goals for 2020 l 80% cut in European Aeronautics: A Vision for 2020* The Goals for 2020 l 80% cut in NOx emissions l Halving perceived aircraft noise l Five-fold reduction in accidents l Air traffic system capable of handling 16 million flights a year l 50% cut in CO 2 emissions per pass-Km l 99% of all flights within 15 minutes of timetable *) published in 2001 DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 6

7 th Framework Programme Aeronautics & Air Transport (2007 – 2013) Workprogramme Activities 1. 7 th Framework Programme Aeronautics & Air Transport (2007 – 2013) Workprogramme Activities 1. The greening of air transport 2. Increasing time efficiency 3. Ensuring customer satisfaction and safety 4. Improving cost efficiency 5. Protection of the aircraft and passengers 6. Pioneering the air transport of the future DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 7

F. P. 7 Scenario for Aeronautics & Air Transport (2007 – 2013) RTD Activities F. P. 7 Scenario for Aeronautics & Air Transport (2007 – 2013) RTD Activities l Collaborative Research (CP) – Level 1 - Upstream RTD (Small – medium projects, as before STREP, CTP) – Level 2 - Focussed integration and validation RTD (Medium - large projects, as before IP, TP; specific topics for each call) l Joint Technology Initiative – Level 3 (Focussed system demonstration, novel scheme) Activities for Structuring European Aeronautics Research l Networks of Excellence (No. E) (Specific topics for each call) l Coordination and Support Actions (CSA) DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 8

Research / Technology and Product Development in Aeronautics Product development Research and technology acquisition Research / Technology and Product Development in Aeronautics Product development Research and technology acquisition Fundamental knowledge Technology development Technology validation Demonstrat ors Prototypes Product definition Product design and development EU Framework Programme Product demonstration Production Level 1 Collaborative Research Level 2 Novel F. P. 7 Concept: Joint Technology Initiative EUREKA -10 DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 9 -5 0 years +5

Call and Budget Aeronautics (RTD) Indicative Budget 217. 5 M€ Level 2 and No. Call and Budget Aeronautics (RTD) Indicative Budget 217. 5 M€ Level 2 and No. E 50% Level 1 50% Support actions 3 M€ JTI bridging action 2 M€ DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 10

Overall Results of 1 st Call AAT Level 2 No. E Number of proposals Overall Results of 1 st Call AAT Level 2 No. E Number of proposals submitted Requested Funding M€ Number of proposals retained Recommended Funding M€ DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 11 Level 1 CSA Total CA SA 5 2 167 5 15 194 141 15 660 5. 1 829 4 0 26 1 5 36 106 0 105. 1 0. 9 2. 8 214. 8

1 st Call - Ranked Priority List Activity Acronym Rank Recommended Grant Level 1 1 st Call - Ranked Priority List Activity Acronym Rank Recommended Grant Level 1 HUMAN 1 2. 843. 041 Level 2 MAAXIMUS 19 40. 200. 000 Level 1 ALFA-BIRD 2 6. 822. 685 CSA-SA SCRATCH 20 750. 000 CSA-SA CREATE 3 632. 590 CSA-SA Aero. SME-NET 21 750. 000 Level 1 VISION 4 1. 485. 714 CSA-SA AEROCHINA 2 22 500. 000 Level 2 DREAM 5 25. 000 Level 2 HIRF SE 23 17. 800. 000 Level 2 SCARLETT 6 23. 000 CSA-SA CEARES 24 128. 458 Level 1 TRIADE 7 4. 173. 360 Level 1 LAYSA 25 3. 088. 349 Level 1 FUTURE 8 6. 996. 196 Level 1 SADE 26 4. 970. 000 Level 1 ACCENT 9 4. 254. 026 Level 1 FLY-BAG 27 2. 300. 000 Level 1 SAFAR 10 4. 700. 000 Level 1 EXTICE 28 3. 000 Level 1 TECC-AE 11 7. 999. 303 CSA-CA Level 1 TAUPE 12 3. 631. 663 Wake. Net 3 Europe 29 900. 000 Level 1 FLEXA 13 5. 374. 684 Level 1 FLOCON 30 3. 564. 536 Level 1 MISSA 14 4. 000 Level 1 HISVESTA 31 2. 208. 250 Level 1 DANIELA 15 4. 140. 635 Level 1 ASSET 32 2. 360. 000 Level 1 AISHA II 16 4. 304. 943 Level 1 IMac-Pro 33 5. 000 Level 1 ACFA 2020 17 3. 124. 968 Level 1 FANTOM 34 1. 700. 080 18 7. 400. 000 Level 1 GREEN-WAKE 35 2. 206. 287 Level 1 LAPCAT-II DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 12

1 st Call - Results of Level 2 Proposal Title vali. Dation of Radical 1 st Call - Results of Level 2 Proposal Title vali. Dation of Radical Engine Architecture syste. Ms Proposal (Ranking) Max. Recommended Funding (M€) Level 2 DREAM 25 SCAlable & Reconfigurab. Le Electronics pla. Tforms and Tools SCARLETT 23 More Affordable Aircraft structure through e. Xtended, Integrated, and Mature n. Umerical Sizing MAAXIMUS 40 HIRF SE 18 HIRF Synthetic Environment Integrated Communication Multiservice Network DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 13 Total: Com. Net 106 0

Priority List Proposed for Funding Level 1 and CSA Retained Number of Proposals submitted Priority List Proposed for Funding Level 1 and CSA Retained Number of Proposals submitted Number 7. 1. 1 Greening of air transport 22 3 16. 1 7. 1. 2 Increasing time efficiency 11 49 63 2 7 11 3. 3 19. 9 45. 5 7. 1. 5 Protection of aircraft & passengers 5 1 2. 3 7. 1. 6 Pioneering air transport 17 20 3 5 18. 9 2. 8 187 32 Work Programme Area 7. 1. 3 Customer & safety 7. 1. 4 Cost efficiency 7. 1. 7 Cross cutting activities Total: DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 14 Recommended funding (M€) 108. 8

Success Rate of the 1 st Call by Instrument l Level 1: 26 out Success Rate of the 1 st Call by Instrument l Level 1: 26 out of 167 proposals l Level 2: 4 out of 5 proposals l CSA: 6 out of 20 proposals DG Research-H. 3 Aeronautics –DK-10 -2007 - 15 DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 15

1 st Call FP 7 – 2007 AAT Summary of Proposal Failure 1. Scientific 1 st Call FP 7 – 2007 AAT Summary of Proposal Failure 1. Scientific and/or technological excellence - Fail to position the work in relation to present state-of-the-art - Level of innovation is too low - Not convincing that technical challenges can be met - Lack of focus in the technical objectives, too many items without synergy 2. Quality and efficiency of implementation and management - Management structure is very weak. - Very little real cooperation between key partners. - Risk assessment and management is not convincingly addressed - Partners have not sufficient critical mass to address all diverse areas - Funding requested is considered too large for the expected results 3. Potential impact through development, dissemination

Changed Terminology of FP 7 Sources: FR/IR & FP 7/Rf. P l “Contract” becomes Changed Terminology of FP 7 Sources: FR/IR & FP 7/Rf. P l “Contract” becomes “Grant Agreement” l “Contractor” becomes “Beneficiary” l “Instruments” become “Funding Schemes” l “Audit certificate” becomes “Certificate on Financial Statement” DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 17

Changes of FP 7 against FP 6 l Up to 75 % EU funding Changes of FP 7 against FP 6 l Up to 75 % EU funding for SME and research institutes l No financial collective responsibility l “Technical responsibility” to carry out the project jointly and severally l No limits for administrative management costs l Guarantee Fund DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 18

Preview of Second Call FP 7 -AAT-2008 -RTD-2 DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 19 Preview of Second Call FP 7 -AAT-2008 -RTD-2 DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 19

Indicative Timetable for the Preparation of the 2 nd Call Aeronautics & Air Transport Indicative Timetable for the Preparation of the 2 nd Call Aeronautics & Air Transport First meeting with Industry on Content March 2007 Discussion with Member & Assoc. States 27 th July 2007 Approval of 2 nd Call by Member & Assoc. 3 rd Oct. 2007 Publication of 2 nd Call for Proposals 30 th Nov. 2007 Deadline for submission 7 th May 2008 Tentative EC Budget: ~ 200 million €* *) Budget from the EC Household 2008 and 2009 DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 20

Aeronautics and Air Transport 2 nd Call – Overview Workprogramme Ensuring Customer The Greening Aeronautics and Air Transport 2 nd Call – Overview Workprogramme Ensuring Customer The Greening Increasing Improving Cost Satisfaction and of Air Transport Time Efficiency Safety Level 1 Upstream RTD from basic research to validation at component or subsystem level – CP, CSA Level 2 Focussed downstream RTD – Multidisciplinary integration and validation at systems level - CP Level 3 RTD up to the highest technology readiness – final proof in systems of systems – JTI, JU Structuring Aeronautics Research through lasting integration - No. E Supporting Programme implementation – setting mechanisms and strategies – CSA (and CP) DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 21 “Clean Sky” JTI SESAR JU Protection of Aircraft and Passengers Pioneering the Air Transport of the Future

Level 2 Topics of 2 nd Call l Lowering external noise l Health management Level 2 Topics of 2 nd Call l Lowering external noise l Health management and permanent serviceable fleet l Avionics for new cockpit and all-conditions operation Full virtuality in design and product development within the extended enterprise Network centric aircraft communications for global aircraft operations l l l Air transport system security DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 22

Level 2 Topic under ” The Greening of Air Transport ” Lowering External Noise Level 2 Topic under ” The Greening of Air Transport ” Lowering External Noise Integration & Validation of “ 2 nd generation” noise reduction technologies: - engine (inlet, fan, bypass duct, advanced propellers, turbo-machinery, combustor, exhaust system, jet) and - airframe noise (wing systems, landing gear, …) Multidisciplinary approach including: - local control: active noise generation and flow control - adaptive and variable concepts, - trade-offs: integration (aircraft, nacelle, engine) performance (aerodynamics, weight, cost) environmental (noise versus emissions). Adjustable to future engines and aircraft architectures DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 23

Level 2 Topic under ” Increasing Time Efficiency ” (1) Health Management & Permanent Level 2 Topic under ” Increasing Time Efficiency ” (1) Health Management & Permanent Serviceable Fleet To ensure continuous aircraft availability at operation (less disruptions -> more time efficiency, less costs & more safety) Development, Integration & Validation of aircraft & engine health monitoring and management technologies, services and processes (incl. operations & IT sys). Integrating interoperable aircraft and ground segments, including the - operators, - MROs (Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul) and - manufacturers (supply chain, OEMs) Best value/cost contributing to diagnosis/prognosis, decision making, to enable a global maintenance system, delivering: - standardised maintenance system architecture (validation: test platform). - key health monitoring technologies (validation: testrigs &large scale testing). DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 24

Level 2 topic under ” Increasing Time Efficiency ” (2) Avionics for New Cockpit Level 2 topic under ” Increasing Time Efficiency ” (2) Avionics for New Cockpit & All-conditions Operation New aircraft operational challenges: - external perturbations, - automation, - crew-centred interface design, incl. future single pilot operations. Development of a core flight deck architecture, integrating technologies eg: improved sensors and data-fusion, task tailored, intuitive graphical, interfaces, 3 D audio environment, head mounted technologies, voice inputs, integrated flight bags. Anticipation & avoidance of perturbations in-flight or on-ground, including weather eg: enhanced vision systems and 3 D situational awareness, weather surveillance sensors and new navigation capabilities. Validation in synthetic environments / ground test benches / flight tests. DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 25

Level 2 Topic under ” Increasing Cost Efficiency ” (1) Full Virtuality in Design Level 2 Topic under ” Increasing Cost Efficiency ” (1) Full Virtuality in Design and Product Development within the Extended Enterprise Reduce time to market and development cost through a new paradigm - based on concurrent engineering - supported by virtual reality across the whole cycle (from conceptual design……. to testing and certification), - involving multidisciplinary teams at all levels - collaborating in an extended enterprise concept. Functionalities to integrate in the framework e. g. : - multi-physics analysis at aircraft, systems, subsystems & component, - "in-context" interactive knowledge design & decision support, - management of uncertainty in the development cycle, - methods to control design evolution across pre-design and dev. , - virtual testing to reduce or eliminate the need of physical testing. Validation: through test cases from real design, development and certification DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 26

Level 2 Topic under ” Increasing Cost Efficiency ” (2) Network centric aircraft communications Level 2 Topic under ” Increasing Cost Efficiency ” (2) Network centric aircraft communications for global aircraft operations Definition, development & demonstration of an aircraft communication concept which will integrate a full range of applications and services eg: - airlines operations, - cabin crew operations, - in-flight and on-ground passenger services, - airport operations, - security services and - air traffic management related operations (in line with SESAR), including the unification of all the related networking protocols. Definition of standard data interfaces with current & future networks. Development of proved concepts for transition from current to new system. DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 27

Level 2 Topic under “Protection of Aircraft and Passengers” Air Transport System Security To Level 2 Topic under “Protection of Aircraft and Passengers” Air Transport System Security To detect and respond to any threat. To survive the effects of hostile actions. On-ground & In-flight threats e. g. - internal: attacks to crew / passengers, dangerous materials, explosives - external: missile or electronic attacks. Integration and validation of a global framework to security embracing: - aircraft - airport , and - air traffic operations. Integrating airborne with ground systems: merging information to react. Attention to future international regulations, standardisation & certification. Validation: simulation (&training) platforms, full scale live trials. DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 28

Subjects for Focused Research Collaborative Projects (CP-FP = Level 1) and Coordination Actions (CSA-CA) Subjects for Focused Research Collaborative Projects (CP-FP = Level 1) and Coordination Actions (CSA-CA) • Flight Physics • Aero-structures • Propulsion • Systems & Equipment • Avionics • Design Systems and Tools • Production • Maintenance • Air Traffic Management • Airports • Human Factors These subjects are likely to remain for all the duration of FP 7 DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 29

New Level 1 Topics: Promising Pioneering Ideas in Air Transport Based upon ACARE’s New Level 1 Topics: Promising Pioneering Ideas in Air Transport Based upon ACARE’s "Out of the Box” study for radical changes • The Cruiser/feeder concept. Very large aircraft flying nearly permanently on stable circuits being fed with passengers from feeder aircraft. • Take-off and landing using ground-based power. Replacing on-board systems and fuel with ground systems and power. • Personal air transport systems. Operational concepts (on-board and on-ground) and vehicle technologies for individual transportation. • New sources of aircraft main propulsive power. New views of propulsion beyond gas turbine concept, using other energy sources. “Greening”: Flight and Air Traffic management. Adopting alternative flight profiles and altitudes for reduced emissions. DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 30

Other Highlights • International Co-operation: All activities open; especially encouraged to tackle global Safety Other Highlights • International Co-operation: All activities open; especially encouraged to tackle global Safety & Environment issues. In addition, enhanced collaboration encouraged on certain topics at Level 1 with selected countries based on recent stimulation actions with Russia, South Africa, India and China. • Cross-cutting activities - Support Actions: o Two topics suppressed (SME stimulation, radical changes stimulation) o Four new topics added (Retrofitting, raising public awareness, support to dissemination, support to conferences) • ERA-Net • No Networks of Excellence; • Funding threshold Level 1 - Level 2 reduced from 8 M€ down to 6 M€. • Maximum funding for Level 2 reduced from 60 M€ down to 50 M€. • Split budget for Level 1/Level 2 at 50%/ 50% DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 31

Seventh Research Framework Programme International Cooperation Participation by legal entities from third countries in Seventh Research Framework Programme International Cooperation Participation by legal entities from third countries in Aeronautics Research l W è EC H 1 u Third level – Fourth level l Fifth level EU + Associated Partners “ICPC” High income No cooperation 1 DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 32

Joint Technology Initiatives “Important projects of common European interest” (cf. Art. 87 3 b) Joint Technology Initiatives “Important projects of common European interest” (cf. Art. 87 3 b) Identification criteria include: • Added value of European-level intervention • Strength of commitment from industry • Degree and clarity of definition of objectives • Scale of impact on industrial competitiveness and growth • Importance of contribution to broader policy objectives • Capacity to attract additional national support and leverage industry funding • Inability of existing instruments to achieve objectives DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 33

Candidate Joint Technology Initiatives Hydrogen and Fuel Cells for a Sustainable Energy Future Global Candidate Joint Technology Initiatives Hydrogen and Fuel Cells for a Sustainable Energy Future Global Monitoring for Environment and Security Aeronautics Clean Sky* Towards new Nanoelectronics Approaches Innovative Medicines for the Citizens of Europe (ENIAC)* (IMI)* Embedded systems (ARTEMIS)* *) Decided by Council DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 34 Other possible themes to be identified later…

Aeronautics JTI « Clean Sky » Objectives: • To provide a step forward in Aeronautics JTI « Clean Sky » Objectives: • To provide a step forward in the technology capability of ATS environmentally friendly systems: • Integration of advanced technologies • Full scale demonstrators • To improve on the overall ATS impact on environment: • Noise and emission reduction • Fuel consumption • To consolidate the European industry around a project of common European interest DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 35

 JTI “Clean Sky” Integrated Technology Demonstrators (ITD) SMART Wing Aircraft Regional Air Transport JTI “Clean Sky” Integrated Technology Demonstrators (ITD) SMART Wing Aircraft Regional Air Transport Green Engines Technology Evaluator Simulator Platform AC, ATM, AP (flight segment) ATS Model Eco-Design DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 36 Green Rotorcraft Systems for Green Operation Linked to “SESAR” Joint Undertaking

JTI ”Clean Sky” – Targets Technology Evaluator ITD Activities Targets Products Smart Fixed Green JTI ”Clean Sky” – Targets Technology Evaluator ITD Activities Targets Products Smart Fixed Green Regional Wing Aircraft Active Wing New Aircraft Configurations CO 2 ~12 to 20% Noise ~10 d. B Widebody 2020 CO 2 -30% NOx -30% Noise -20 d. B Advance d Aerodynamics (Low Drag & Noise) Low Weight Structures CO 2 ~10 to 20% Noise ~10 d. B Green Rotorcraft New Powerplants Innovative Blades & Rotors New Aircraft Configurations CO 2 ~26 to 40% NO x ~53 to 65% Noise ~10 d. B Narrowbody 2015 CO 2 -20% NOx -20% Noise -15 d. B Sustainable & Green Engines Advanced LP & HP System Technology New Engine Concepts (i. e. Open Rotor) CO 2 ~15 to 20% NO x ~15 to 40% Noise ~15 d. B Regional 2020 CO 2 -40% NOx -40% Noise -20 d. B Systems for Green Operations Mission & Trajectory Management Aircraft Energy Management CO 2 ~10 to 15% Noise ~17 d. B Corporate 2020 CO 2 -30% NOx -30% Noise -10 d. B Note: Targets shown represent the incremental impact of JTI DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 37 Eco Design Whole Life Cycle Environmental Impact Analysis CO 2 ~10% Noise ~10 d. B Rotorcraft 2020 CO 2 -30% NOx -60% Noise -10 d. B

Resulting JTI Structure External Bodies ACARE Transport Prog. Committee JTI NS Rep. Group Main Resulting JTI Structure External Bodies ACARE Transport Prog. Committee JTI NS Rep. Group Main Governing body, Strategic Orientation. • Commission • 12 ITD Leaders • 6 Associate represent. European Commission Joint Undertaking Executive Board Legal representative of JU + supporting staff, day-to-day operations, communication Consultative body, 1 representative per participant DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 38 ITD Steering Committees JU Director Advisory Board JTI scientific, technical, financial, managerial matters General Forum Decision Recommendation ITD Participants Technical management, • ITD Leaders • Associates ITD: Integrated Technology Demonstrator

JTI « Clean Sky » Membership and Participation l Joint Undertaking Members: 7 -year JTI « Clean Sky » Membership and Participation l Joint Undertaking Members: 7 -year commitment, contribution to JU resources – European Commission – ITD Leaders – Associates l Participants in JTI: Limited participation in duration and scope Minimum 25% of JTI activities – Partners via Calls for proposals l Subcontractors via Calls for Tender DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 39

Integrated Technology Demonstrators (ITD) Leaders l SMART Fixed Wing: – l Green Regional Aircraft Integrated Technology Demonstrators (ITD) Leaders l SMART Fixed Wing: – l Green Regional Aircraft – l Rolls-Royce (UK) + Safran (F) Systems for Green Operation – l Agusta. Westland (I, UK) + Eurocopter (F, D) Green Engines – l Alenia Aeronautica (I) + EADS CASA (E) Green Rotorcraft – l Airbus (F, D, UK, E) + SAAB (SE) Thales (F) + Liebherr (D) Ecodesign – Dassault Aviation (F) + Fraunhofer Gesellschaft (D) SAAB, EADS CASA and Fh. G were added in past months. DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 40

JTI « Clean Sky » – Budget (in million €) l SMART Fixed Wing JTI « Clean Sky » – Budget (in million €) l SMART Fixed Wing Green Rotorcraft Green Regional Aircraft Green Engines Systems for Green Operation Eco Design Technology Evaluator 372 155 177 419 295 109 31 l Running Costs 48 l l l Total DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 41 _____ 1600 24 % 10 % 11 % 27 % 19 % 7 % 2 %

JTI “Clean Sky” - Financial Scheme In Cash Annual installments In Kind Annual evaluation JTI “Clean Sky” - Financial Scheme In Cash Annual installments In Kind Annual evaluation ITD Leaders commitment, to be fulfilled via Calls for Proposal l At least 25% of the budget will be dedicated to Partners via Calls for Proposals, enabling wider accession to Clean Sky A 12% SME participation is envisaged Max. 3% of budget allocated for operational costs (cash only) DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 42

JTI “Clean Sky” Time Line l l l l Proposal adopted by Commission, 25 JTI “Clean Sky” Time Line l l l l Proposal adopted by Commission, 25 th June 2007 Opinion of European Parliament on 23 rd November 2007 Discussion at Competitiveness Council, 22 nd/23 rd Nov. ‘ 07 Adoption by Council on 13 th December 2007 JU comes in existence after publication in Official Journal JTI Take-off Forum, 5 th February 2008 in Brussels Becomes operational upon signature of Stakeholder Agreement, Q 1 ’ 08 First Calls for Proposal by the end ’ 08, start ’ 09 (tbc) – Will be published via Clean Sky web-site – National dissemination via NS Representative Group DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 43

SESAR Objectives Single European Sky ATM Research l l l A consistent, focussed and SESAR Objectives Single European Sky ATM Research l l l A consistent, focussed and users-driven project Ambitious but realistic objectives for the European ATM infrastructure: – Triple capacity – Half cost – Environmental impact per flight -10% – Factor 10 in terms of safety A European project which needs to be synchronised with other international initiatives DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 44

SESAR* Organisation SESAR Consortium The three phases of SESAR: ATM Masterpla n Joint Undertaking SESAR* Organisation SESAR Consortium The three phases of SESAR: ATM Masterpla n Joint Undertaking Implementation DG RTD-H. 3 Aeronautics - 45 • Definition Phase (2005 - 2007), delivering the European ATM Master Plan • Development Phase (2007 - 2013) to develop the new systems • Implementation Phase (2014 - ) deploy the new technologies *) SESAR = Single European Sky ATM Research